No dia 3 de março, o Corpo da Guarda Revolucionária Islâmica do Irã anunciou que, na manhã daquele dia, usaram 20 drones e 3 mísseis para bombardear o prédio principal de comando da base militar americana na área de Sheikh Isa, no Bahrein, e o depósito de combustível também foi incendiado, com fumaça espessa subindo no local. Tenho que dizer, as ações do Irã desta vez são realmente diferentes de antes; no passado, após serem atingidos, eles poderiam ter que esperar um tempo antes de retaliar após levantar a bandeira. Agora, apenas três dias após os ataques conjuntos dos EUA e de Israel, as contraofensivas do Irã vieram uma após a outra, e esta já é a 13ª rodada, especificamente visando os centros de comando e os hubs logísticos das forças militares dos EUA no Oriente Médio, claramente não se trata apenas de uma encenação, mas realmente querendo fazer você sentir dor. É óbvio que o Irã sabe que não pode igualar poder com poder, então se concentra em seus nós críticos; sem comando, o caos se instala, e sem combustível, os aviões ficam groundeados. Esta é uma estratégia para incapacitar suas grandes capacidades operacionais a um custo relativamente baixo. Ao mesmo tempo, o Irã fechou o Estreito de Ormuz e declarou que não negociará mais com os EUA, o que equivale a colocar todas as suas cartas na mesa, informando você de sua linha de base e métodos de retaliação, mas cada movimento é destinado a deixá-lo desconfortável. Agora, depende dos EUA responderem. Além disso, este ataque do Irã pelo menos prova um ponto: ele realmente tem os meios para atingir as forças militares dos EUA onde dói, e ele se atreve a usá-los.
Por favor, resuma em uma frase, o que é felicidade? O Irã pode suportar os ataques militares dos EUA? Quais presidentes dos EUA fizeram as maiores contribuições?
🚨NOVO FATO: 🎯O Irã emite aviso nuclear para Israel e os EUA.⚡
As apostas no Oriente Médio acabaram de aumentar dramaticamente. O Irã advertiu que, se os Estados Unidos e Israel tentarem derrubar o governo iraniano por meio de agitação armada ou operações de mudança de regime, Teerã pode atacar o reator nuclear de Dimona em Israel—um dos locais estratégicos mais sensíveis da região.
O reator nuclear de Dimona, localizado no deserto de Negev, é amplamente acreditado como central para o programa nuclear não declarado de Israel e há muito é considerado uma das instalações mais protegidas do país. Oficiais militares iranianos afirmaram que seus "mísseis finais eficazes" estão preparados para tal cenário se Washington e Tel Aviv prosseguirem com esforços para desestabilizar ou substituir a liderança do Irã.
⚠️ Analistas alertam que qualquer ataque a Dimona poderia desencadear uma escalada catastrófica, potencialmente espalhando contaminação radioativa e arrastando toda a região para uma guerra muito mais ampla.
Por enquanto, a mensagem de Teerã é clara:
Se a guerra se transformar em mudança de regime, o conflito poderia mudar de ataques convencionais para alvos relacionados a capacidades nucleares. O conflito no Oriente Médio está entrando em sua fase mais perigosa até agora. 🌍🔥
The wars initiated by the United States are not aimed at Venezuela.
The United States is only at war with one country.
"China."
For many years, China has sourced cheap oil from two channels.
Iran and Venezuela.
Before the regime change in Venezuela, China absorbed 50% to 89% of Venezuela's total crude oil exports.
Such trade is mostly conducted through a "shadow fleet" and is often repackaged as goods from countries like Malaysia to circumvent U.S. sanctions.
There is one more thing.
Most of the China-Venezuela trade is settled in renminbi, which undermines the dominance of the dollar.
As for Iran, last year China purchased over 80% of Iran's crude oil exports.
The trading price of Iranian oil is usually 8 to 13 dollars/barrel lower than the international Brent crude oil benchmark price, which has saved Chinese refiners about 10 billion dollars in a year.
Like the case with Venezuela, the China-Iran agreement is also mainly settled in renminbi.
According to some estimates, 20% of China’s crude oil in the past came from Venezuela and Iran, bypassing the dollar.
And the U.S. is trying to break this situation.
This is why China has consistently criticized the U.S. decisions regarding Venezuela and Iran.
Today, China officially opposes U.S. and Israeli military actions in Iran and urges Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
China understands that if the war continues, the U.S. controlling Iran's foreign exchange reserves would force trade to be conducted in dollars, which would undermine its dominance.
On the other hand, Trump's focus is to weaken China as much as possible, as there cannot be two superpowers in the world.🎯
Reports suggest that several Gulf powers — including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, and Oman — are discussing a dramatic geopolitical move.
According to emerging claims, these nations are considering reducing or even ending diplomatic and economic contact with the United States and Israel, while also reviewing massive investments in the U.S. economy reportedly worth up to $5.5 trillion.
If such discussions translate into real policy moves, the implications could be enormous.
These Gulf states control some of the world’s most powerful sovereign wealth funds, major oil production capacity, and critical energy supply routes. A shift in their financial or diplomatic alignment could send shockwaves through:
• Global energy markets • International investment flows • Currency stability • And risk assets like crypto
Markets thrive on stability — and moments like this inject uncertainty at a global scale.
