Coinspeaker

Senators Bill Cassidy and Cynthia Lummis introduced the Mined in America Act on March 30, 2026, a bill that would establish a voluntary federal certification program for domestic Bitcoin mining facilities, codify the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve into statute, and create a direct Treasury procurement channel through which certified miners sell newly mined BTC to the federal government in exchange for a capital gains tax exemption.

The legislation, which carries no new fiscal authorizations, designates the Department of Commerce as the administering certifying body and directs the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Manufacturing Extension Partnership to support domestic mining hardware development – a mandate that implicitly acknowledges what the bill’s sponsors describe as an untenable dependence on hardware manufactured by foreign adversaries.

The bill now awaits committee referral, with the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee the most likely venue for initial review. It arrives as a companion to the broader reserve architecture that Senator Lummis has advanced since her introduction of the BITCOIN Act of 2025, which first proposed Treasury-managed custody of federal Bitcoin holdings.

We suspect the more consequential provision is not the certification label itself but the Treasury procurement mechanism – a structure that, if enacted, would make the federal government a recurring, price-insensitive buyer of domestically mined BTC, introducing a demand floor with no clear precedent in sovereign commodity acquisition.

DISCOVER: Meme coin supercycle: Top performers this week

Mined in America Act: Legislative Mechanics and Operative Provisions

The mechanism functions as follows: a mining facility or pool applying for “Mined in America” certification must demonstrate to the Department of Commerce that it operates no equipment manufactured by entities domiciled in, or controlled by, countries designated as foreign adversaries under existing U.S. trade law – a category that presently encompasses China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela.

Full hardware phase-out is required by the end of the decade, giving operators a defined transition runway but imposing a hard deadline on continued use of equipment from manufacturers such as Bitmain Technologies and MicroBT, which together account for the overwhelming majority of the approximately 97% of mining rigs currently sourced from Chinese-domiciled companies.

Senators Cynthia Lummis and Bill Cassidy just introduced the "Mined in America Act." This one is worth paying attention to.

The problem it addresses is straightforward. The United States controls roughly 38% of the global Bitcoin hash rate, but the vast majority of the hardware… pic.twitter.com/7LF4kO6rO0

— TFTC (@TFTC21) March 30, 2026

Certified operators gain access to pre-existing Department of Energy and U.S. Department of Agriculture program benefits – including grid stabilization contracts, renewable energy absorption arrangements, and methane capture initiatives at landfill and oil field sites – without triggering new appropriations. That framing is notable because it allows sponsors to characterize the bill as fiscally neutral while still delivering material economic incentives to compliant miners.

The reserve codification provision links certification directly to Treasury acquisition: miners holding the “Mined in America” designation may sell newly mined Bitcoin to the Treasury at market rates in exchange for exemption from capital gains tax on the transaction. Revenue from staking rewards and airdrop income on the government’s existing seized-asset holdings – estimated between 198,000 and 328,000 BTC following Trump’s 2025 executive order – would fund further open-market purchases, creating a self-reinforcing accumulation structure that requires no direct congressional appropriation beyond the initial statutory authorization.

EXPLORE: Crypto breakout alerts this week

Bitcoin Mining Nationalization: Hash Rate Distribution and BTC Supply Implications

The transmission chain operates as follows: the certification regime, combined with the tax exemption incentive, creates a structural tilt toward domestic hardware procurement that – if adopted at scale – would concentrate an increasing share of U.S. hash rate among operators whose capital expenditure cycles are now tied to a nascent domestic ASIC manufacturing base rather than the established Bitmain and MicroBT supply chains.

Source: Blockchain

The United States currently controls approximately 38% of global Bitcoin hash rate, a figure that makes it the dominant single-jurisdiction contributor to network security, yet one achieved almost entirely on imported hardware whose firmware integrity has already been called into question by late 2024 U.S. Customs inspections that identified remote-access vulnerabilities in imported Chinese mining rigs.

We anticipate that the near-term hardware transition cost – sourcing certified equipment from a domestic manufacturing base that does not yet exist at commercial scale – will compress margins for mid-tier miners who lack the capital to absorb dual procurement cycles, potentially accelerating consolidation toward larger, better-capitalized operators who can participate in the Treasury sales program. The parallel to the post-2021 China mining ban is instructive but imperfect: that episode redistributed hash rate geographically without altering the hardware supply chain; the Mined in America Act, if enacted, targets the supply chain itself.

On the supply side, the Treasury procurement channel introduces a buyer whose acquisition behavior is not governed by profit motive – a structural novelty in Bitcoin’s market history. We suspect the effective float of newly mined BTC available to secondary markets would narrow if a meaningful share of certified mining output is routed directly to the reserve, a dynamic with directional implications for spot supply that analysts have not yet fully priced into hash-rate-adjusted valuation models.

DISCOVER: Best Crypto To Get This Month!

next

The post US Senators Float Reserve-Backed Bitcoin Mining Bill, Raising Nationalization Prospect appeared first on Coinspeaker.

XRP USD is trading near $1.34, up +2.6% over the last 24 hours, yet the chart doesn’t quite align with the on-chain data beneath it. Exchange outflows are running at record levels, a pattern historically associated with accumulation phases, but the price refuses to confirm. That disconnect is the tension driving XRP markets right now, and how it resolves could matter considerably for positioning.

According to exchange flow data, large volumes of XRP are being withdrawn from trading platforms, shrinking the liquid supply available to sellers. When supply tightens, and demand holds steady, the price typically follows. Typically. The fact that XRP is hovering rather than climbing suggests either that demand hasn’t yet caught up or that significant sell walls remain overhead.

