I didn't want to jump back into talking about project @OpenGradient this quickly,
but after I sat down to review some info, I realized I was seeing the concept from a narrow, or rather superficial perspective.
This happens to everyone.
The first glance at any project is always based on numbers:
distribution ratios, tokens, big figures… and we build a quick opinion on that.
That's what happened to me.
But when you step back from the numbers as mere figures,
and start to see how and when instead of how much,
your perspective changes completely.
I noticed that the idea isn't just about distributing tokens and calling it a day;
there's an attempt to improve in the long run.
Not everything is set in stone from the get-go,
and not everything is locked down excessively.
There’s balance.
There's a $9.5 million support for the project from Coinbase Ventures and a16z crypto.
The involvement of strong players indicates that there's a real structure happening behind the scenes.
The main players here are the team, investors, and ecosystem,
everyone's on the same page:
a long-term commitment, not a quick pump and dump that leaves the coin in the gutter, killing the project like the rest.
Even the early moves seem calculated to kickstart growth, not to pressure it.
I found that the project doesn't give off a sense of a quick opportunity;
instead, it gives off a feeling of slow building.
Does that mean it’s guaranteed? Definitely not.
But at least there’s clear thinking.
It's not just random numbers thrown around to grab attention; there's a clear difference.
I'll talk about the rest of the details in a future post.
#opg $OPG
but after I sat down to review some info, I realized I was seeing the concept from a narrow, or rather superficial perspective.
This happens to everyone.
The first glance at any project is always based on numbers:
distribution ratios, tokens, big figures… and we build a quick opinion on that.
That's what happened to me.
But when you step back from the numbers as mere figures,
and start to see how and when instead of how much,
your perspective changes completely.
I noticed that the idea isn't just about distributing tokens and calling it a day;
there's an attempt to improve in the long run.
Not everything is set in stone from the get-go,
and not everything is locked down excessively.
There’s balance.
There's a $9.5 million support for the project from Coinbase Ventures and a16z crypto.
The involvement of strong players indicates that there's a real structure happening behind the scenes.
The main players here are the team, investors, and ecosystem,
everyone's on the same page:
a long-term commitment, not a quick pump and dump that leaves the coin in the gutter, killing the project like the rest.
Even the early moves seem calculated to kickstart growth, not to pressure it.
I found that the project doesn't give off a sense of a quick opportunity;
instead, it gives off a feeling of slow building.
Does that mean it’s guaranteed? Definitely not.
But at least there’s clear thinking.
It's not just random numbers thrown around to grab attention; there's a clear difference.
I'll talk about the rest of the details in a future post.
#opg $OPG