Crypto Breaking

La principale criptovaluta ha formato un rimbalzo cauto dopo essere scivolata a un minimo di nove mesi vicino a $74,500 all'inizio della settimana, scambiando circa il 5% più in alto mentre gli acquirenti mettono alla prova il confine nella regione dei $78,000 con gli occhi puntati sulla potenziale salita verso la zona dei $85,000. I partecipanti al mercato stanno valutando un mix di segnali tecnici, dinamiche di liquidità e cambiamenti nel sentiment istituzionale mentre tracciano un percorso di ritorno verso i livelli di resistenza che i trader hanno mantenuto sotto osservazione per mesi. Sebbene il rimbalzo sia notevole, gli analisti avvertono che la sua durata dipenderà da quanto rapidamente potrà assorbire la rinnovata pressione di vendita e se la domanda di ETF spot potrà sostenere i guadagni oltre l'immediato assetto tecnico.

L'intelligenza artificiale è diventata il tema di investimento dominante per i più grandi family office del mondo, mentre le criptovalute attirano un interesse relativamente limitato. Il Rapporto Globale sui Family Office 2026 di JPMorgan Private Bank, che ha intervistato 333 family office monofamiliari in 30 paesi tra maggio e luglio 2025, delinea un panorama in cui l'IA è prioritizzata da una chiara maggioranza, e le criptovalute rimangono una classe di attivi di nicchia. I risultati dello studio mostrano un ampio divario tra il slancio nell'IA e il debole appetito per gli attivi digitali, sottolineando come i family office stiano calibrando il rischio e la diversificazione in un ambiente macroeconomico in rapida evoluzione. Un dato chiave: il 65% degli intervistati sta dando priorità agli investimenti correlati all'intelligenza artificiale ora o nel breve termine, mentre solo il 17% considera le criptovalute e gli attivi digitali come un tema significativo. Le cifre dettagliate del rapporto rivelano inoltre che l'esposizione alle criptovalute rimane minima su base globale.

ARK Invest, il gestore patrimoniale guidato da Cathie Wood, ha ampliato le sue scommesse su azioni collegate alle criptovalute mentre un ampio calo del mercato ha spinto le azioni verso il basso lunedì 2 febbraio 2026. In una notifica di trading esaminata per questo rapporto, ARK ha rivelato acquisti consistenti attraverso i suoi ETF principali, in particolare l'ARK Innovation ETF ARKK e l'ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF ARKF. I maggiori incrementi sono stati in Robinhood e BitMine, con partecipazioni sostanziali anche in Coinbase e Block Inc, tra altri nomi tra cui Circle, l'emittente del USD Coin, e diversi nomi esposti alle criptovalute. Le operazioni illustrano la continua volontà di ARK di aumentare l'esposizione al settore anche mentre i mercati più ampi ritornano su guadagni recentemente amplificati, riflettendo una strategia che mira a capitalizzare su potenziali temi adiacenti alle criptovalute durante i ribassi.

Spot volumes across the leading crypto venues have tumbled to roughly $1 trillion by the end of January, down from around $2 trillion in October, a sign of waning investor appetite as risk sentiment deteriorates. Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) is trading well below its autumn peak, with a roughly 37% to 38% slide since October, as liquidity tightens and traders reassess risk in a markedly cautious environment. Data from CryptoQuant underscore the trend: spot volumes on major exchanges have sharply contracted, underlining a broader disengagement from the market. In practical terms, Binance’s Bitcoin activity illustrates the pattern, sliding from about $200 billion in October to roughly $104 billion more recently. The overall effect is a market that feels thinner and less dynamic than it did even a few months ago.

“Spot demand is drying up,” warned a CryptoQuant analyst, noting that the correction’s genesis is closely tied to the Oct. 10 liquidation event. The sharp drop in activity isn’t merely a temporary pullback; it signals a structural loosening of liquidity that makes price discovery more brittle and less responsive to positive catalysts. The implication is clear: even as spot prices move, the momentum behind a sustained rally has cooled, leaving markets more susceptible to macro shocks or sudden shifts in risk appetite.

Behind the price action lies a liquidity backdrop that many observers say is being tested from multiple angles. In addition to dwindling spot volumes, stablecoin flows are turning negative for the sector, with notable outflows from exchanges and a roughly $10 billion fall in stablecoin market capitalization cited as further evidence of tightening liquidity. The combination of lower trading turnover and shrinking reserve balances for the stablecoin sector paints a picture of a market that is more fragile than its headlines might suggest.

Bitter medicine, but a necessary market move

From a tactical perspective, market researchers see macro factors as the primary pressure points over the next several months. Justin d’Anethan, head of research at Arctic Digital, points to the Fed’s policy trajectory as the dominant driver of near-term risk for Bitcoin and its peers. If policymakers maintain a hawkish tilt, the dollar tends to strengthen, real yields rise, and risk assets—crypto included—face heightened headwinds. The question is not whether Bitcoin will rebound on a longer horizon, but when macro conditions will align with a more favorable liquidity environment.

That said, the bear case is not the only storyline. Proponents argue that Bitcoin’s long-standing role as a hedge against policy missteps and currency debasement remains intact, even if the near term is challenging. As one analyst noted, the narrative around Bitcoin as a defense against reckless monetary policy persists, even if the current environment punishes risk assets in the short run. The logic is that the asset class could regain footing should there be a reset in policy expectations or a shift toward more accommodative measures at the macro level.

Looking ahead, several potential catalysts could spark a meaningful rally if they materialize. ETF inflows into crypto-backed vehicles, clearer regulatory guidance for the sector, or softer economic data that nudges the Fed toward rate cuts could tilt the balance toward buyers. The sentiment shift would be meaningful not just for Bitcoin but for the broader ecosystem, where a renewed bid could help restore some depth to order books and improve price discovery.

“It might be a bitter medicine, but the recent move feels ultimately necessary and healthy to clear out leverage, tone down speculation, and force investors to reconsider valuations.”

Another layer to consider is the ongoing debate about price bottoms. Some market observers see a two-stage path: short-term holders (STH) must move into a loss position, and long-term holders (LTH) must begin to realize losses before capitulation ends. The current setup shows STH realized prices still above LTH realized prices, suggesting that a bottom is not yet in place. A key line in the sand is the $74,000 level, which, if violated, could push Bitcoin into bear-market territory even as longer-term holders reassess risk and exposure. Meanwhile, the broader market structure suggests that any sustained relief rally would likely require a combination of improved liquidity, quieter macro data, and a shift in risk sentiment away from the current risk-off stance.