The token remains range-bound despite the supply signal. Standard Chartered revised its 2026 XRP price forecast to $2.80, and whether that prediction converts into viable price action depends on what happens at the levels that have contained XRP for weeks.

(SOURCE: TradingView)

Can XRP USD Price Reclaim $1.50 and Challenge the $2.80 Analyst Target?

At $1.34, XRP sits in a technically ambiguous zone. The supply shock provides a fundamental tailwind, but price action ultimately answers to technical structure, and right now, resistance between $1.45 and $1.55 has proven stubborn. Volume during recent recovery attempts has been underwhelming, suggesting that buyers’ conviction remains limited at these levels.

The bull case is straightforward: if exchange outflows continue at the current pace and ETF approval momentum builds, accumulated demand could trigger a breakout through $1.50, opening a path toward the $2.80 Standard Chartered target. That scenario requires a sustained volume expansion, not just a brief spike.

$XRP — $1.33The OCC's Final Rule goes live TODAY, April 1 — Ripple is now one step closer to operating as a fully regulated National Trust Bank under federal oversight. CoinGape

Ripple also unlocked 1 billion XRP from escrow in the past 24 hours. CoinGecko

Meanwhile, 7… pic.twitter.com/VIy3o4eCGG

— Thom Sieloff 🇺🇸 (@RealThomSieloff) April 1, 2026

The base case, and arguably the more probable one near-term, is continued consolidation between $1.20 and $1.50 as the market waits for a cleaner catalyst. The invalidation level sits near $1.18; a close below that figure would suggest the supply shock narrative is being overwhelmed by broader risk-off pressure.

Momentum indicators appear neutral-to-slightly bullish on the daily timeframe, consistent with accumulation rather than distribution. TradingView’s XRP USD chart shows the token above its short-term moving averages but below longer-term resistance, a setup that resolves directionally in the long run.

The XRP options market appears to be pricing volatility without strong directional bias, reinforcing the “coiled spring” interpretation. Patient holders have a case; traders chasing momentum here may find the setup thin.

EXPLORE: Crypto breakout alerts this week

Bitcoin Hyper Targets Early-Stage Upside as XRP Tests Key Resistance

The XRP USD supply shock is a compelling setup, but at a $1.34 entry with a $2.80 analyst target, the implied upside is roughly 2x from current levels. For investors with an appetite for greater asymmetry, the logic of considering earlier-stage infrastructure projects becomes harder to dismiss. That’s the context in which Bitcoin Hyper (HYPER) is drawing attention.

Bitcoin Hyper positions itself as the first Bitcoin Layer 2 with Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) integration — a genuinely novel architectural claim in a space where most L2’s run EVM-compatible stacks. The project targets Bitcoin’s three core structural limitations: slow throughput, high fees, and the absence of programmable smart contracts.

By layering SVM execution on top of Bitcoin’s security, the team argues it can deliver sub-second finality and low-cost smart contract execution without sacrificing the trust model that makes BTC valuable. The presale has raised more than $32M at a current token price of $0.0136779, with staking available for early participants.

Visit the Bitcoin Hyper Presale Website Here.

EXPLORE: Next Crypto to Explode in April

next

The post XRP USD Supply Shock: Can the Price Break Above $1.50? appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Bitfarms (BITF) shares climbed 6.6% on Tuesday despite reporting a $284.5 million net loss for full-year 2025 – a result driven by falling Bitcoin prices, elevated cost of revenue, and digital asset impairments that collectively erased the company’s gross margin. The market’s reaction was not irrational. It was a deliberate forward-price of something the income statement cannot capture: an infrastructure business that no longer exists in the same form it did twelve months ago.

Call it the Pivot Premium. When institutional investors look past a nine-figure GAAP loss to bid a mining stock higher, they are pricing the option value of a rebuilt business model – not the quarter just reported. That dynamic is now central to how public miners are being valued, and Bitfarms’ Tuesday session crystallized it.

DISCOVER: Meme coin supercycle: Top performers this week

Bitfarms Full-Year 2025 Earnings: Breaking Down the $284.5M Loss

The headline loss figure obscures a more complicated picture. Revenue grew 72% year-on-year to $229 million – a number that would signal momentum in almost any other context. The problem is cost of revenue came in at $248 million, producing a gross loss before a single dollar of overhead was allocated.

FY 2025 Results: – Commercialization underway at Panther Creek, Sharon & Moses Lake – Well capitalized for near-term site permitting & leasing – US Redomiciliation & Rebrand (~April 1) Call replay: https://t.co/5HoNUOBU56 Press Release: https://t.co/KhWOZXbEyk

— Keel Infrastructure (@Bitfarms_io) March 31, 2026

General and administrative expenses rose year-over-year, compounding the operational drag. The most structurally significant line item, however, was the fair value movement on digital assets: a $50.5 million loss in 2025 against a $26 million gain in 2024 – a $76.5 million swing that reflects Bitcoin’s 46% decline from its October peak. A $28.2 million realized gain on digital asset sales partially offset that mark-to-market hit, but the net effect was material.

The company’s full-year results filing confirms Bitfarms still holds approximately $161 million in unencumbered Bitcoin – a balance sheet position that functions as both a legacy asset and a transitional buffer as the company winds down its mining operations. That figure matters: it tells investors the company has runway to execute the pivot without immediate capital market pressure.

The math on Bitcoin mining itself is already bad. Network difficulty has risen 58.5% since the April 2024 halving, compressing per-unit mining economics precisely as Bitcoin’s price retreated from cycle highs. Bitfarms’ gross loss is partly an industry-wide condition, not just a company-specific failure.

