BeInCrypto Global

A especulação sobre uma possível outra venda de Bitcoin pela MicroStrategy se intensificou depois que uma transferência on-chain não confirmada mostrou 491 BTC saindo de uma carteira vinculada à empresa em 1º de julho. Nem a MicroStrategy nem seu presidente-executivo, Michael Saylor, confirmaram qualquer venda.
O rumor se espalhou pelo X (Twitter) na sexta-feira. Enquanto isso, o Bitcoin (BTC) negociou em alta após 1º de julho, sugerindo que o mercado absorveu facilmente a transação alegada.
O trader pseudônimo Light sinalizou a transferência, avaliada em aproximadamente US$ 30 milhões aos preços atuais. Isso equivale a apenas 0,058% dos 847.363 BTC que a Strategy reportou na sua mais recente divulgação à SEC. O montante cobre cerca de 4% da oferta de 21 milhões de moedas do bitcoin.

President Donald Trump is privately weighing clemency for Sean “Diddy” Combs while Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) remains shut out. The SBF pardon application sits untouched even as Trump signed six emissions-related pardons on Friday.
Sources say a Friday White House meeting focused on Clean Air Act cases only. High-profile requests remain under private discussion.
Diddy Clemency Talks Reach the Oval Office
Sources told CBS News that Trump has been privately discussing clemency requests, including one from Combs. The music mogul is serving just over four years at Fort Dix after his 2025 conviction on two prostitution-related transportation counts.
Jurors acquitted him of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. Trump told the Times in January that Combs had written him a letter seeking a pardon, though he said he was not considering it then.
However, Combs was not expected on the pardons team’s Friday list. Reports in May said Trump was weighing 250 pardons to mark America’s 250th birthday.
Friday’s signings deepen an established pattern instead. Trump pardoned Wyoming mechanic Troy Lake last year over similar emissions charges, and a June 29 executive order told the EPA to deprioritize tampering enforcement.
Trump confirmed the new pardons in a Friday post on Truth Social.
“It is my Great Honor to have just signed Pardons for six people who were persecuted by the Biden Administration, and were in, or being sent to, prison, for ‘fixing their car.’ … I AM SETTING THEM ALL FREE, RIGHT NOW!”
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Where Does the SBF Pardon Stand?
The FTX founder filed a formal pardon application with the Justice Department on June 8, requesting relief after completing his 25-year sentence. The petition remains pending.
Trump has shown no movement on it. In the same January interview, he said he had no intention of pardoning Bankman-Fried. A federal appeals court then crushed his retrial bid in June, leaving the sentence intact.
The contrast with Changpeng Zhao (CZ) is instructive. Trump granted the Binance founder a full pardon on October 21, 2025. CZ had served four months for an anti-money laundering compliance failure, while Binance paid $4.3 billion to settle.
SBF’s case reads differently in Washington. Prosecutors put the FTX fraud at $8 billion, and Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ruben Gallego introduced a resolution opposing any pardon.
Even strong recoveries have not softened that stance. The FTX Recovery Trust has returned roughly $10 billion, with smaller claims recovering up to 120% of 2022 values.
Meanwhile, his market takes from prison revived pardon chatter this week without changing his legal position.
The pattern suggests a firm line in Trump’s clemency thinking. Convictions he frames as regulatory overreach win relief quickly, while large-scale customer fraud stays frozen.
Whether the July Fourth window produces additional names could show how far that distinction stretches.

O XRP acabou de registrar um volume de negociação maior do que o Bitcoin na Upbit. Agora, a altcoin é negociada acima de um nível de resistência recentemente recuperado.
Como resultado, analistas estão observando se o XRP tem impulso suficiente para desafiar a próxima grande zona. O aumento na atividade coloca o nível de US$ 1,15 bem no centro da atenção dos traders.
O volume de negociação mede a quantidade de um ativo negociada em um período específico. O aumento do volume é frequentemente visto como um sinal de maior participação do mercado. Em geral, isso reflete um maior interesse dos investidores tanto nos canais de negociação de varejo quanto nos institucionais.

