CoindooOfficial
957 Publicações
CoindooOfficial
Denunciar
Bloquear usuário
0 Seguindo
56 Seguidores
416 Curtiu
Publicações
Artigo
Ver tradução
Clarity Act: Major Law Enforcement Shift Paves Way for July VoteA significant shift in law enforcement strategy has removed a major hurdle for the CLARITY Act, signaling a potential July vote on vital crypto legislation.
Key Takeaways
MCSA declared neutral stance on H.R. 3633 in July 3 letter.Senate Banking advanced the bill 15-9 on May 14.Bill on Senate calendar since June 1, July vote targeted.Stablecoin yield limits and ethics provision still unresolved.
The Major County Sheriffs of America dropped its opposition to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act on July 3, removing one of the last organized law enforcement objections in the Senate.
In a letter, shared on X by journalist Eleanor Terrett, addressed to Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren, the organization confirmed the reversal of the position it had staked out in a May 14 filing. "Based on that continued review, MCSA is now neutral on H.R. 3633," the group wrote, with President Sheriff Bob Gualtieri signing the document.
🚨NEWS: The Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA) has shifted to a “neutral” position on the Clarity Act after what it describes as “continued discussions in recent days regarding parts of Section 604,” aka the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act.In a letter to Senate Banking… pic.twitter.com/24XIZTfWHR— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) July 3, 2026
Neutrality is not endorsement, and the letter makes that distinction deliberately. MCSA stopped short of backing the bill and instead attached a list of conditions it wants addressed before final passage.
Section 604 Was the Sticking Point
The dispute centered on Section 604, which incorporates the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. The provision shields non-custodial software developers and distributed ledger service providers from liability for illicit activity committed by users of their platforms.
In its May letter, MCSA argued the language could open a loophole for bad actors and complicate criminal investigations involving digital assets. The Fraternal Order of Police and the National Sheriffs' Association raised similar objections, warning the provision might exempt certain mixers and DeFi activities from money transmission rules.
Supporters of the section pushed back on that reading. Blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs noted the text preserves the criminal carve-out under 18 U.S.C. § 1960(b)(1)(C), the statute prosecutors have relied on in mixer-related cases. According to the July 3 letter, discussions with the administration provided additional clarity on how Section 604 would be interpreted and implemented, which proved sufficient to move the sheriffs off active opposition.
What the Sheriffs Still Want
MCSA is now asking Congress to amend the bill so that state and local law enforcement receive a formal role in the Treasury study required under Section 309, along with seats on any advisory bodies or interagency working groups the legislation creates.
The reasoning is practical rather than political. State and local agencies investigate the overwhelming majority of crimes involving digital assets, the letter argues, spanning narcotics trafficking, fraud, ransomware, organized retail theft, and terrorism financing. The group also wants the federal framework paired with funding for training, technology, and forensic capabilities at the local level.
Crypto investor Mark Chadwick, who has tracked the bill's progress, wrote on X that the sheriffs' resistance had been among the most significant obstacles in the Senate. "One more major hurdle down," Chadwick posted.
Why This Matters for the Bill's Timeline
The procedural math explains the urgency. The CLARITY Act passed the House 294-134 back in July 2025, then spent months stalled in the Senate. The Senate Banking Committee finally advanced its version 15-9 on May 14, with all 13 Republicans joined by two Democrats. The bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders on June 1, making it formally eligible for a floor vote.
Senator Cynthia Lummis, the bill's lead sponsor, told Fox Business on June 24 that negotiators expect to finalize the Senate compromise text around the July 4 recess and plan to "move in July," the first public floor-date commitment from a sponsor. The window is narrow. The Senate returns from recess on July 13, and the August break begins around August 10, leaving roughly four weeks of floor time. The bill needs 60 votes to clear the Senate, must be reconciled with the Senate Agriculture Committee's Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act, and the combined text must then be squared with the House-passed version. Majority Leader John Thune has not yet announced a floor date, and he has signaled the National Defense Authorization Act takes priority in the week of July 13, which could push CLARITY consideration to late July.
Removing a credible law enforcement objection matters in that context. Senate offices weigh input from policing organizations heavily on politically sensitive bills, and Democrats who supported the committee version conditioned their floor votes on further progress. Every withdrawn objection could make those votes easier to deliver.
The Obstacles That Remain
Neutrality from the sheriffs does not clear the field. Banking groups continue to press for restrictions on stablecoin yield, arguing that yield-bearing tokens function like unregulated deposit products and could pull funds out of traditional banks. That dispute has been the primary drag on the bill since the January draft.
The ethics question has also resurfaced. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand renewed calls for provisions barring elected officialsfrom issuing their own tokens, following reports that the Trump family's crypto ventures generated over $1.4 billion in 2025, with more than $630 million tied to the Official Trump memecoin. Democrats on the Banking Committee flagged the ethics language as a condition for floor support back in May.
For the crypto industry, the MCSA shift is a net positive that narrows the list of open objections to two well-defined disputes. Whether that is enough to secure 60 votes before August may determine if the United States gets a market structure law in 2026 at all.
#CLARITYAct
Clarity Act: Major Law Enforcement Shift Paves Way for July Vote
A significant shift in law enforcement strategy has removed a major hurdle for the CLARITY Act, signaling a potential July vote on vital crypto legislation.
Key Takeaways
MCSA declared neutral stance on H.R. 3633 in July 3 letter.Senate Banking advanced the bill 15-9 on May 14.Bill on Senate calendar since June 1, July vote targeted.Stablecoin yield limits and ethics provision still unresolved.
The Major County Sheriffs of America dropped its opposition to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act on July 3, removing one of the last organized law enforcement objections in the Senate.
In a letter, shared on X by journalist Eleanor Terrett, addressed to Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren, the organization confirmed the reversal of the position it had staked out in a May 14 filing. "Based on that continued review, MCSA is now neutral on H.R. 3633," the group wrote, with President Sheriff Bob Gualtieri signing the document.
🚨NEWS: The Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA) has shifted to a “neutral” position on the Clarity Act after what it describes as “continued discussions in recent days regarding parts of Section 604,” aka the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act.In a letter to Senate Banking… pic.twitter.com/24XIZTfWHR— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) July 3, 2026
Neutrality is not endorsement, and the letter makes that distinction deliberately. MCSA stopped short of backing the bill and instead attached a list of conditions it wants addressed before final passage.
Section 604 Was the Sticking Point
The dispute centered on Section 604, which incorporates the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. The provision shields non-custodial software developers and distributed ledger service providers from liability for illicit activity committed by users of their platforms.
In its May letter, MCSA argued the language could open a loophole for bad actors and complicate criminal investigations involving digital assets. The Fraternal Order of Police and the National Sheriffs' Association raised similar objections, warning the provision might exempt certain mixers and DeFi activities from money transmission rules.
Supporters of the section pushed back on that reading. Blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs noted the text preserves the criminal carve-out under 18 U.S.C. § 1960(b)(1)(C), the statute prosecutors have relied on in mixer-related cases. According to the July 3 letter, discussions with the administration provided additional clarity on how Section 604 would be interpreted and implemented, which proved sufficient to move the sheriffs off active opposition.
What the Sheriffs Still Want
MCSA is now asking Congress to amend the bill so that state and local law enforcement receive a formal role in the Treasury study required under Section 309, along with seats on any advisory bodies or interagency working groups the legislation creates.
The reasoning is practical rather than political. State and local agencies investigate the overwhelming majority of crimes involving digital assets, the letter argues, spanning narcotics trafficking, fraud, ransomware, organized retail theft, and terrorism financing. The group also wants the federal framework paired with funding for training, technology, and forensic capabilities at the local level.
Crypto investor Mark Chadwick, who has tracked the bill's progress, wrote on X that the sheriffs' resistance had been among the most significant obstacles in the Senate. "One more major hurdle down," Chadwick posted.
Why This Matters for the Bill's Timeline
The procedural math explains the urgency. The CLARITY Act passed the House 294-134 back in July 2025, then spent months stalled in the Senate. The Senate Banking Committee finally advanced its version 15-9 on May 14, with all 13 Republicans joined by two Democrats. The bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders on June 1, making it formally eligible for a floor vote.
Senator Cynthia Lummis, the bill's lead sponsor, told Fox Business on June 24 that negotiators expect to finalize the Senate compromise text around the July 4 recess and plan to "move in July," the first public floor-date commitment from a sponsor. The window is narrow. The Senate returns from recess on July 13, and the August break begins around August 10, leaving roughly four weeks of floor time. The bill needs 60 votes to clear the Senate, must be reconciled with the Senate Agriculture Committee's Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act, and the combined text must then be squared with the House-passed version. Majority Leader John Thune has not yet announced a floor date, and he has signaled the National Defense Authorization Act takes priority in the week of July 13, which could push CLARITY consideration to late July.
Removing a credible law enforcement objection matters in that context. Senate offices weigh input from policing organizations heavily on politically sensitive bills, and Democrats who supported the committee version conditioned their floor votes on further progress. Every withdrawn objection could make those votes easier to deliver.
The Obstacles That Remain
Neutrality from the sheriffs does not clear the field. Banking groups continue to press for restrictions on stablecoin yield, arguing that yield-bearing tokens function like unregulated deposit products and could pull funds out of traditional banks. That dispute has been the primary drag on the bill since the January draft.
The ethics question has also resurfaced. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand renewed calls for provisions barring elected officialsfrom issuing their own tokens, following reports that the Trump family's crypto ventures generated over $1.4 billion in 2025, with more than $630 million tied to the Official Trump memecoin. Democrats on the Banking Committee flagged the ethics language as a condition for floor support back in May.
For the crypto industry, the MCSA shift is a net positive that narrows the list of open objections to two well-defined disputes. Whether that is enough to secure 60 votes before August may determine if the United States gets a market structure law in 2026 at all.
#CLARITYAct
Key Takeaways
MCSA declared neutral stance on H.R. 3633 in July 3 letter.Senate Banking advanced the bill 15-9 on May 14.Bill on Senate calendar since June 1, July vote targeted.Stablecoin yield limits and ethics provision still unresolved.
The Major County Sheriffs of America dropped its opposition to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act on July 3, removing one of the last organized law enforcement objections in the Senate.
In a letter, shared on X by journalist Eleanor Terrett, addressed to Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren, the organization confirmed the reversal of the position it had staked out in a May 14 filing. "Based on that continued review, MCSA is now neutral on H.R. 3633," the group wrote, with President Sheriff Bob Gualtieri signing the document.
🚨NEWS: The Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA) has shifted to a “neutral” position on the Clarity Act after what it describes as “continued discussions in recent days regarding parts of Section 604,” aka the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act.In a letter to Senate Banking… pic.twitter.com/24XIZTfWHR— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) July 3, 2026
Neutrality is not endorsement, and the letter makes that distinction deliberately. MCSA stopped short of backing the bill and instead attached a list of conditions it wants addressed before final passage.
Section 604 Was the Sticking Point
The dispute centered on Section 604, which incorporates the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. The provision shields non-custodial software developers and distributed ledger service providers from liability for illicit activity committed by users of their platforms.
In its May letter, MCSA argued the language could open a loophole for bad actors and complicate criminal investigations involving digital assets. The Fraternal Order of Police and the National Sheriffs' Association raised similar objections, warning the provision might exempt certain mixers and DeFi activities from money transmission rules.
Supporters of the section pushed back on that reading. Blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs noted the text preserves the criminal carve-out under 18 U.S.C. § 1960(b)(1)(C), the statute prosecutors have relied on in mixer-related cases. According to the July 3 letter, discussions with the administration provided additional clarity on how Section 604 would be interpreted and implemented, which proved sufficient to move the sheriffs off active opposition.
What the Sheriffs Still Want
MCSA is now asking Congress to amend the bill so that state and local law enforcement receive a formal role in the Treasury study required under Section 309, along with seats on any advisory bodies or interagency working groups the legislation creates.
The reasoning is practical rather than political. State and local agencies investigate the overwhelming majority of crimes involving digital assets, the letter argues, spanning narcotics trafficking, fraud, ransomware, organized retail theft, and terrorism financing. The group also wants the federal framework paired with funding for training, technology, and forensic capabilities at the local level.
Crypto investor Mark Chadwick, who has tracked the bill's progress, wrote on X that the sheriffs' resistance had been among the most significant obstacles in the Senate. "One more major hurdle down," Chadwick posted.
Why This Matters for the Bill's Timeline
The procedural math explains the urgency. The CLARITY Act passed the House 294-134 back in July 2025, then spent months stalled in the Senate. The Senate Banking Committee finally advanced its version 15-9 on May 14, with all 13 Republicans joined by two Democrats. The bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders on June 1, making it formally eligible for a floor vote.
Senator Cynthia Lummis, the bill's lead sponsor, told Fox Business on June 24 that negotiators expect to finalize the Senate compromise text around the July 4 recess and plan to "move in July," the first public floor-date commitment from a sponsor. The window is narrow. The Senate returns from recess on July 13, and the August break begins around August 10, leaving roughly four weeks of floor time. The bill needs 60 votes to clear the Senate, must be reconciled with the Senate Agriculture Committee's Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act, and the combined text must then be squared with the House-passed version. Majority Leader John Thune has not yet announced a floor date, and he has signaled the National Defense Authorization Act takes priority in the week of July 13, which could push CLARITY consideration to late July.
Removing a credible law enforcement objection matters in that context. Senate offices weigh input from policing organizations heavily on politically sensitive bills, and Democrats who supported the committee version conditioned their floor votes on further progress. Every withdrawn objection could make those votes easier to deliver.
The Obstacles That Remain
Neutrality from the sheriffs does not clear the field. Banking groups continue to press for restrictions on stablecoin yield, arguing that yield-bearing tokens function like unregulated deposit products and could pull funds out of traditional banks. That dispute has been the primary drag on the bill since the January draft.
The ethics question has also resurfaced. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand renewed calls for provisions barring elected officialsfrom issuing their own tokens, following reports that the Trump family's crypto ventures generated over $1.4 billion in 2025, with more than $630 million tied to the Official Trump memecoin. Democrats on the Banking Committee flagged the ethics language as a condition for floor support back in May.
For the crypto industry, the MCSA shift is a net positive that narrows the list of open objections to two well-defined disputes. Whether that is enough to secure 60 votes before August may determine if the United States gets a market structure law in 2026 at all.
#CLARITYAct
121
Artigo
MiCA bloqueia exchanges enquanto bancos alemães colocam Bitcoin em aplicativosA mesma regulamentação europeia que expulsou a Binance do EEE está levando a negociação de Bitcoin e Ethereum para dentro de aplicativos bancários alemães, revelando para que o MiCA foi realmente desenhado.
Principais conclusões
A Binance perdeu o prazo de licenciamento do MiCA de 1º de julho.
O regulador da Espanha descartou exceções ou prorrogações.
O Sparkassen leva a negociação de BTC a 50 milhões de clientes.
O DZ Bank já possui sua autorização da BaFin.
1º de julho marcou o fim do período de transição do MiCA, e a maior bolsa do mundo o atravessou sem uma licença. A Binance retirou sua solicitação na Grécia dias antes do prazo, dizendo que buscaria autorização em outro Estado-membro e esperando aprovação nos próximos meses. Até que isso aconteça, a exchange enfrenta procedimentos ordenados de encerramento em diversas jurisdições da UE.
MiCA bloqueia exchanges enquanto bancos alemães colocam Bitcoin em aplicativos
A mesma regulamentação europeia que expulsou a Binance do EEE está levando a negociação de Bitcoin e Ethereum para dentro de aplicativos bancários alemães, revelando para que o MiCA foi realmente desenhado.
Principais conclusões
A Binance perdeu o prazo de licenciamento do MiCA de 1º de julho.
O regulador da Espanha descartou exceções ou prorrogações.
O Sparkassen leva a negociação de BTC a 50 milhões de clientes.
O DZ Bank já possui sua autorização da BaFin.