EXPLORE: Crypto breakout alerts this week

Bitfarms AI Infrastructure Pivot: What the Keel Infrastructure Rebrand Actually Signals

In November 2025, Bitfarms announced it would wind down Bitcoin mining entirely – a move that sent shares down 18% at the time. Five months later, the same strategic decision is being rewarded. CEO Ben Gagnon framed the transition on Tuesday’s earnings call in terms that left little ambiguity: “No half-measures, no compromises, and in time, no Bitcoin. We built a new company.”

🚨HUGE: BITFARMS PLANS FULL EXIT FROM BITCOIN

Bitfarms still holds 1,827 $BTC but signaled plans to eventually SELL ALL remaining bitcoin.

The company is pivoting from bitcoin mining toward a 2.2 GW AI and HPC data center pipeline as it rebrands to “Keel Infrastructure.” pic.twitter.com/Yx7Kgc4QnG

— Coin Bureau (@coinbureau) March 31, 2026

That new company is being formalized. Bitfarms disclosed it has received shareholder approval to rebrand as Keel Infrastructure and to shift its legal domicile from Canada to the United States – a jurisdictional move that facilitates US institutional capital access and aligns the company structurally with the domestic HPC and AI data center market it intends to serve. The rebrand was expected to be executed Wednesday.

The pivot positions Bitfarms alongside a cohort of former miners – including Core Scientific, which has signed GPU colocation agreements with CoreWeave – that are repurposing power infrastructure for high-performance computing demand. The investment thesis is straightforward: miners own large blocks of power capacity in locations where new grid connections take years to permit. AI hyperscalers need that capacity now. The arbitrage is real, and institutional investors have already re-rated Core Scientific on that basis. Bitfarms, now Keel Infrastructure, is attempting the same transition from a smaller base.

What the market is pricing is not the 2025 income statement. It is the option on contracted HPC capacity, lower energy cost exposure relative to cloud-native AI infrastructure, and the possibility that the company’s existing site footprint commands a valuation premium as AI power demand continues to outpace supply.

Bitfarms Share Reaction: Why Investors Looked Past the Net Loss

A 6.6% single-session gain on a $284.5 million loss report is not short covering noise. It reflects a deliberate re-rating by investors who have already absorbed the mining business deterioration and are now assigning value to the infrastructure company being built in its place. The $161 million unencumbered Bitcoin position provides a tangible floor; the HPC pivot provides the ceiling narrative.

Source: Tradingview

The pattern mirrors what has already played out elsewhere in the sector. Mining-adjacent firms diversifying beyond their original compute model have consistently attracted incremental institutional interest even when near-term financials remain stressed – because the market prices the destination, not the transition cost.

Whether Tuesday’s move holds depends entirely on execution. The Pivot Premium is not permanent. It evaporates the moment a capacity milestone is missed, a hyperscaler deal falls through, or the rebrand fails to generate disclosed HPC revenue within the next two quarters. The next earnings cycle, under the Keel Infrastructure name, is where the re-rating either gets confirmed or reversed.

DISCOVER: Best Crypto To Get This Month!

next

The post Bitfarms Shares Jump Despite $285M Net Loss as Miner Expands AI Pivot appeared first on Coinspeaker.

A new paper from Google Quantum AI has compressed the estimated hardware requirements for breaking elliptic-curve cryptography – the signature scheme underpinning Bitcoin and crypto transactions – by roughly 20-fold, moving a long-running theoretical threat measurably closer to an engineering problem.

The research, co-authored by Google researchers, Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake, and Stanford cryptographer Dan Boneh, revises the physical qubit threshold downward from prior estimates exceeding 10 million to fewer than 500,000, a compression that forces institutional risk models to treat Q-Day as a medium-term rather than generational concern. At current market prices, the assets directly exposed to the cryptographic assumption at issue exceed $600 billion across Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins.

EXPLORE: Google Warns of Coruna iPhone Exploit Targeting Crypto

Shor’s Algorithm Efficiency: What the 20x Qubit Compression Actually Represents

The operative mechanism here is Shor’s algorithm applied to the 256-bit elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem – the mathematical foundation of ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm), which Bitcoin and Ethereum use to authorize transactions by proving private key ownership without revealing the key itself.

A sufficiently capable quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm could, in principle, derive a private key from an exposed public key, allowing an attacker to sign transactions and drain funds without authorization.

Prior estimates, drawn from analyses between 2017 and 2023, projected that executing this attack would require machines on the order of millions of physical qubits – hardware so distant from current capability that the threat horizon sat comfortably in the 2040s under most institutional models.

Many are wondering "what Google saw" that caused them to revise their post-quantum cryptography transition deadline to 2029 last week. It was this: https://t.co/dQtmTK9pdz

— nic carter (@nic_carter) March 31, 2026

The Google Quantum AI whitepaper, published March 30, 2026, revises that threshold sharply: Shor’s algorithm for the same problem can now be executed with no more than 1,200 logical qubits and 90 million Toffoli gates – or alternatively 1,450 logical qubits and 70 million Toffoli gates – on a superconducting, cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) with fewer than 500,000 physical qubits, completing the attack in minutes from a primed state.

The distinction between logical and physical qubits matters: physical qubits are noisy and require error-correction overhead, meaning many physical qubits are needed to sustain one reliable logical qubit. The 20x compression reflects advances in error-correction efficiency and gate optimization – not a new algorithmic breakthrough, but a tighter engineering implementation of a known approach. Google does not claim such a machine exists today. The paper’s significance is in recalibrating what the hardware target looks like, not in announcing it has been reached.

