SatoshiEdge

$DOGE
Ievads
Dogecoin (DOGE), kas sākotnēji tika izveidots kā mēmu iedvesmota kriptovalūta, ir piedzīvojusi ievērojamas vērtības un popularitātes svārstības. Nesenie notikumi, īpaši tādu augsta līmeņa personību kā Elons Masks un Donalds Tramps, ir atkal izraisījuši interesi par Dogecoin. Šajā rakstā ir apskatīts, kā Dogecoin tuvākajās dienās var kļūt par vērtīgu kriptovalūtu un vai tai ir potenciāls nākamajos gados kļūt par galveno.
Pašreizējā tirgus ainava
Pēdējās cenu izmaiņas

Page 1
🚨 B i n a n c e S q u a r e C o m m u n i t y A l e r t :
B e w a r e o f C o n n e c t e d S c a m T o k e n s - P i z z a
( P I Z Z A ) a n d M a p l e ( M A P L E ) 🚨
Date: May 24, 2026
To our vigilant Binance Square community, we are issuing an urgent warning regarding two
potentially connected scam tokens on the BNB Smart Chain (BSC): Pizza (PIZZA) and
Maple (MAPLE). Our on-chain analysis suggests a high probability of these tokens being
launched by the same malicious actors, employing similar rug-pull tactics.
🍕 Pizza (PIZZA) - The First Incident
The PIZZA token (contract address: 0x707266E2B21AD1921bdE5A8c5F4E1E034aFA7777) was
launched approximately 7 days ago on the BNB Smart Chain. It gained significant attention,
reportedly being shown in trending sections on various platforms. However, it experienced
a drastic price collapse, consistent with a rug pull, with its market capitalization
plummeting from approximately $190,000 to $5,000.
Key Findings for PIZZA:
•Contract Address: 0x707266E2B21AD1921bdE5A8c5F4E1E034aFA7777 [1]
•Deployer Wallet: 0x4cC563fa9578278E27A91227092823684Ff3770E [2]
•Liquidity Pool: The primary liquidity pool was PIZZA/WBNB on PancakeSwap (pair
address: 0x73233C2F91a8609D2aC1a14C74b64a372198E6A4) [3]. At the time of analysis, the
liquidity was extremely low, at approximately $7.1K, with a market cap of $5.4K [4].
•Security Audit Score: DEX Screener's Token Sniffer audit for PIZZA shows a score of
0/100, indicating severe vulnerabilities and high risk [4].
🍁 Maple (MAPLE) - The New Threat
Following the PIZZA rug pull, a new token named MAPLE (contract address:
0x06AEE50283c94D72A62394437FD6f2e917577777) was launched approximately 16 hours ago.
Our investigation reveals strong on-chain connections to the PIZZA scam.
Key Findings for MAPLE:
•Contract Address: 0x06AEE50283c94D72A62394437FD6f2e917577777 [5]
•Deployer Wallet: 0xB8E3E7A9eeca678101e985be85adf87a8f20368f [6]
•Funding Source: The MAPLE deployer wallet
(0xB8E3E7A9eeca678101e985be85adf87a8f20368f) received its initial BNB funding from a
Page 2
wallet (0xf78b2eda7c1e20ff9906b31fe3612195bce9d6ce) labeled as
HiFiSwap: Bridge [7]. This bridge address also funded the deployer of the PIZZA token
[8].
•Liquidity Pool: The MAPLE/WBNB liquidity pool on PancakeSwap shows a current
liquidity of $36K [9].
🔗 The Connection: A Common Deployer
Crucially, both the PIZZA token and the MAPLE token were deployed by the same
underlying contract: 0xe2cE6ab80874Fa9Fa2aAE65D277Dd6B8e65C9De0 [10]. This contract acts
as a factory for creating new tokens. This strong on-chain link indicates that the same entity
or group is behind both projects, strongly suggesting a coordinated scam operation.
⚠ Warning to the Community
Given the clear patterns of a rug pull with the PIZZA token and the direct on-chain
connection to the newly launched MAPLE token, we urge the Binance Square community to
exercise extreme caution. These projects exhibit characteristics commonly associated with
scam tokens, including:
•Rapid Price Depreciation: The PIZZA token experienced a significant and rapid drop in
value shortly after launch.
•Low Liquidity: While MAPLE currently has some liquidity, the history of PIZZA suggests
this could be removed at any time.
•Anonymous Developers: The use of factory contracts and lack of transparent
developer information are red flags.
•High-Risk Audit Scores: The 0/100 Token Sniffer score for PIZZA is a critical indicator of
malicious contract design.
We strongly advise against investing in or trading the MAPLE token
(0x06AEE50283c94D72A62394437FD6f2e917577777) or any other tokens launched by the
connected deployer wallet (0xe2cE6ab80874Fa9Fa2aAE65D277Dd6B8e65C9De0).
Always conduct your own thorough research (DYOR) before investing in any cryptocurrency
project. Verify contract addresses, audit reports, team transparency, and community
sentiment.
References:
1.BscScan: Pizza (PIZZA) Token Contract
2.BscScan: Pizza Deployer Wallet
Page 3
3.DEX Screener: Pizza/WBNB Pair
4.DEX Screener: Pizza (PIZZA) Details
5.BscScan: Maple (MAPLE) Token Contract
6.BscScan: Maple Deployer Wallet
7.BscScan: HiFiSwap: Bridge
8.BscScan: Pizza Deployer Wallet Transactions
9.DEX Screener: Maple/WBNB Pair
10.BscScan: Common Deployer Contract
Stay safe and vigilant!
The Binance Square Community Team