1º de julho marcou o fim do período de transição do MiCA, e a maior bolsa do mundo o atravessou sem uma licença. A Binance retirou sua solicitação na Grécia dias antes do prazo, dizendo que buscaria autorização em outro Estado-membro e esperando aprovação nos próximos meses. Até que isso aconteça, a exchange enfrenta procedimentos ordenados de encerramento em diversas jurisdições da UE.
Principais conclusões
A Binance perdeu o prazo de licenciamento do MiCA de 1º de julho.
O regulador da Espanha descartou exceções ou prorrogações.
O Sparkassen leva a negociação de BTC a 50 milhões de clientes.
O DZ Bank já possui sua autorização da BaFin.
1º de julho marcou o fim do período de transição do MiCA, e a maior bolsa do mundo o atravessou sem uma licença. A Binance retirou sua solicitação na Grécia dias antes do prazo, dizendo que buscaria autorização em outro Estado-membro e esperando aprovação nos próximos meses. Até que isso aconteça, a exchange enfrenta procedimentos ordenados de encerramento em diversas jurisdições da UE.
75
Artigo
Ver tradução
Crypto Outperforms Gold and S&P 500 Over the Past WeekThe crypto market gained more than gold and U.S. equities over the past week, its first clear stretch of outperformance in months, just as institutional flows turned positive after weeks of redemptions.
Key Takeaways:
Weekly performance: Total crypto market cap up 4.61%, gold up 2.13%, S&P 500 up 1.77%.Leaders: SOL gained 15.86%, ETH 11.46%, XRP 8.05%, BTC 3.99% over seven days.Flows: Bitcoin funds drew $221.7 million July 2, ending a 10-day redemption streak.
A Week Where Crypto Led
TradingView data shows the total crypto market capitalization rising 4.6% over the past eight sessions to $2.15 trillion, recovering from the $2.05 trillion low printed in late June. Over the same window, gold added 2.1% to trade near $4,175 per ounce at the time of writing, while the S&P 500 gained 1.77%.
Total crypto market capitalization daily chart.
Inside the top 10, the recovery was broad but uneven, according to CoinMarketCap. Solana led with a 15.86% weekly gain to $83.25, followed by Hyperliquid at 11.76% and Ethereum at 11.46%, back above $1,750. XRP added 8.05% to $1.14, while Bitcoin climbed 3.99% to around $62,500. The laggards were still green: Dogecoin rose 2.75%, BNB 1.25%, and TRON 0.89%.
S&P 500 (SPX) daily chart.
One week does not establish a trend, and the starting points differ enormously. Equities sit near record levels after repeated all-time highs this cycle. Gold set its own record above $5,500 in late January before retracing roughly 25%.
XAU/USD (gold) daily chart.
Crypto, by contrast, is the deepest drawdown in the group: Bitcoin trades about 50% below its October 2025 peak of $126,000, and total altcoin capitalization has contracted by a similar magnitude.
The Fastest Horse Argument
That gap is precisely what the rotation thesis rests on. When the assets that already delivered, equities and precious metals, become crowded or begin retracing, capital with realized profits historically looks for the sector with the most room to recover. Billionaire investor Paul Tudor Jones coined the framing on CNBC in 2020, calling Bitcoin the fastest horse in an environment of monetary expansion, months before the asset repriced tenfold. He has not abandoned the view: in an October 2025 CNBC appearance, Jones argued Bitcoin would outpace gold in a world of fiscal expansion, citing its fixed supply.
The mechanical version of the argument today: stocks near highs offer limited upside, gold has already corrected from its peak, silver has done the same, and crypto is the only major alternative asset trading at half its former valuation. The pattern has precedent. After gold peaked in August 2020 and cooled, capital rotated into crypto within months, fueling the 2020–2021 cycle. Swyftx lead analyst Pav Hundal told Cointelegraph that Bitcoin bottoms have historically lagged gold's relative strength by around 14 months, a timeline that would place the rotation window in the current period. Analyst Benjamin Cowen offered the counterweight in the same report, cautioning that a massive rotation from metals into crypto is "probably not going to happen" in the short term.
The honest read sits between the two: rotation is a recurring cycle pattern, not a law, and crypto's smaller size and far higher volatility mean the same capital produces sharper moves in both directions. A sector worth $2.15 trillion is a fraction of global equities or the gold market, which cuts both ways.
What the Flows Are Saying
The most concrete recent signal comes from institutional products. U.S. spot Bitcoin funds drew $221.7 million on July 2, their largest daily inflow in two months, snapping a 10-day redemption streak that had removed $2.73 billion, per CoinDesk. Ethereum products turned a day earlier, ending a nine-day outflow run on July 1 and adding $29.08 million on July 2. Every major crypto fund category finished that session green, including XRP, Solana, and HYPE products.
The trigger seemed like to be macro: a weak June jobs report showing 57,000 payrolls, roughly half of forecasts, sharply cut the market-implied odds of a July Fed rate hike and lifted risk assets broadly. That detail matters for interpretation. The inflows look like investors responding to improved rate conditions rather than a spontaneous rotation, which suggests capital is watching and waiting for confirmation rather than committing. Year-to-date net outflows from Bitcoin funds still stand near $5.5 billion, so one green day recovers only a fraction of what left.
Nothing in the current data confirms that a rotation has begun, and this bounce could fade like earlier ones this year. What the week does establish is the precondition set: profitable traditional assets, a deeply discounted crypto market, and the first evidence that institutional money responds immediately when macro pressure eases. If the inflows extend into a multi-week streak and Bitcoin holds above the $62,000 area, the fastest-horse argument moves from theory toward evidence. Until then, it remains a possible setup, not a signal.
#crypto
Crypto Outperforms Gold and S&P 500 Over the Past Week
The crypto market gained more than gold and U.S. equities over the past week, its first clear stretch of outperformance in months, just as institutional flows turned positive after weeks of redemptions.
Key Takeaways:
Weekly performance: Total crypto market cap up 4.61%, gold up 2.13%, S&P 500 up 1.77%.Leaders: SOL gained 15.86%, ETH 11.46%, XRP 8.05%, BTC 3.99% over seven days.Flows: Bitcoin funds drew $221.7 million July 2, ending a 10-day redemption streak.
A Week Where Crypto Led
TradingView data shows the total crypto market capitalization rising 4.6% over the past eight sessions to $2.15 trillion, recovering from the $2.05 trillion low printed in late June. Over the same window, gold added 2.1% to trade near $4,175 per ounce at the time of writing, while the S&P 500 gained 1.77%.
Total crypto market capitalization daily chart.
Inside the top 10, the recovery was broad but uneven, according to CoinMarketCap. Solana led with a 15.86% weekly gain to $83.25, followed by Hyperliquid at 11.76% and Ethereum at 11.46%, back above $1,750. XRP added 8.05% to $1.14, while Bitcoin climbed 3.99% to around $62,500. The laggards were still green: Dogecoin rose 2.75%, BNB 1.25%, and TRON 0.89%.
S&P 500 (SPX) daily chart.
One week does not establish a trend, and the starting points differ enormously. Equities sit near record levels after repeated all-time highs this cycle. Gold set its own record above $5,500 in late January before retracing roughly 25%.
XAU/USD (gold) daily chart.
Crypto, by contrast, is the deepest drawdown in the group: Bitcoin trades about 50% below its October 2025 peak of $126,000, and total altcoin capitalization has contracted by a similar magnitude.
The Fastest Horse Argument
That gap is precisely what the rotation thesis rests on. When the assets that already delivered, equities and precious metals, become crowded or begin retracing, capital with realized profits historically looks for the sector with the most room to recover. Billionaire investor Paul Tudor Jones coined the framing on CNBC in 2020, calling Bitcoin the fastest horse in an environment of monetary expansion, months before the asset repriced tenfold. He has not abandoned the view: in an October 2025 CNBC appearance, Jones argued Bitcoin would outpace gold in a world of fiscal expansion, citing its fixed supply.
The mechanical version of the argument today: stocks near highs offer limited upside, gold has already corrected from its peak, silver has done the same, and crypto is the only major alternative asset trading at half its former valuation. The pattern has precedent. After gold peaked in August 2020 and cooled, capital rotated into crypto within months, fueling the 2020–2021 cycle. Swyftx lead analyst Pav Hundal told Cointelegraph that Bitcoin bottoms have historically lagged gold's relative strength by around 14 months, a timeline that would place the rotation window in the current period. Analyst Benjamin Cowen offered the counterweight in the same report, cautioning that a massive rotation from metals into crypto is "probably not going to happen" in the short term.
The honest read sits between the two: rotation is a recurring cycle pattern, not a law, and crypto's smaller size and far higher volatility mean the same capital produces sharper moves in both directions. A sector worth $2.15 trillion is a fraction of global equities or the gold market, which cuts both ways.
What the Flows Are Saying
The most concrete recent signal comes from institutional products. U.S. spot Bitcoin funds drew $221.7 million on July 2, their largest daily inflow in two months, snapping a 10-day redemption streak that had removed $2.73 billion, per CoinDesk. Ethereum products turned a day earlier, ending a nine-day outflow run on July 1 and adding $29.08 million on July 2. Every major crypto fund category finished that session green, including XRP, Solana, and HYPE products.
The trigger seemed like to be macro: a weak June jobs report showing 57,000 payrolls, roughly half of forecasts, sharply cut the market-implied odds of a July Fed rate hike and lifted risk assets broadly. That detail matters for interpretation. The inflows look like investors responding to improved rate conditions rather than a spontaneous rotation, which suggests capital is watching and waiting for confirmation rather than committing. Year-to-date net outflows from Bitcoin funds still stand near $5.5 billion, so one green day recovers only a fraction of what left.
Nothing in the current data confirms that a rotation has begun, and this bounce could fade like earlier ones this year. What the week does establish is the precondition set: profitable traditional assets, a deeply discounted crypto market, and the first evidence that institutional money responds immediately when macro pressure eases. If the inflows extend into a multi-week streak and Bitcoin holds above the $62,000 area, the fastest-horse argument moves from theory toward evidence. Until then, it remains a possible setup, not a signal.
#crypto
Key Takeaways:
Weekly performance: Total crypto market cap up 4.61%, gold up 2.13%, S&P 500 up 1.77%.Leaders: SOL gained 15.86%, ETH 11.46%, XRP 8.05%, BTC 3.99% over seven days.Flows: Bitcoin funds drew $221.7 million July 2, ending a 10-day redemption streak.
A Week Where Crypto Led
TradingView data shows the total crypto market capitalization rising 4.6% over the past eight sessions to $2.15 trillion, recovering from the $2.05 trillion low printed in late June. Over the same window, gold added 2.1% to trade near $4,175 per ounce at the time of writing, while the S&P 500 gained 1.77%.
Total crypto market capitalization daily chart.
Inside the top 10, the recovery was broad but uneven, according to CoinMarketCap. Solana led with a 15.86% weekly gain to $83.25, followed by Hyperliquid at 11.76% and Ethereum at 11.46%, back above $1,750. XRP added 8.05% to $1.14, while Bitcoin climbed 3.99% to around $62,500. The laggards were still green: Dogecoin rose 2.75%, BNB 1.25%, and TRON 0.89%.
S&P 500 (SPX) daily chart.
One week does not establish a trend, and the starting points differ enormously. Equities sit near record levels after repeated all-time highs this cycle. Gold set its own record above $5,500 in late January before retracing roughly 25%.
XAU/USD (gold) daily chart.
Crypto, by contrast, is the deepest drawdown in the group: Bitcoin trades about 50% below its October 2025 peak of $126,000, and total altcoin capitalization has contracted by a similar magnitude.
The Fastest Horse Argument
That gap is precisely what the rotation thesis rests on. When the assets that already delivered, equities and precious metals, become crowded or begin retracing, capital with realized profits historically looks for the sector with the most room to recover. Billionaire investor Paul Tudor Jones coined the framing on CNBC in 2020, calling Bitcoin the fastest horse in an environment of monetary expansion, months before the asset repriced tenfold. He has not abandoned the view: in an October 2025 CNBC appearance, Jones argued Bitcoin would outpace gold in a world of fiscal expansion, citing its fixed supply.
The mechanical version of the argument today: stocks near highs offer limited upside, gold has already corrected from its peak, silver has done the same, and crypto is the only major alternative asset trading at half its former valuation. The pattern has precedent. After gold peaked in August 2020 and cooled, capital rotated into crypto within months, fueling the 2020–2021 cycle. Swyftx lead analyst Pav Hundal told Cointelegraph that Bitcoin bottoms have historically lagged gold's relative strength by around 14 months, a timeline that would place the rotation window in the current period. Analyst Benjamin Cowen offered the counterweight in the same report, cautioning that a massive rotation from metals into crypto is "probably not going to happen" in the short term.
The honest read sits between the two: rotation is a recurring cycle pattern, not a law, and crypto's smaller size and far higher volatility mean the same capital produces sharper moves in both directions. A sector worth $2.15 trillion is a fraction of global equities or the gold market, which cuts both ways.
What the Flows Are Saying
The most concrete recent signal comes from institutional products. U.S. spot Bitcoin funds drew $221.7 million on July 2, their largest daily inflow in two months, snapping a 10-day redemption streak that had removed $2.73 billion, per CoinDesk. Ethereum products turned a day earlier, ending a nine-day outflow run on July 1 and adding $29.08 million on July 2. Every major crypto fund category finished that session green, including XRP, Solana, and HYPE products.
The trigger seemed like to be macro: a weak June jobs report showing 57,000 payrolls, roughly half of forecasts, sharply cut the market-implied odds of a July Fed rate hike and lifted risk assets broadly. That detail matters for interpretation. The inflows look like investors responding to improved rate conditions rather than a spontaneous rotation, which suggests capital is watching and waiting for confirmation rather than committing. Year-to-date net outflows from Bitcoin funds still stand near $5.5 billion, so one green day recovers only a fraction of what left.
Nothing in the current data confirms that a rotation has begun, and this bounce could fade like earlier ones this year. What the week does establish is the precondition set: profitable traditional assets, a deeply discounted crypto market, and the first evidence that institutional money responds immediately when macro pressure eases. If the inflows extend into a multi-week streak and Bitcoin holds above the $62,000 area, the fastest-horse argument moves from theory toward evidence. Until then, it remains a possible setup, not a signal.
#crypto
102
Artigo
Alerta de Mercado de Altcoins: Venda à Vista Não Mostra FundoOs mercados à vista de altcoins registraram sua maior venda líquida em cinco anos em junho, mostram dados da CryptoQuant, com menos de um terço das 100 principais criptomoedas apresentando ganhos nos últimos 90 dias.
Principais destaques
A diferença entre o volume acumulado de compras/vendas em 1 ano para altcoins (excluindo BTC e ETH) atingiu um extremo de 5 anos em junho.
30 das 100 principais criptomoedas por capitalização de mercado registraram retornos positivos de 90 dias em 3 de julho de 2026.
A capitalização do mercado de altcoins está perto de US$ 881 bilhões, abaixo de suas médias móveis simples de 50 dias (US$ 921,5 bi), 100 dias (US$ 959,9 bi) e 200 dias (US$ 1,02 tri). O RSI diário está em 49,45.
Alerta de Mercado de Altcoins: Venda à Vista Não Mostra Fundo
Os mercados à vista de altcoins registraram sua maior venda líquida em cinco anos em junho, mostram dados da CryptoQuant, com menos de um terço das 100 principais criptomoedas apresentando ganhos nos últimos 90 dias.
Principais destaques
A diferença entre o volume acumulado de compras/vendas em 1 ano para altcoins (excluindo BTC e ETH) atingiu um extremo de 5 anos em junho.
30 das 100 principais criptomoedas por capitalização de mercado registraram retornos positivos de 90 dias em 3 de julho de 2026.