DISCOVER: Meme coin supercycle: Top performers this week

Bitcoin Crypto Address Exposure: Which Outputs Are Vulnerable to Quantum and How Much BTC Is at Risk

Bitcoin’s cryptographic exposure is not uniform across all address types. The highest-risk category is pay-to-public-key (P2PK) outputs – legacy address formats, prevalent in early Bitcoin blocks, including Satoshi-era coinbase outputs, where the full public key is written directly into the blockchain and permanently visible.

A quantum attacker with a functional CRQC could target these addresses without needing to observe a live transaction, since the public key is already on-chain.

A secondary category involves address reuse in pay-to-public-key-hash (P2PKH) outputs: once a user spends from a P2PKH address, the public key is revealed in the transaction, creating a window – however narrow – during which a CRQC could theoretically derive the private key before the transaction confirms.

Approximately 6.7 million Bitcoin addresses currently carry exposed public keys through one of these two mechanisms, representing a material share of the circulating supply. Whether any of those addresses belong to sophisticated institutional holders is unknown publicly, but the concentration of early-mined Bitcoin in P2PK outputs means the aggregate BTC-at-risk figure is not trivial.

Saw some people panicking or asking about quantum computing's impact on crypto. At a high level, all crypto has to do is to upgrade to Quantum-Resistant (Post-Quantum) Algorithms. So, no need to panic. 😂

In practice, there are some execution considerations. It's hard to…

— CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz_binance) March 31, 2026

The Bitcoin protocol has no active post-quantum upgrade path at the consensus level. Discussions around quantum-resistant signature schemes – including lattice-based alternatives being standardized by NIST – exist in developer forums, but no Bitcoin Improvement Proposal has reached consensus-stage consideration for a post-quantum migration.

The compressed timeline Google has published changes the urgency calculus for that discussion, even if the engineering problem of migrating a UTXO set of this scale remains formidable.

EXPLORE: Crypto breakout alerts this week

next

The post Google Cuts Quantum Cracking Timeline 20x, Renewing Bitcoin and Crypto Security Debate appeared first on Coinspeaker.

BTC USD is trading at approximately $68,200, down roughly +2.2% in the past 24 hours, as a key on-chain metric quietly signals something analysts haven’t flagged since the 2022 cycle bottom. The question isn’t whether a buy zone exists; it’s whether the market has actually reached it yet.

According to CryptoQuant data, Bitcoin’s realized price, the aggregate cost basis of all coins weighted by their last on-chain movement, currently sits at $54,286, while spot trades near $68,774. That places Bitcoin approximately 21% above its realized price, a gap that has compressed sharply from a roughly 120% premium recorded when BTC traded above $119,000 in late 2024.

CryptoQuant analysts flagged the setup as an emerging “accumulation zone” comparable to 2022, though the framing draws scrutiny: the actual 2022 bottom was defined by spot trading below realized price, not 21% above it. The capitulation signal, in other words, has not fired.

That nuance, compression without confirmation, frames the technical picture heading into April. Macro catalysts remain live, and the on-chain backdrop is shifting faster than most cycle timelines would predict.

(SOURCE: TradingView)

Can Bitcoin Price Reclaim $70,000 Before a Deeper Correction Sets In?

Bitcoin’s 24-hour range of $67,500 to $68,700 reflects consolidation rather than conviction. Volume over the past 24 hours ranged between $41.6Bn and $57.7Bn, elevated but not the kind of surge associated with decisive breakouts. The 50-day moving average sits at approximately $67,388, serving as near-term support, while $70,000 marks the next meaningful resistance level.

Technical indicators present an unusual consensus. Investing.com’s aggregated signals show 12 of 12 moving averages are in buy territory, with RSI at 64.7 and STOCH at 99.1, the latter flashing overbought on shorter timeframes.

$BTC got rejected from the $69,000-$70,000 resistance zone.

Earlier this acted as a support for Bitcoin and has now flipped into resistance. pic.twitter.com/48xYG8NKwn

— Ted (@TedPillows) April 1, 2026

Three scenarios are plausible from current levels. The bull case: spot holds $67,000, reclaims $68,500, and pushes toward $70,000 amid improving geopolitical sentiment following President Trump’s comments that Middle East tensions would resolve shortly.

The base case shows consolidation between $65,950 and $68,500 persists through the week as the market awaits a clearer macro trigger. The bear case, and the one the on-chain data does not rule out, involves a flush toward the $54,000 realized price level, which would represent a further 20% decline and, historically, the kind of genuine capitulation that precedes durable cycle lows. BTC’s correlation with macro risk assets suggests that the scenario remains contingent on external shocks rather than crypto-native dynamics.

DISCOVER: Meme coin supercycle: Top performers this week

LiquidChain Targets Early-Mover Positioning as BTC USD Tests Structural Levels

(SOURCE: LiquidChain)

For investors watching BTC USD consolidate at prior highs, the arithmetic of large-cap upside looks increasingly constrained at current valuations. Even a clean break to $70,000 represents a move of roughly +3% from here. That’s a meaningful difference from the asymmetry available earlier in the cycle, and it’s precisely the gap that early-stage infrastructure projects attempt to fill.

LiquidChain ($LIQUID) is a Layer 3 infrastructure project positioning itself as a cross-chain liquidity layer, fusing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment. The architecture centers on a Unified Liquidity Layer and Deploy-Once design: developers build once and access all three ecosystems simultaneously, with Verifiable Settlement providing on-chain auditability.

The presale is currently priced at $0.01445 per $LIQUID, with $636,000 raised to date. L3 infrastructure is a nascent and technically complex category; execution risk and adoption uncertainty are real. That said, the cross-chain fragmentation problem the project targets is well-documented as a structural bottleneck for the broader market.

Visit the LiquidChain Presale Website Here. 

DISCOVER: Best Memecoins To Buy This Month!

next

The post BTC USD Nearing Buy Zone: Best Opportunity in 3 Years? appeared first on Coinspeaker.