Why it matters

The ongoing liquidity squeeze matters for both traders and builders in the crypto space. For traders, thinner order books translate into more pronounced price swings and greater sensitivity to even modest inflows or outflows. For developers and liquidity providers, persistent capital discipline among market participants could translate into slower onboarding of new users and a more selective approach to product design. The current environment also highlights the interconnectedness between macro policy, currency markets, and digital-asset liquidity—a reminder that crypto markets remain highly sensitive to conventional financial drivers even as they mature in other ways.

From a strategic perspective, the market is watching for early signs that liquidity conditions are improving. Clear signals could include the resumption of ETF inflows into crypto vehicles, regulatory clarity that reduces policy risk, or data showing that macro headwinds are fading and risk appetite is returning. Until then, the trajectory appears to hinge on external catalysts rather than purely technical factors, reinforcing the point that the current phase is about digestion and re-pricing rather than rapid upside.

What to watch next

Macro policy signals and Fed commentary that could shift risk sentiment and liquidity expectations.

Any inflows into crypto-backed exchange-traded products or similar instruments that could broaden participation.

Bitcoin testing of key support levels (such as around $74,000) and how the market reacts to a potential breach.

Continuing stablecoin flows and overall liquidity trends across major exchanges.

Regulatory developments in major jurisdictions that could affect market structure or investor access.

Sources & verification

CryptoQuant analytics showing a drop in spot-volume activity and a drop in Binance Bitcoin volumes from October to January.

Darkfost_Coc’s X posts cited in market commentary about spot demand drying up and the October 10 liquidation event driving the correction.

Cointelegraph reporting on liquidity conditions, stablecoin outflows, and the broader market context.

Analysis from Justin d’Anethan (Arctic Digital) on macro risks and BTC’s near-term price trajectory.

Alphractal’s discussion of short-term vs long-term holder realized prices as market-cycle indicators.

Market reaction and key details

Market participants are navigating a period of liquidity constraint that appears to be shaping the near-term price action more than any single bullish catalyst. The pullback underscores the dependence of crypto markets on macro conditions and the willingness of participants to commit capital in an environment where risk-off sentiment is prevalent. While the longer-term thesis around digital assets as hedges against policy risk remains, the near term demands a cautious, evidence-based approach as liquidity conditions evolve.

This article was originally published as Crypto Spot Volumes Plunge to 2024 Lows as Demand Slumps on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

L'emittente di stablecoin Tether e Opera hanno annunciato una collaborazione per espandere l'accesso finanziario nei mercati in via di sviluppo attraverso MiniPay, un wallet autogestito costruito sulla blockchain di Celo. La partnership aggiunge USDt e Tether Gold XAUT al repertorio di MiniPay, mirato a utenti in Africa, America Latina e Asia sudorientale che fanno affidamento su un valore stabile per risparmi e rimesse. Tether afferma che l'iniziativa è in linea con la sua missione di fornire accesso semplice e affidabile a un valore stabile. MiniPay, che l'azienda descrive come attivo in 60 paesi con 12.6 milioni di wallet e 350 milioni di transazioni, ha riportato un aumento del 50% degli utenti durante il quarto trimestre, guidato principalmente dai mercati emergenti.

HYPE’s surge followed an announcement that Hyperliquid’s core infrastructure, powered by HyperCore, will back a proposal to bring prediction markets onto the platform. The HIP-4 proposal aims to expand the layer-1 ecosystem beyond traditional perpetuals by enabling outcomes trading with fully collateralized contracts on Hyperliquid, the largest decentralized perpetual futures venue in crypto. The plan envisions a payout cap on outcomes, with no leverage, no liquidations, and no margin calls. In practical terms, traders would be able to bet on events—from political elections to sports outcomes—using Hyperliquid USDH (CRYPTO: USDH) as the canonical settlement asset. The news arrived via Hyperliquid’s X feed on Monday, underscoring a push driven by what the team described as “extensive user demand” for prediction markets and bound options-like instruments. The rollout is described as a work in progress, with testing currently underway on a testnet as developers work to validate order flow and settlement logic before any mainnet deployment.

Key takeaways

HIP-4 would introduce fully collateralized outcomes contracts on Hyperliquid, removing leverage, liquidations, and margin calls while delivering a capped payout structure akin to a betting slip.

The feature is currently in testnet, with canonical markets expected to denominate in Hyperliquid USDH (CRYPTO: USDH).

The move responds to strong user demand for prediction-market-style exposure and could unlock additional applications built atop Hyperliquid’s infrastructure.

Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE (CRYPTO: HYPE), reacted positively to the news, climbing as much as 19.5% to roughly $37.14 in the immediate aftermath, as investors weighed the potential for expanded use cases alongside ongoing price momentum.

Trading activity in perpetuals remains structurally robust, with DeFiLlama data showing weekly volumes above $200 billion, even after a peak in early November at about $341.7 billion.

The HIP-4 integration would fuse perpetuals with event-driven markets, echoing prior collaborations that tied on-chain derivatives to broader, event-based trading.

Tickers mentioned: $HYPE, $USDH

Sentiment: Bullish

Price impact: Positive. The announcement and ensuing price action point to renewed interest in Hyperliquid’s ecosystem and its potential expansion into prediction markets.

Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. The combination of testnet validation and potential mainnet rollout suggests patience may be rewarded as the platform proves the stability and usability of HIP-4 outcomes contracts.

Market context: The news sits within a broader landscape where on-chain perpetuals and tokenized prediction markets have gained traction, with liquidity and trading activity remaining resilient even amid intermittent market pullbacks. DeFiLlama’s data shows that weekly perps trading volumes have held above $200 billion, a sign of continued demand for crypto derivatives amid a backdrop of evolving regulatory and product considerations.

Why it matters

Hyperliquid’s pursuit of HIP-4 signals a strategic attempt to converge two of crypto’s most active use cases: perpetual futures and on-chain prediction markets. By anchoring canonical markets to USDH, the ecosystem aims to reduce counterparty risk while broadening the spectrum of tradable events. If successful, the design could create a more diverse suite of hedging tools for traders and offer builders a template for creating novel, bounded-outcome products on top of HyperCore’s infrastructure.

The potential integration is more than a technical upgrade; it reflects a broader shift in DeFi toward event-driven demand. Prediction markets, in particular, have long been cited for their appeal in aggregating information and forecasting outcomes. Pairing this with the liquidity and composability of on-chain perpetuals could yield a new class of hybrid instruments that combine the immediacy of marginless bets with the risk controls that users increasingly demand. Still, it is early in the development cycle—the team characterizes the feature as “work in progress” and emphasizes testnet validation and careful deployment planning to avoid systemic risk in live markets.

From an ecosystem perspective, HIP-4 underscores Hyperliquid’s ambition to remain at the intersection of high-velocity derivatives and real-world event exposure. While the immediate utility centers on prediction markets, the underlying architecture could enable other applications—such as bounded, collateralized options-like vehicles or cross-market bets anchored to diversified datasets. The potential for on-chain governance to influence product direction remains a focal point for builders and investors watching Hyperliquid’s roadmap unfold.

