$Jager

Both Jager and SafeBSC use a 5% tax, but the mechanisms are completely different:

1) Value Source

Jager: The 5% tax goes mainly to traders/LP/burn → fully dependent on trading volume.

SafeBSC: 70% of tax builds a yield-generating treasury, 30% DCA BTC → value comes from external yield, not only volume.

2) Burn Mechanism

Jager: Burns strongly when volume is high; when volume drops, burn slows down sharply.

SafeBSC: Burns using daily yield, so supply reduction continues even in low-volume periods.

3) Example Data (realistic hypothetical):

If market volume drops for 30 days:

Jager: burn + rewards may drop ~70% due to lack of transactions.

SafeBSC: burn can maintain ~80–90% activity thanks to treasury yield + BTC gains.

4) Summary

Jager: works well in high-volume conditions but weakens when volume slows.

SafeBSC: more sustainable because its burn is yield-driven, not volume-dependent.

This is a mechanism comparison only.