The Solana Policy Institute, a Washington-focused nonprofit launched in late 2025 to advance blockchain-specific legislative and regulatory strategy, has characterized the current U.S. crypto policy environment as entering a materially new phase – one defined by implementation rather than survival, and by legislative specificity rather than existential debate.

Kristin Smith, President of the Institute and former executive director of the Blockchain Association, stated the shift plainly: ‘For a long time we were playing defense,’ adding that the industry’s posture has now moved toward establishing durable rules of the road.

We suspect the Institute’s public framing is not merely descriptive but strategic – a signal to institutional capital, regulatory counterparts, and legislative staff that the sector has sufficient policy stability to warrant engagement at a higher level of specificity.

When a blockchain-specific policy organization with this institutional pedigree characterizes the environment this way, it functions as a credibility marker aimed at the compliance officers, asset managers, and agency rulemakers who have been watching from a cautious distance. The timing – coinciding with the Clarity Act’s anticipated April 2026 markup and the post-GENIUS Act settlement of stablecoin policy – reinforces that reading.

DISCOVER: Meme coin supercycle: Top performers this week

Solana Policy Institute: Mandate, Structure, and the Legislative Developments Driving the ‘New Phase’ Framing

The Solana Policy Institute describes itself as a non-partisan nonprofit operating across three policy arenas: Congress, where it pursues legal certainty through market structure legislation; federal regulatory agencies, where it engages on rulemaking; and the White House, where it monitors and shapes executive priorities.

Its CEO, Miller Whitehouse-Levine – formerly an early employee of the DeFi Education Fund – has been explicit that the Institute’s advocacy is intended to be technology-neutral, seeking a level competitive playing field rather than outcomes that advantage Solana-based infrastructure over rival networks.

2/ @millercwl's take:

“I think that the easiest way to think about it is @Solana operates like a multi-lane highway versus a single lane road.

So on blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum, everyone queues up and goes through the same doorway or down the same road in order.…

— Solana Policy Institute (@SolanaInstitute) March 31, 2026

The specific developments underpinning the Institute’s ‘new phase’ characterization are identifiable. The GENIUS Act’s passage in 2025 resolved the most contentious stablecoin questions – reserve requirements, issuer eligibility, federal versus state licensing – that had stalled legislative progress for two prior congressional sessions.

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, known as the Clarity Act, is tracking toward committee markup in April 2026 with reported bipartisan support, which would represent the first comprehensive market structure bill to advance that far in the Senate. Whitehouse-Levine has articulated the Institute’s core concern as the weaponization of legal ambiguity – noting that ‘crypto better than any other industry unfortunately understands how legal ambiguities or interpretations can be weaponized against an industry’ – and has framed clear SEC-CFTC jurisdictional demarcation on securities versus commodities as the central structural objective.

EXPLORE: Crypto breakout alerts this week

next

The post Crypto Policy Enters ‘New Phase,’ According to Solana Policy Institute appeared first on Coinspeaker.

L'Autorità per il Finanziamento delle Attività Imprenditoriali del New Hampshire (BFA) è pronta a emettere $100 milioni in obbligazioni collateralizzate da Bitcoin con una classificazione provvisoria Ba2 da Moody’s Investors Service - una designazione di grado speculativo che colloca questo strumento due notch sotto la soglia più bassa del grado investimentale e segna il primo caso noto di un'autorità pubblica statunitense che emette debito completamente garantito da Bitcoin.

Per i mercati obbligazionari municipali abituati a titoli a livello statale classificati Aa o superiori, un Ba2 su una struttura cripto-collateralizzata non è semplicemente una nota a piè di pagina - è un segnale che l'universo degli acquirenti municipali convenzionali è, per mandato, ampiamente escluso prima che venga staccato il primo cedolino.

Bitmine Immersion Technologies (NYSE American: BMNR) disclosed on March 30, 2026 that its Ethereum treasury has reached 4.732 million ETH tokens, with combined crypto holdings, total cash of $961 million, and other positions – including “moonshot” assets – aggregating to $10.7 billion.

At the reference price of $2,005 per ETH, the company’s Ethereum stack alone carries a notional value exceeding $9.4 billion, placing Bitmine among the largest single corporate holders of Ether by token count. The disclosure confirms an accelerating accumulation cadence that has now removed a measurable fraction of Ethereum’s circulating supply from active market participation.

Bitmine states it now controls 3.92% of the total ETH token supply, which the company frames as being over 78% of the way toward its self-described “Alchemy of 5%” threshold – a target it set roughly eight months prior. The pace of that accumulation, given the scale of capital deployed in that window, represents one of the more aggressive single-entity ETH acquisition programs on record among publicly listed equities.

JUST IN:

TOM LEE AND BITMINE $BMNR BOUGHT 71.1K ETHEREUM THIS PAST WEEK … Here is Bitmine's updated holdings

– 4,732,082 $ETH, up from 4.66M on March 22nd (3.14M are currently staked) – 197 Bitcoin $BTC – $961M cash – $200M stake in Beast Industries – $102M stake in Eightco… pic.twitter.com/PcGqFtfNz2

— Tom Lee Tracker (Not actually Tom) (@TomLeeTracker) March 30, 2026

DISCOVER: Meme coin supercycle: Top performers this week

Bitmine ETH Treasury: Breaking Down the 4.732M Position

Of the 4.732 million ETH disclosed, Bitmine reports 3,142,643 tokens are actively staked – valued at approximately $6.3 billion at current prices – through MAVAN (Made in America VAlidator Network), the company’s proprietary institutional staking infrastructure launched on March 25, 2026.