Weekly change in perps trading volume since February 2021. Source: DeFiLlama

The broader market context remains nuanced. While HYPE (CRYPTO: HYPE) experienced a notable uptick on the HIP-4 news, the overall crypto market has retraced in parts of February, with traders closely watching liquidity distributions, regulatory signaling, and institutional participation. The price action is part of a broader narrative in which traders seek to balance risk across multiple on-chain arenas, including tokenized stocks and other decentralized derivatives. As data from CoinGecko shows, the community continues to monitor Hyperliquid’s price trajectory and the dynamics of its USDH stablecoin, while the project explores expanding use cases that could drive sustained engagement beyond perpetuals trading alone.

What to watch next

Progress of HIP-4 on the testnet, including any finalized parameters for payout caps, settlement windows, and event eligibility criteria.

Clear milestones toward a potential mainnet rollout, including any governance votes or audits that would de-risk a broader deployment.

Further announcements tying HIP-4 to other Hyperliquid features, such as deeper integration with on-chain perps or cross-market instruments.

Any partnerships or collaborations (for example, with wallet providers or DeFi rails) that might facilitate user onboarding to prediction-market-like products on Hyperliquid.

Regulatory clarity around prediction markets and event-based collateralized contracts, which could influence design choices and geographic availability.

Sources & verification

Hyperliquid’s X post announcing HIP-4 support and its motivation for demand-driven expansion: https://x.com/HyperliquidX/status/2018327360723202167

DeFiLlama perps trading volume data and historical context: https://defillama.com/perps

Hyperliquid price index and market performance reports: https://cointelegraph.com/hyperliquid-price-index

CoinGecko market data referenced for price movements and market context: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/hyperliquid

Metamask Infinex integration with Hyperliquid Perps (context for cross-use-case potential): https://cointelegraph.com/news/metamask-infinex-integrate-hyperliquid-perps

Hyperliquid expands into prediction markets with HIP-4

The plan to introduce HIP-4 outcomes trading marks a notable shift for Hyperliquid, aiming to weave a prediction-market layer into a platform already known for its high-velocity perpetuals. The proposed mechanism would allow traders to place fully collateralized bets on discrete outcomes, all anchored to Hyperliquid USDH. The design prioritizes risk controls—no leverage, no liquidations, no margin calls—while presenting a familiar “betting slip” experience with a capped payout. In practical terms, participants would be wagering on the probability of events within a fixed payout band, with final settlements determined by verifiable outcomes rather than discretionary counterparty behavior. The testnet phase is essential to stress-testing order matching, settlement timing, and the governance signals that could guide a broader deployment.

HyperCore’s endorsement of HIP-4 suggests a broader strategic intent: to test how event-based markets can coexist with, and complement, on-chain perpetuals. The canonical markets would settle in USDH, aligning with Hyperliquid’s current liquidity and risk framework. The X post frames the feature as a response to user demand for bounded, options-like instruments—an appetite that has grown as traders seek products with clear risk parameters and transparent settlement rules. If HIP-4 proves resilient on testnet, the roadmap could include additional revenue streams for developers who design novel contracts atop Hyperliquid’s infrastructure, potentially unlocking a new class of decentralized derivatives that blend real-world events with blockchain-native risk management.

Media coverage and market data reflect a crypto ecosystem that is actively experimenting with the boundaries between traditional risk transfer and decentralized finance. The price reaction to the HIP-4 signal—HYPE rising to the mid-$30s range in the wake of the development—underscores investor interest in expanded product capabilities. The DeFiLlama data showing persistent, multi-hundred-billion-dollar weekly volumes in perpetuals indicates a robust liquidity backbone that HIP-4 could leverage. Still, the journey from testnet to mainnet is non-trivial; the technical complexity of event-driven settlement, combined with the need for robust governance and regulatory alignment, means timing and execution will be critical. As Hyperliquid navigates these challenges, the broader market will watch how prediction-market-inspired instruments fare in real-world testing and whether they can coexist with the governance and security standards that underpin decentralized finance.

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

This article was originally published as Hype Surges 20% After Hyperliquid Backs Prediction Markets on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Stablecoin issuer Tether has introduced MiningOS, an open-source software stack designed to streamline Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) mining while broadening decentralization. Portrayed as a modular, scalable operating system, MOS is aimed at users spanning from hobbyists to multi-geography institutions. The project centers on a self-hosted, peer-to-peer architecture, reducing reliance on centralized services and vendor lock-in. Tether emphasizes transparency, openness, and collaboration as core pillars of Bitcoin infrastructure, pitching MOS as a meaningful shift away from proprietary tooling. The OS is released under the Apache 2.0 license and relies on Holepunch P2P protocols, a combination that Tether says eliminates central points of failure and backdoors. This rollout follows a June last year announcement of an open-source mining OS and signals an industry push toward more inclusive mining tooling.

In a post on X, Tether announced the rollout of MiningOS, framing the software as a universal platform that scales from a home rig to industrial-scale deployments. The MOS website underscores its modular design, allowing miners to tailor settings to their specific scale and output requirements. Tether’s messaging stresses that MOS eliminates traditional barriers to entry by offering a fully open environment, where “no black boxes, no lock-in, no limits” guide the user experience. The emphasis on open standards and self-hosted operation resonates with a wider industry trend toward decentralization and resilience in critical infrastructure that underpins Bitcoin’s network.

Paolo Ardoino, Tether’s chief executive, reinforced the vision in a separate social post, describing MiningOS as a “complete operational platform that can scale from a home setup to industrial grade site, even across multiple geographies.” This stance aligns with the broader objective of enabling a more distributed and controllable mining landscape, where operators are not tethered to a single vendor or hardware ecosystem. By promoting a self-contained stack that communicates through an integrated peer-to-peer network, MOS seeks to sidestep common pain points around vendor lock-in and opaque operations.

Tether’s announcement positions MiningOS as an important milestone in the ongoing evolution of crypto mining tooling. The project explicitly distances itself from proprietary, closed systems and highlights a commitment to interoperability across diverse hardware and network conditions. The MOS platform, as described, comes with a management layer that makes it easier for miners to adjust configurations as their operations scale, a feature that could simplify transitions from small personal rigs to larger, geographically distributed farms. The self-hosted nature of MOS means participants can run the system independently, reducing outsourcing risks and aligning with a privacy- and security-conscious segment of the mining community.

