Ridhi Sharma

#dusk @Dusk $DUSK
Il finanziamento istituzionale ha molte regole da seguire per proteggere gli investitori e garantire un mercato equo. La maggior parte delle blockchain pubbliche mostrano di default tutti i dettagli delle transazioni e chi possiede cosa. Questo è un problema perché non rispetta le regole in vigore. #dusk Network è un tipo di blockchain che garantisce che tutto rimanga riservato e sicuro.
Dusk si concentra sul mantenimento della riservatezza e della sicurezza. Utilizza codici per garantire che ogni informazione finanziaria rimanga riservata su Internet. Allo stesso tempo, consente a determinate persone, come revisori o autorità di regolamentazione governative, di verificare che tutto sia in ordine. Ciò significa che Dusk può aiutare a creare titoli digitali, come token che rappresentano proprietà o debiti, in modo conforme alle normative stabilite da governi e organizzazioni come MiFID II e MiCA.

#walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL
Nel mondo della crittografia le cose cambiano rapidamente. Ci sono molti token in circolazione, ma pochi di essi sono veramente utili. Sono semplicemente venduti nell'ottica che potranno avere un valore maggiore in futuro. $WAL è diverso. È il token utilizzato dal @Walrus 🦭/acc . Sempre più persone stanno iniziando a conoscere WAL, specialmente dopo che è stato adottato su Binance. Questo perché WAL è effettivamente utile, non semplicemente oggetto di chiacchiere.
Il sistema WAL si basa su tre elementi che lavorano insieme per rendere Walrus una rete di archiviazione che non richiede autorizzazioni, non è controllata da una singola persona e funziona bene, con denaro. Ognuno di questi elementi svolge una funzione specifica, ma tutti collaborano strettamente tra loro. Walrus ha bisogno di questi tre elementi per essere una rete di archiviazione. I tre elementi principali che compongono WAL sono fondamentali perché Walrus funzioni correttamente.

#walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL
Lo storage decentralizzato dovrebbe essere davvero robusto. Di solito finisce per essere lento. Questo accade perché crea molte copie di tutto, utilizza molta larghezza di banda e costa molto da gestire. Questi problemi hanno fatto sì che poche persone utilizzino lo storage decentralizzato. La nuova versione di @Walrus 🦭/acc sta cercando di cambiare questa situazione. E lo sta facendo in modo audace. Il protocollo Walrus sta davvero cercando di migliorare lo storage.
Al centro del design di Walrus c'è un'idea che è altrettanto potente: non è necessario sprecare risorse per rendere qualcosa robusto. Walrus dimostra che può funzionare bene anche quando crea copie di qualcosa come quattro o cinque. Ciò significa che Walrus può continuare a funzionare anche se qualcosa va storto. Può farlo senza sprecare denaro. Questo non è un compromesso. È un modo per progettare un sistema che funziona bene e non costa troppo. <t-14/><t-15/>#walrus il design è un esempio di questo perché si basa su molta riflessione e pianificazione.

#dusk @Dusk $DUSK
Decentralized finance is getting more established.. There is still a big problem that needs to be solved. It is not about how fast things happen or how much money is moving around. The main issue is, about trust. Can DeFi be private. Keep things confidential like regular banks and institutions have to do by law? This is an one because DeFi also needs to be transparent and allow audits. For a time this is where most blockchains have failed. Decentralized finance needs to figure this out.
The #dusk Network was created with a problem in mind. Of trying to add privacy and rules to an existing public ledger the Dusk Network does things differently. It starts with an idea: when it comes to regulated finance the Dusk Network needs to have privacy as a standard feature but it does not need to be completely secret. A lot of people get these two ideas mixed up. They are really not the same thing. The Dusk Network is about finding a balance, between privacy and openness.
Most blockchains are pretty open. You can see everything that is going on. People can look at wallet balances and transaction histories. See who owns what assets. This is okay when people are just trying things out.. It is not good for big institutions that have to follow a lot of rules.
Dusk does things differently. It uses tools like zero-knowledge proofs and privacy primitives to keep things private. This means that people can keep their business to themselves.. When someone needs to check on things Dusk can still prove that everything is okay. Dusk is, about keeping financial activity private when it needs to be while still being transparent when necessary which is what Dusk is trying to achieve with its blockchain.
What makes this approach believable is that you do not have to choose between being private and following the rules. The rules for things like knowing who your customers are and stopping money laundering are built into the system. This means that companies do not have to trust that everything is being done correctly outside of the system. The rules for who can use the system and what they have to report are all part of the system itself. This way the rules are clear. Everyone can see that they are being followed. The system makes sure that all the rules are enforced and that everyone can check that they are being enforced. This approach is about privacy and compliance for things, like the systems rules.
The underlying architecture is based on discipline. Dusk has a design. This means that smart contracts and decentralized applications work on a layer that's compatible with the EVM. This makes things easy for developers. They do not have to deal with unnecessary problems.
At the time Dusk has a separate layer for settlement and consensus and privacy enforcement. This layer is specifically designed for activities that have to follow rules.
This separation is what allows the Dusk network to be flexible, without breaking any rules that it has to follow. Dusk network stays flexible. Dusk still follows the rules.
The $DUSK token is really important for this system. It helps in ways. You can use the DUSK token to pay for things like transaction fees. You can also use it to deploy contracts and participate in staking. The DUSK token is even used to make decisions about how the network is run.
The total number of DUSK tokens that can exist is one billion. The way new DUSK tokens are added to the system is set up to help keep the network safe and make sure the people who help run it are doing their job. This is done over time. Is not meant to be a quick way to get people excited. The DUSK token is meant to help the network work properly and safely. It is not meant to be a distraction, from what the network's supposed to do.
Dusk has done something important with its Confidential Security Contract standard, which is called XSC. The XSC contracts are made to help turn financial things into tokens in a way that follows the rules. Things like getting dividends, voting and doing company business can all be done automatically on the blockchain but peoples ownership and transaction information stay secret. This means companies can use financial systems on the blockchain without getting in trouble with regulators. Dusks XSC makes this possible so companies can use the blockchain for things, like dividend distributions and voting rights and it is all done in a way that keeps the ownership and transaction data of the Dusk Confidential Security Contract secret.
Dusks partnerships are really important beyond the rules that Dusk follows. Dusk works with exchanges that are regulated companies that provide data and layers that help different systems work together. This helps connect financial systems and new decentralized markets. Dusk makes it possible for regulated assets to move between chains while keeping everything private and following the law. This means more people can use these assets without lowering the standards that're in place. Dusks partnerships and the way Dusk works are key, to making this happen with Dusk.
What Dusk ultimately represents is a change in the way we think. Dusk does not see rules and regulations as something that blockchain technology needs to get from. Dusk sees rules and regulations as something that needs to be dealt with in a way. Dusk makes sure that privacy and following the rules are in line, with being able to program things. This way Dusk provides a way for big financial institutions and blockchain technology to work together in a way that makes sense for both Dusk and the institutions.
Not as a compromise, but as a convergence secure, private, and built to operate in the real world.

#walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL
One of the most important changes in the @Walrus 🦭/acc recently hasn’t received much attention, largely because it doesn’t look dramatic at first glance. The move toward a client-orchestrated data flow sounds like a technical adjustment. In reality, it reshapes how control, trust, and scalability work across the entire system.
What stands out to me is that #walrus no longer treats the client as a passive participant. The client doesn’t just upload data and hope the network handles the rest. Instead, the client actively coordinates how data is encoded, distributed, and later retrieved. That distinction matters, because decentralization isn’t only about where data lives it’s about who decides how it moves.
By pushing orchestration to the client side, Walrus Protocol avoids a subtle form of centralization that many decentralized storage systems fall into. In those systems, coordination quietly shifts to middleware, gateways, or trusted services. Walrus removes that dependency. Control stays at the edge, not in the middle.
In practice, the flow works like this. When data is uploaded, it’s first handled by a publisher that encodes and distributes it across Walrus storage nodes. What matters is what happens next. The metadata and availability proofs are anchored directly on the Sui blockchain. That anchoring turns storage into something verifiable and composable, rather than an external service bolted on after the fact.
This is where the design starts to feel intentional. Because coordination lives on Sui, Walrus inherits its security model and its programmability through the Move language. Storage stops being “off to the side.” It becomes something developers can reason about inside smart contracts. That’s a meaningful shift.
From my perspective, this is what unlocks the next tier of use cases. Smart contracts can reference stored data, verify that it’s actually available, and enforce logic around it. That’s not just useful it’s necessary for things like NFTs with truly immutable media, AI datasets that need provable integrity, Layer-2 systems that depend on certified data availability, and decentralized websites that shouldn’t be alterable behind the scenes.
Another part of the architecture I find especially compelling is how #walrus treats storage capacity itself. Storage isn’t just something you rent and forget about. It can be represented and managed as a programmable asset. That opens up design space most developers haven’t had before. Storage duration, access rights, and usage constraints can all be enforced at the contract level. Data stops being a background cost and becomes part of application logic.
What also deserves credit is that Walrus doesn’t lock this model into a single ecosystem. While Sui plays a central coordination and verification role, the protocol is intentionally open. Builders on Ethereum or Solana can still use Walrus for storage, while benefiting from Sui’s strengths behind the scenes. That makes Walrus feel like shared infrastructure rather than a closed stack.
On the retrieval side, the design stays pragmatic. Users don’t have to interact directly with storage nodes. An aggregator collects data and serves it through a read cache or CDN layer. Performance is preserved without turning trust into a casualty. That balance is harder to strike than it looks, and most systems end up choosing one over the other. Walrus doesn’t.
Stepping back, this update reinforces what Walrus is really aiming to be. Not just “decentralized storage,” but a true data layer one where orchestration is decentralized, trust is anchored on-chain, and storage is programmable by default.
To me, client-orchestrated data flow isn’t a feature update. It’s a structural decision. It’s the kind of change that determines whether a system can scale honestly, attract serious builders, and support real applications without quietly re-centralizing when things get hard.
That’s why this matters. It brings Walrus closer to its long-term vision: a permissionless, verifiable, and composable data layer for the internet not in theory, but in how it actually operates.