Promotores israelenses indiciaram na sexta-feira Eli Lavon, um cidadão americano de 21 anos, por supostamente espionar em nome da inteligência iraniana em troca de cerca de US$ 1.379 em cripto. O caso mostra o alegado “manual” de recrutamento do Irã via criptomoedas amadurecendo para um trabalho por encomenda para espionagem.
Lavon é supostamente o primeiro americano indiciado na onda de espionagem de Israel, que conta com pelo menos 60 réus desde 2023. Em muitos casos, pequenos pagamentos em vez de ideologia parecem impulsionar os recrutados.
Um anúncio de emprego, três telefones e US$ 1,379

A new BeInCrypto Intelligence report, built with market data from RWA.xyz and feedback from BeInCrypto’s Expert Council, tracks roughly $60 billion in tokenized real-world assets across more than 7,000 products and 12 asset classes.
The findings show a market that is growing, but still narrow.
Just 62 assets hold 88% of total value. Five products account for roughly half the market: Figure HELOC, Circle USYC, Tether Gold, BlackRock BUIDL, and Justoken JMWH.
The activity gap is just as stark. Across 1,289 tokenized assets valued above $100,000, 910 assets worth $32.9 billion showed zero weekly transfers.
Access is also limited. The report found that 97% of the market sits outside US retail reach. Only about $1.7 billion is legally accessible to US retail investors.
Meanwhile, tokenized stocks are growing fast by product count, but the report found that 59% of stock tokens provide synthetic price exposure rather than actual ownership of the underlying shares.
These findings raise a direct question: is tokenization failing to deliver on liquidity, or is the market still in an early infrastructure phase?
BeInCrypto asked five industry executives to respond to the report’s findings.
Real State of Tokenization in 2026 Securitize: The First Phase Was Never About Public Trading
Tal Elyashiv, Co-Founder and Managing Partner of SPiCE Venture Capital and Co-Founder of Securitize, said the report’s finding on tokenized equities points to a real structural issue.
“My stance on what the report shows about tokenizing shares/equity, is that this tokenization needs to be at the source. Tokenization that does not include full ownership is problematic at best, and completely wrong IMHO. This is exactly what Securitize is doing.”
Tal Elyashiv, Co-Founder of Securitize
Elyashiv also argued that low transfer activity should not be read as failure in every case. Many early tokenized products were designed for institutional issuance, compliance, and settlement, rather than public secondary trading.
“Many of the first assets tokenized were funds (VC funds, private funds). Tokenization in these cases was not done to facilitate retail/public trading, but rather to upgrade institutional issuance infrastructure, compliance, and settlement. BUIDL for example, was created for institutional TradFi and DeFi use cases (and this is what it serves)”
That view matches one of the report’s central distinctions. Some assets are Distributed and can move across public blockchain rails. Others are Represented, using blockchain mainly as a digital record of an off-chain position.
For Elyashiv, that first stage had to prove resilience before tokenized assets could move into broader distribution.
“The previous stage needed to succeed and show resilience, as well as regulatory clarity, before moving to the public trading stage. But we are entering that phase.”
Real State of Tokenization in 2026 Raiku: Activity Depends on Predictable Execution
Robin Nordnes, CEO and Founder of Raiku, said the dormancy data points to a deeper infrastructure problem.
The report found that more than half of tokenized market value showed no weekly transfer activity. Nordnes said this is not mainly about asset quality or regulation. He said institutions need predictable execution before they actively manage capital on-chain.
Robin Nordnes, CEO and Founder of Raiku
“The dormancy finding doesn’t surprise me, and I don’t think it’s primarily a regulatory story or an asset quality story,” Nordnes asserts. “What we hear consistently from institutional allocators is that they won’t actively manage capital on-chain until they can answer two questions with confidence: will my transaction execute, and when… For passive holding that’s tolerable. For active trading, collateral management or intraday rebalancing, it isn’t.”
That issue becomes more important if tokenized assets are used for active trading, collateral management, or daily fund operations. In those settings, uncertainty around settlement timing can affect spreads, liquidity buffers, and portfolio decisions.
“The transaction fee is actually the smaller part of the problem,” Nordnes explains. “The bigger cost of execution uncertainty is everything that sits around it: the wider spreads you need to run if you can’t guarantee timing, the liquidity buffers you hold because you might not execute when you need to, the positions you simply don’t take because the uncertainty makes the trade unmodelable.”
D3: The Weak Spots Show Where Growth May Come From
The report found that only one of 12 asset classes has reached production-grade maturity: US Treasury debt.
Fred Hsu, Co-Founder and CEO of D3, said that finding should not be read only as a weakness. Instead, he said it shows where tokenization may have the most room to create value.
Fred Hsu, Co-Founder and CEO of D3
“Only treasuries have reached production grade so far, and almost every other class is still concentrated or experimental. That looks like a weakness, but it is really a map of where the value is. The classes that never matured are the fragmented, illiquid markets traditional finance never priced well, because tracking ownership and moving value cost too much. The asset was always real, what was missing was a way to reach it. The infrastructure that finally reaches those markets is what decides where the next phase of growth comes from,” Hsu told BeInCrypto.
Treasuries are easier to tokenize because the asset class is liquid, familiar, and easier for institutions to assess. More complex assets, including private credit, commodities, real estate, and tokenized equities, still face legal, operational, and distribution barriers.
TransFi: Stablecoins Show Where Tokenization Already Works
Raj Kamal, Founder and CEO of TransFi, said the report’s findings should be considered alongside stablecoins, which the report excludes from its core $60 billion RWA market figure.
Kamal argued that stablecoins remain the clearest example of tokenization solving real-world problems at scale.
Raj Kamal, Founder and CEO of TransFi
“In my view, the real RWA tokenization that is solving real world problems is stablecoins. Where there is a tokenization happening of a real world asset – the US dollar. Through USDC and USDT, billions of dollars of stablecoins are making remittances, B2B flows, payroll & freelancer payments, ecommerce checkouts, corporate treasury flows and forex flows and many other payments faster, easier, more predictable and cheaper.”
That argument does not erase the liquidity gap in tokenized securities and funds. But it shows that tokenization can work when the product solves a clear workflow problem.
Kamal said the next wave of adoption may come from payments and corporate use cases, where stablecoins already have strong demand.
“And the proof points come from an ever-increasing number of large traditional institutions looking to get into stablecoin issuance, Western Union, PayPal, Banks and others. And the reality is that we are just scratching the surface of the multi-trillion dollar traditional payments that is likely to move on to stablecoins. We should be celebrating this clear game changer in global payments as proof of RWAs working,” Kamal notes.
Brickken: The Market Is Still Building the Access Layer
Edwin Mata, CEO of Brickken, said the report’s numbers reflect a market still early in institutional adoption.
He said the first phase of tokenization focused on trust, regulatory readiness, and compliant infrastructure. The next phase will depend on whether tokenized assets become easier to access and use.
Edwin Mata, CEO of Brickken
“These numbers make sense and reflect the current state of the market, tokenization is still early in institutional adoption and that’s how it was supposed to be. The first phase was always about trust: proving the tech works, meeting regulatory bars, getting compliant infrastructure in place. In essence, that groundwork isn’t wasted time but rather the foundation on which everything else will be built.”
Mata compared the path ahead to stablecoins. In his view, tokenized assets will grow when they solve practical business problems, not simply because they exist on-chain.
He said the winners will be the platforms that make tokenized assets discoverable, interoperable, and usable in real workflows.
“Tokenized markets are heading the same direction, as regulation clarifies (Clarity Act or MiCA in Europe is a good example) and infrastructure matures, the winners will ultimately be whoever builds the access layer: discovery, interoperability layers, the infrastructure that turns a tokenized asset from a static record into something businesses and institutions can actually rely and build on.”
The Takeaway: Tokenization Has Value, But Not Yet Depth
The report does not show that tokenization is dead. It shows that the market is still early in its structure.
The assets exist. Major institutions are involved. Treasuries have reached production-grade maturity. But much of the market remains concentrated, restricted, or inactive on-chain.
That makes the next phase clear. Tokenization will not scale only by minting more assets. It needs better settlement, compliance, distribution, execution, and access.
The first phase proved that real value can be represented on-chain. The next phase will determine whether those assets can become active financial markets.
Read the full BeInCrypto Intelligence report here.