The new open-source stack is described as technology with broad potential: a tool that supports a range of infrastructure rather than constraining users to a particular hardware bundle. While Block’s open-source mining initiatives have drawn attention for similar aims, MOS differentiates itself by aiming for hardware and deployment versatility. The messaging underscores an ecosystem approach—users can participate in development, propose improvements, and contribute to ongoing refinements without gatekeeping or licensing constraints. The Apache 2.0 licensing framework is highlighted as a guarantee of freedom to use, adapt, and share MOS, promoting widespread experimentation and collaborative advancement within the mining community.

Beyond the technical specifics, MiningOS is framed as part of Tether’s broader diversification: a shift from pure stablecoins toward tokenization, AI applications, decentralized finance, and even gold and Bitcoin holdings. The company has pursued a series of investments and initiatives in these areas, illustrating a broader strategic push into infrastructure and ecosystem-building that could yield longer-term implications for the crypto markets and mining operations. The initiative is also emblematic of a trend toward open-source, community-driven software in crypto, where decentralization and transparency are increasingly prioritized in foundational technologies.

Key takeaways

MiningOS is a modular, scalable operating system designed for miners ranging from hobbyists to large institutions.

It is open-source under the Apache 2.0 license and uses Holepunch P2P protocols to enable a self-hosted, peer-to-peer mining network.

The platform emphasizes transparency with the ethos: “No black boxes. No lock-in. No Limits.”

MOS is hardware-agnostic, aiming to work across a wide range of infrastructure rather than tying users to a single vendor’s hardware.

The release aligns with Tether’s broader strategy to expand beyond stablecoins into tokenization, AI, DeFi, and physical assets like gold and Bitcoin.

Industry context suggests a growing appetite for open-source, interoperable mining tools that reduce vendor risk and boost resilience.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC

Sentiment: Neutral

Market context: The move arrives amid broader interest in open-source mining infrastructure, with miners seeking greater control and diversification of tooling amid regulatory and macro market dynamics.

Why it matters

The MiningOS initiative matters because it targets a core fragility in Bitcoin mining: reliance on closed, vendor-driven ecosystems. By offering an open, modular platform that can be self-hosted and connected through a peer-to-peer network, MOS has the potential to lower entry barriers and broaden participation. For hobbyists, startups, or institutions exploring distributed deployments, this could translate into greater autonomy over hardware choices, software updates, and security postures, reducing the dependency on a single supplier or managed service provider.

From a security and transparency standpoint, an Apache 2.0-licensed, open-source stack backed by a widely auditable codebase can enhance trust in the mining process. The absence of central controllers—in line with Holepunch P2P principles—could mitigate certain single points of failure and reduce the risk of backdoors or covert dependencies. For researchers and developers, MOS offers a sandbox for experimentation, potential audits, and community-driven improvements that can accelerate protocol-level and operational refinements in mining software.

Economically, the openness of the platform could influence the mining ecosystem by encouraging interoperability across hardware and hosting environments. If MOS gains traction, operators might enjoy more flexible scaling, easier relocation of rigs, and the ability to optimize energy usage without being tied to a specific vendor roadmap. In an industry characterized by tight margins and evolving energy considerations, the ability to mix and match components under a common, transparent framework could be a meaningful step toward more resilient mining operations.

What to watch next

Adoption metrics: number of miners and sites adopting MiningOS and integrating it with diverse hardware stacks.

Repository activity: frequency of updates, issue resolution, and community contributions.

Security reviews: independent audits or third-party assessments of MOS’s architecture and the Holepunch-based network design.

Interoperability milestones: real-world deployments across different geographies and hosting environments.

Roadmap disclosures: forthcoming features, governance inputs, and governance mechanisms for open-source development.

Sources & verification

Tether’s X post announcing the MiningOS rollout: https://x.com/tether/status/2018406288816836847

MiningOS official site and product description: https://mos.tether.io/

Paolo Ardoino’s X post discussing MOS scalability: https://x.com/paoloardoino/status/2018443917453127768

Earlier announcement of open-source mining OS plans: https://cointelegraph.com/news/tether-bitcoin-mining-software-open-source

Open-source MiningOS: a turning point for crypto mining?

MiningOS enters the stage as more than just a new tool; it embodies a shift toward open development and interoperability in a sector historically defined by vendor lock-in. By enabling a self-hosted, peer-to-peer network with an adaptable management layer, MOS offers a blueprint for how mining infrastructure could evolve—one where miners retain control over their hardware, software stack, and operational parameters. If the project rapidly demonstrates reliability, performance, and community participation, it could become a reference model for decentralized mining operations moving forward.

As the ecosystem continues to grapple with regulatory expectations, energy considerations, and the need for robust supply chains, open-source initiatives like MiningOS could play a valuable role in shaping a more transparent and resilient mining landscape. For practitioners and observers, the next few quarters will reveal whether MOS can translate its principles into widespread, sustainable adoption across a diverse set of miners and geographies.

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

This article was originally published as Tether Debuts MiningOS: Open-Source Bitcoin Mining Platform on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

The multidistrict saga surrounding FTX’s collapse is inching toward resolution, as FTX users and Fenwick & West filed a proposed settlement in a Florida federal court. The parties say they will present the terms for court approval on February 27, though the filing did not reveal the settlement’s specifics. In a bid to quiet the sprawling class-action litigation that has grown since FTX’s 2022 implosion, plaintiffs and Fenwick also asked the court to pause all deadlines and pending motions ahead of the submission. Plaintiffs claim Fenwick played a key role in enabling the alleged fraud, a charge the firm disputes as routine legal work.

Key takeaways

The proposed settlement between FTX users and Fenwick & West is slated for submission to a Florida federal court on February 27, with terms not disclosed publicly.

The filing seeks a pause on all deadlines and pending motions in the related class-action suit as the settlement unfolds.

The plaintiffs allege Fenwick provided substantial assistance that helped structure the operations and permit alleged misuses, a claim Fenwick previously sought to dismiss as unsupported.

The underlying litigation traces to a multidistrict class action filed after FTX’s collapse in late 2022, encompassing claims against the exchange, promoters, and various partners.

Earlier in the process, the court allowed the amended complaint to proceed against Fenwick, denying Fenwick’s bid to dismiss the case.

A related action against Sullivan & Cromwell, FTX’s former outside counsel, was voluntarily dismissed last year amid insufficient evidence.

Tickers mentioned:

Market context: The settlement development sits within a broader wave of post-collapse litigation in the crypto space, as investors seek accountability and clarity around the governance and structural practices that supported FTX and its affiliated entities. The case underscores the persistent vigilance of plaintiffs’ counsel against entities that provided legal or advisory services to high-profile crypto platforms during their rapid growth and subsequent downfall.

