The strangest thing about AI Agents is that they can die for very "human" reasons.
Most people think the best agent will be the smartest agent.
I think the exact opposite.
In an ecosystem like @OpenLedger , what determines how long an agent survives might not be its intelligence.
It’s cash flow.
An agent can make more accurate predictions.
Analyze better.
Be smarter.
But if it doesn't generate enough value to sustain its own operations, it will sooner or later disappear.
Sounds a lot like a business.
Or even like a living organism.
It is not the strongest of the species that survives.
But the one most adaptable to change.
And it was from that exact thought that I started to realize a much bigger question about AI Agents.
A question that forces me to re-examine the entire role of humans in the AI economy.
I’ve just written a deeper dive into this in my latest analysis.
If you think AI is just a tool, you might find this perspective quite uncomfortable.
Please read my lengthy analysis below, and let's discuss this topic together.
@OpenLedger #OpenLedger $OPEN $BNB