A capitalização do mercado de altcoins está perto de US$ 881 bilhões, abaixo de suas médias móveis simples de 50 dias (US$ 921,5 bi), 100 dias (US$ 959,9 bi) e 200 dias (US$ 1,02 tri). O RSI diário está em 49,45.
Principais destaques
A diferença entre o volume acumulado de compras/vendas em 1 ano para altcoins (excluindo BTC e ETH) atingiu um extremo de 5 anos em junho.
30 das 100 principais criptomoedas por capitalização de mercado registraram retornos positivos de 90 dias em 3 de julho de 2026.
A capitalização do mercado de altcoins está perto de US$ 881 bilhões, abaixo de suas médias móveis simples de 50 dias (US$ 921,5 bi), 100 dias (US$ 959,9 bi) e 200 dias (US$ 1,02 tri). O RSI diário está em 49,45.
158
Artigo
A corrida das criptomoedas de Trump: a luta dos EUA pela dominação globalDonald Trump enquadra a liderança em cripto dos EUA como uma corrida geopolítica crítica contra a China, enquanto a SEC busca modernizar as regulamentações para garantir essa supremacia.
Principais conclusões
Trump enquadra a liderança dos EUA em criptomoedas como um imperativo estratégico para garantir a supremacia americana.
Uma declaração de julho de 2026 revelou que a família Trump obteve mais de US$ 1,4 bilhão em renda com empreendimentos de cripto no ano passado.
O presidente da SEC, Paul Atkins, formalizou uma iniciativa conjunta com a CFTC para harmonizar a supervisão federal.
Em uma entrevista recente ao CNBC’s Joe Kernen, o presidente Donald Trump enquadrou a liderança dos Estados Unidos no setor de criptomoedas não apenas como uma oportunidade econômica, mas como um imperativo nacional estratégico. Diante de possíveis conflitos de interesse relacionados aos ganhos expressivos de sua família com ativos digitais, Trump contrapôs ao posicionar as criptomoedas como uma corrida geopolítica de alto risco contra rivais globais.
A corrida das criptomoedas de Trump: a luta dos EUA pela dominação global
Donald Trump enquadra a liderança em cripto dos EUA como uma corrida geopolítica crítica contra a China, enquanto a SEC busca modernizar as regulamentações para garantir essa supremacia.
Principais conclusões
Trump enquadra a liderança dos EUA em criptomoedas como um imperativo estratégico para garantir a supremacia americana.
Uma declaração de julho de 2026 revelou que a família Trump obteve mais de US$ 1,4 bilhão em renda com empreendimentos de cripto no ano passado.
O presidente da SEC, Paul Atkins, formalizou uma iniciativa conjunta com a CFTC para harmonizar a supervisão federal.
Em uma entrevista recente ao CNBC’s Joe Kernen, o presidente Donald Trump enquadrou a liderança dos Estados Unidos no setor de criptomoedas não apenas como uma oportunidade econômica, mas como um imperativo nacional estratégico. Diante de possíveis conflitos de interesse relacionados aos ganhos expressivos de sua família com ativos digitais, Trump contrapôs ao posicionar as criptomoedas como uma corrida geopolítica de alto risco contra rivais globais.
Principais conclusões
Trump enquadra a liderança dos EUA em criptomoedas como um imperativo estratégico para garantir a supremacia americana.
Uma declaração de julho de 2026 revelou que a família Trump obteve mais de US$ 1,4 bilhão em renda com empreendimentos de cripto no ano passado.
O presidente da SEC, Paul Atkins, formalizou uma iniciativa conjunta com a CFTC para harmonizar a supervisão federal.
Em uma entrevista recente ao CNBC’s Joe Kernen, o presidente Donald Trump enquadrou a liderança dos Estados Unidos no setor de criptomoedas não apenas como uma oportunidade econômica, mas como um imperativo nacional estratégico. Diante de possíveis conflitos de interesse relacionados aos ganhos expressivos de sua família com ativos digitais, Trump contrapôs ao posicionar as criptomoedas como uma corrida geopolítica de alto risco contra rivais globais.
243
Artigo
Análise do Preço do XRP: Avaliando a Força do Repique de JulhoO XRP está mostrando sinais de possível estabilização, pois o esgotamento on-chain coincide com uma recuperação técnica inicial, embora os participantes do mercado estejam observando a confirmação de volume em níveis de resistência acima da cabeça.
Principais destaques
O XRP está sendo negociado atualmente perto de US$ 1,10.
A Santiment registra mínimas recordes nas proporções de MVRV de 30 dias e de 365 dias.
O preço voltou a subir acima das médias móveis de 50 e 100 períodos no gráfico de 4h.
Ainda está abaixo de todas as SMAs no gráfico diário.
O XRP está mostrando sinais de possível estabilização, pois o esgotamento on-chain coincide com uma recuperação técnica inicial, embora os participantes do mercado estejam observando a confirmação de volume em níveis de resistência acima da cabeça.
Análise do Preço do XRP: Avaliando a Força do Repique de Julho
O XRP está mostrando sinais de possível estabilização, pois o esgotamento on-chain coincide com uma recuperação técnica inicial, embora os participantes do mercado estejam observando a confirmação de volume em níveis de resistência acima da cabeça.
Principais destaques
O XRP está sendo negociado atualmente perto de US$ 1,10.
A Santiment registra mínimas recordes nas proporções de MVRV de 30 dias e de 365 dias.
O preço voltou a subir acima das médias móveis de 50 e 100 períodos no gráfico de 4h.
Ainda está abaixo de todas as SMAs no gráfico diário.
O XRP está mostrando sinais de possível estabilização, pois o esgotamento on-chain coincide com uma recuperação técnica inicial, embora os participantes do mercado estejam observando a confirmação de volume em níveis de resistência acima da cabeça.
Principais destaques
O XRP está sendo negociado atualmente perto de US$ 1,10.
A Santiment registra mínimas recordes nas proporções de MVRV de 30 dias e de 365 dias.
O preço voltou a subir acima das médias móveis de 50 e 100 períodos no gráfico de 4h.
Ainda está abaixo de todas as SMAs no gráfico diário.
O XRP está mostrando sinais de possível estabilização, pois o esgotamento on-chain coincide com uma recuperação técnica inicial, embora os participantes do mercado estejam observando a confirmação de volume em níveis de resistência acima da cabeça.
98
Artigo
Bitcoin sobe com dados de empregos dos EUA que podem enfraquecer o Fed mais duroO Bitcoin disparou com um relatório de empregos dos EUA mais fraco, subindo para US$ 61.500, cerca de 5% nas últimas 24 horas e mantendo-se firmemente acima de US$ 61.000.
Principais conclusões
O Bitcoin subiu para US$ 61.466 após um relatório fraco de empregos de junho, avançando cerca de 5% no dia.
Os EUA adicionaram apenas 57.000 empregos, ante uma previsão de 110.000.
A taxa de desemprego de 4,2% reflete pessoas deixando a força de trabalho, não força do mercado.
A surpresa negativa enfraquece a guinada mais dura recente do Fed sob Kevin Warsh.
Já havia sido ofertado antes da publicação
O movimento começou antes da divulgação dos dados. Ao longo da noite e nas primeiras horas, o Bitcoin oscilou numa faixa de US$ 59.800 a US$ 60.800, chegando a testar US$ 59.800 perto da meia-noite antes de encontrar suporte, com todas as três médias móveis agrupadas de forma bem apertada abaixo do preço no gráfico de 30 minutos (a 50 perto de US$ 60.236, a 100 em US$ 59.441, a 200 em US$ 59.607). O preço se manteve acima de todas elas, num cenário construtivo.
Bitcoin sobe com dados de empregos dos EUA que podem enfraquecer o Fed mais duro
O Bitcoin disparou com um relatório de empregos dos EUA mais fraco, subindo para US$ 61.500, cerca de 5% nas últimas 24 horas e mantendo-se firmemente acima de US$ 61.000.
Principais conclusões
O Bitcoin subiu para US$ 61.466 após um relatório fraco de empregos de junho, avançando cerca de 5% no dia.
Os EUA adicionaram apenas 57.000 empregos, ante uma previsão de 110.000.
A taxa de desemprego de 4,2% reflete pessoas deixando a força de trabalho, não força do mercado.
A surpresa negativa enfraquece a guinada mais dura recente do Fed sob Kevin Warsh.
Já havia sido ofertado antes da publicação
O movimento começou antes da divulgação dos dados. Ao longo da noite e nas primeiras horas, o Bitcoin oscilou numa faixa de US$ 59.800 a US$ 60.800, chegando a testar US$ 59.800 perto da meia-noite antes de encontrar suporte, com todas as três médias móveis agrupadas de forma bem apertada abaixo do preço no gráfico de 30 minutos (a 50 perto de US$ 60.236, a 100 em US$ 59.441, a 200 em US$ 59.607). O preço se manteve acima de todas elas, num cenário construtivo.
Principais conclusões
O Bitcoin subiu para US$ 61.466 após um relatório fraco de empregos de junho, avançando cerca de 5% no dia.
Os EUA adicionaram apenas 57.000 empregos, ante uma previsão de 110.000.
A taxa de desemprego de 4,2% reflete pessoas deixando a força de trabalho, não força do mercado.
A surpresa negativa enfraquece a guinada mais dura recente do Fed sob Kevin Warsh.
Já havia sido ofertado antes da publicação
O movimento começou antes da divulgação dos dados. Ao longo da noite e nas primeiras horas, o Bitcoin oscilou numa faixa de US$ 59.800 a US$ 60.800, chegando a testar US$ 59.800 perto da meia-noite antes de encontrar suporte, com todas as três médias móveis agrupadas de forma bem apertada abaixo do preço no gráfico de 30 minutos (a 50 perto de US$ 60.236, a 100 em US$ 59.441, a 200 em US$ 59.607). O preço se manteve acima de todas elas, num cenário construtivo.
46
Artigo
Standard Chartered Lança Emissão de USDC para InstituiçõesA Standard Chartered integrou o acesso a stablecoins diretamente em sua infraestrutura bancária por meio de uma parceria com a Circle, anunciada em 2 de julho de 2026.
Principais Conclusões
A Standard Chartered lançou a emissão e o resgate institucionais de USDC com a Circle.
Os clientes acessam o USDC através do banco, sem manter contas diretas da Circle.
Ele combina banco fiduciário, custódia e liquidação em blockchain em um único fluxo regulamentado.
O lançamento começa nos Emirados Árabes Unidos pelas operações do DIFC da Standard Chartered.
A nova capacidade permite que clientes institucionais mintem e resgatem USDC pela Standard Chartered sem abrir contas separadas com a Circle, efetivamente incorporando operações com stablecoin dentro de um banco global regulamentado, em vez de depender de plataformas ou exchanges nativas de cripto.
Standard Chartered Lança Emissão de USDC para Instituições
A Standard Chartered integrou o acesso a stablecoins diretamente em sua infraestrutura bancária por meio de uma parceria com a Circle, anunciada em 2 de julho de 2026.
Principais Conclusões
A Standard Chartered lançou a emissão e o resgate institucionais de USDC com a Circle.
Os clientes acessam o USDC através do banco, sem manter contas diretas da Circle.
Ele combina banco fiduciário, custódia e liquidação em blockchain em um único fluxo regulamentado.
O lançamento começa nos Emirados Árabes Unidos pelas operações do DIFC da Standard Chartered.
A nova capacidade permite que clientes institucionais mintem e resgatem USDC pela Standard Chartered sem abrir contas separadas com a Circle, efetivamente incorporando operações com stablecoin dentro de um banco global regulamentado, em vez de depender de plataformas ou exchanges nativas de cripto.
Principais Conclusões
A Standard Chartered lançou a emissão e o resgate institucionais de USDC com a Circle.
Os clientes acessam o USDC através do banco, sem manter contas diretas da Circle.
Ele combina banco fiduciário, custódia e liquidação em blockchain em um único fluxo regulamentado.
O lançamento começa nos Emirados Árabes Unidos pelas operações do DIFC da Standard Chartered.
A nova capacidade permite que clientes institucionais mintem e resgatem USDC pela Standard Chartered sem abrir contas separadas com a Circle, efetivamente incorporando operações com stablecoin dentro de um banco global regulamentado, em vez de depender de plataformas ou exchanges nativas de cripto.
37
Artigo
Ver tradução
Ethereum's Multi-Year Trendline Meets Eight Weeks of ETF OutflowsEthereum is sitting on the line that has defined its entire structure since the last bear market, and it's testing it under real pressure.
Key Takeaways
ETH trades at $1,615.80, sitting almost exactly on a trendline held since mid-2022.Price is below both its 50-month and 100-month moving averages.Ethereum spot ETFs have seen eight straight weeks of outflows.Whether the trendline holds depends on flows and macro, not the chart alone.
ETH trades at $1,615 at the time of writing, up 3.5% for the past 24h, resting almost exactly on an ascending trendline that has held as support since mid-2022. The entire post-2022 structure rests on this line, and it's being tested while momentum is weak and institutional money is leaving.
The Make-or-Break Level?
The technical setup is unusually clean. The ascending trendline connects the 2022 bear-market bottom near $1,000 through a series of higher lows, and price has just wicked down to test it again, with the current monthly candle showing a small green recovery off the low. This may be a genuine make-or-break level: hold it, and the multi-year structure stays intact; lose it on a monthly close, and that structure breaks.
Ethereum long-term monthly price chart.
The moving averages sit overhead as resistance, not support. The 50-month SMA is at $2,385 and the 100-month at $1,760.80, and price at $1,616 is now below both. That matters because the 100-month had been acting as a secondary support shelf; with price beneath it, ETH is leaning entirely on the ascending trendline. Monthly RSI at 40.53, below the midline and declining, confirms the test is happening under pressure rather than from strength.
Eight Straight Weeks of Outflows
The flow backdrop tells the same story as the price. Ethereum spot ETFs have bled for eight consecutive weeks, with no positive week in the run:
That's a sustained, uninterrupted institutional redemption streak lining up exactly with the price decline into the trendline. The flows and the price weakness are one story: persistent selling with no offsetting institutional bid.
Where the Institutional Push Fits
This is the environment the newly launched Ethereum Institutional non-profit, anchor-funded by BitMine, SharpLink, and Joseph Lubin, is built for - accelerating the institutional adoption of ETH. Its framing, that Ethereum's "neutrality without representation can be received as silence" and that institutions need a dedicated advocate "in the room", reads as a direct response to exactly what the flow data shows: institutions pulling back with no coordinated voice selling ETH as the base layer for tokenization and on-chain finance. Its arrival amid eight weeks of outflows could not be coincidental to the broader narrative.
1/ Announcing Ethereum InstitutionalAn independent non-profit dedicated to accelerating the institutional adoption of Ethereum, its L2s, applications and overall ecosystem. pic.twitter.com/XUeViH6rrq— Ethereum Institutional (@ethereuminsti) July 1, 2026
The Macro Caveat
The past month's crypto weakness has been partly macro-driven, with the US-Iran conflict fueling a broad risk-off move alongside unchanged rates and a strong dollar. ETH's slide into the trendline isn't purely an Ethereum-specific story, it's largely the macro tide pulling the whole market down because of the broader uncertainty. That cuts both ways: the test may resolve more on macro sentiment shifting than on Ethereum fundamentals, and a flow reversal, if it comes, could likely need a macro catalyst as much as an adoption one.
What Needs to Change
Put together, this is a clean conditional, and it has to stay conditional rather than predictive. ETH is holding a trendline that has defined its structure since 2022, but it's doing so with weak momentum, below both major moving averages, and against eight straight weeks of negative flows. For the line to hold and an uptrend to resume, the flow picture needs to turn, which is exactly where the institutional-adoption push becomes relevant. If efforts like Ethereum Institutional bring institutions back as buyers, and if the war-driven risk-off eases, the ETF outflows could flip to inflows and provide the demand to defend the trendline and press back toward the averages overhead.