Earlier reporting confirmed Bitmine’s prior staking transaction of approximately 94,670 ETH valued at roughly $204 million, which at the time brought total staked holdings to 3,142,291 ETH – figures that map directly to the current disclosure and confirm the staking position has been largely stable while total holdings continued to grow through fresh acquisition.

Source: Arkham

Beyond ETH, Bitmine disclosed $102 million in ORBS holdings, which the company characterizes as providing investors direct public-equity exposure to OpenAI – a claim that warrants independent verification but signals the firm’s appetite for high-conviction asymmetric positions.

Total cash stands at $961 million, providing a meaningful liquidity buffer relative to a combined position book that is heavily concentrated in a single volatile asset. The balance sheet composition – approximately 88% crypto by notional value – leaves little ambiguity about the company’s strategic orientation.

Every ETH token moved into Bitmine’s staking infrastructure is withdrawn from the liquid circulating supply. At 4.732 million tokens, the company’s holdings exceed the daily trading volume of ETH on most centralized exchanges by a significant multiple, meaning any forced liquidation scenario would itself become a price-relevant market event.

EXPLORE: Crypto breakout alerts this week

Corporate Ethereum Treasury: The Structural Case Behind the Disclosure

Bitmine’s 3.92% supply ownership figure is not merely a vanity metric. Ethereum’s proof-of-stake architecture means that staked ETH earns protocol-level yield – currently in the 3%–4% annualized range – while simultaneously reducing the float available to spot and derivatives markets.

A single entity controlling nearly 4% of supply and directing the majority of that into a validator network creates a compounding supply floor: the position generates yield in additional ETH, which if retained, increases the ownership percentage without additional capital outlay.

The institutional backing Bitmine cites – ARK Investment Management’s Cathie Wood, Pantera Capital, Founders Fund, Galaxy Digital, Digital Currency Group, and Kraken among others – suggests the position is not speculative in the retail sense.

Source: Total Ethereum Spot ETF Net Inflow / SoSoValue

These are mandate-driven allocators whose involvement implies a due-diligence threshold has been cleared, a signal qualitatively distinct from retail-driven accumulation. The parallel to Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury playbook is structural: a public company uses equity market access to accumulate a scarce digital asset at scale, concentrating supply while maintaining a liquid stock for institutional entry.

Bitmine reports BMNR is currently the 100th most traded stock in the United States, averaging $920 million in daily volume over the prior five sessions – a liquidity profile that amplifies both the capital-raise capacity and the volatility risk inherent in a three-employee firm managing a $10.7 billion combined position.

The next material disclosure event – whether an 8-K update on ETH acquisition activity or Q1 fiscal 2026 earnings – will indicate whether Bitmine closes the remaining gap to 5% supply ownership before Ethereum’s market structure shifts again. At the current accumulation velocity, the threshold is within reach. The coins are not being sold.

DISCOVER: Best Memecoins To Buy This Month!

next

The post Bitmine Immersion Technologies Reports 4.732M ETH Treasury Holdings appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Nakamoto Holdings, the Bitcoin-native conglomerate founded by BTC Inc. CEO David Bailey, sold approximately $20 million worth of Bitcoin at a realized loss of roughly 40%,  a liquidation event that implies an average acquisition cost somewhere in the range of $33,000 per BTC against a sale price consistent with market levels at the time of execution.

The transaction was not framed as a routine portfolio rebalancing; a 40% realized loss on a position of this size, for a firm whose entire strategic identity is built around BTC accumulation, signals a forced or at minimum urgency-driven disposition.

For a company that raised over $750 million in mid-2025 explicitly to seed and hold Bitcoin treasury positions globally, selling at a deep loss raises direct questions about liquidity management and the durability of its funding model.

Bitcoin treasury company Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA) disclosed in its 10-K filed on March 30, 2026, that it sold approximately 284 BTC in March for about $20 million, with an average selling price of around $70,422 per BTC. In 2025, the company net purchased 5,342 BTC with a… pic.twitter.com/DRq8cpT0L6

— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) March 30, 2026

Nakamoto merged with healthcare provider KindlyMD in May 2025, securing a record $510 million PIPE alongside additional debt financing, with Anchorage Digital handling custody. The architecture was designed to cycle BTC gains back into accumulation while maintaining a 40% public equity exposure cap – a structure that, in theory, insulates the BTC stack from forced liquidation. A $20 million sale at a 40% loss suggests the architecture is under pressure it was not designed to absorb.

DISCOVER: Meme coin supercycle: Top performers this week

Implied Acquisition Cost vs. Realized Exit Price For Nakamoto Bitcoin Holdings

Working from the reported figures, a 40% realized loss on a $20 million sale implies the position was carried at a cost basis of approximately $33.3 million – meaning Nakamoto effectively recovered $0.60 on every dollar deployed into that tranche of Bitcoin.

If the sale occurred at Bitcoin prices in the $80,000–$95,000 range that characterized much of early-to-mid 2026, the implied acquisition price for this specific tranche would place the original purchase somewhere between $133,000 and $158,000 per coin – levels consistent with late-2025 peak accumulation when treasury firms were competing aggressively for spot supply.

David Bailey's $NAKA and Cory Klippsten's $SQNS duking it out to see who can lose the title of worst managed BTCTC https://t.co/RKa5o3VZLS pic.twitter.com/vuLRAltJBL

— Pledditor (@Pledditor) March 30, 2026

The precise vehicle for the sale – whether OTC block, open-market execution, or exchange liquidation – has not been confirmed, and the on-chain footprint has not been independently verified by Arkham Intelligence or Lookonchain at time of writing.