@CZ @Binance News
$RAVE
1St scammer wallet Made 202.33K With Rugging The pull is The Main Mastermind. Wallet Handed over to law enforcement Team's is ⏬
0x4cC563fa72135f3E7337F1862D2601284Ff3770E
2Nd scammer wallet Made 5.36K with Rugging The pull Is ⏬
0x2d345a90D2BFC051cC253d914020138BF062A8b1
3rd scammer Wallet Made 3.42K is⏬
0x6cB61d73Dcb6b2692f6950776874274B6d8315a3
4Th scammer wallet who Made 2.57K is⏬
0x860428f18Faf733ca70afe5810C467790c260008
5Th scammer wallet Made 1.35K is⏬
0x59F57a21b97f133EA741c1248Aab2DA07F3f4169
Total Scammed - 216K DOLLARS
The “Pizza Day” memecoin collapse should be a wake-up call for the entire crypto industry.
On 21st of May The Market Cap of This Scam was 158970$
Today left with only 6.8k
Bubble Map Show interconnected Wallets who Dumped on Retailers Managed by Thier Teams and so Called Fake KOLs..
Check contract adress on bubble Map everything is clear who's behind those scams - 0x707266E2B21AD1921bdE5A8c5F4E1E034aFA7777
A fake narrative.
A coordinated hype campaign.
Fake legitimacy.
And then a brutal liquidity wipeout.
Within a short time, this Pizza token went from around $175K market cap to almost nothing left — leaving retail investors trapped while promoters moved on to the next trend.
How did they fooled Retailers?
With A Fake Twitter account
What’s becoming obvious is how organized these meme launch schemes have become on platforms like Flap and Four.Meme.
The pattern looks the same every single time:
🚨 Create a trending meme narrative
🚨 Launch token with low accountability
🚨 Use coordinated KOL repost networks
🚨 Push fake “community” momentum
🚨 Farm retail liquidity
🚨 Dump and disappear
The accounts heavily involved in promotion/reposting around this ecosystem included usernames such as:
@pizzaa098
@maplee082
@Web3_GXFC
@dexsignals
@zhangdm8
@yingge001
@vegeta0730
@davin5201
@pilot3226
@sanpaoAlpha
@laodi888
@caicai1953
@i_m_m_
@btcoindown
@furan86999
@ihd321
@0xPaomo
@shuirenzhi88858
@Ted55668
@AutorunSOL
@yijiezumei
@yzcjmsn7
Chinese Scammers who call Themselves KOLs has been supported By Bitget and Binance wallet is A Joke how we are far far away from protecting our user's and opening doors for Scammers every day..
These accounts may have participated in promotion, reposting, engagement farming, or narrative amplification surrounding meme launches and speculative token activity. Next time when you say any Token/Coin Posted by any of Them Don't Touch The scam.
All of These accounts you can see in screenshot are The Scammers and Thier Next scamcoin is Maple...
This is why retail investors must stop blindly trusting:
❌ follower counts
❌ repost armies
❌ “alpha groups”
❌ fake engagement
❌ paid KOL networks
❌ polished websites and narratives
Most newcomers entering crypto do not understand how sophisticated these hype cycles have become.
A meme coin today can have:
✔ fake social proof
✔ artificial volume
✔ insider wallets
✔ bundled buys
✔ temporary liquidity
✔ coordinated influencers
And still collapse within hours.
The industry keeps talking about “mass adoption,” but how can newcomers trust Web3 when launchpads are flooded with copy-paste meme rugs every single day?
Exchanges and platforms enabling this environment while profiting from endless speculative launches should seriously rethink what kind of ecosystem they are helping create.
Crypto should reward builders and real communities — not coordinated pump-and-dump culture designed to turn retail into exit liquidity.
Thier next scam
Another day, another “new narrative” meme coin scam appearing out of nowhere.
Now the same style of promotion is happening again with “Maple” — and people should pay attention before history repeats itself. even after Investigating i found out the same Wallets who Dumped pizza scam and run with people money is now launch Maple scam today on flap .
The pattern looks painfully familiar:
⚠️ Fresh X account activity
⚠️ Coordinated repost networks
⚠️ Trend-based branding
⚠️ “Community” hype overnight
⚠️ Meme launchpad exposure
⚠️ Fast engagement farming
⚠️ Retail FOMO targeting
This is exactly how many recent meme rugs started before collapsing and leaving holders trapped.
Crypto newcomers need to understand something important:
A professional-looking website does NOT mean legitimacy.
A verified-looking X page does NOT mean legitimacy.
Big follower counts do NOT mean legitimacy.
Trending posts do NOT mean legitimacy.
Most of these meme launches are driven by attention economics, not real utility.
And in many cases:
• insiders buy early
• KOL networks amplify hype
• retail buys late
• liquidity disappears
• project dies silently