None of that is guaranteed. If outflows continue and macro stays risk-off, the trendline that has held since June 2022 becomes the last line of defense, and a monthly close decisively below it would break the multi-year structure. The chart describes proximity to a decision point; the flows and macro describe the forces that will resolve it; the institutional push describes the mechanism that could tip it toward holding. ETH sits at a genuine inflection where the technical level, the flow trend, and the macro backdrop all have to align for the bullish case to hold.
#Ethereum
Ethereum's Multi-Year Trendline Meets Eight Weeks of ETF Outflows
Ethereum is sitting on the line that has defined its entire structure since the last bear market, and it's testing it under real pressure.
Key Takeaways
ETH trades at $1,615.80, sitting almost exactly on a trendline held since mid-2022.Price is below both its 50-month and 100-month moving averages.Ethereum spot ETFs have seen eight straight weeks of outflows.Whether the trendline holds depends on flows and macro, not the chart alone.
ETH trades at $1,615 at the time of writing, up 3.5% for the past 24h, resting almost exactly on an ascending trendline that has held as support since mid-2022. The entire post-2022 structure rests on this line, and it's being tested while momentum is weak and institutional money is leaving.
The Make-or-Break Level?
The technical setup is unusually clean. The ascending trendline connects the 2022 bear-market bottom near $1,000 through a series of higher lows, and price has just wicked down to test it again, with the current monthly candle showing a small green recovery off the low. This may be a genuine make-or-break level: hold it, and the multi-year structure stays intact; lose it on a monthly close, and that structure breaks.
Ethereum long-term monthly price chart.
The moving averages sit overhead as resistance, not support. The 50-month SMA is at $2,385 and the 100-month at $1,760.80, and price at $1,616 is now below both. That matters because the 100-month had been acting as a secondary support shelf; with price beneath it, ETH is leaning entirely on the ascending trendline. Monthly RSI at 40.53, below the midline and declining, confirms the test is happening under pressure rather than from strength.
Eight Straight Weeks of Outflows
The flow backdrop tells the same story as the price. Ethereum spot ETFs have bled for eight consecutive weeks, with no positive week in the run:
That's a sustained, uninterrupted institutional redemption streak lining up exactly with the price decline into the trendline. The flows and the price weakness are one story: persistent selling with no offsetting institutional bid.
Where the Institutional Push Fits
This is the environment the newly launched Ethereum Institutional non-profit, anchor-funded by BitMine, SharpLink, and Joseph Lubin, is built for - accelerating the institutional adoption of ETH. Its framing, that Ethereum's "neutrality without representation can be received as silence" and that institutions need a dedicated advocate "in the room", reads as a direct response to exactly what the flow data shows: institutions pulling back with no coordinated voice selling ETH as the base layer for tokenization and on-chain finance. Its arrival amid eight weeks of outflows could not be coincidental to the broader narrative.
1/ Announcing Ethereum InstitutionalAn independent non-profit dedicated to accelerating the institutional adoption of Ethereum, its L2s, applications and overall ecosystem. pic.twitter.com/XUeViH6rrq— Ethereum Institutional (@ethereuminsti) July 1, 2026
The Macro Caveat
The past month's crypto weakness has been partly macro-driven, with the US-Iran conflict fueling a broad risk-off move alongside unchanged rates and a strong dollar. ETH's slide into the trendline isn't purely an Ethereum-specific story, it's largely the macro tide pulling the whole market down because of the broader uncertainty. That cuts both ways: the test may resolve more on macro sentiment shifting than on Ethereum fundamentals, and a flow reversal, if it comes, could likely need a macro catalyst as much as an adoption one.
What Needs to Change
Put together, this is a clean conditional, and it has to stay conditional rather than predictive. ETH is holding a trendline that has defined its structure since 2022, but it's doing so with weak momentum, below both major moving averages, and against eight straight weeks of negative flows. For the line to hold and an uptrend to resume, the flow picture needs to turn, which is exactly where the institutional-adoption push becomes relevant. If efforts like Ethereum Institutional bring institutions back as buyers, and if the war-driven risk-off eases, the ETF outflows could flip to inflows and provide the demand to defend the trendline and press back toward the averages overhead.
None of that is guaranteed. If outflows continue and macro stays risk-off, the trendline that has held since June 2022 becomes the last line of defense, and a monthly close decisively below it would break the multi-year structure. The chart describes proximity to a decision point; the flows and macro describe the forces that will resolve it; the institutional push describes the mechanism that could tip it toward holding. ETH sits at a genuine inflection where the technical level, the flow trend, and the macro backdrop all have to align for the bullish case to hold.
#Ethereum
Key Takeaways
ETH trades at $1,615.80, sitting almost exactly on a trendline held since mid-2022.Price is below both its 50-month and 100-month moving averages.Ethereum spot ETFs have seen eight straight weeks of outflows.Whether the trendline holds depends on flows and macro, not the chart alone.
ETH trades at $1,615 at the time of writing, up 3.5% for the past 24h, resting almost exactly on an ascending trendline that has held as support since mid-2022. The entire post-2022 structure rests on this line, and it's being tested while momentum is weak and institutional money is leaving.
The Make-or-Break Level?
The technical setup is unusually clean. The ascending trendline connects the 2022 bear-market bottom near $1,000 through a series of higher lows, and price has just wicked down to test it again, with the current monthly candle showing a small green recovery off the low. This may be a genuine make-or-break level: hold it, and the multi-year structure stays intact; lose it on a monthly close, and that structure breaks.
Ethereum long-term monthly price chart.
The moving averages sit overhead as resistance, not support. The 50-month SMA is at $2,385 and the 100-month at $1,760.80, and price at $1,616 is now below both. That matters because the 100-month had been acting as a secondary support shelf; with price beneath it, ETH is leaning entirely on the ascending trendline. Monthly RSI at 40.53, below the midline and declining, confirms the test is happening under pressure rather than from strength.
Eight Straight Weeks of Outflows
The flow backdrop tells the same story as the price. Ethereum spot ETFs have bled for eight consecutive weeks, with no positive week in the run:
That's a sustained, uninterrupted institutional redemption streak lining up exactly with the price decline into the trendline. The flows and the price weakness are one story: persistent selling with no offsetting institutional bid.
Where the Institutional Push Fits
This is the environment the newly launched Ethereum Institutional non-profit, anchor-funded by BitMine, SharpLink, and Joseph Lubin, is built for - accelerating the institutional adoption of ETH. Its framing, that Ethereum's "neutrality without representation can be received as silence" and that institutions need a dedicated advocate "in the room", reads as a direct response to exactly what the flow data shows: institutions pulling back with no coordinated voice selling ETH as the base layer for tokenization and on-chain finance. Its arrival amid eight weeks of outflows could not be coincidental to the broader narrative.
1/ Announcing Ethereum InstitutionalAn independent non-profit dedicated to accelerating the institutional adoption of Ethereum, its L2s, applications and overall ecosystem. pic.twitter.com/XUeViH6rrq— Ethereum Institutional (@ethereuminsti) July 1, 2026
The Macro Caveat
The past month's crypto weakness has been partly macro-driven, with the US-Iran conflict fueling a broad risk-off move alongside unchanged rates and a strong dollar. ETH's slide into the trendline isn't purely an Ethereum-specific story, it's largely the macro tide pulling the whole market down because of the broader uncertainty. That cuts both ways: the test may resolve more on macro sentiment shifting than on Ethereum fundamentals, and a flow reversal, if it comes, could likely need a macro catalyst as much as an adoption one.
What Needs to Change
Put together, this is a clean conditional, and it has to stay conditional rather than predictive. ETH is holding a trendline that has defined its structure since 2022, but it's doing so with weak momentum, below both major moving averages, and against eight straight weeks of negative flows. For the line to hold and an uptrend to resume, the flow picture needs to turn, which is exactly where the institutional-adoption push becomes relevant. If efforts like Ethereum Institutional bring institutions back as buyers, and if the war-driven risk-off eases, the ETF outflows could flip to inflows and provide the demand to defend the trendline and press back toward the averages overhead.
None of that is guaranteed. If outflows continue and macro stays risk-off, the trendline that has held since June 2022 becomes the last line of defense, and a monthly close decisively below it would break the multi-year structure. The chart describes proximity to a decision point; the flows and macro describe the forces that will resolve it; the institutional push describes the mechanism that could tip it toward holding. ETH sits at a genuine inflection where the technical level, the flow trend, and the macro backdrop all have to align for the bullish case to hold.
#Ethereum
53
Artigo
OpenUSD Pode Não Destronar o USDC: CEO da Circle Explica Por QuêO lançamento do Open USD, o consórcio de stablecoins com mais de 140 empresas apoiado pela Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Coinbase e BlackRock, gerou uma resposta direta da pessoa que tem muito a perder.
Principais conclusões
O CEO da Circle, Jeremy Allaire, argumentou publicamente que o Open USD não vai destronar o USDC.
Ele cita dados da Artemis que colocam o USDC em 80% do volume de stablecoins em dólares on-chain.
Seu ponto mais contundente: os produtos do consórcio têm um histórico "medíocre" em escala.
É a refutação do incumbente, não uma prova neutra — e ele tem um interesse claro.
OpenUSD Pode Não Destronar o USDC: CEO da Circle Explica Por Quê
O lançamento do Open USD, o consórcio de stablecoins com mais de 140 empresas apoiado pela Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Coinbase e BlackRock, gerou uma resposta direta da pessoa que tem muito a perder.
Principais conclusões
O CEO da Circle, Jeremy Allaire, argumentou publicamente que o Open USD não vai destronar o USDC.
Ele cita dados da Artemis que colocam o USDC em 80% do volume de stablecoins em dólares on-chain.
Seu ponto mais contundente: os produtos do consórcio têm um histórico "medíocre" em escala.
É a refutação do incumbente, não uma prova neutra — e ele tem um interesse claro.
Principais conclusões
O CEO da Circle, Jeremy Allaire, argumentou publicamente que o Open USD não vai destronar o USDC.
Ele cita dados da Artemis que colocam o USDC em 80% do volume de stablecoins em dólares on-chain.
Seu ponto mais contundente: os produtos do consórcio têm um histórico "medíocre" em escala.
É a refutação do incumbente, não uma prova neutra — e ele tem um interesse claro.
140
Artigo
Ver tradução
Bitcoin: Is the Crowd Leaving? - Analyzing the On-chain DataBitcoin retail inflows have hit record lows on Binance, while ETF holders are aggressively redeeming assets. Is this a structural market warning or a classic contrarian bottom signal?
Key Takeaways
Retail inflows to Binance hit a record low of 329 BTC per day.That's roughly 8x below the 2021 average and 11x below 2018.Bitcoin ETFs have seen about $8.48 billion in net outflows since May 6.Both point to the crowd exiting, but neither is a timing signal.
Retail Never Showed Up This Cycle
Data from CryptoQuant shared by analyst Darkfost, tracking Binance inflows under 1 BTC, a proxy for retail, against price since 2018. According to the analyst, retail inflows now average 329 BTC per day, the lowest in the exchange's history. The historical contrast is the whole point:
That's roughly an 8x collapse from the 2021 average and 11x from 2018, which saw a single-day record of 10,400 BTC. The telling detail: the 30-day average that spiked in every prior cycle (2018, 2021, 2023) flatlined near the bottom of its range through 2025-2026, even as Bitcoin ran above $100K. Every price top this cycle failed to trigger a retail spike. The cohort simply didn't turn up.
Darkfost's Explanation
Darkfost offers several possible reasons, framed as his analysis. Retail may have chased exposure elsewhere this cycle, in altcoins or other assets. Spot Bitcoin ETFs may have captured investors and pulled them out of on-exchange activity into a wrapped vehicle. And some retail may simply be holding longer-term or waiting for better performance. His broader framing is that this cohort could be "going extinct" on Binance, with the market's makeup shifting toward institutionalization.
The ETF Outflows Tell a Parallel Story
The wrapped-exposure crowd is leaving too. According to Santiment, Bitcoin ETFs have combined for about $8.48 billion in net outflows since May 6, approaching the $10 billion mark. Santiment's read is explicitly contrarian: it treats sustained outflows as a sentiment signal, where price tends to move opposite the crowd's expectations over time, rather than a mechanical predictor of further downside. The longer the outflow streak, in their view, the more it reflects fear and capitulation than a fresh reason to sell.
Bitcoin ETF outflows.
Their historical anchor is a mirror image. On October 6, 2025, ETFs saw +$1.21 billion in inflows, which Santiment marked as a "sell signal at ATH", inflows peaking exactly as price topped. Now the inverse: heavy outflows clustering near the lows, which they read as a strong fear signal. Their thesis is that the best buying opportunities have historically come when ETF investors and retail are most eager to exit.
Where Price Sits
Bitcoin trades around $60,185 at the time of writing, after reaching $61,050 and attempting to stabilize following the June decline that bottomed near $58,000. All three major moving averages sit well overhead as resistance, and momentum is recovering off the lows rather than reversing, a tentative steadying, not a confirmed turn.
Bitcoin daily price technical chart from TradingView.
The Tension Between the Two Reads
Both analysis frame the crowd's exit constructively, but in ways that don't fully fit together, and that's worth being honest about. Darkfost reads it as structural institutionalization: retail replaced by institutions and ETFs. Santiment reads it as contrarian capitulation: weak hands leaving strengthens the bottom case. Both are reasonable, and both are interpretations, not confirmed outcomes.
The tension is real. If retail is structurally "extinct," permanently migrated to ETFs as Darkfost suggests, then Santiment's "they'll capitulate and then return to buy" logic weakens, because you can't get a retail-driven recovery from a cohort that has left for good. The two theses can't both be fully true. Either retail comes back (supporting the contrarian bottom case) or it has structurally gone (supporting institutionalization), but not both.
What It Doesn't Tell You
The critical limit is that none of this is predictive. Retail being absent doesn't mean price bottoms; it can equally mean the market has lost a demand source that historically drove rallies. Santiment's own framing is careful, outflows "can pressure price in the short term" even as they build the longer-term bottom case, so the contrarian signal is a probabilistic historical tendency, not a timing tool.
What both datasets confirm is the phenomenon, not the outcome: the retail and ETF crowd is exiting Bitcoin at historic intensity. Whether that clears the way for a bottom or removes a demand driver the market needs is exactly what the data can't resolve. It describes who has left, not where price goes next.
#BTC
Bitcoin: Is the Crowd Leaving? - Analyzing the On-chain Data
Bitcoin retail inflows have hit record lows on Binance, while ETF holders are aggressively redeeming assets. Is this a structural market warning or a classic contrarian bottom signal?
Key Takeaways
Retail inflows to Binance hit a record low of 329 BTC per day.That's roughly 8x below the 2021 average and 11x below 2018.Bitcoin ETFs have seen about $8.48 billion in net outflows since May 6.Both point to the crowd exiting, but neither is a timing signal.
Retail Never Showed Up This Cycle
Data from CryptoQuant shared by analyst Darkfost, tracking Binance inflows under 1 BTC, a proxy for retail, against price since 2018. According to the analyst, retail inflows now average 329 BTC per day, the lowest in the exchange's history. The historical contrast is the whole point:
That's roughly an 8x collapse from the 2021 average and 11x from 2018, which saw a single-day record of 10,400 BTC. The telling detail: the 30-day average that spiked in every prior cycle (2018, 2021, 2023) flatlined near the bottom of its range through 2025-2026, even as Bitcoin ran above $100K. Every price top this cycle failed to trigger a retail spike. The cohort simply didn't turn up.
Darkfost's Explanation
Darkfost offers several possible reasons, framed as his analysis. Retail may have chased exposure elsewhere this cycle, in altcoins or other assets. Spot Bitcoin ETFs may have captured investors and pulled them out of on-exchange activity into a wrapped vehicle. And some retail may simply be holding longer-term or waiting for better performance. His broader framing is that this cohort could be "going extinct" on Binance, with the market's makeup shifting toward institutionalization.
