MAYA-BNB

Kite era solo un'altra annuncio di progetto crypto "agente AI" che scorreva nel mio feed, e quasi lo scorrevo a destra. I miei occhi ora si appannano. Un altro? Suona tutto come la stessa offerta: autonomo questo, intelligente quello. Sono già stato bruciato in passato su concetti che erano dieci passi avanti rispetto a ciò che la tecnologia poteva effettivamente fare.
Quando ho letto per la prima volta di Kite, ho fatto quella stessa espressione scettica. Un altro blockchain per agenti AI? Ma la frase "pagamenti agentici" è rimasta con me. Non si trattava solo di AI che svolgeva compiti; si trattava di AI che transazionava. Questo è un problema diverso, più concreto. La mia confusione era semplice: perché un'AI ha bisogno del proprio blockchain? Non può semplicemente usare il mio portafoglio?

Kite caught my eye in a weird way. Not because I understood it right away, but because I didn’t. I remember reading a short description and thinking, why would an AI need its own blockchain. I almost skipped it, which is usually my signal that there’s something worth slowing down for.
After thinking about it more, the idea started to make sense in a very non hype way.
We keep talking about AI agents like they’re just smarter bots. But if you actually imagine them operating on chain, the old assumptions break fast. Most blockchains are built around humans approving actions. Even when we automate things, there’s still a person behind the scenes pulling strings. Agents don’t work like that. They act constantly, make small decisions, and interact with other agents without asking for permission every five minutes.
Kite seems to start from that reality instead of forcing agents into human shaped wallets.
The identity setup is what really changed my view. Separating users, agents, and sessions sounds technical, but it’s actually very practical. It means I can let an agent do its job without handing over permanent control. If something goes wrong, the session ends. The agent doesn’t become this unstoppable thing draining funds while I sleep. That’s a design choice that feels grounded in real risk, not theory.
Another thing that stood out is why Kite went with its own Layer 1 but stayed EVM compatible. At first, it felt unnecessary. Then I thought about speed and coordination. If agents are negotiating prices, paying each other for services, or reacting to data in real time, slow finality kills the whole point. This isn’t about chasing lower fees. It’s about timing actually mattering.
The KITE token rollout also feels unusually patient. Early utility is mostly about participation and incentives. The heavier stuff like staking, governance, and fees comes later. That tells me they’re expecting real activity first, not just empty governance votes. I’ve seen too many tokens try to govern ecosystems that don’t really exist yet.
What makes Kite relevant now is the gap between how fast AI is moving and how static crypto infrastructure still feels. We talk nonstop about autonomous systems, but payments and coordination are still very manual under the hood. If agents are going to handle work for us, they need rails built for them, not borrowed ones.
I’m not convinced this is guaranteed to win. Nothing is. But Kite feels like it’s asking the right question at the right time. And for everyday crypto users, that might matter more than another shiny feature nobody actually uses.

#KITE @KITE AI $KITE