What the math clearly confirms: this was not a tax-loss harvest on a marginal position. A $13.3 million realized loss represents a meaningful destruction of capital for a firm that positioned itself as a long-duration BTC holder, not a trading entity. The numbers crystallize a core structural vulnerability – acquiring BTC near cycle highs with leveraged or equity-dilutive capital leaves no margin for drawdown without eventual forced realization.

EXPLORE: Crypto breakout alerts this week

Balance Sheet Pressure and What the Liquidation Reveals

Nakamoto’s funding model depends on mNAV arbitrage: issue equity or notes at a premium to net asset value, deploy proceeds into BTC, and let appreciation widen the spread. That engine runs in reverse when the stock collapses.

Source: Tradingview

By early 2026, Nakamoto’s share price had fallen roughly 99% from its May 2025 peaks, effectively closing off the ATM and PIPE channels that provided its accumulation fuel. With equity-based financing unavailable at viable dilution rates, the firm’s options narrow to debt service from cash reserves or liquidation of BTC holdings – the latter being precisely what this transaction appears to represent.

The contrast with other leveraged BTC treasury operators is instructive. Strategy (MSTR) responded to market stress by doubling down with additional capital raises, leaning into its premium to NAV while it held.

GameStop, by contrast, retained its 4,710 BTC position despite external speculation about a sell-off – a posture only sustainable for firms without acute debt service obligations. Nakamoto’s realized loss suggests it has neither the premium engine nor the unencumbered balance sheet to absorb the drawdown passively.

Governance risk compounds the balance sheet stress. Nakamoto’s concurrent acquisition of Bailey-owned BTC Inc. and UTXO Management – using shares valued near $1.12 each following the 99% collapse – has drawn criticism from market watchers who characterize the moves as self-dealing at shareholder expense.

A treasury firm selling BTC at a 40% loss while simultaneously acquiring its founder’s private assets is a combination that no amount of Bitcoin-denominated convertible note structuring can fully obscure.

DISCOVER: Best Memecoins To Buy This Month!

next

The post Bitcoin Treasury Firm Nakamoto Sells $20M in Bitcoin at 40% Realized Loss appeared first on Coinspeaker.

La World Foundation, l'entità dietro la rete di identità biometrica di Sam Altman, Worldcoin, ha ceduto 239 milioni di token WLD crypto a quattro controparti istituzionali non divulgate per circa $65 milioni, con regolamenti eseguiti tramite World Assets, Ltd. a partire dal 20 marzo 2026, a un prezzo medio di $0,2719 per token.

Il prezzo di vendita rappresenta uno sconto del 97,7% rispetto al massimo storico del WLD crypto di marzo 2024 di $11,82, posizionando questa transazione come una delle vendite OTC a livello di fondazione più ripide rispetto alla valutazione di picco nella recente storia delle crypto istituzionali.

Il Comitato Bancario del Senato sta pianificando di tenere la sua audizione di conferma per il candidato alla presidenza della Federal Reserve Kevin Warsh non appena nella settimana del 13 aprile 2026, secondo un rapporto di domenica di Punchbowl News che cita due fonti familiari con la programmazione del comitato.

Il tempismo rimane contingente al completamento e alla presentazione da parte di Kevin Warsh di tutta la documentazione di divulgazione richiesta al comitato – un prerequisito procedurale che le fonti hanno descritto come la variabile primaria che mantiene la data fluida. La Casa Bianca ha formalmente trasmesso le doppie nomine di Warsh – Presidente della Fed per un mandato di quattro anni e Governatore della Fed per un mandato di 14 anni a partire dal 1 febbraio 2026 – al Senato il 30 marzo 2026, avviando il processo di conferma contro la scadenza imminente della scadenza del mandato dell'attuale Presidente Jerome Powell il 15 maggio 2026.

MicroStrategy (MSTR) non ha aumentato la sua posizione in Bitcoin la scorsa settimana, secondo i dati on-chain e l'assenza del segnale abituale di acquisto della domenica del presidente esecutivo Michael Saylor su X – terminando una striscia di acquisti di 13 settimane iniziata alla fine di dicembre 2025.

La pausa è la prima interruzione in quella che era diventata un'offerta settimanale programmatica, durante la quale la società con sede a Tysons Corner, Virginia, ha acquisito circa 90,831 BTC.

ESPLORA: MicroStrategy Punta a 1 Milione di BTC: Dentro il Piano di Accumulo a Lungo Termine di Saylor

Il prezzo del Bitcoin è tornato a superare i 67.000 dollari, registrando un guadagno di circa +1% in 24 ore mentre il rischio geopolitico spinge gli investitori a cercare beni rifugio, sia tradizionali che digitali. Il movimento rispecchia la propria offerta dell'oro, una correlazione che si è notevolmente intensificata da quando il conflitto in Medio Oriente è entrato nella sua quinta settimana.

Il catalizzatore questa volta è stata un'escalation simultanea su più fronti. Le forze Houthi sostenute dall'Iran hanno aperto un nuovo fronte nel conflitto, le truppe di terra americane sono arrivate nella regione, e il Wall Street Journal ha riportato che il presidente Trump sta valutando un'operazione militare per rimuovere l'uranio arricchito dall'Iran, anche se non è stata presa alcuna decisione.

Un singolo errore di un annunciatore UFC ha appena consegnato a un trader un ritorno quasi di 100x, e il video sta già circolando come prova di quanto rapidamente possano crollare le quote del mercato delle previsioni. Sabato, un utente di Polymarket UFC ha convertito $676 in $67,608 in pochi secondi, capitalizzando su una breve finestra quando le quote live della piattaforma hanno fallito.