The ETF Outflows Tell a Parallel Story
The wrapped-exposure crowd is leaving too. According to Santiment, Bitcoin ETFs have combined for about $8.48 billion in net outflows since May 6, approaching the $10 billion mark. Santiment's read is explicitly contrarian: it treats sustained outflows as a sentiment signal, where price tends to move opposite the crowd's expectations over time, rather than a mechanical predictor of further downside. The longer the outflow streak, in their view, the more it reflects fear and capitulation than a fresh reason to sell.
Bitcoin ETF outflows.
Their historical anchor is a mirror image. On October 6, 2025, ETFs saw +$1.21 billion in inflows, which Santiment marked as a "sell signal at ATH", inflows peaking exactly as price topped. Now the inverse: heavy outflows clustering near the lows, which they read as a strong fear signal. Their thesis is that the best buying opportunities have historically come when ETF investors and retail are most eager to exit.
Where Price Sits
Bitcoin trades around $60,185 at the time of writing, after reaching $61,050 and attempting to stabilize following the June decline that bottomed near $58,000. All three major moving averages sit well overhead as resistance, and momentum is recovering off the lows rather than reversing, a tentative steadying, not a confirmed turn.
Bitcoin daily price technical chart from TradingView.
The Tension Between the Two Reads
Both analysis frame the crowd's exit constructively, but in ways that don't fully fit together, and that's worth being honest about. Darkfost reads it as structural institutionalization: retail replaced by institutions and ETFs. Santiment reads it as contrarian capitulation: weak hands leaving strengthens the bottom case. Both are reasonable, and both are interpretations, not confirmed outcomes.
The tension is real. If retail is structurally "extinct," permanently migrated to ETFs as Darkfost suggests, then Santiment's "they'll capitulate and then return to buy" logic weakens, because you can't get a retail-driven recovery from a cohort that has left for good. The two theses can't both be fully true. Either retail comes back (supporting the contrarian bottom case) or it has structurally gone (supporting institutionalization), but not both.
What It Doesn't Tell You
The critical limit is that none of this is predictive. Retail being absent doesn't mean price bottoms; it can equally mean the market has lost a demand source that historically drove rallies. Santiment's own framing is careful, outflows "can pressure price in the short term" even as they build the longer-term bottom case, so the contrarian signal is a probabilistic historical tendency, not a timing tool.
What both datasets confirm is the phenomenon, not the outcome: the retail and ETF crowd is exiting Bitcoin at historic intensity. Whether that clears the way for a bottom or removes a demand driver the market needs is exactly what the data can't resolve. It describes who has left, not where price goes next.
#BTC
Key Takeaways
Retail inflows to Binance hit a record low of 329 BTC per day.That's roughly 8x below the 2021 average and 11x below 2018.Bitcoin ETFs have seen about $8.48 billion in net outflows since May 6.Both point to the crowd exiting, but neither is a timing signal.
Retail Never Showed Up This Cycle
Data from CryptoQuant shared by analyst Darkfost, tracking Binance inflows under 1 BTC, a proxy for retail, against price since 2018. According to the analyst, retail inflows now average 329 BTC per day, the lowest in the exchange's history. The historical contrast is the whole point:
That's roughly an 8x collapse from the 2021 average and 11x from 2018, which saw a single-day record of 10,400 BTC. The telling detail: the 30-day average that spiked in every prior cycle (2018, 2021, 2023) flatlined near the bottom of its range through 2025-2026, even as Bitcoin ran above $100K. Every price top this cycle failed to trigger a retail spike. The cohort simply didn't turn up.
Darkfost's Explanation
Darkfost offers several possible reasons, framed as his analysis. Retail may have chased exposure elsewhere this cycle, in altcoins or other assets. Spot Bitcoin ETFs may have captured investors and pulled them out of on-exchange activity into a wrapped vehicle. And some retail may simply be holding longer-term or waiting for better performance. His broader framing is that this cohort could be "going extinct" on Binance, with the market's makeup shifting toward institutionalization.
The ETF Outflows Tell a Parallel Story
The wrapped-exposure crowd is leaving too. According to Santiment, Bitcoin ETFs have combined for about $8.48 billion in net outflows since May 6, approaching the $10 billion mark. Santiment's read is explicitly contrarian: it treats sustained outflows as a sentiment signal, where price tends to move opposite the crowd's expectations over time, rather than a mechanical predictor of further downside. The longer the outflow streak, in their view, the more it reflects fear and capitulation than a fresh reason to sell.
Bitcoin ETF outflows.
Their historical anchor is a mirror image. On October 6, 2025, ETFs saw +$1.21 billion in inflows, which Santiment marked as a "sell signal at ATH", inflows peaking exactly as price topped. Now the inverse: heavy outflows clustering near the lows, which they read as a strong fear signal. Their thesis is that the best buying opportunities have historically come when ETF investors and retail are most eager to exit.
Where Price Sits
Bitcoin trades around $60,185 at the time of writing, after reaching $61,050 and attempting to stabilize following the June decline that bottomed near $58,000. All three major moving averages sit well overhead as resistance, and momentum is recovering off the lows rather than reversing, a tentative steadying, not a confirmed turn.
Bitcoin daily price technical chart from TradingView.
The Tension Between the Two Reads
Both analysis frame the crowd's exit constructively, but in ways that don't fully fit together, and that's worth being honest about. Darkfost reads it as structural institutionalization: retail replaced by institutions and ETFs. Santiment reads it as contrarian capitulation: weak hands leaving strengthens the bottom case. Both are reasonable, and both are interpretations, not confirmed outcomes.
The tension is real. If retail is structurally "extinct," permanently migrated to ETFs as Darkfost suggests, then Santiment's "they'll capitulate and then return to buy" logic weakens, because you can't get a retail-driven recovery from a cohort that has left for good. The two theses can't both be fully true. Either retail comes back (supporting the contrarian bottom case) or it has structurally gone (supporting institutionalization), but not both.
What It Doesn't Tell You
The critical limit is that none of this is predictive. Retail being absent doesn't mean price bottoms; it can equally mean the market has lost a demand source that historically drove rallies. Santiment's own framing is careful, outflows "can pressure price in the short term" even as they build the longer-term bottom case, so the contrarian signal is a probabilistic historical tendency, not a timing tool.
What both datasets confirm is the phenomenon, not the outcome: the retail and ETF crowd is exiting Bitcoin at historic intensity. Whether that clears the way for a bottom or removes a demand driver the market needs is exactly what the data can't resolve. It describes who has left, not where price goes next.
#BTC
78
Artigo
A STRC da Strategy Rebateu com seu Novo Estrutura enquanto o BTC CaíaAs ações preferenciais preferidas da Strategy receberam seu primeiro veredito positivo de mercado sobre o novo marco de capital da empresa, mesmo com o Bitcoin continuando a cair.
Principais conclusões
As ações preferenciais da Strategy (antes conhecida como MicroStrategy) se recuperaram após o anúncio do marco de capital em 29 de junho.
A STRC recuperou cerca de 13%, a maior alta entre as quatro séries de ações preferenciais.
O Bitcoin continuou a cair no mesmo período, fechando em junho abaixo de US$ 60.000.
A divergência aponta para um catalisador específico da empresa, e não para um repique do mercado de criptos como um todo.
A STRC da Strategy Rebateu com seu Novo Estrutura enquanto o BTC Caía
As ações preferenciais preferidas da Strategy receberam seu primeiro veredito positivo de mercado sobre o novo marco de capital da empresa, mesmo com o Bitcoin continuando a cair.
Principais conclusões
As ações preferenciais da Strategy (antes conhecida como MicroStrategy) se recuperaram após o anúncio do marco de capital em 29 de junho.
A STRC recuperou cerca de 13%, a maior alta entre as quatro séries de ações preferenciais.
O Bitcoin continuou a cair no mesmo período, fechando em junho abaixo de US$ 60.000.
A divergência aponta para um catalisador específico da empresa, e não para um repique do mercado de criptos como um todo.
Principais conclusões
As ações preferenciais da Strategy (antes conhecida como MicroStrategy) se recuperaram após o anúncio do marco de capital em 29 de junho.
A STRC recuperou cerca de 13%, a maior alta entre as quatro séries de ações preferenciais.
O Bitcoin continuou a cair no mesmo período, fechando em junho abaixo de US$ 60.000.
A divergência aponta para um catalisador específico da empresa, e não para um repique do mercado de criptos como um todo.
148
Artigo
Ver tradução
Citi Lowers Bitcoin and Ether Targets, but Not Below Today's PriceCitigroup has cut its price targets for both major cryptocurrencies again, but the detail that matters is buried under the "downgrade" headline: even the reduced targets still sit well above where Bitcoin and Ether trade today.
Key Takeaways
Citi cut its 12-month Bitcoin target to $82,000 from $112,000, and ETH to $2,240 from $3,175.The main driver was cutting its assumed 12-month ETF inflows to zero from $10 billion.Even after the cut, both targets sit roughly 39-41% above current prices.It's a flow-model recalibration, not a call for further downside.
In a note shared by Reuters, the bank lowered its 12-month Bitcoin target to $82,000 from $112,000, a cut of roughly 27%, and trimmed its Ether target to $2,240 from $3,175, down about 29%.
The Mechanical Driver: ETF Inflows Cut to Zero
The revision comes down to one modeling decision. Citi cut its 12-month net ETF inflow assumption to zero, down from $10 billion. Because the bank's price model treats ETF flows as an important driver, removing $10 billion in assumed inflows and replacing it with nothing mechanically pulls the targets lower. This isn't a change of heart about the asset, it's the model catching up to observed reality.
That reality is negative flows. Citi noted Bitcoin ETF flows are down about $3.3 billion year-to-date and have recently turned negative, which is the empirical basis for zeroing out the forward assumption. As the bank put it, ETF flows, "an important driver of prices, have turned negative recently." It's worth noting this is Citi's second cut of 2026, having already lowered its Bitcoin target from $143,000 to $112,000 in March, a sign of how quickly institutional sentiment has cooled.
The Three Sentiment Drags
Beyond the flow-model change, Citi named three factors weighing on the outlook:
Stalled legislation: slow progress on US crypto legislation, keeping the regulatory catalyst out of reach.Treasury-company selling: concerns over potential Bitcoin selling by digital-asset treasury companies, a live issue given Strategy's recently announced BTC Monetization Program and similar corporate structures.AI rotation: a rotation of investor capital into AI-related assets, drawing money away from crypto on the margin.
The bank expects broader investor adoption to stay on hold until a new catalyst emerges.
Where Price Actually Sits
Here's the context that reframes the whole story. At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading at $58,900 according to CoinMarketCap, its weakest since September 2024, having halved from its $126,000 all-time high set October 2025. Ether is at $1,570, its lowest since April 2025.
Against those depressed levels, the cut targets tell a different story than "Citi turns bearish." The revised $82,000 Bitcoin target still sits roughly 39% above the current price, and the $2,240 Ether target about 41% above where Ether trades. So while the headline is a downgrade, the bank isn't calling for further downside, it lowered the ceiling, but its 12-month targets still imply significant upside from current levels. That distinction is easy to lose and worth holding onto.
What the Downgrade Actually Is
Structurally, this is a flow-model revision, not a thesis break. Citi didn't abandon its constructive medium-term view; it recalibrated its ETF inflow assumption to match the negative 2026 flows the market actually produced, which mechanically lowered the targets. The bank's stated position is essentially that adoption is paused pending a catalyst, not that the asset class is broken.
The AI-rotation point ties into a broader narrative visible across the market this year: capital being pulled toward AI on the margin, leaving crypto flows depleted in the near term. What would change Citi's math is straightforward, and it's the same thing the bank zeroed out: ETF flows. If inflows return, the assumption that dragged these targets down reverses, and with it the modeled ceiling. Until then, Citi's message is a lowered target from a paused market, not a forecast of deeper losses from here.
#bitcoin
Citi Lowers Bitcoin and Ether Targets, but Not Below Today's Price
Citigroup has cut its price targets for both major cryptocurrencies again, but the detail that matters is buried under the "downgrade" headline: even the reduced targets still sit well above where Bitcoin and Ether trade today.
Key Takeaways
Citi cut its 12-month Bitcoin target to $82,000 from $112,000, and ETH to $2,240 from $3,175.The main driver was cutting its assumed 12-month ETF inflows to zero from $10 billion.Even after the cut, both targets sit roughly 39-41% above current prices.It's a flow-model recalibration, not a call for further downside.
In a note shared by Reuters, the bank lowered its 12-month Bitcoin target to $82,000 from $112,000, a cut of roughly 27%, and trimmed its Ether target to $2,240 from $3,175, down about 29%.
The Mechanical Driver: ETF Inflows Cut to Zero
The revision comes down to one modeling decision. Citi cut its 12-month net ETF inflow assumption to zero, down from $10 billion. Because the bank's price model treats ETF flows as an important driver, removing $10 billion in assumed inflows and replacing it with nothing mechanically pulls the targets lower. This isn't a change of heart about the asset, it's the model catching up to observed reality.
That reality is negative flows. Citi noted Bitcoin ETF flows are down about $3.3 billion year-to-date and have recently turned negative, which is the empirical basis for zeroing out the forward assumption. As the bank put it, ETF flows, "an important driver of prices, have turned negative recently." It's worth noting this is Citi's second cut of 2026, having already lowered its Bitcoin target from $143,000 to $112,000 in March, a sign of how quickly institutional sentiment has cooled.
The Three Sentiment Drags
Beyond the flow-model change, Citi named three factors weighing on the outlook:
Stalled legislation: slow progress on US crypto legislation, keeping the regulatory catalyst out of reach.Treasury-company selling: concerns over potential Bitcoin selling by digital-asset treasury companies, a live issue given Strategy's recently announced BTC Monetization Program and similar corporate structures.AI rotation: a rotation of investor capital into AI-related assets, drawing money away from crypto on the margin.
The bank expects broader investor adoption to stay on hold until a new catalyst emerges.
Where Price Actually Sits
Here's the context that reframes the whole story. At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading at $58,900 according to CoinMarketCap, its weakest since September 2024, having halved from its $126,000 all-time high set October 2025. Ether is at $1,570, its lowest since April 2025.
Against those depressed levels, the cut targets tell a different story than "Citi turns bearish." The revised $82,000 Bitcoin target still sits roughly 39% above the current price, and the $2,240 Ether target about 41% above where Ether trades. So while the headline is a downgrade, the bank isn't calling for further downside, it lowered the ceiling, but its 12-month targets still imply significant upside from current levels. That distinction is easy to lose and worth holding onto.
What the Downgrade Actually Is
Structurally, this is a flow-model revision, not a thesis break. Citi didn't abandon its constructive medium-term view; it recalibrated its ETF inflow assumption to match the negative 2026 flows the market actually produced, which mechanically lowered the targets. The bank's stated position is essentially that adoption is paused pending a catalyst, not that the asset class is broken.
The AI-rotation point ties into a broader narrative visible across the market this year: capital being pulled toward AI on the margin, leaving crypto flows depleted in the near term. What would change Citi's math is straightforward, and it's the same thing the bank zeroed out: ETF flows. If inflows return, the assumption that dragged these targets down reverses, and with it the modeled ceiling. Until then, Citi's message is a lowered target from a paused market, not a forecast of deeper losses from here.
#bitcoin
Key Takeaways
Citi cut its 12-month Bitcoin target to $82,000 from $112,000, and ETH to $2,240 from $3,175.The main driver was cutting its assumed 12-month ETF inflows to zero from $10 billion.Even after the cut, both targets sit roughly 39-41% above current prices.It's a flow-model recalibration, not a call for further downside.
In a note shared by Reuters, the bank lowered its 12-month Bitcoin target to $82,000 from $112,000, a cut of roughly 27%, and trimmed its Ether target to $2,240 from $3,175, down about 29%.
