Oil Is Rising on Risk, Not on Fundamentals
The surge around the Strait of Hormuz has pushed oil close to 100 dollars per barrel, but according to me this is not a true supply shortage story. The market is reacting to disruption risk rather than a real shift in supply and demand. This distinction matters because it changes how we should read the current price action.
If we step back to the earlier outlook from the U.S. Energy Information Administration in the Short-Term Energy Outlook, the picture was very different. Global supply was expected to exceed demand for an extended period, leading to persistent inventory builds. According to me, this remains the core narrative for oil through 2026 and beyond.
Supply growth is not limited to OPEC+. It is also coming strongly from non OPEC regions such as Brazil, Guyana, and Argentina. At the same time demand growth has been slowing since 2024. According to me, this combination almost guarantees a surplus, even if the market is not fully pricing it in yet.
Another important layer is China. Strategic stockpiling has been absorbing part of the excess supply and preventing a deeper price drop. But according to me this is only a delay mechanism. Once that buying slows, the imbalance becomes much more visible.
Recent updates have lifted price expectations because of geopolitical tensions, but they still point to continued inventory growth. According to me, this reinforces a split market structure. The short term is driven by risk and headlines, while the long term is still defined by oversupply.
In the end, according to me, once tensions ease the market will return to its original path. Prices could fall faster than many expect because the underlying fundamentals have not actually changed.
#OilPricesDrop #CreatorpadVN