A senadora Kirsten Gillibrand renovou seu apelo por uma proibição de moeda meme que cubra o presidente, membros do Congresso e seus cônjuges. A iniciativa responde a novos registros que mostram que Donald Trump ganhou US$ 636 milhões com seu token TRUMP em 2025.
A democrata de Nova York quer que o Congresso torne ilegal que funcionários eleitos e seus cônjuges emitam ou patrocinem ativos digitais. O pedido surge quando o startup de criptomoedas do filho dela enfrenta um escrutínio crescente em Washington.
O inesperado lucro de Trump reacende a briga pela proibição de memecoins

Os desenvolvedores de Ordinals dizem que sua tecnologia vai sobreviver à BIP-110, uma proposta de mudança de regra que visa impedir que as pessoas armazenem arquivos no Bitcoin. A disputa se resume a uma questão. O Bitcoin (BTC) deve lidar apenas com dinheiro, ou com qualquer coisa que os usuários paguem?
Incrições permitem que as pessoas armazenem imagens e texto na blockchain do Bitcoin, de forma semelhante a NFTs. A BIP-110 bloquearia a maior parte desses dados por um ano. Os apoiadores chamam isso de spam, enquanto os críticos dizem que o Bitcoin deveria permanecer aberto para todos.
O que a BIP-110 mudaria para o Bitcoin?