The Mechanical Driver: ETF Inflows Cut to Zero
The revision comes down to one modeling decision. Citi cut its 12-month net ETF inflow assumption to zero, down from $10 billion. Because the bank's price model treats ETF flows as an important driver, removing $10 billion in assumed inflows and replacing it with nothing mechanically pulls the targets lower. This isn't a change of heart about the asset, it's the model catching up to observed reality.
That reality is negative flows. Citi noted Bitcoin ETF flows are down about $3.3 billion year-to-date and have recently turned negative, which is the empirical basis for zeroing out the forward assumption. As the bank put it, ETF flows, "an important driver of prices, have turned negative recently." It's worth noting this is Citi's second cut of 2026, having already lowered its Bitcoin target from $143,000 to $112,000 in March, a sign of how quickly institutional sentiment has cooled.
The Three Sentiment Drags
Beyond the flow-model change, Citi named three factors weighing on the outlook:
Stalled legislation: slow progress on US crypto legislation, keeping the regulatory catalyst out of reach.Treasury-company selling: concerns over potential Bitcoin selling by digital-asset treasury companies, a live issue given Strategy's recently announced BTC Monetization Program and similar corporate structures.AI rotation: a rotation of investor capital into AI-related assets, drawing money away from crypto on the margin.
The bank expects broader investor adoption to stay on hold until a new catalyst emerges.
Where Price Actually Sits
Here's the context that reframes the whole story. At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading at $58,900 according to CoinMarketCap, its weakest since September 2024, having halved from its $126,000 all-time high set October 2025. Ether is at $1,570, its lowest since April 2025.
Against those depressed levels, the cut targets tell a different story than "Citi turns bearish." The revised $82,000 Bitcoin target still sits roughly 39% above the current price, and the $2,240 Ether target about 41% above where Ether trades. So while the headline is a downgrade, the bank isn't calling for further downside, it lowered the ceiling, but its 12-month targets still imply significant upside from current levels. That distinction is easy to lose and worth holding onto.
What the Downgrade Actually Is
Structurally, this is a flow-model revision, not a thesis break. Citi didn't abandon its constructive medium-term view; it recalibrated its ETF inflow assumption to match the negative 2026 flows the market actually produced, which mechanically lowered the targets. The bank's stated position is essentially that adoption is paused pending a catalyst, not that the asset class is broken.
The AI-rotation point ties into a broader narrative visible across the market this year: capital being pulled toward AI on the margin, leaving crypto flows depleted in the near term. What would change Citi's math is straightforward, and it's the same thing the bank zeroed out: ETF flows. If inflows return, the assumption that dragged these targets down reverses, and with it the modeled ceiling. Until then, Citi's message is a lowered target from a paused market, not a forecast of deeper losses from here.
#bitcoin
46
Artigo
Quão ruim foi junho para o Bitcoin depois que os ETFs sangraram capital todas as semanasJunho de 2026 foi um mês estruturalmente significativo para o Bitcoin, não apenas um mês de queda. A evidência mais clara está nos fundos de Bitcoin à vista negociados em ETF: eles perderam capital de forma contínua, sem uma única semana positiva.
Principais conclusões
ETFs de Bitcoin à vista registraram saídas líquidas todas as semanas até junho.
O BTC caiu de cerca de US$ 73 mil para US$ 58 mil, a menor mínima desde setembro de 2024.
Cada ciclo de Bitcoin exigiu muito mais capital para um retorno menor em percentual.
A pressão de venda e os sinais de acumulação se intensificaram ao mesmo tempo.
Essa recompra institucional sustentada, junto com uma forte queda de preço e uma divergência relevante na cadeia (on-chain), é o que faz junho parecer uma mudança na estrutura do mercado, e não apenas um simples selloff.
Quão ruim foi junho para o Bitcoin depois que os ETFs sangraram capital todas as semanas
Junho de 2026 foi um mês estruturalmente significativo para o Bitcoin, não apenas um mês de queda. A evidência mais clara está nos fundos de Bitcoin à vista negociados em ETF: eles perderam capital de forma contínua, sem uma única semana positiva.
Principais conclusões
ETFs de Bitcoin à vista registraram saídas líquidas todas as semanas até junho.
O BTC caiu de cerca de US$ 73 mil para US$ 58 mil, a menor mínima desde setembro de 2024.
Cada ciclo de Bitcoin exigiu muito mais capital para um retorno menor em percentual.
A pressão de venda e os sinais de acumulação se intensificaram ao mesmo tempo.
Essa recompra institucional sustentada, junto com uma forte queda de preço e uma divergência relevante na cadeia (on-chain), é o que faz junho parecer uma mudança na estrutura do mercado, e não apenas um simples selloff.
Principais conclusões
ETFs de Bitcoin à vista registraram saídas líquidas todas as semanas até junho.
O BTC caiu de cerca de US$ 73 mil para US$ 58 mil, a menor mínima desde setembro de 2024.
Cada ciclo de Bitcoin exigiu muito mais capital para um retorno menor em percentual.
A pressão de venda e os sinais de acumulação se intensificaram ao mesmo tempo.
Essa recompra institucional sustentada, junto com uma forte queda de preço e uma divergência relevante na cadeia (on-chain), é o que faz junho parecer uma mudança na estrutura do mercado, e não apenas um simples selloff.
69
Artigo
Donald Trump Divulgou Quanto Criptomoeda Ele Tem em Seu Mais Recente ArquivoO presidente dos EUA, Donald trump, divulgou renda de criptomoedas em uma escala sem precedentes modernos.
Principais conclusões
A divulgação financeira de Trump de 2025 foi divulgada em 30 de junho de 2026 pelo Escritório de Ética do Governo.
Ela lista US$ 236,25 milhões em receitas líquidas com as vendas dos tokens da World Liberty Financial.
Os detalhes do registro de criptomoedas mantidas em carteiras frias entre ETH, BTC, USDC, USD e LINK.
As anotações do revisor apontam uma extensão de 45 dias e multas por atraso para transações previamente não reportadas.
A divulgação anual de Donald Trump de 2025, protocolada no formulário OGE 278e, foi certificada pelo Escritório de Ética do Governo dos EUA em 30 de junho de 2026. O relatório de 927 páginas detalha centenas de milhões de dólares em renda relacionada a cripto, a maior parte vinculada a um único empreendimento: World Liberty Financial.
Donald Trump Divulgou Quanto Criptomoeda Ele Tem em Seu Mais Recente Arquivo
O presidente dos EUA, Donald trump, divulgou renda de criptomoedas em uma escala sem precedentes modernos.
Principais conclusões
A divulgação financeira de Trump de 2025 foi divulgada em 30 de junho de 2026 pelo Escritório de Ética do Governo.
Ela lista US$ 236,25 milhões em receitas líquidas com as vendas dos tokens da World Liberty Financial.
Os detalhes do registro de criptomoedas mantidas em carteiras frias entre ETH, BTC, USDC, USD e LINK.
As anotações do revisor apontam uma extensão de 45 dias e multas por atraso para transações previamente não reportadas.
A divulgação anual de Donald Trump de 2025, protocolada no formulário OGE 278e, foi certificada pelo Escritório de Ética do Governo dos EUA em 30 de junho de 2026. O relatório de 927 páginas detalha centenas de milhões de dólares em renda relacionada a cripto, a maior parte vinculada a um único empreendimento: World Liberty Financial.
Principais conclusões
A divulgação financeira de Trump de 2025 foi divulgada em 30 de junho de 2026 pelo Escritório de Ética do Governo.
Ela lista US$ 236,25 milhões em receitas líquidas com as vendas dos tokens da World Liberty Financial.
Os detalhes do registro de criptomoedas mantidas em carteiras frias entre ETH, BTC, USDC, USD e LINK.
As anotações do revisor apontam uma extensão de 45 dias e multas por atraso para transações previamente não reportadas.
A divulgação anual de Donald Trump de 2025, protocolada no formulário OGE 278e, foi certificada pelo Escritório de Ética do Governo dos EUA em 30 de junho de 2026. O relatório de 927 páginas detalha centenas de milhões de dólares em renda relacionada a cripto, a maior parte vinculada a um único empreendimento: World Liberty Financial.
85
Artigo
O Prazo do MiCA Chegou: Quais Bolsas Foram LicenciadasEm 1º de julho de 2026, termina o período de transição da regulamentação da UE sobre Mercados de Cripto-Ativos (MiCA) e qualquer bolsa que atenda usuários da UE sem uma licença de CASP estará operando fora da lei da União Europeia. A parte impressionante não é a regra em si, mas o quão poucas empresas realmente conseguiram atender ao requisito, e o quão concentrados estão os sobreviventes licenciados.
Principais conclusões
O período de transição do MiCA termina em 1º de julho de 2026, sem extensões.
Apenas uma pequena fração das empresas de cripto da Europa anteriores ao MiCA conseguiu obter uma licença.
As bolsas licenciadas se concentram fortemente em Malta, Áustria e Luxemburgo.
O Prazo do MiCA Chegou: Quais Bolsas Foram Licenciadas
Em 1º de julho de 2026, termina o período de transição da regulamentação da UE sobre Mercados de Cripto-Ativos (MiCA) e qualquer bolsa que atenda usuários da UE sem uma licença de CASP estará operando fora da lei da União Europeia. A parte impressionante não é a regra em si, mas o quão poucas empresas realmente conseguiram atender ao requisito, e o quão concentrados estão os sobreviventes licenciados.
Principais conclusões
O período de transição do MiCA termina em 1º de julho de 2026, sem extensões.
Apenas uma pequena fração das empresas de cripto da Europa anteriores ao MiCA conseguiu obter uma licença.
As bolsas licenciadas se concentram fortemente em Malta, Áustria e Luxemburgo.
Principais conclusões
O período de transição do MiCA termina em 1º de julho de 2026, sem extensões.
Apenas uma pequena fração das empresas de cripto da Europa anteriores ao MiCA conseguiu obter uma licença.
As bolsas licenciadas se concentram fortemente em Malta, Áustria e Luxemburgo.
32
Artigo
Banco Adquiriria 120M€ em BitcoinUm banco privado com sede nos Emirados Árabes Unidos teria usado a recente correção do mercado para adquirir 120 milhões de euros em Bitcoin, embora a alegação não tenha auditoria independente.
Principais conclusões
O Goldman Lampe Private Bank anunciou uma compra de 120M€ (US$ 137M) em Bitcoin por meio de um comunicado à imprensa.
O Banco Nacional da República Tcheca emitiu um aviso afirmando que a entidade não possui autorização para prestar serviços financeiros em sua jurisdição.
A aquisição reportada se baseia em um comunicado corporativo; até o momento, não foram fornecidas evidências públicas on-chain ou auditorias de terceiros.
Banco Adquiriria 120M€ em Bitcoin
Um banco privado com sede nos Emirados Árabes Unidos teria usado a recente correção do mercado para adquirir 120 milhões de euros em Bitcoin, embora a alegação não tenha auditoria independente.
Principais conclusões
O Goldman Lampe Private Bank anunciou uma compra de 120M€ (US$ 137M) em Bitcoin por meio de um comunicado à imprensa.
O Banco Nacional da República Tcheca emitiu um aviso afirmando que a entidade não possui autorização para prestar serviços financeiros em sua jurisdição.
A aquisição reportada se baseia em um comunicado corporativo; até o momento, não foram fornecidas evidências públicas on-chain ou auditorias de terceiros.
Principais conclusões
O Goldman Lampe Private Bank anunciou uma compra de 120M€ (US$ 137M) em Bitcoin por meio de um comunicado à imprensa.
O Banco Nacional da República Tcheca emitiu um aviso afirmando que a entidade não possui autorização para prestar serviços financeiros em sua jurisdição.
A aquisição reportada se baseia em um comunicado corporativo; até o momento, não foram fornecidas evidências públicas on-chain ou auditorias de terceiros.
63
Artigo
Ver tradução
Visa, Mastercard, and BlackRock Back a New Stablecoin: Open USDA new stablecoin is launching with one of the broadest backer lists the sector has seen. Open Standard announced Open USD, a stablecoin supported by a consortium of more than 140 financial and crypto companies.
Key Takeaways
Open Standard launched Open USD, a stablecoin backed by a consortium of 140+ companies.Partners can mint and redeem at no cost and share in the reserve earnings.Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, BNY, and Coinbase are among the backers.It's governed collaboratively by its partners rather than a single issuer.
The notable part isn't the token itself, plenty of dollar-pegged stablecoins already exist, but the governance and economics built around it, which aim directly at the structural complaints businesses have long had about existing stablecoins.
What Open USD Actually Is
At its core, Open USD is a new stablecoin built for global money movement, a dollar-pegged token designed to move value across borders and across the internet economy. Three design principles define it. Businesses can mint and redeem Open USD at no cost, with no artificial volume limits. Partners receive all earnings from the underlying reserves, minus a small management fee, rather than the issuer alone capturing the yield those reserves generate. And the stablecoin is governed collaboratively through Open Standard, an independent company whose board is composed of Open USD's own partners rather than a single controlling entity.
Each of those targets a specific pain point with existing stablecoins: minting and redemption fees that get prohibitively expensive at scale, businesses being shut out of the reserve earnings, and limited recourse when a third-party issuer's roadmap doesn't serve a business's needs. Zach Abrams, Founding CEO of Open Standard, framed the launch around that gap: "We're thrilled to bring together over 140 businesses to launch Open USD. It's a stablecoin built for the internet economy, designed by the businesses growing it."
The Biggest Names, and Why Each One Matters
The backer list is what gives the launch its weight. A few stand out for what they specifically bring:
Visa and Mastercard: the two dominant global card networks. Their participation signals that traditional card rails see stablecoin infrastructure as complementary to their business rather than a threat.Stripe: one of the largest payment processors globally. Because Stripe sits directly in the checkout flow for a huge share of internet commerce, its involvement gives Open USD a path into everyday consumer and merchant transactions, not just institutional settlement.BlackRock: the world's largest asset manager, and the clearest institutional credibility signal on the list. It already manages tokenized fund products, so this extends that posture into stablecoin infrastructure.BNY: one of the world's largest custodian banks, handling trillions in assets under custody. Its presence matters for institutional trust in how the reserves backing Open USD would be held.American Express and Discover: rounding out the major card networks, meaning all the dominant US card brands are aligned with this single effort rather than building competing ones.Coinbase: the largest US-based crypto exchange and a key on-ramp, giving Open USD direct distribution into crypto-native users.Ripple and Solana: major blockchain infrastructure players rather than payment companies, signaling Open USD is built for multi-chain deployment rather than tied to one ecosystem.Western Union and MoneyGram: the two largest global remittance firms, targeting the cross-border money-movement use case where stablecoin speed and cost advantages are most pronounced, especially in emerging markets.
Several executives put the launch in their own terms. Mastercard's Jorn Lambert, Chief Product Officer, framed it as an infrastructure philosophy: "The technologies that changed the world, from the internet to mobile networks, succeeded because they became shared infrastructure that anyone could build on." BlackRock's Samara Cohen, Global Head of Market Development, called it "a constructive step toward giving businesses more choice in how they access tokenized value and participate in internet native digital rails." And BNY's Carolyn Weinberg, Chief Product and Innovation Officer, offered the announcement's most specific market-size claim: "We anticipate that stablecoins alone may grow to $1.5 trillion by 2030."
The Banking Coalition Behind It
Beyond the headline names, the partner list includes a striking number of major regional and national banks spanning nearly every continent: Standard Chartered, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, DBS, U.S. Bank, BBVA, Mizuho, Westpac, Itaú, OCBC, and dozens more. That breadth is itself a signal. Open USD isn't positioning as a US-centric or Western-centric stablecoin, it's assembling distribution across Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa at the same time, through established banking relationships in each region.
What It Could Mean Across the Crypto Sector
The mechanics, free minting, shared reserve earnings, and partner governance, land differently depending on where you sit.