The latest filings come amid continuing scrutiny of the legal professionals involved with FTX’s rapid expansion and collapse. As the class-action landscape evolves, observers are watching for how courts balance claims of aiding and abetting alleged fraud with the provision of routine legal services. The procedural posture—requesting a stay of deadlines while settlement talks proceed—reflects a cautious approach common in complex, multi-party disputes where settlements hinge on granular disclosures and the preservation of claims for future relief.

The public record links provided in the filing and related reporting outline a narrative that has persisted through 2023 and into 2024: lawsuits against Fenwick & West, and other firms connected to FTX, have sought to pin responsibility for the alleged mismanagement and misrepresentations that preceded the exchange’s fall. For readers who want to trace the procedural path, the primary docket entry can be found on CourtListener, detailing the In re FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange Collapse Litigation (Docket 67478547/1060).

In August, reporting highlighted the plaintiffs’ assertion that Fenwick played a central role in constructing the corporate architecture that allegedly obscured fund flows and blurred the lines between FTX and Alameda Research. The plaintiffs argued Fenwick advised on strategies to avoid regulatory registrations for money transmission and closely monitored the flow of funds between entities. Fenwick, however, has maintained that its involvement was limited to standard, lawful legal services and has sought to dismiss the case on that basis.

As the parties move toward a potential settlement, the broader litigation landscape includes related actions against Sullivan & Cromwell, FTX’s former outside counsel. That suit was dismissed in late 2024 after a judge found insufficient evidence to sustain the claims, a development noted in contemporaneous reporting. The dynamic nature of the MDL means that even as one line of the case approaches resolution, other actions and inquiries continue to shape the broader accountability narrative for FTX and its ecosystem.

Several connected stories have kept pressure on the topic, including coverage of Sam Bankman-Fried’s public profile shifts and ongoing regulatory and enforcement scrutiny around crypto exchanges. While those narratives sit outside the precise scope of the Fenwick settlement, they contribute to a broader understanding of how legal accountability is evolving within the crypto industry. Readers seeking more background can explore related discussions and analyses that situate this case within the wider regulatory and litigation environment surrounding decentralized finance, investor protections, and exchange operations.

Why it matters

The proposed settlement, if approved, could offer a measure of closure to tens of thousands of FTX users who allege they were harmed by the exchange’s collapse. Beyond the monetary implications, the handling of Fenwick’s role is significant for the crypto legal ecosystem, potentially influencing how law firms structure and defend their involvement with blockchain-based platforms. The case also highlights the tension between legitimate legal services and alleged facilitation of wrongdoing, a line that courts have to adjudicate with careful scrutiny in high-profile crypto matters.

Moreover, the decision to pause litigation deadlines during settlement talks signals a practical approach to dispute management in complex civil actions tied to rapidly evolving tech sectors. The outcome could affect how similar cases are staged in the future, including how settlements are negotiated when a firm’s liability status remains contested. For practitioners, the development underscores the importance of precise pleadings, transparent settlement disclosures, and the strategic use of procedural stays to manage sprawling multi-district actions.

For investors and observers, the exercise of accountability in FTX-related litigation remains a barometer for the broader crypto market’s maturation. Legal clarity surrounding the responsibilities of service providers—ranging from law firms to advisers—can influence reputational risk, professional liability standards, and the willingness of market participants to engage with crypto platforms under current regulatory regimes. While the settlement’s terms are still unknown, the process itself reinforces that the crypto sector is subject to traditional civil litigation norms, even as it often operates at the frontier of technology and finance.

What to watch next

Formal filing of the proposed settlement terms for judicial review on or around February 27, with a public decision timeline from the court.

Any court-approved stay or modification of deadlines in the MDL as part of the settlement process.

Disclosure of settlement terms and any conditions related to the release of claims or non-monetary remedies.

Subsequent rulings clarifying Fenwick’s status and any broader implications for defending parties in related actions, including the Sullivan & Cromwell matter.

Updates from the parties on comment and cooperation during the settlement process, as well as any related appellate or procedural developments in the MDL.

Sources & verification

CourtListener docket entry for In re FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange Collapse Litigation (67478547/1060).

Cointelegraph coverage on the August update describing Fenwick’s alleged key role in the FTX fraud case.

Cointelegraph reporting on Fenwick’s motion to dismiss and the subsequent denial of that bid.

Cointelegraph coverage of the November ruling allowing the amended complaint to proceed against Fenwick & West.

Cointelegraph report on Sullivan & Cromwell’s related case, including its later voluntary dismissal.

Settlement moves forward in multidistrict FTX litigation

The case centered on Fenwick & West centers on the foundational question of whether a prominent law firm provided more than routine guidance to a crypto exchange that later collapsed under scrutiny. The scheduled February 27 submission marks a formal juncture where the court will weigh the proposed agreement’s terms against the claims and defenses that have accumulated over the years. While the exact conditions remain confidential, the parties’ joint request to pause deadlines indicates an effort to stabilize the procedural posture while negotiations proceed. The CourtListener docket and associated reporting lay out a narrative in which Fenwick is challenged on the basis that its client-facing structures and advisory roles may have contributed to the alleged misrepresentations and fund flows that characterized FTX and Alameda’s operations.

As observers await more detail, the case’s trajectory illustrates a broader trend in crypto-related civil actions: settlements are often the preferred vehicle for resolving complex, high-stakes disputes spanning multiple jurisdictions and dozens of plaintiffs. The fact that Fenwick has engaged in discussions aimed at a court-approved resolution—despite ongoing disputes about liability—reflects a pragmatic approach to risk management for legal firms tied to rapidly evolving crypto platforms. The ongoing discussion also underscores the role courts play in mediating the balance between providing necessary legal services and addressing allegations of complicity in alleged fraud. For readers following the regulatory and legal dimensions of crypto, this development provides a concrete example of how the legal system handles claims of assisting and abetting alleged wrongdoing in a high-profile crypto ecosystem.

In parallel, the broader litigator landscape remains active as related actions against other parties tied to FTX continue to unfold. The voluntary dismissal of the Sullivan & Cromwell case, after a separate evaluation of evidence, indicates that the path to accountability in these matters can be uneven and highly fact-specific. Nonetheless, the core question of what constitutes appropriate professional responsibility in the crypto world remains a guiding thread for both practitioners and market participants. The ongoing dispute, the methodology of discovery, and the potential for contemporaneous settlements will shape how similar cases are approached in the future, as courts seek to set precedents that balance legal accountability with the practicalities of representing clients in a nascent, rapidly changing sector.

For readers wanting to verify the components of this developing story, the primary CourtListener entry provides a window into the case’s procedural posture, while related articles paint the broader context of how Fenwick, and by extension law firms associated with crypto platforms, fit into the post-collapse accountability framework. The convergence of litigation strategy, regulatory scrutiny, and settlement dynamics in this matter will continue to be a focal point for legal observers and crypto market participants as 2026 progresses.