Uma queixa formal pediu ao órgão de fiscalização dos padrões do Parlamento que examine se o líder do Reform UK, Nigel Farage, violou regras de lobby. Isso acontece depois de Farage ter recebido doações do bilionário Christopher Harborne, que, segundo relatos, detém uma participação de 12% na stablecoin USDT da Tether.
O deputado trabalhista Phil Brickell apresentou a queixa em 2 de julho. Ele pediu ao Comissário Parlamentar de Deontologia Daniel Greenberg que revisse o encontro privado de Farage com o governador do Banco da Inglaterra, Andrew Bailey, em setembro de 2025.

O Standard Chartered obteve sua licença MiCA em 29 de junho, juntando-se a 37 empresas incluídas na atualização mais recente do registro da Autoridade Europeia dos Valores Mobiliários e dos Mercados (ESMA). Os provedores cripto licenciados na UE agora totalizam 280.
O lote é a primeira grande onda de licenciamento desde que o período transitório do MiCA foi encerrado em 1º de julho. As empresas beneficiadas pelo regime de “grandfathering” que perderam o prazo não podem mais atender clientes da UE sob as regras nacionais.
[IMAGE PLACEHOLDER — A Alemanha lidera o registro de licenças MiCA, detalhamento de CASP da ESMA por país, Fonte: BeInCrypto]

A Samsung Electronics e várias grandes empresas financeiras sul-coreanas negam ter laços formais com a Open USD, a stablecoin atrelada ao dólar que foi lançada esta semana com uma alegada aliança de mais de 140 parceiros corporativos.
A reação contrária, reportada pela primeira vez pelo Chosun Biz em 3 de julho, põe à prova a credibilidade de uma das maiores listas de parceiros já reunidas no setor de stablecoins.
A Open Standard anunciou a Open USD (OUSD) em 30 de junho, prometendo cunhagem sem taxas para os membros e uma parcela da receita do fundo de reserva. Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock e Coinbase encabeçam a lista.

Cerca de 70% de todos os mercados fechados na Polymarket registraram menos de US$ 10.000 no volume de negociação reportado entre 2021 e o fim de maio de 2026, segundo uma análise da CNBC.
Os resultados chegam como mercados de previsão após um aumento no volume, impulsionado pela Copa do Mundo de 2026. Essa diferença mostra como um pequeno grupo de contratos de destaque, em vez da plataforma como um todo, captura a maior parte do dinheiro.
A maioria dos mercados fechados da Polymarket negociou menos de US$ 10.000
A CNBC obteve dados de mercados fechados da API Gamma da Polymarket, que contabiliza o volume nocional dos dois lados de cada negociação. A distribuição saiu fortemente distorcida.

O banco central da Índia quer isolar o setor bancário do cripto. O Reserve Bank of India (RBI) disse a um painel parlamentar que os ativos digitais não devem servir como instrumentos de pagamento.
A Comissão Parlamentar Permanente de Finanças ouviu o depoimento para seu estudo sobre ativos digitais virtuais. Os legisladores planejam apresentar o relatório durante a sessão das monções.
Banco Central defende contenção do cripto na Índia
Os membros do comitê disseram que o RBI argumentou por uma estratégia de contenção, e não por um manual de regras convencional. O banco central acredita que a regulamentação formal poderia legitimar ativos especulativos. Ele alertou que regras claras poderiam dar aos investidores de varejo uma falsa sensação de segurança.

