ပင်မစာမျက်နှာ
အသိပေးချက်
ပရိုဖိုင်
Trending Articles
သတင်း
စာမှတ်ထည့်ပြီး လိုက်ခ်လုပ်ပြီးပါပြီ
မှတ်တမ်း
ဖန်တီးသူ စင်တာ
ဆက်တင်များ
Aesthetic_Meow
--
ဖော်လိုလုပ်မည်
2025 EOY AMA with
@CZ
it’s a pleasure to hear them for me✨
@Daniel Zou (DZ) 🔶
@BNB Chain
ရှင်းလင်းချက်- ပြင်ပအဖွဲ့အစည်း၏ ထင်မြင်ယူဆချက်များ ပါဝင်သည်။ ဘဏ္ဍာရေးဆိုင်ရာ အကြံပေးခြင်း မဟုတ်ပါ။ စပွန်ဆာပေးထားသော အကြောင်းအရာများ ပါဝင်နိုင်ပါသည်။
See T&Cs.
BNB
855.64
+0.39%
0
0
နောက်ဆုံးရ ခရစ်တိုသတင်းများကို စူးစမ်းလေ့လာပါ
⚡️ ခရစ်တိုဆိုင်ရာ နောက်ဆုံးပေါ် ဆွေးနွေးမှုများတွင် ပါဝင်ပါ
💬 သင်အနှစ်သက်ဆုံး ဖန်တီးသူများနှင့် အပြန်အလှန် ဆက်သွယ်ပါ
👍 သင့်ကို စိတ်ဝင်စားစေမည့် အကြောင်းအရာများကို ဖတ်ရှုလိုက်ပါ
အီးမေးလ် / ဖုန်းနံပါတ်
အကောင့်ဖွင့်မည်
အကောင့်ဝင်မည်
သက်ဆိုင်ရာ ဖန်တီးသူ
Aesthetic_Meow
@Rasul_Likhy
ဖော်လိုလုပ်မည်
ဖန်တီးသူထံမှ ပိုမိုလေ့လာပါ
Noman Peerzada want to meet "Newbies". Meet with him😍
--
DeFi Product to Institutional-Grade Rails
--
Kite AI chose EVM compatibility not as a simple addition, but as a core strategy. @KITE AI #KITE $KITE For autonomous agents to function as economic actors—handling money, paying for services, enforcing rules, and collaborating—the main obstacle isn't intelligence, but effort. The speed at which developers can turn ideas into working products and the cognitive load required for usefulness are key. Kite's EVM foundation minimizes this effort. Existing tools like Solidity, standard token types, proven contract designs, wallet systems, and security practices provide a common development language. Agent developers can use their current knowledge, avoiding the need to learn new execution rules or tools for testing. This is crucial because agent systems are interconnected networks, not single programs. Agents must interact with various stablecoins, identity systems, policy managers, data sources, and marketplaces. Interoperability is essential. The EVM community has built shared components and common understandings over years, making it a natural environment for large-scale interoperability. However, Kite's approach faces unique challenges from autonomous agents, such as frequent small transactions, automated response loops, and machine-speed threats. EVM compatibility alone is insufficient. The goal is to blend familiar execution with strong controls—identity, access permissions, clear transaction logs, and rules to prevent uncontrolled risks from automation. This highlights Kite's strategy: EVM compatibility is the starting point, not the end. The primary objective is to earn developer trust, then add agent-specific features that ensure autonomy is secure, responsible, and economically transparent. In essence, Kite aims to expand the safe capabilities of agent code, especially when human oversight is absent, rather than changing how developers write code. Sometimes, the fastest path forward involves using familiar tools.
--
APRO's recent trading behavior suggests rotation rather than a breakdown. The increased volume is effectively absorbing supply without causing prices to fall sharply. This typically indicates a market that is active, not failing. When volume grows but downward price movement slows, it implies sellers are finding buyers. This is common in a distribution phase where ownership changes hands, not a structural collapse where liquidity dries up. Price movements during these periods can feel unsettling: rallies seem weak, dips feel repeated, and confidence wanes. However, the crucial point is what doesn't occur—support levels don't break decisively. From a practical standpoint, this is when charts quietly readjust. Momentum indicators often lose their intensity before price finds a clear direction. Downward trends weaken, volatility decreases, and the market starts trading within a tighter range. This isn't a bullish signal yet, but it is a sign of stability. This phase is interesting because it offers clarity. When prices consistently find support at the same level despite high volume, risk becomes quantifiable. You can see where the market's current trend would be invalidated, rather than guessing where it might be wrong. This clarity improves the risk-reward ratio, even in a cautious market. The shift to observe is not a sudden price increase, but a change in behavior: Dips become less severe instead of more so. Rallies last longer than before. Breaks below support are short-lived and quickly reversed. If these changes begin to appear, the market is moving from distribution to building acceptance. If they don't, the underlying structure will indicate it early on. In summary, APRO is not showing signs of trouble. It's showing signs of decision-making. Markets often reward patience the most when conditions feel slow, heavy, and uncertain just before a clear direction emerges. @APRO Oracle #APRO $AT
--
Lorenzo Protocol’s stBTC versus enzoBTC represents a subtle design choice that addresses a significant issue in BTCFi: the confusion arising when a single token attempts to both "earn" and "spend" simultaneously. stBTC is the component designed for earning yield. Consider it a stake receipt—a token that signifies BTC locked into a staking or yield-generating process. Its purpose is performance. You hold it to grow your BTC over time. While it can be used in DeFi, it functions more like an interest-bearing deposit: productive, but not the best choice for straightforward settlement. enzoBTC is the cash-like component. It's a wrapped, 1:1 representation of BTC, intended for smooth transactions across DeFi platforms: for swaps, routing, liquidity pools, integrations, and any application that requires "plain BTC." Its aim is simplicity and composability, not yield generation. The reason for separating them? Combining these functions typically causes difficulties. Tokens that generate yield can trade at slight premiums or discounts, especially under pressure, and they often include additional programmatic features that not all protocols are equipped to handle. By separating the "earning mechanism" (stBTC) from the "liquidity infrastructure" (enzoBTC), Lorenzo simplifies BTCFi. Your earning position remains focused on yield, and your spendable BTC stays reliable. A practical comparison: stBTC is BTC optimized for performance. enzoBTC is BTC optimized for settlement. With these roles clearly defined, BTCFi strategies become clearer—you can choose when to pursue yield and when you simply need BTC-like cash on-chain. #LorenzoProtocol @Lorenzo Protocol $BANK
--
နောက်ဆုံးရ သတင်း
Tokenization's Impact on Finance Expected to Surpass Digital Media Disruption
--
Russian Central Bank Acknowledges Impact of Cryptocurrency Mining on Ruble
--
Crypto Market Faces Structural Shift as Institutional Influence Grows
--
White House Economic Advisor Comments on Inflation and Federal Reserve Chair Selection
--
Maple Finance CEO Predicts Shift to On-Chain Capital Markets
--
ပိုမို ကြည့်ရှုရန်
ဆိုဒ်မြေပုံ
နှစ်သက်ရာ Cookie ဆက်တင်များ
ပလက်ဖောင်း စည်းမျဉ်းစည်းကမ်းများ