The same promotion ecosystem keeps rotating from one narrative to another:
Pizza → Maple → next trend → next victims.
Before buying ANY meme token, always check:
✔ token distribution
✔ deployer wallet activity
✔ liquidity lock status
✔ insider concentration
✔ organic vs botted engagement
✔ whether the project has real builders
Retail investors should stop treating every trending meme as “the next opportunity.”
Because for many of these launch groups, the real business model is not building communities — it’s farming attention and extracting liquidity from hype cycles.
Stay careful. The market is full of manufactured narratives pretending to be communities.
If you lost money in such Scams Don't forget to Comment how much you lost because Now is The Time To involve Law enforcement Teams And give them thier clusters wallet to know where did The money is Going. And How's behind Them...
. There Must Be A Big Name involved And The same will be investigated soon
#scam #Scam? #scamriskwarning #ScamAwareness #onlyscam
$LAB $GENIUS
Binance operates the underlying blockchain infrastructure (BNB Chain) and integrates platforms like Flap into its official applications, it heavily amplifies the visibility and reach of these predatory scams.
The community's growing resentment toward Binance stems from a highly critical dual-role the exchange plays in this ecosystem:
## 1. Promoting Toxic Platforms via the "Meme Rush" Feature
The primary reason people hold Binance accountable is their active curation of these tools. The Binance Web3 Wallet explicitly integrated and announced support for the [Flap protocol via its "Meme Rush" portal](https://www.rootdata.com/news/507717). By giving an unvetted, high-risk memecoin generator a direct shortcut inside the official app, Binance essentially channeled thousands of everyday retail investors directly into a highly aggressive, unregulated "player-vs-player" (PvP) environment where [98% of participants are systematically rugged by bots and serial scammers]
## 2. Profit From the Chaos
Every single time a scammer launches a fake coin, and every time an investor buys or sells a token on the BNB Chain, gas fees are paid in BNB (Binance's native token). Even if a token drops to absolute zero and a user loses everything, Binance and the validators of the BNB Chain still successfully collect network transaction fees. This dynamic creates an inherent conflict of interest: the higher the chaotic volume of rapid-fire memecoin deployments, the more economic activity occurs on Binance's home chain. [1]
------------------------------
## The Fine Line: Infrastructure vs. Endorsement
The ongoing debate within the community highlights a deep divide regarding Binance's ultimate responsibility:
* The Case for Blame (Platform Responsibility): Critics argue that as the largest crypto ecosystem globally, Binance has an ethical obligation to protect users. By displaying a "Low Risk" tag on technical smart contracts or featuring gamified launchpads in their self-custody wallet, they blur the lines. This layout gives unverified, anonymous scammers an unearned seal of legitimacy, leaving inexperienced users highly vulnerable to deception.
* The Legal Defense (Decentralized Rails): Binance's official counter-position is that the BNB Chain is a decentralized, public, permissionless ledger. Legally, they cannot block an anonymous developer from launching a contract on a public chain any more than an internet provider can block a scammer from building a website. Furthermore, because a Web3 wallet is a self-custody tool, Binance maintains that users assume full responsibility for their on-chain interactions.
## How to Isolate Your Funds from Web3 Platform Risks
If you intend to continue using Binance for regular centralized trading but want to protect your capital from the dangerous exploits of the Web3 space, you can implement strict defensive boundaries:
* Separate Exchange and Web3 Assets: Move your primary trading funds entirely into the main Binance Exchange custody. Do not keep active funds sitting in the integrated Web3 self-custody wallet where accidental clicks can authorize malicious dApps.
* Purge Active Approvals: If you have interacted with "Pizza" or any other sketchy token bonding curves, go to your wallet settings or use a secure external tool like Revoke.cash to completely revoke unlimited spending permissions on your BNB.
* Ignore In-Wallet Dashboards: Treat the "Meme Rush", "Trending Hot", or automated token launch sections inside self-custody applications strictly as highly speculative advertisements rather than verified, safe financial opportunities.