Durante il combattimento pesi massimi tra Tyrell Fortune e Marcin Tybura, il presentatore UFC Bruce Buffer ha inizialmente annunciato Tybura come il vincitore. Le azioni di Polymarket per Fortune sono immediatamente crollate a un centesimo. Un trader identificato come LlamaEnjoyer su Polymarket e Verrissimus su X ha riconosciuto la chiamata come potenzialmente errata e ha scommesso $676 su Fortune a quelle quote depresse.

Circa l'80% delle azioni privilegiate perpetue di Strategy (MSTR) Stretch (STRC) sono detenute da investitori al dettaglio in criptovalute, ha rivelato il CEO di Strategy Phong Le mercoledì tramite i social media, una cifra che colloca il capitale delle piccole imprese al centro del principale veicolo di finanziamento per l'acquisizione di Bitcoin dell'azienda. Lo strumento ha già generato oltre $1,2 miliardi in acquisti di Bitcoin solo nel 2026.

Questa concentrazione al dettaglio non è semplicemente una nota demografica. Collega direttamente la capacità di raccolta di capitale di STRC al sentimento al dettaglio verso Bitcoin, il che significa che una correzione sostenuta nel prezzo di BTC può compromettere la capacità di Strategy di finanziare ulteriori accumuli tramite lo strumento, comprimendo l'offerta programmata che STRC è stato progettato per sostenere.

La rappresentante degli Stati Uniti Maxine Waters (D-CA), la democratica di rango nel Comitato per i Servizi Finanziari della Camera, ha formalmente richiesto che la Federal Reserve Bank di Kansas City spieghi la propria base legale per l'approvazione di un conto master della Federal Reserve per Payward Financial, l'entità che opera con il nome di Kraken Financial, segnando la prima volta che un exchange di criptovalute ha ottenuto accesso diretto all'infrastruttura di pagamento principale della Fed.

In una lettera trasmessa giovedì al presidente della Fed di Kansas City Jeff Schmid, Waters ha richiesto una risposta scritta entro il 10 aprile, citando carenze di trasparenza e l'assenza di qualsiasi base statutaria o regolamentare per la classificazione del conto della banca regionale. L'approvazione, che la Fed di Kansas City ha confermato il 4 marzo 2026, è stata strutturata come un “conto a scopo limitato” — una designazione che non appare né nel Federal Reserve Act né nelle Linee Guida per l'Accesso ai Conti della Federal Reserve Board.

Ondo crypto sta negoziando controcorrente. Mentre i mercati crypto più ampi sanguinano, ONDO sta registrando un notevole guadagno intraday, in aumento di circa +5% nella giornata, negoziando a $0.262, mentre la maggior parte delle altcoin sta subendo pesanti perdite. Il catalizzatore sembra essere istituzionale, e il momento è deliberato. Una partnership recentemente annunciata con Franklin Templeton ha iniettato una rara spinta narrativa in un token che, tecnicamente parlando, ha ancora una lunga strada da percorrere per la ripresa.

Ondo Finance e Franklin Templeton hanno confermato una collaborazione per tokenizzare cinque dei fondi comuni di investimento quotati di Franklin Templeton sulla piattaforma Ondo Global Markets. Gli ETF tokenizzati mireranno a investitori in diverse regioni non statunitensi, con casi d'uso espliciti che spaziano dalla garanzia DeFi all'infrastruttura finanziaria on-chain.

GameStop (GME) ha confermato di aver trattenuto tutti i 4,710 Bitcoin nel suo tesoro, valutati a circa $368.4 milioni al 31 gennaio 2026, ponendo fine a due mesi di speculazioni sulla vendita provocate da un trasferimento onchain a Coinbase Prime. La divulgazione, contenuta nel rapporto annuale 10-K dell'azienda presentato martedì alla Securities and Exchange Commission, chiude formalmente l'overhang che aveva oscurato la posizione di Bitcoin di GME da gennaio.

La conferma rimuove 4,710 BTC dal pool di monete che il mercato aveva valutato come potenziale offerta sul lato della vendita — una distinzione che porta un peso strutturale in un momento in cui il posizionamento istituzionale di Bitcoin rimane sotto scrutinio amid una maggiore volatilità del mercato.

ARK Invest ha annunciato che incorporerà i dati del mercato delle previsioni di Kalshi nel suo processo di investimento, utilizzando segnali di probabilità in tempo reale per informare la ricerca macroeconomica, monitorare gli indicatori di prestazione e supportare le strategie di gestione del rischio e di copertura. Questa mossa posiziona ARK tra un piccolo ma crescente gruppo di gestori istituzionali che trattano i mercati dei contratti per eventi come una legittima fonte di dati alternativa piuttosto che come un'attrazione speculativa.

Il fondatore e CEO di ARK, Cathie Wood, ha inquadrato l'adozione come un passo istituzionale logico. “Portare i mercati delle previsioni nei flussi di lavoro istituzionali è un passo naturale per l'innovazione nella ricerca finanziaria,” ha dichiarato Wood in una dichiarazione giovedì. Il direttore della ricerca di ARK, Nick Grous, ha aggiunto che i mercati delle previsioni “offrono alcune delle espressioni più pure del rischio attorno ai risultati economici chiave e specifici delle aziende.”

Un membro del Congresso in carica ha introdotto una legislazione per vietare allo staff congressuale di operare su piattaforme di mercati predittivi, estendendo un'ondata di attività legislativa bipartisan che ha prodotto almeno sei progetti di legge distinti dal gennaio 2026 mirati all'intersezione del settore con le informazioni riservate. La mossa riflette un crescente disagio istituzionale con una struttura di mercato che, per design, prezza gli esiti politici—e quindi crea incentivi finanziari diretti per coloro che hanno accesso privilegiato al processo decisionale del governo per operare su di esso.