Os retornos do trading de XRP atingiram níveis históricos de dor nunca vistos antes nos 12 anos de história do token. No entanto, um analista acabou de sinalizar uma nova compra técnica. Enquanto isso, outros alertam que a estrutura da tendência mais ampla continua firmemente de baixa.
O cenário coloca o XRP em um ponto crítico de encruzilhada, onde previsões otimistas e pessimistas colidem abertamente ao longo do mercado.
Por que os retornos do trading de XRP estão em níveis históricos de dor
Níveis históricos de dor descrevem períodos em que o investidor médio mantém um ativo muito abaixo do preço em que comprou. O XRP está vivendo exatamente essa situação, com detentores de curto e de longo prazo amargando perdas simultaneamente.

The FIFA World Cup trophy now contains gold worth roughly $713,000, according to London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) calculations. Spot gold trades above $4,100 per ounce, more than double its price during the 2022 tournament in Qatar.
The figure makes football’s top prize the most valuable trophy in world sport by metal content alone. Its cultural worth climbs far higher.
World Cup Trophy Gold Value More Than Doubles Since 2022
Gold traded near $1,600 per ounce when Argentina lifted the trophy in December 2022. Data now shows the metal above $4,100 after a rebound from an eight-month low. Weak US jobs data drove the latest leg higher, as traders scaled back expectations for further Fed rate hikes.
Consequently, the melt value of the trophy’s 4.93 kilograms of pure gold has surged more than 150%. The same metal totaled about $277,000 during the last tournament.
The climb has not followed a straight line, however. Gold briefly broke below $4,000 in June before Bitcoin (BTC), and gold rallied together on renewed haven demand this week.
Gold Spot. Source: TradingView Why the World Cup Trophy Outshines Other Prizes
FIFA introduced the current 14.5-inch trophy in 1974, when its raw materials cost about $25,000. The 18-karat sculpture holds nearly 11 pounds of gold, and no other major prize comes close. Winners receive a gold-plated replica, while the original remains with FIFA.
Sterling silver, the metal in most rival trophies, rose even faster. Silver trades near $62 per ounce, up roughly 160% from about $24 during the Qatar finals. Still, FIFA estimates the original trophy’s total worth above $20 million once heritage and prestige enter the equation.
American sports show the same pattern on a smaller scale. The Borg-Warner Trophy of the Indianapolis 500 contains about 69 kilograms of silver, worth nearly $156,000 at melt value. The Vince Lombardi Trophy carries roughly $7,230 in silver, and the Europa League prize sits near $22,600.
What the Gold Rally Signals for Markets
Safe-haven demand continues to support the metal as investors weigh Federal Reserve policy and sliding oil prices. At the same time, gold held above $4,000 this week while crude extended its losses.
Crypto markets feel the same forces. Bitcoin recently reclaimed the $60,000 level after Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said inflation risks had eased. Similarly, trackers show smart money rotating into commodities while the crypto winter drags on.
Meanwhile, commentators such as Robert Kiyosaki argue the gold safe-haven case remains intact.
The 2026 tournament crowns its champion later this month. Whether gold holds above $4,100 by the final may reveal as much about markets as about football.

Os ETFs de Bitcoin à vista (BTC) atraíram US$ 221,72 milhões em entradas líquidas em 2 de julho, interrompendo uma sequência de 10 dias de resgates.
A virada elevou os ativos líquidos totais nos fundos para US$ 74,37 bilhões, revertendo um período que refletiu o recuo institucional mais profundo desde o lançamento dos produtos.
Uma Reversão após um Mês Recorde de Saídas
O ingresso ocorreu após uma fase de forte pressão para os fundos. Nas 10 sessões de negociação anteriores, os ETFs de Bitcoin à vista registraram saídas de mais de US$ 2,7 bilhões, à medida que o capital deixou os produtos.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned that tokenized assets will remain peripheral unless markets resolve who legally owns them and where settlement is final.
New BeInCrypto research shows why, mapping a $60 billion market fractured across regulatory regimes and largely closed to US retail investors.
Why Legal Clarity Matters For Tokenization’s Future, According to IMF
Tobias Adrian, Financial Counsellor and Director of the IMF’s Monetary and Capital Markets Department, highlighted that tokenization is more than a technology upgrade. He noted that it changes the structure of the financial system itself.
Legal clarity is central to that argument. Adrian said clear rules on ownership, settlement, and jurisdiction will decide whether tokenization moves to the center of finance or stays at its edge.
“Market participants must know whether tokenized records constitute definitive ownership, whether settlement finality is legally recognized, and which jurisdiction’s law applies. Without clarity, tokenization will remain fragmented and peripheral,” Adrian said.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Ownership and Access Split the Market
BeInCrypto’s Real State of Tokenization in 2026 report puts hard numbers behind that concern. It tracked roughly $60 billion in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) as of May 31, excluding stablecoins and repurchase agreements.
The market splits into several parallel markets rather than one. Regulatory regime, geography, and investor status divide them. About 97% of that value is either inaccessible to US retail investors or carries no retail-grade regulation.
Only $1.7 billion is open to retail buyers, while accredited US investors can access roughly $8.3 billion, including Regulation D products.
The $60B Tokenized Assets Market by Regulatory Access Tier. Source: BeInCrypto Real State of Tokenization in 2026
Ownership type is also part of the divide. Tokens fall into direct ownership, fund shares, or synthetic exposure. Synthetic structures give price exposure without any claim on the asset.
The distinction is clearest in equities. 59% of all stock tokens by count provide synthetic price exposure rather than actual share ownership, according to the report. Holders track a price but own no shares
Regulatory ambiguity compounds the problem. About 39% of the market lacks an identifiable regulatory framework, a gap the report flags as a due diligence risk for allocators.
Adrian frames the problem in principle. The report shows it in the data. Both point to the same unfinished work on ownership rights and settlement. The open question is whether that infrastructure arrives soon enough.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