For businesses building on stablecoins, this is who the model is built for. Free minting at scale plus a share of the reserve yield flips the economics: instead of paying an issuer that keeps the interest on the float, partners capture part of that yield themselves. At high volume, that's a real shift in who profits from the reserves.
For existing issuers, it's competitive pressure. The market is dominated by a few issuers that keep the reserve yield, a model the GENIUS Act reinforces by barring them from paying interest to holders. Open USD attacks exactly that, sharing yield and dropping fees. With its backers' distribution, it pressures issuers competing only on being early or regulated.
For investors, the honest read is that Open USD is infrastructure, not a token to speculate on. The signal isn't "buy Open USD"; it's that the biggest names in payments and asset management are converging on stablecoins as shared infrastructure. What's worth watching is second-order: the publicly traded backers with stablecoin exposure, and whether consortium models like this accelerate payment volume moving onto stablecoin rails.
For everyday users, the impact is indirect, cheaper, faster transactions if Open USD reaches the checkout flows, exchanges, and remittance corridors its backers run. With Western Union and MoneyGram on the list, cross-border transfers in emerging markets are where ordinary users would see the clearest benefit.
The Throughline: Infrastructure, Not a Product
The consistent theme across the quoted executives is infrastructure neutrality. BlackRock frames it as business choice, BNY frames it as a market-size opportunity that justifies institutional support, and Mastercard frames it explicitly as a continuation of how the internet itself succeeded, through open, shared, interoperable infrastructure rather than a closed, single-company system. That shared framing across a card network, an asset manager, and a custodian bank is the clearest indication of what Open USD is trying to be: less a product competing on features, and more a shared utility layer governed by the businesses that use it.
Whether it delivers on that is the open question. The pitch, collaborative governance, shared reserve economics, and free minting, is a direct answer to what businesses have disliked about incumbent stablecoins. But a consortium that asks more than 140 companies, including direct rivals like Visa and Mastercard, to align on governance and economics is also a coordination challenge, and its success will depend on execution, not just the strength of the backer list. For now, the sheer breadth of that list is the story.
#altcoins
Visa, Mastercard, and BlackRock Back a New Stablecoin: Open USD
A new stablecoin is launching with one of the broadest backer lists the sector has seen. Open Standard announced Open USD, a stablecoin supported by a consortium of more than 140 financial and crypto companies.
Key Takeaways
Open Standard launched Open USD, a stablecoin backed by a consortium of 140+ companies.Partners can mint and redeem at no cost and share in the reserve earnings.Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, BNY, and Coinbase are among the backers.It's governed collaboratively by its partners rather than a single issuer.
The notable part isn't the token itself, plenty of dollar-pegged stablecoins already exist, but the governance and economics built around it, which aim directly at the structural complaints businesses have long had about existing stablecoins.
What Open USD Actually Is
At its core, Open USD is a new stablecoin built for global money movement, a dollar-pegged token designed to move value across borders and across the internet economy. Three design principles define it. Businesses can mint and redeem Open USD at no cost, with no artificial volume limits. Partners receive all earnings from the underlying reserves, minus a small management fee, rather than the issuer alone capturing the yield those reserves generate. And the stablecoin is governed collaboratively through Open Standard, an independent company whose board is composed of Open USD's own partners rather than a single controlling entity.
Each of those targets a specific pain point with existing stablecoins: minting and redemption fees that get prohibitively expensive at scale, businesses being shut out of the reserve earnings, and limited recourse when a third-party issuer's roadmap doesn't serve a business's needs. Zach Abrams, Founding CEO of Open Standard, framed the launch around that gap: "We're thrilled to bring together over 140 businesses to launch Open USD. It's a stablecoin built for the internet economy, designed by the businesses growing it."
The Biggest Names, and Why Each One Matters
The backer list is what gives the launch its weight. A few stand out for what they specifically bring:
Visa and Mastercard: the two dominant global card networks. Their participation signals that traditional card rails see stablecoin infrastructure as complementary to their business rather than a threat.Stripe: one of the largest payment processors globally. Because Stripe sits directly in the checkout flow for a huge share of internet commerce, its involvement gives Open USD a path into everyday consumer and merchant transactions, not just institutional settlement.BlackRock: the world's largest asset manager, and the clearest institutional credibility signal on the list. It already manages tokenized fund products, so this extends that posture into stablecoin infrastructure.BNY: one of the world's largest custodian banks, handling trillions in assets under custody. Its presence matters for institutional trust in how the reserves backing Open USD would be held.American Express and Discover: rounding out the major card networks, meaning all the dominant US card brands are aligned with this single effort rather than building competing ones.Coinbase: the largest US-based crypto exchange and a key on-ramp, giving Open USD direct distribution into crypto-native users.Ripple and Solana: major blockchain infrastructure players rather than payment companies, signaling Open USD is built for multi-chain deployment rather than tied to one ecosystem.Western Union and MoneyGram: the two largest global remittance firms, targeting the cross-border money-movement use case where stablecoin speed and cost advantages are most pronounced, especially in emerging markets.
Several executives put the launch in their own terms. Mastercard's Jorn Lambert, Chief Product Officer, framed it as an infrastructure philosophy: "The technologies that changed the world, from the internet to mobile networks, succeeded because they became shared infrastructure that anyone could build on." BlackRock's Samara Cohen, Global Head of Market Development, called it "a constructive step toward giving businesses more choice in how they access tokenized value and participate in internet native digital rails." And BNY's Carolyn Weinberg, Chief Product and Innovation Officer, offered the announcement's most specific market-size claim: "We anticipate that stablecoins alone may grow to $1.5 trillion by 2030."
The Banking Coalition Behind It
Beyond the headline names, the partner list includes a striking number of major regional and national banks spanning nearly every continent: Standard Chartered, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, DBS, U.S. Bank, BBVA, Mizuho, Westpac, Itaú, OCBC, and dozens more. That breadth is itself a signal. Open USD isn't positioning as a US-centric or Western-centric stablecoin, it's assembling distribution across Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa at the same time, through established banking relationships in each region.
What It Could Mean Across the Crypto Sector
The mechanics, free minting, shared reserve earnings, and partner governance, land differently depending on where you sit.
For businesses building on stablecoins, this is who the model is built for. Free minting at scale plus a share of the reserve yield flips the economics: instead of paying an issuer that keeps the interest on the float, partners capture part of that yield themselves. At high volume, that's a real shift in who profits from the reserves.
For existing issuers, it's competitive pressure. The market is dominated by a few issuers that keep the reserve yield, a model the GENIUS Act reinforces by barring them from paying interest to holders. Open USD attacks exactly that, sharing yield and dropping fees. With its backers' distribution, it pressures issuers competing only on being early or regulated.
For investors, the honest read is that Open USD is infrastructure, not a token to speculate on. The signal isn't "buy Open USD"; it's that the biggest names in payments and asset management are converging on stablecoins as shared infrastructure. What's worth watching is second-order: the publicly traded backers with stablecoin exposure, and whether consortium models like this accelerate payment volume moving onto stablecoin rails.
For everyday users, the impact is indirect, cheaper, faster transactions if Open USD reaches the checkout flows, exchanges, and remittance corridors its backers run. With Western Union and MoneyGram on the list, cross-border transfers in emerging markets are where ordinary users would see the clearest benefit.
The Throughline: Infrastructure, Not a Product
The consistent theme across the quoted executives is infrastructure neutrality. BlackRock frames it as business choice, BNY frames it as a market-size opportunity that justifies institutional support, and Mastercard frames it explicitly as a continuation of how the internet itself succeeded, through open, shared, interoperable infrastructure rather than a closed, single-company system. That shared framing across a card network, an asset manager, and a custodian bank is the clearest indication of what Open USD is trying to be: less a product competing on features, and more a shared utility layer governed by the businesses that use it.
Whether it delivers on that is the open question. The pitch, collaborative governance, shared reserve economics, and free minting, is a direct answer to what businesses have disliked about incumbent stablecoins. But a consortium that asks more than 140 companies, including direct rivals like Visa and Mastercard, to align on governance and economics is also a coordination challenge, and its success will depend on execution, not just the strength of the backer list. For now, the sheer breadth of that list is the story.
#altcoins
Key Takeaways
Open Standard launched Open USD, a stablecoin backed by a consortium of 140+ companies.Partners can mint and redeem at no cost and share in the reserve earnings.Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, BNY, and Coinbase are among the backers.It's governed collaboratively by its partners rather than a single issuer.
The notable part isn't the token itself, plenty of dollar-pegged stablecoins already exist, but the governance and economics built around it, which aim directly at the structural complaints businesses have long had about existing stablecoins.
What Open USD Actually Is
At its core, Open USD is a new stablecoin built for global money movement, a dollar-pegged token designed to move value across borders and across the internet economy. Three design principles define it. Businesses can mint and redeem Open USD at no cost, with no artificial volume limits. Partners receive all earnings from the underlying reserves, minus a small management fee, rather than the issuer alone capturing the yield those reserves generate. And the stablecoin is governed collaboratively through Open Standard, an independent company whose board is composed of Open USD's own partners rather than a single controlling entity.
Each of those targets a specific pain point with existing stablecoins: minting and redemption fees that get prohibitively expensive at scale, businesses being shut out of the reserve earnings, and limited recourse when a third-party issuer's roadmap doesn't serve a business's needs. Zach Abrams, Founding CEO of Open Standard, framed the launch around that gap: "We're thrilled to bring together over 140 businesses to launch Open USD. It's a stablecoin built for the internet economy, designed by the businesses growing it."
The Biggest Names, and Why Each One Matters
The backer list is what gives the launch its weight. A few stand out for what they specifically bring:
Visa and Mastercard: the two dominant global card networks. Their participation signals that traditional card rails see stablecoin infrastructure as complementary to their business rather than a threat.Stripe: one of the largest payment processors globally. Because Stripe sits directly in the checkout flow for a huge share of internet commerce, its involvement gives Open USD a path into everyday consumer and merchant transactions, not just institutional settlement.BlackRock: the world's largest asset manager, and the clearest institutional credibility signal on the list. It already manages tokenized fund products, so this extends that posture into stablecoin infrastructure.BNY: one of the world's largest custodian banks, handling trillions in assets under custody. Its presence matters for institutional trust in how the reserves backing Open USD would be held.American Express and Discover: rounding out the major card networks, meaning all the dominant US card brands are aligned with this single effort rather than building competing ones.Coinbase: the largest US-based crypto exchange and a key on-ramp, giving Open USD direct distribution into crypto-native users.Ripple and Solana: major blockchain infrastructure players rather than payment companies, signaling Open USD is built for multi-chain deployment rather than tied to one ecosystem.Western Union and MoneyGram: the two largest global remittance firms, targeting the cross-border money-movement use case where stablecoin speed and cost advantages are most pronounced, especially in emerging markets.
Several executives put the launch in their own terms. Mastercard's Jorn Lambert, Chief Product Officer, framed it as an infrastructure philosophy: "The technologies that changed the world, from the internet to mobile networks, succeeded because they became shared infrastructure that anyone could build on." BlackRock's Samara Cohen, Global Head of Market Development, called it "a constructive step toward giving businesses more choice in how they access tokenized value and participate in internet native digital rails." And BNY's Carolyn Weinberg, Chief Product and Innovation Officer, offered the announcement's most specific market-size claim: "We anticipate that stablecoins alone may grow to $1.5 trillion by 2030."
The Banking Coalition Behind It
Beyond the headline names, the partner list includes a striking number of major regional and national banks spanning nearly every continent: Standard Chartered, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, DBS, U.S. Bank, BBVA, Mizuho, Westpac, Itaú, OCBC, and dozens more. That breadth is itself a signal. Open USD isn't positioning as a US-centric or Western-centric stablecoin, it's assembling distribution across Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa at the same time, through established banking relationships in each region.
What It Could Mean Across the Crypto Sector
The mechanics, free minting, shared reserve earnings, and partner governance, land differently depending on where you sit.
For businesses building on stablecoins, this is who the model is built for. Free minting at scale plus a share of the reserve yield flips the economics: instead of paying an issuer that keeps the interest on the float, partners capture part of that yield themselves. At high volume, that's a real shift in who profits from the reserves.
For existing issuers, it's competitive pressure. The market is dominated by a few issuers that keep the reserve yield, a model the GENIUS Act reinforces by barring them from paying interest to holders. Open USD attacks exactly that, sharing yield and dropping fees. With its backers' distribution, it pressures issuers competing only on being early or regulated.
For investors, the honest read is that Open USD is infrastructure, not a token to speculate on. The signal isn't "buy Open USD"; it's that the biggest names in payments and asset management are converging on stablecoins as shared infrastructure. What's worth watching is second-order: the publicly traded backers with stablecoin exposure, and whether consortium models like this accelerate payment volume moving onto stablecoin rails.
For everyday users, the impact is indirect, cheaper, faster transactions if Open USD reaches the checkout flows, exchanges, and remittance corridors its backers run. With Western Union and MoneyGram on the list, cross-border transfers in emerging markets are where ordinary users would see the clearest benefit.
The Throughline: Infrastructure, Not a Product
The consistent theme across the quoted executives is infrastructure neutrality. BlackRock frames it as business choice, BNY frames it as a market-size opportunity that justifies institutional support, and Mastercard frames it explicitly as a continuation of how the internet itself succeeded, through open, shared, interoperable infrastructure rather than a closed, single-company system. That shared framing across a card network, an asset manager, and a custodian bank is the clearest indication of what Open USD is trying to be: less a product competing on features, and more a shared utility layer governed by the businesses that use it.
Whether it delivers on that is the open question. The pitch, collaborative governance, shared reserve economics, and free minting, is a direct answer to what businesses have disliked about incumbent stablecoins. But a consortium that asks more than 140 companies, including direct rivals like Visa and Mastercard, to align on governance and economics is also a coordination challenge, and its success will depend on execution, not just the strength of the backer list. For now, the sheer breadth of that list is the story.
#altcoins
77
Artigo
Ver tradução
Crypto Fraudster Gets 30 Years Over a Fake Gold-Backed TokenA fraud that used a fabricated cryptocurrency ecosystem as one of its central vehicles has ended in a 30-year prison sentence.
Key Takeaways
Guo Wengui was sentenced to 30 years for a fraud built partly on a fake crypto ecosystem.His Himalaya Exchange and H-Coin token raised over $262 million from investors.Prosecutors said H-Coin was falsely marketed as backed by gold reserves.The total fraud exceeded $1 billion, with $889 million ordered forfeited.
On June 29, 2026, US District Judge Analisa Torres in Manhattan sentenced self-exiled Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui, also known as Miles Guo or Ho Wan Kwok, for a scheme that prosecutors say defrauded followers of more than $1 billion. For a crypto audience, the most relevant piece is how a fake token sat at the center of it.
The Crypto Mechanism: H-Coin and a Fake Gold Backing
Guo built and promoted the Himalaya Exchange, presented to his followers as a legitimate cryptocurrency ecosystem. Inside it, he marketed a token called H-Coin (also known as Himalaya Coin or HCN). According to the Department of Justice and the SEC, the central deception was a specific false claim: that H-Coin was backed by 20% gold reserves. That backing never existed. It was fabricated to give the token a veneer of asset-backed security and draw in retail investors looking for exactly that kind of safety in a crypto product.
The H-Coin scheme alone raised over $262 million from victims, a figure prosecutors tied specifically to the Himalaya Exchange component, separate from Guo's other fraudulent ventures. That makes this a textbook case of a pattern crypto investors should recognize: a fake asset-backing claim used to manufacture false credibility. Gold-backing and reserve claims are a recurring fraud vector in the space, and this case attaches real numbers, a prosecution, and a sentence to the pattern.
The Scale: A Billion-Dollar Fraud
The crypto piece sat inside a much larger enterprise. Guo was convicted in July 2024 on nine felony counts including racketeering, wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering, after a scheme that ran from 2018 to March 2023. Prosecutors established that his combined operation, of which the Himalaya Exchange and H-Coin were one part, defrauded followers of more than $1 billion. Judge Torres ordered the forfeiture of $889 million in illegal gains toward victim restitution.