This article was originally published as FTX User Lawsuit Settled by Fenwick Over Exchange Work on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Una lettura dell'ISM Manufacturing PMI di gennaio pari a 52,6 segnala un ritorno all'espansione per il settore manifatturiero statunitense, il miglior risultato da agosto 2022 e ben al di sopra della soglia di 50 che denota crescita. I dati arrivano mentre il Bitcoin tende vicino a $78,000 dopo essere scivolato a un minimo di 10 mesi intorno a $75,442 all'inizio della settimana, sottolineando la sensibilità dei mercati delle criptovalute ai segnali macro. Il PMI ha superato la previsione del consenso di circa 48,5 e ha posto fine a un periodo di contrazione di 26 mesi, uno sviluppo che i partecipanti al mercato vedono come un potenziale punto di svolta per la liquidità, le aspettative di inflazione e l'orientamento della politica. La combinazione di segnali manifatturieri più forti e asset rischiosi resilienti ha portato i trader a ponderare se un miglioramento macro più ampio potrebbe sollevare i prezzi delle criptovalute nei mesi a venire.

Un nuovo lotto di documenti del Dipartimento di Giustizia rilasciato di sabato ha riacceso l'attenzione sui legami dell'industria cripto con Jeffrey Epstein. I documenti nominano diverse figure di spicco e descrivono uno spettro di collegamenti—da menzioni casuali a investimenti diretti e incontri collaborativi—con il finanziere che è morto nella sua cella nel carcere nell'agosto 2019. Il DOJ afferma che i rilasci fanno parte dei suoi doveri pubblici in corso, ma gli avvocati delle vittime sostengono che la gestione sia stata difettosa a causa delle redazioni e delle considerazioni sulla privacy. Tra i nomi citati ci sono Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, Adam Back e Brock Pierce, così come Joi Ito, Austin Hill, Bryan Johnson, Howard Lutnick e altri, con riferimenti a investimenti in iniziative blockchain come Valar Ventures e Blockstream.

Il targeting fisico degli utenti crypto o dei loro familiari—comunemente descritto come “attacchi con chiave inglese”—è passato dalla periferia delle discussioni sui rischi a una minaccia tangibile, secondo un audit di sicurezza di CertiK. In un rapporto sugli attacchi con chiave inglese pubblicato domenica, CertiK ha dichiarato che ci sono stati 72 casi verificati in tutto il mondo nel 2025 in cui i possessori di crypto hanno affrontato danni fisici diretti. L'azienda osserva che tali attacchi non sono più casi marginali, con aggressioni fisiche e rapimenti in aumento di circa il 75% rispetto al 2024. I dati preliminari indicano una crisi che potrebbe influenzare il comportamento in tutto l'ecosistema, dai fondatori agli individui ad alto patrimonio netto, poiché la gestione del rischio si estende oltre le difese digitali nel mondo reale.

Il prezzo del Bitcoin è sceso a un minimo stagionale di $74,555 lunedì, segnando un ritracciamento di circa il 40% dal suo massimo storico. Il calo è arrivato mentre i prodotti scambiati in borsa (ETP) del Bitcoin globale registravano forti deflussi, sottolineando un clima di avversione al rischio che è persistito nel mercato. Sebbene il movimento abbia suscitato sentimenti ribassisti e metriche di valutazione attenuate, alcuni osservatori vedono svilupparsi un'impostazione di payoff asimmetrica sullo sfondo—una che potrebbe catalizzare un'inversione significativa se la domanda ritorna mentre la liquidità rimane favorevole.

La Casa Bianca ha ospitato funzionari senior dell'amministrazione e leader dei settori delle criptovalute e bancario per tracciare come le stablecoin e altri asset digitali potrebbero adattarsi all'interno di un nuovo quadro di struttura di mercato ai sensi del Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. La sessione è avvenuta dopo che il Comitato Bancario del Senato ha rinviato un markup sulla legge all'inizio dell'anno, un promemoria della complessità legislativa che circonda uno spazio in rapida evoluzione. I partecipanti della Digital Chamber, un gruppo di advocacy per le criptovalute, hanno sottolineato la necessità di guardrail su azioni tokenizzate, finanza decentralizzata e l'etica dei funzionari eletti che detengono asset digitali mentre i dettagli politici vengono negoziati. Le discussioni segnalano una volontà di collegare le ambizioni politiche con le realtà del settore, anche mentre i legislatori si preparano per un processo intercomitato e multichiamato prima di qualsiasi voto finale.

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) ha affrontato una prova severa mentre i prezzi sono scesi a circa $74,680 lunedì, dopo che una serie di scommesse con leva sono state liquidate per circa $1,8 miliardi dalla discesa di giovedì. Gli investitori hanno abbandonato gli asset rischiosi poiché le valutazioni tecnologiche sembravano eccessive, e molti trader sono passati a contante o obbligazioni governative a breve termine. Il contesto di mercato più ampio includeva un crollo nei prezzi dell'argento in tre giorni e domande persistenti su se l'appetito per il rischio potesse riprendersi, anche se l'oro continuava ad accumulare interesse di capitale come riserva di valore con la sua capitalizzazione di mercato che si aggirava intorno ai $33 trilioni. Nei mercati dei derivati, segnali concreti di panico sono rimasti sfuggenti, con diversi indicatori che suggerivano resilienza piuttosto che paura aperta.

codice errore: 524

Questo articolo è stato originariamente pubblicato come ParaFi Capital Invests $35M in Jupiter to Accelerate Growth su Crypto Breaking News – la tua fonte di fiducia per le notizie crypto, le notizie su Bitcoin e gli aggiornamenti sulla blockchain.

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) sta tentando un rally di sollievo dopo un forte ritracciamento, salendo da circa $74,508 per superare di nuovo $79,000 mentre i compratori intervengono. Il prossimo grande ostacolo si trova vicino a $84,000, dove la pressione di vendita storica si è riaffermata in questo ciclo. L'umore nel mercato più ampio rimane fragile: l'Indice di Paura & Avidità delle Criptovalute è scivolato in Paura Estrema a 14, il valore più profondo del 2026, mentre i dati di Santiment hanno evidenziato una negatività sproporzionata nei canali social. Alcuni partecipanti al mercato vedono il calo come una potenziale opportunità di acquisto, indicando l'area $75,000–$80,000 come un possibile minimo, anche se le opinioni sono lontane dall'essere uniformi. PlanC, un analista BTC, ha suggerito che il ritracciamento verso quella zona potrebbe essere “l'opportunità di ritracciamento più profonda di questo rally di Bitcoin.”