Fact-Check Report: Meme Coin Launchpads (Four.meme, Flap, Pump.fun, etc.) – Business Model, Revenues, "Big Players," and Retail Reality (as of 2026)1. How These Platforms Actually WorkThese are permissionless meme coin launchpads using a bonding curve mechanism:
Anyone connects a wallet and deploys a token in ~1 minute with minimal/no code (upload image, name, description).Early buyers push the price up a "curve." When it hits a market cap threshold (e.g., ~$50k–$100k), liquidity auto-migrates to a DEX like Raydium (Solana) or PancakeSwap (BNB Chain).Platforms take a trading fee (often ~1% or split) while the coin trades on their interface or after graduation.Creator incentives: Some share revenue back to creators (e.g., Pump.fun added 50% revenue share in some cases).
Four.meme (BNB Chain): Fair launch focus, cheap creation, instant PancakeSwap listing potential. Closely tied to BNB ecosystem.
four.meme
Flap (BNB/EVM): Similar, with revenue sharing features for creators and lower barriers. Smaller scale than Four.meme.
dwf-labs.com
Pump.fun (Solana pioneer): The blueprint. Generated massive volume but most tokens never "graduate."This design lowers barriers dramatically → explosion in launches, but also in low-quality/rug-prone tokens.2. Revenues for Platform Owners – Not "Billions" in Profit, But Huge Fees
Pump.fun: Cumulative revenue crossed $1 billion by early 2026 (hundreds of millions in 2025 alone). Peak daily revenue ~$1M+, with records over $15M on hot days. It raised ~$500M–$600M+ in a 2025 token sale at high valuation. Founders/team became very wealthy.Four.meme: In peak periods (e.g., Oct 2025), it flipped Pump.fun with $1.4M daily revenue. Cumulative fees in tens of millions (DeFiLlama shows ~$92M+ cumulative revenue tracked). Strong BNB Chain momentum.Flap: Much smaller; lower adoption, not in the same revenue league.
How owners make money: Platform fees on trading volume (the "house rake"). High volume from thousands of daily launches = steady revenue even if 95%+ of tokens fail. They also benefit from native token launches/sales. Not "billions in pure profit" after costs, team, buybacks, etc., but life-changing wealth for small teams.
These platforms captured value from the meme meta the same way casinos or lottery operators do — volume over quality.3. Connection to "Big Players" / Authority (Binance, etc.)
Four.meme & BNB Chain: Strong indirect ties. Binance founder CZ has hyped BNB memes and "4" narrative. Binance Wallet integrated with Four.meme for "Meme Rush." Many ecosystem tokens reference Binance. BNB Chain benefits massively from the activity (fees to validators, PancakeSwap). Not direct "Binance-owned," but symbiotic — Binance ecosystem gets retail activity and chain usage.Pump.fun: Independent Solana project. No major "Big Player" ownership, though Solana ecosystem (VCs, foundations) benefits from overall activity.No evidence of centralized "cartel" controlling rugs. It's decentralized greed + incentives. Big exchanges/chains profit from trading fees and TVL indirectly.
The system aligns incentives for platforms/chains (more launches = more fees/gas), creators (easy deployment + possible revenue share), and early speculators — at the expense of late buyers.4. The "Dirty Well" Reality: Retail Losses & Rug StatisticsYour description is largely accurate on outcomes:
Failure rate extreme: 98%+ of tokens on major launchpads show pump-and-dump or rug characteristics. Most die the same day or within hours. Narrative coins pump on hype then vanish as attention shifts.Vast majority of retail traders lose money. Studies show tiny % (often <1-5%) of wallets profit significantly; most buy high and get rugged or faded.Why it feels designed this way: Zero/low cost to launch + bonding curve creates natural pump, easy for snipers/bots/insiders to dump. Short attention spans + FOMO = constant rotation to new narratives. Platforms earn regardless.Soft rugs, honeypots, dev wallets dumping, paid shillers, and copycat narratives are rampant. "Narrative Day = End Day" is the meta for many.
Not everyone loses: Smart/early participants, bots, KOLs with paid bags, and platforms win. But average retail user is the exit liquidity.Balanced TakeawayThese platforms are highly profitable extraction machines for owners and heavy participants. They made founders wealthy and boosted chains like Solana/BNB with activity. The model is "efficient" at generating volume but terrible for long-term value creation — it's closer to a high-speed casino or lottery than productive finance.It's not a grand conspiracy with "Big Players" orchestrating every rug, but emergent incentives in a low-regulation, high-greed environment. Easy launches = flood of garbage = most people lose.Regulatory note: Authorities (including in India) are increasing scrutiny on market manipulation, unregistered securities, and scams. On-chain tracing makes serial rugs riskier over time.Bottom line: Yes, the system is stacked against late buyers in most cases.
Treat it as gambling, not investing. Use tiny amounts, strict risk management, heavy DYOR (check liquidity locks, dev wallets, rugscreeners), or avoid entirely. Legitimate building happens elsewhere in crypto.If you want sources for specific stats, on-chain examples, or help analyzing a particular token/platform, provide details. Stay safe out there.
That's a common pattern in the memecoin space, but the "exchanges are running the rugs" part is a widespread conspiracy theory without solid evidence. The launch-and-rug timing tacticYes, scammers frequently tie launches to hype events, holidays, or narratives (Bitcoin Pizza Day, Christmas, elections, sports events, etc.). They build FOMO over days/weeks with social media spam, fake partnerships, and "upcoming big announcements," then pull liquidity, dump tokens, or enable sells only for insiders around the peak (event day). This has happened repeatedly with Pizza Day coins in past years too — multiple rugs extracting hundreds of thousands while the narrative pumps.