Beyond the Himalaya Exchange, the fraud ran through other vehicles, including his GTV Media Group, whose 2020 stock offering raised hundreds of millions, and a luxury membership program. The crypto component was one engine in a multi-part machine.
How the Trust Was Built
What made the fraud work is a mechanism crypto users should pay attention to, because it recurs constantly in the space: affinity. Guo built his following by positioning himself as a prominent dissident and critic of the Chinese Communist Party according to CNN, and he used the trust that platform generated to push his investment products, H-Coin among them, to an audience inclined to believe him. The victims weren't anonymous speculators; they were followers who trusted the messenger. That dynamic, where shared identity or cause lowers a victim's guard, is one of the most common setups in crypto fraud.
Where the Money Went
The contrast between the stated purpose and the actual use of funds is stark. Money raised under the banner of supporting Chinese democracy was instead diverted to personal luxury, including a $26.5 million New Jersey mansion, a $37 million superyacht, a $1 million Lamborghini, a $140,000 piano, and even a $36,000 mattress. Judge Torres said Guo "preyed on those seeking to bring Democracy to China," taking their money to live lavishly.
The Defense and the Political Backdrop
Guo maintained his innocence throughout, with his defense arguing the prosecution was a Chinese-state-orchestrated campaign to discredit a prominent dissident. Judge Torres rejected that framing. His legal team has indicated it plans to appeal.
On the political side, briefly: According to Al Jazeera, Guo had a documented relationship with former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, and the two announced a joint anti-CCP initiative in 2020. Bannon was separately arrested in 2020 aboard Guo's yacht in an unrelated case. That context is part of Guo's public profile, but it sits to the side of the crypto fraud at the heart of the sentence.
The Enforcement Signal
For readers tracking crypto fraud enforcement, the most useful detail is structural. The DOJ and SEC didn't fold the crypto losses anonymously into a single fraud total; they enumerated and quantified the Himalaya Exchange and H-Coin scheme as its own line item, over $262 million, with the fake gold-backing claim named explicitly as the deception. That specificity matters. It signals regulators are increasingly willing to isolate and prosecute the crypto component of a broader fraud on its own terms, with named tokens, quantified losses, and the precise false claims spelled out. For an industry where "backed by" claims are made constantly, a sentenced case that turns on a fabricated reserve is a marker worth noting.
The takeaway for investors is simple but worth repeating: an asset-backing claim is only as good as its proof. Guo's case is a reminder to verify reserve and backing claims independently, regardless of how trusted or credible the person making them appears to be. The messenger's platform is not the asset's collateral.
#crime
Crypto Fraudster Gets 30 Years Over a Fake Gold-Backed Token
A fraud that used a fabricated cryptocurrency ecosystem as one of its central vehicles has ended in a 30-year prison sentence.
Key Takeaways
Guo Wengui was sentenced to 30 years for a fraud built partly on a fake crypto ecosystem.His Himalaya Exchange and H-Coin token raised over $262 million from investors.Prosecutors said H-Coin was falsely marketed as backed by gold reserves.The total fraud exceeded $1 billion, with $889 million ordered forfeited.
On June 29, 2026, US District Judge Analisa Torres in Manhattan sentenced self-exiled Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui, also known as Miles Guo or Ho Wan Kwok, for a scheme that prosecutors say defrauded followers of more than $1 billion. For a crypto audience, the most relevant piece is how a fake token sat at the center of it.
The Crypto Mechanism: H-Coin and a Fake Gold Backing
Guo built and promoted the Himalaya Exchange, presented to his followers as a legitimate cryptocurrency ecosystem. Inside it, he marketed a token called H-Coin (also known as Himalaya Coin or HCN). According to the Department of Justice and the SEC, the central deception was a specific false claim: that H-Coin was backed by 20% gold reserves. That backing never existed. It was fabricated to give the token a veneer of asset-backed security and draw in retail investors looking for exactly that kind of safety in a crypto product.
The H-Coin scheme alone raised over $262 million from victims, a figure prosecutors tied specifically to the Himalaya Exchange component, separate from Guo's other fraudulent ventures. That makes this a textbook case of a pattern crypto investors should recognize: a fake asset-backing claim used to manufacture false credibility. Gold-backing and reserve claims are a recurring fraud vector in the space, and this case attaches real numbers, a prosecution, and a sentence to the pattern.
The Scale: A Billion-Dollar Fraud
The crypto piece sat inside a much larger enterprise. Guo was convicted in July 2024 on nine felony counts including racketeering, wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering, after a scheme that ran from 2018 to March 2023. Prosecutors established that his combined operation, of which the Himalaya Exchange and H-Coin were one part, defrauded followers of more than $1 billion. Judge Torres ordered the forfeiture of $889 million in illegal gains toward victim restitution.
Beyond the Himalaya Exchange, the fraud ran through other vehicles, including his GTV Media Group, whose 2020 stock offering raised hundreds of millions, and a luxury membership program. The crypto component was one engine in a multi-part machine.
How the Trust Was Built
What made the fraud work is a mechanism crypto users should pay attention to, because it recurs constantly in the space: affinity. Guo built his following by positioning himself as a prominent dissident and critic of the Chinese Communist Party according to CNN, and he used the trust that platform generated to push his investment products, H-Coin among them, to an audience inclined to believe him. The victims weren't anonymous speculators; they were followers who trusted the messenger. That dynamic, where shared identity or cause lowers a victim's guard, is one of the most common setups in crypto fraud.
Where the Money Went
The contrast between the stated purpose and the actual use of funds is stark. Money raised under the banner of supporting Chinese democracy was instead diverted to personal luxury, including a $26.5 million New Jersey mansion, a $37 million superyacht, a $1 million Lamborghini, a $140,000 piano, and even a $36,000 mattress. Judge Torres said Guo "preyed on those seeking to bring Democracy to China," taking their money to live lavishly.
The Defense and the Political Backdrop
Guo maintained his innocence throughout, with his defense arguing the prosecution was a Chinese-state-orchestrated campaign to discredit a prominent dissident. Judge Torres rejected that framing. His legal team has indicated it plans to appeal.
On the political side, briefly: According to Al Jazeera, Guo had a documented relationship with former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, and the two announced a joint anti-CCP initiative in 2020. Bannon was separately arrested in 2020 aboard Guo's yacht in an unrelated case. That context is part of Guo's public profile, but it sits to the side of the crypto fraud at the heart of the sentence.
The Enforcement Signal
For readers tracking crypto fraud enforcement, the most useful detail is structural. The DOJ and SEC didn't fold the crypto losses anonymously into a single fraud total; they enumerated and quantified the Himalaya Exchange and H-Coin scheme as its own line item, over $262 million, with the fake gold-backing claim named explicitly as the deception. That specificity matters. It signals regulators are increasingly willing to isolate and prosecute the crypto component of a broader fraud on its own terms, with named tokens, quantified losses, and the precise false claims spelled out. For an industry where "backed by" claims are made constantly, a sentenced case that turns on a fabricated reserve is a marker worth noting.
The takeaway for investors is simple but worth repeating: an asset-backing claim is only as good as its proof. Guo's case is a reminder to verify reserve and backing claims independently, regardless of how trusted or credible the person making them appears to be. The messenger's platform is not the asset's collateral.
#crime
Key Takeaways
Guo Wengui was sentenced to 30 years for a fraud built partly on a fake crypto ecosystem.His Himalaya Exchange and H-Coin token raised over $262 million from investors.Prosecutors said H-Coin was falsely marketed as backed by gold reserves.The total fraud exceeded $1 billion, with $889 million ordered forfeited.
On June 29, 2026, US District Judge Analisa Torres in Manhattan sentenced self-exiled Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui, also known as Miles Guo or Ho Wan Kwok, for a scheme that prosecutors say defrauded followers of more than $1 billion. For a crypto audience, the most relevant piece is how a fake token sat at the center of it.
The Crypto Mechanism: H-Coin and a Fake Gold Backing
Guo built and promoted the Himalaya Exchange, presented to his followers as a legitimate cryptocurrency ecosystem. Inside it, he marketed a token called H-Coin (also known as Himalaya Coin or HCN). According to the Department of Justice and the SEC, the central deception was a specific false claim: that H-Coin was backed by 20% gold reserves. That backing never existed. It was fabricated to give the token a veneer of asset-backed security and draw in retail investors looking for exactly that kind of safety in a crypto product.
The H-Coin scheme alone raised over $262 million from victims, a figure prosecutors tied specifically to the Himalaya Exchange component, separate from Guo's other fraudulent ventures. That makes this a textbook case of a pattern crypto investors should recognize: a fake asset-backing claim used to manufacture false credibility. Gold-backing and reserve claims are a recurring fraud vector in the space, and this case attaches real numbers, a prosecution, and a sentence to the pattern.
The Scale: A Billion-Dollar Fraud
The crypto piece sat inside a much larger enterprise. Guo was convicted in July 2024 on nine felony counts including racketeering, wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering, after a scheme that ran from 2018 to March 2023. Prosecutors established that his combined operation, of which the Himalaya Exchange and H-Coin were one part, defrauded followers of more than $1 billion. Judge Torres ordered the forfeiture of $889 million in illegal gains toward victim restitution.
Beyond the Himalaya Exchange, the fraud ran through other vehicles, including his GTV Media Group, whose 2020 stock offering raised hundreds of millions, and a luxury membership program. The crypto component was one engine in a multi-part machine.
How the Trust Was Built
What made the fraud work is a mechanism crypto users should pay attention to, because it recurs constantly in the space: affinity. Guo built his following by positioning himself as a prominent dissident and critic of the Chinese Communist Party according to CNN, and he used the trust that platform generated to push his investment products, H-Coin among them, to an audience inclined to believe him. The victims weren't anonymous speculators; they were followers who trusted the messenger. That dynamic, where shared identity or cause lowers a victim's guard, is one of the most common setups in crypto fraud.
Where the Money Went
The contrast between the stated purpose and the actual use of funds is stark. Money raised under the banner of supporting Chinese democracy was instead diverted to personal luxury, including a $26.5 million New Jersey mansion, a $37 million superyacht, a $1 million Lamborghini, a $140,000 piano, and even a $36,000 mattress. Judge Torres said Guo "preyed on those seeking to bring Democracy to China," taking their money to live lavishly.
The Defense and the Political Backdrop
Guo maintained his innocence throughout, with his defense arguing the prosecution was a Chinese-state-orchestrated campaign to discredit a prominent dissident. Judge Torres rejected that framing. His legal team has indicated it plans to appeal.
On the political side, briefly: According to Al Jazeera, Guo had a documented relationship with former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, and the two announced a joint anti-CCP initiative in 2020. Bannon was separately arrested in 2020 aboard Guo's yacht in an unrelated case. That context is part of Guo's public profile, but it sits to the side of the crypto fraud at the heart of the sentence.
The Enforcement Signal
For readers tracking crypto fraud enforcement, the most useful detail is structural. The DOJ and SEC didn't fold the crypto losses anonymously into a single fraud total; they enumerated and quantified the Himalaya Exchange and H-Coin scheme as its own line item, over $262 million, with the fake gold-backing claim named explicitly as the deception. That specificity matters. It signals regulators are increasingly willing to isolate and prosecute the crypto component of a broader fraud on its own terms, with named tokens, quantified losses, and the precise false claims spelled out. For an industry where "backed by" claims are made constantly, a sentenced case that turns on a fabricated reserve is a marker worth noting.
The takeaway for investors is simple but worth repeating: an asset-backing claim is only as good as its proof. Guo's case is a reminder to verify reserve and backing claims independently, regardless of how trusted or credible the person making them appears to be. The messenger's platform is not the asset's collateral.
#crime
84
Artigo
Preço do HYPE se recupera em direção às máximas recentes após queda para a faixa de US$ 60O token nativo da Hyperliquid, HYPE, se recuperou na parte superior da sua recente faixa de negociação em 29 de junho, apagando a maior parte de uma queda no meio da semana que o havia levado à faixa baixa de US$ 60, enquanto o mercado mais amplo enfraquecia.
Principais conclusões
O HYPE rebotou perto de US$ 65,74 em 29 de junho, subindo perto de 6% e recuperando suas principais médias móveis.
Cerca de 99% das taxas do protocolo recompram HYPE, conectando a demanda ao uso da plataforma.
O cenário-base da Multicoin vê US$ 319 até 2028, cerca de cinco vezes de alta.
O movimento de recuperação veio após uma semana mais fraca, interpretada como uma pausa (resfriamento) em vez de saída de capital.
Preço do HYPE se recupera em direção às máximas recentes após queda para a faixa de US$ 60
O token nativo da Hyperliquid, HYPE, se recuperou na parte superior da sua recente faixa de negociação em 29 de junho, apagando a maior parte de uma queda no meio da semana que o havia levado à faixa baixa de US$ 60, enquanto o mercado mais amplo enfraquecia.
Principais conclusões
O HYPE rebotou perto de US$ 65,74 em 29 de junho, subindo perto de 6% e recuperando suas principais médias móveis.
Cerca de 99% das taxas do protocolo recompram HYPE, conectando a demanda ao uso da plataforma.
O cenário-base da Multicoin vê US$ 319 até 2028, cerca de cinco vezes de alta.
O movimento de recuperação veio após uma semana mais fraca, interpretada como uma pausa (resfriamento) em vez de saída de capital.
Principais conclusões
O HYPE rebotou perto de US$ 65,74 em 29 de junho, subindo perto de 6% e recuperando suas principais médias móveis.
Cerca de 99% das taxas do protocolo recompram HYPE, conectando a demanda ao uso da plataforma.
O cenário-base da Multicoin vê US$ 319 até 2028, cerca de cinco vezes de alta.
O movimento de recuperação veio após uma semana mais fraca, interpretada como uma pausa (resfriamento) em vez de saída de capital.
118
Faça login para explorar mais conteúdos
Junte-se a usuários de criptomoedas de todo o mundo no Binance Square.
⚡️ Obter informações mais recentes e úteis sobre criptomoeda.
💬 Com a confiança da maior corretora de criptomoedas do mundo.
👍 Descubra insights reais de criadores verificados.
E-mail / número de telefone
Tópicos em Alta
BitcoinFallsOver50%FromOctoberHigh
66,966 visualizações
992 discutindo
#bitcoinfallsover50%fromoctoberhigh
Bitcoin quebra em dois a partir do topo de outubro; ontem/quase ontem só veio varrer até US$ 57,7K e fez todo mundo “prender o fôlego” em grupo! 😱
Que sorte que as notícias de emprego dos EUA salvaram a situação—o tio já quase “caiu no buraco” (perigo) um tiquinho e depois recuou o pé de novo para US$ 61K–US$ 62K. Agora os tubarões de longo prazo (LTH) estão aguentando um prejuízo de até 78% da oferta em circulação, mas eles compraram o repique a US$ 90K no começo do ano—nada fora do que já vinha. Em outras palavras: “não vender é não ter prejuízo” versão tubarões! 😂
A QCP Capital diz que este é apenas um repique técnico; ainda não é reversão de tendência de verdade.
Trader, o que fazer? Não vê vela verde e sai gritando “fomo” cedo—senta aí, prende o cinto de segurança e espera passar de agosto pra ver qual caminho o tio escolhe!
⚠️ Isto não é aconselhamento financeiro. Use o código VINHTOCDO para atualizar mais rápido! 🚀
#bitcoin #ATH #TradingSignals #VINHTOCDO
$BTC
$ETH
$BNB
Vinhtocdo
·6 curtidas
·8.5k visualizações
MoonbeamToMigrateGLMRToBase
36,509 visualizações
640 discutindo
COMEXGoldSettlesUp1.49%At$4187.3
6,391 visualizações
119 discutindo