Bed Bath & Beyond sta espandendo nel finanziamento immobiliare tokenizzato concordando di acquisire Tokens.com per costruire un gateway unificato per il finanziamento immobiliare e gli asset tokenizzati. L'accordo, annunciato il 2 febbraio 2026, incorporerebbe Tokens.com in Bed Bath & Beyond come una sussidiaria interamente posseduta e si baserebbe sulla presenza blockchain dell'azienda, inclusi tZERO e GrainChain, per offrire un'interfaccia che consolida proprietà, valutazioni e liquidità per asset tradizionali e on-chain. Il piano prevede tokenizzazione, prestiti garantiti da asset e accesso cripto tramite uno stack regolamentato, con prodotti ipotecari e di equità domestica supportati da partner come Figure Technologies. Se tutte le condizioni di chiusura sono soddisfatte, la piattaforma potrebbe essere operativa entro la metà del 2026. Lo sviluppo segue il deposito del Capitolo 11 di Bed Bath & Beyond nel 2023 e la successiva vendita dei suoi asset di marca a Overstock, che in seguito è stata ribattezzata Beyond Inc.

Gli avvocati distrettuali di New York e il procuratore generale dello stato hanno intensificato la loro critica al quadro federale delle stablecoin incarnato dal GENIUS Act, sostenendo che potrebbe inavvertitamente proteggere gli emittenti dalla responsabilità e lasciare le vittime esposte a frodi. In una lettera evidenziata da CNN, il procuratore generale di New York Letitia James e quattro avvocati distrettuali hanno avvertito che la legge "fornirà copertura legale" per gli emittenti di stablecoin per partecipare ad attività illecite, potenzialmente minando le protezioni per i consumatori man mano che i pagamenti digitali diventano sempre più radicati nel commercio quotidiano. La missiva si è concentrata su due emittenti prominenti, Tether e Circle, sostenendo che le loro pratiche non hanno costantemente protetto gli utenti né facilitato il recupero tempestivo dei fondi rubati. L'insistenza della lettera riflette una tensione più ampia tra gli obiettivi della politica federale e l'applicazione a livello statale che si è intensificata man mano che i movimenti di denaro on-chain e l'attività di trading di stablecoin si espandono.

L'India sta trasformando la sua iniziativa domestica sull'e-rupee da un esperimento controllato di pagamenti digitali a uno strumento strategico volto a rimodellare il commercio transfrontaliero, i trasferimenti e i flussi turistici. La rupia digitale sostenuta dalla banca centrale, emessa dalla Reserve Bank of India (RBI) e testata in parallelo in esperimenti al dettaglio e all'ingrosso, è sempre più considerata come una ferrovia di regolamento sovrano piuttosto che come una semplice ferrovia di pagamento. Mentre i responsabili politici valutano le connessioni con le CBDC di altri paesi, Nuova Delhi sembra stia testando non solo la tecnologia ma anche l'architettura di governance e regolamentazione necessaria per supportare regolamenti finali senza confini. La traiettoria suggerisce che l'e-rupee potrebbe diventare uno strumento per semplificare i movimenti di denaro internazionali, legando al contempo le ambizioni finanziarie dell'India a obiettivi geopolitici più ampi.

President Donald Trump has tapped former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh to lead the central bank, a move that has rippled through crypto markets and liquidity expectations in the U.S. ahead of a potential Senate confirmation. The nomination was announced on Friday, with Warsh positioned to succeed Jerome Powell when Powell’s term ends in May, pending congressional approval. The prospect of Warsh at the helm arrives as markets wrestle with a mixed macro backdrop: a Fed that could continue a gradual easing trajectory, even as liquidity conditions remain a dominant driver for risk assets, including digital currencies. In this environment, crypto traders are weighing whether Warsh’s stance on balance sheet policy could tilt liquidity in or out of the market and how that could influence price action across the sector.

Key takeaways

Warsh’s nomination signals a possible continuation of an easing-friendly trajectory, but his approach to the balance sheet could complicate liquidity expectations for risk assets, including Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC).

Market liquidity remains a critical variable for crypto traders, with Bitcoin and other assets often reacting more to liquidity shifts than to the Fed Funds Rate alone.

Warsh’s reportedly skeptical posture on balance-sheet expansion may translate into a lower-liquidity environment if adhered to, potentially weighing on risk assets and precious metals.

Fed rate expectations appear mixed: most traders expect no rate change at the March 18 meeting, while a growing share anticipates a 25-basis-point cut by the June 17 gathering.

Over the recent weekend, crypto markets retraced significantly, losing roughly $250 billion in aggregate market capitalization as part of a broader risk-off move across stocks and commodities driven by liquidity worries.

Sentiment: Neutral

Price impact: Negative. A liquidity-focused sell-off coincided with Warsh’s nomination, underscoring how liquidity conditions are shaping crypto and risk-asset pricing more than policy signals themselves.

Market context: The nomination arrives as traders parse whether the Fed will balance rate relief with restraint on its balance sheet, a dynamic that has historically shaped liquidity conditions impacting crypto liquidity, risk assets, and traditional markets alike. Analysts have emphasized that while central-bank policy remains important, liquidity regimes can drive outsized moves in crypto, particularly during periods of policy ambiguity or fiscal-mueled uncertainty.

Why it matters

The coming confirmation fight over Kevin Warsh’s candidacy to chair the Federal Reserve stands at the intersection of policy and liquidity—a nexus that has become a focal point for crypto traders. Warsh’s background includes a formidably hawkish stance on some policy levers, yet his reported skepticism about expanding the central bank’s balance sheet raises the possibility of a more conservative approach to liquidity provision. For a market that has shown acute sensitivity to liquidity shifts, that stance could imply more cautious conditions for speculative assets, including Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC).

Crypto markets have already been caught in a broader risk-off wave that spilled into digital assets over the weekend, with analysts citing a liquidity drought as a major driver behind the drawdown in crypto as well as equities and precious metals. The pullback and the subsequent debate about Warsh’s influence on the Fed’s balance-sheet trajectory underscore a broader narrative: in the current regime, liquidity is a primary determinant of price action. If Warsh pushes for balance-sheet shrinkage or slower expansion, traders could face a less forgiving environment where even modest liquidity withdrawals produce outsized price moves in high-beta assets, including major cryptocurrencies.

On balance, investors are watching the policy conversation through the prism of liquidity rather than short-term rate moves alone. A prominent view circulating among market watchers is that a more cautious balance-sheet stance could offset some of the immediate rate-cut expectations, potentially delivering a “lower-liquidity but higher-volatility” regime for crypto markets. That dynamic is already being reflected in the way traders respond to every whisper of central-bank maneuvering, with Bitcoin and other tokens often moving in step with shifts in risk appetite and funding conditions rather than with the cadence of policy announcements themselves. This environment amplifies the importance of cross-asset liquidity signals, and it helps explain why whispers about a slower expansion of the Fed balance sheet can trigger risk-off moves even before a concrete policy decision is made.