It's low-effort, repeatable, and profitable for anonymous operators using cheap deployment tools on BSC, Solana, etc. Stats show the vast majority of new memecoins (often 90%+) follow pump-and-dump or rug patterns.

On Binance/exchanges "being behind it"No credible evidence that Binance (or Coinbase) directly launches and rugs these tokens. Major exchanges have regulatory scrutiny, compliance teams, and reputations to protect. Orchestrating retail rugs would be illegal and massively risky for them.
Exchanges do benefit indirectly from trading volume and new user sign-ups during hype cycles. They run their own promotions (giveaways, events) around Pizza Day or similar, which can attract users — some of whom then lose money on shady memecoins.

Binance has repeatedly warned users about memecoin scams, phishing, and fake airdrops. They've had their own issues (e.g., BNB Chain account hacks promoting scams).

Most rugs trace back to anonymous dev wallets, snipers, and teams using copy-paste contracts — not exchange insiders. Funds sometimes flow to CEX wallets for cashing out, but that's standard for any scammer.

Binance has faced plenty of legitimate criticism over the years (regulatory fines, past practices under CZ, etc.), and some users feel their promotions are predatory. But blaming them as the puppet masters of years of memecoin rugs is a stretch — it's mostly decentralized greed + easy tooling + social media hype machines.Coinbase tends to be more conservative with listings and has less exposure to BSC/Solana memecoin chaos, which explains the perception difference.Bottom line adviceYour strategy observation is spot-on for risk awareness: treat event-tied narrative coins launched shortly before as extremely high risk. Check on-chain basics (LP locked/burned? Ownership renounced? Dev wallets dumping?), team transparency, and audit status before touching anything. Most of these are zero-sum gambling where early insiders win and late buyers lose.If you're seeing specific patterns or wallet flows on this Pizza token (or others), on-chain analysis tools can help trace, but real identities stay hidden in most cases. Stay safe out there — the space rewards skepticism.
#Rugpull #Fourscam #ScamAwareness #ScamAlert

Kā es pazaudēju apmēram $3,000 Soul Society (HON) kriptovalūtu krāpšanā: Pilna brīdinājuma stāsts
Web3 sapņu pievilcība
Agrā 2025. gadā, tāpat kā daudzi citi, kas meklē nākamo lielo iespēju kriptovalūtās, es sastapu Soul Society (HON). Projekts solīja revolucionāru Web3.0 sociālās ID sistēmu, kas balstīta uz Growth-Type Soul Bound Tokens (SBTs). Tas reklamējās kā veids, kā ikdienas aktivitātes pārvērst par ienesīgām misijām un radīt personalizētu blokķēdes balstītu sociālo identitāti. Tematika apvienoja "Soulbound" mehāniku no spēlēm ar sociālajiem tīkliem, DeFi atlīdzībām un anime iedvesmotu "Soul Society" noskaņu, kas piesaistīja daudz uzmanības.