O economista Peter Schiff diz que as moedas meme do presidente Donald Trump servem como um canal legal para suborno. Ele argumenta que os compradores dos tokens pagam por acesso ao presidente.
A alegação surge dias depois de uma divulgação federal ter mostrado mais de US$ 1 bilhão em renda de cripto para Trump em 2025. Enquanto isso, ambos os tokens estão pouco acima das mínimas históricas registradas em junho.
Por que Schiff diz que as moedas meme de Trump funcionam como subornos
No episódio mais recente do The Peter Schiff Show, o economista apontou a queda na avaliação das moedas meme TRUMP e MELANIA. Dados da CoinGecko mostram que a TRUMP foi negociada hoje a US$ 1,71, quase 98% abaixo do pico de US$ 73,43 em janeiro de 2025.

A Binance apenas indicou a possível deslistagem de 4 altcoins em 3 de julho. A exchange adicionou AEUR, PYR, SCRT e VANRY à sua lista de Tag de Monitoramento. Como resultado, PYR e SCRT despencaram 11% cada em poucas horas nas bolsas globais.
O movimento remodela o risco de curto prazo para qualquer pessoa que ainda esteja com as quatro altcoins sinalizadas.
Binance Adiciona 4 Altcoins à Lista de Monitoramento
A Tag de Monitoramento é o aviso formal da Binance de que um token carrega risco elevado e pode ser deslistado se o desempenho não melhorar. Além disso, a tag sinaliza que um projeto não atende mais totalmente aos critérios rigorosos de listagem da exchange. Isso aumenta a possibilidade distinta de remoção.

O presidente da FIFA, Gianni Infantino, provocou a presença de um “super-mega top global artist” não identificado para o show de intervalo da Copa do Mundo em 19 de julho. Os mercados de apostas já tratam Justin Bieber como o favorito claro para a vaga secreta.
Madonna, Shakira e BTS serão as atrações do primeiro show de intervalo na história da Copa do Mundo, no MetLife Stadium. O vocalista do Coldplay, Chris Martin, é o curador da produção do Global Citizen.
O palco corresponde às apostas. O MetLife Stadium recebe 80.663 fãs, e a FIFA espera até cinco bilhões de telespectadores de TV. A presença já ultrapassou o recorde de 1994, com mais de 5,3 milhões de visitantes no estádio até agora.

O diretor de investimentos (CIO) da Bitwise, Matt Hougan, diz que a fase em que a MicroStrategy foi o comprador mais dominante de Bitcoin (BTC) provavelmente terminou, e que a gigante do tesouro agora está mais propensa a vender do que apenas acumular o ativo.
As ações preferenciais da Strategy (MSTR) desabaram nas últimas semanas, e um novo plano de capital agora permite que a empresa venda Bitcoin para três propósitos principais, incluindo o cumprimento das obrigações de dividendos.
Como a máquina de Bitcoin da MicroStrategy travou
Por anos, a Strategy funcionou como uma fonte unidirecional de demanda por Bitcoin, segundo Hougan. A empresa expandiu seu tesouro por meio de ofertas de ações por meio de ATM e de ações preferenciais, comprando frequentemente milhares de BTC a cada semana.