The policy debate also intersects with the broader macro narrative, including how other instruments and markets react to liquidity changes. Notably, commentary from market observers points to a potential decoupling between rate-path expectations and liquidity trajectories. If the Fed maintains rate paths while constraining balance-sheet growth, investors may recalibrate risk positions, leading to more pronounced drawdowns in crypto during periods of liquidity tightening. This framework aligns with the observed response to Warsh’s nomination, where the market’s reaction reflects fears of a tighter funding environment rather than a straightforward shift in interest rates alone.

The discussion on policy comes amid a chorus of voices highlighting that liquidity, not just policy, is the primary driver of crypto price dynamics. For example, discussions around the so-called “US liquidity drought” have been cited as a central factor in recent selloffs, underscoring why investors are calibrating their expectations for how Warsh’s tenure could reshape liquidity channels across financial markets. The implications extend beyond Bitcoin to the wider crypto ecosystem, where liquidity conditions shape funding costs, investor appetite for risk, and the potential for dramatic price swings during periods of stress.

Interest rate cut expectations. Source: CMEgroup

The point is not simply whether rate cuts occur, but how the Fed’s balance-sheet stance interacts with liquidity. Warsh’s nomination has injected a layer of uncertainty into how the Fed might balance rate relief against potential liquidity tightening. Traders will be watching for guidance on the Fed’s approach to asset purchases, collateral management, and broader balance-sheet normalization in the weeks ahead. In the interim, the market consensus remains that March’s meeting could leave rates unchanged, with a non-trivial share of participants penciling in a 25-basis-point cut for June, aligning with expectations that the next big policy pivot would occur later in the year, once Powell’s term concludes.

The backdrop to all of this includes a broader market narrative about why liquidity matters so intensely for crypto. Market liquidity is not simply about the level of cash on hand; it’s about the ease with which investors can access funding, the cost of capital, and the willingness of market makers to provide liquidity during stressed periods. When liquidity tightens, crypto prices can become more volatile as traders compete for scarce funding. Conversely, ample liquidity tends to smooth price action, allowing markets to absorb shocks more readily. Warsh’s nomination thus sits at a crucial juncture: it could either sustain a gradual easing environment with manageable liquidity or prompt a more cautious posture that reduces liquidity provision and heightens sensitivity to funding conditions.

For readers following the policy debate, several anchors remain in focus. The FedWatch framework from CME Group shows a split expectation: around 85% of participants anticipate no rate change at the March 18 meeting, while the market sentiment for a June 17 rate cut climbs modestly higher, with roughly half of surveyed participants factoring in a 25-bp cut. These probabilities illustrate how the market is pricing policy in tandem with evolving liquidity expectations, a combination that bears directly on crypto funding scenarios and price volatility in the near term.

Related: Crypto loses speculative edge as AI and robotics attract capital: Delphi

In this landscape, investors and builders alike are watching for signals that can clarify the path forward for liquidity and policy. Warsh’s nomination adds a new layer to an ongoing debate about how the Fed will navigate the tension between rate relief and balance-sheet restraint. The next few weeks could provide clearer signals about whether the central bank leans toward expanding or contracting liquidity, and crypto markets will likely respond in ways that reflect those shifts more directly than they did in the lead-up to Warsh’s nomination.

What to watch next

Senate confirmation votes for Kevin Warsh and any accompanying policy briefings on balance-sheet strategy.

Statements or testimonies outlining the Fed’s plans for asset purchases or balance-sheet normalization.

March 18 Federal Reserve meeting results and commentary on near-term policy trajectories.

June 17 Federal Reserve meeting expectations and any signals about the pace of balance-sheet adjustments.

Liquidity indicators and cross-asset funding conditions to gauge how crypto markets respond to shifts in liquidity supply.

Sources & verification

Official mention of Warsh’s nomination and framing of the potential policy path (Friday announcement).

Comments on Warsh’s balance-sheet stance and its implications for liquidity and QE-type measures.

Weekend market data indicating a broad sell-off and a roughly $250 billion decline in crypto market capitalization as a liquidity-driven move.

Market expectations data from CME Group’s FedWatch tool outlining March and June meeting expectations.

Quoted insights from analysts on US liquidity conditions and their impact on crypto and equities.

Markets reaction and key details

The nomination of Kevin Warsh to chair the Federal Reserve has stirred a nuanced dialogue about the future path of U.S. monetary policy and, crucially, the liquidity landscape for crypto markets. Warsh’s approach—further details of which will emerge during the confirmation process—has led traders to consider the possibility of continued rate relief in the near term, paired with a more cautious stance on expanding the balance sheet. Such a combination could sustain a conditional easing trajectory while increasing the sensitivity of markets to shifts in liquidity, a dynamic that crypto traders know well. Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) and the broader digital asset space are likely to react not merely to rate decisions but to how freely funding channels remain accessible during stress periods.

The past weekend’s price action underscored the central role of liquidity. The crypto market experienced a broad retreat as risk sentiment soured across equities and precious metals, in what analysts described as a liquidity-driven correction. Raoul Pal’s commentary pointing to the US liquidity drought as a primary driver of the downturn has been cited in multiple analyses as evidence that policy moves may be overshadowed by the funding environment. While some traders see Warsh’s nomination as a signal that the Fed could keep easing options on the table, others worry that a contractionary tilt on the balance sheet could compress liquidity more than anticipated, potentially keeping downward pressure on high-beta assets during periods of stress.

From a market-structure perspective, the money-flow narrative remains central. Traders examine how the Fed’s balance-sheet framework might influence the availability of collateral, the cost of funding, and the propensity of institutions to extend leverage in crypto markets. The CME’s forward-looking probabilities reflect a nuanced picture: while a March rate hold remains the baseline for many, a subset of participants expects a June cut, suggesting that the policy path remains uncertain and tightly coupled with liquidity dynamics. The interplay between policy expectations and liquidity conditions will likely determine how quickly the crypto space can recover from the weekend’s slide and whether new support can emerge in the absence of a sharp expansion in bank reserves or other funding channels.

As the nomination unfolds, crypto investors are weighing how this appointment will shape the environment in which digital assets trade. The consensus remains that liquidity is the main lens through which investors assess risk assets, including Bitcoin, which means that the Warsh narrative will continue to influence pricing avenues—especially if the balance-sheet policy signals point toward tighter funding conditions in the months ahead. The next set of policy statements, confirmed meetings, and liquidity metrics will be critical in determining whether the crypto market can stabilize or whether further volatility lies ahead as investors recalibrate their models for a liquidity-sensitive regime.

This article was originally published as Trump’s Fed Nomination: Mixed Signals on Bitcoin, US Liquidity on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.