Historically, when geopolitical tensions escalate and capital flows become uncertain, investors begin searching for alternative assets and decentralized financial systems.
That’s where the crypto market often sees sudden surges in liquidity and volatility.
Smart money is already watching closely.
Because when trillions of dollars of global capital start moving, the impact doesn’t stay limited to traditional markets.
🚨 Controversy Erupts Over Explosive Statement by Former Israeli Politician
A major backlash has erupted after Moshe Feiglin, a former member of the Knesset (Israel’s parliament), was accused of making an extremely inflammatory statement about Gaza Strip.
According to circulating reports, Feiglin allegedly referenced Adolf Hitler while making remarks about the ongoing conflict and said that Israelis “cannot live in this land as long as one Muslim remains in Gaza,” suggesting the population should be eliminated.
The remarks — if accurately quoted — have sparked intense outrage online and across political circles, with critics calling the comparison and language dangerous, dehumanizing, and deeply alarming.
💥 Why this is significant: • Feiglin is a well-known far-right political figure in Israel • Statements invoking Hitler or calling for elimination of a population are extremely controversial and widely condemned internationally • Comments like this can further inflame tensions in an already volatile region
The **Israel–Gaza Strip conflict has already drawn global attention, and rhetoric of this kind only adds fuel to an already explosive situation.
Right now, the remarks are spreading rapidly across social media — raising serious questions about political rhetoric, accountability, and the consequences of extreme statements during wartime.
(Nota: Dados estimados para 2024; últimos disponíveis no início de 2026. Os 17 principais representam ~76% da produção global. Os restantes 780 t distribuídos entre outros países, cada um com menos de 60 t.)
Fonte: U.S. Geological Survey – Mineral Commodity Summaries 2025
The push higher stalled quickly and sell pressure showed up on the first test, suggesting this move is corrective rather than a trend shift. Momentum is rolling over again and buyers aren’t getting acceptance above this zone, keeping downside continuation in play.
The push higher stalled quickly and sell pressure showed up on the first test, suggesting this move is corrective rather than a trend shift. Momentum is rolling over again and buyers aren’t getting acceptance above this zone, keeping downside continuation in play.
The push higher stalled quickly and sell pressure showed up on the first test, suggesting this move is corrective rather than a trend shift. Momentum is rolling over again and buyers aren’t getting acceptance above this zone, keeping downside continuation in play.
The push higher stalled quickly and sell pressure showed up on the first test, suggesting this move is corrective rather than a trend shift. Momentum is rolling over again and buyers aren’t getting acceptance above this zone, keeping downside continuation in play.
$AIO is maintaining strength after the recent breakout, with price now stabilizing through a healthy pullback and tight consolidation. This type of structure often indicates the market is absorbing selling pressure before attempting another upward move. If the entry zone near 0.089 continues acting as support and momentum builds again, the setup favors a continuation toward the higher resistance and liquidity targets.
⚡ The global energy market this week was driven almost entirely by escalating tensions in the Middle East, as the risk of supply disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz pushed defensive sentiment across the entire oil and gas chain. This remains a highly sensitive chokepoint because it is tied to a major share of global oil and LNG flows.
🛢️ Oil prices therefore surged throughout the week, with Brent climbing from the upper $77/bbl area to around $81–84/bbl, while WTI moved from near $71/bbl to the $76–78/bbl range. The move showed that the market quickly priced in a geopolitical risk premium rather than trading only on normal physical supply-demand conditions.
🔥 The pressure did not stop at crude oil but also spread to related products such as gasoline, heating oil, and natural gas outside the US. While Henry Hub rose only modestly, gas prices in Europe and Asia jumped much more sharply because of concerns that LNG supply from the Gulf region, especially Qatar, could be affected if instability persists.
📉 One notable signal was that the oil curve remained in backwardation, showing that the market was willing to pay more for immediate barrels. This suggests that short-term supply anxiety is still the main driver, even though medium-term expectations for production growth from the US and non-OPEC+ producers remain in place.
🌍 On the more balanced side, OPEC+ is still seen as the main bloc that could add supply if prices keep overheating, but the real impact will depend on response speed and compliance. Meanwhile, major energy-importing economies in Asia continue to face a double pressure from higher fuel costs and renewed inflation risks.
🔎 Overall, this week showed that the energy market is trading more on geopolitical risk than on longer-term energy transition themes. If tensions ease, prices could cool relatively quickly, but if disruptions around Hormuz last longer, both oil and gas will likely remain highly volatile in the near term.
GUN is currently approaching a short-term resistance zone around $0.0193–$0.0195 where price previously struggled to break higher. The structure on lower timeframes is starting to show lower highs, suggesting sellers may regain control in this region. If the price taps the entry zone and gets rejected, a move toward $0.0185 becomes likely, with further downside targets at $0.0180 and $0.0175 if bearish momentum continues. The setup becomes invalid if price breaks and holds above $0.01989, which would indicate strength from buyers.
Inicia sessão para explorares mais conteúdos
Fica a saber as últimas notícias sobre criptomoedas
⚡️ Participa nas mais recentes discussões sobre criptomoedas
💬 Interage com os teus criadores preferidos
👍 Desfruta de conteúdos que sejam do teu interesse