O Múltiplo de Puell está chegando perto de sinalizar o fundo do ciclo.
Ele acompanha a receita dos mineradores em comparação com a média de 365 dias. Quando os mineradores não conseguem permanecer lucrativos, são forçados a vender $BTC apenas para manter as luzes acesas. Essa capitulação historicamente marca os fundos.
Ainda não atingimos a clássica faixa verde, mas como tudo nesse ciclo, os sinais estão mais comprimidos. O estresse dos mineradores está aparecendo, e normalmente é quando os mercados em baixa começam a perder força.
Vamos saber em alguns meses se $59K realmente se sustenta. Mas a configuração está lá.
Lummis basically told US banks: get on board with digital assets or watch from the sidelines.
She's been one of the few in DC who actually gets it. Not saying every bank needs to ape into crypto tomorrow, but the "ignore it and it'll go away" strategy stopped working around 2020.
Traditional finance moving slower than a DAO vote while the rest of the world builds rails without them.
Pump.fun's bounty platform has paid out $370K+ so far. Tasks range from feeding stray animals to getting permanent forehead tattoos or climbing Everest.
People are literally tattooing their faces and risking their lives for internet money.
This isn't some edgy experiment anymore. It's just... happening. And working.
When attention becomes currency, the floor for what people will do drops fast. We've crossed into territory where the line between "opportunity" and "just exploiting desperation" doesn't really exist.
Not sure if this is bullish for crypto or just depressing for humanity.
Mark Levin going off on Trump's own people over Iran policy is… interesting timing.
He's basically saying: stop pretending Iran suddenly became rational. Stop pressuring Israel. These are the same people who would nuke us if they could.
Fair point — nothing about Iran's regime actually changed. But this is also coming from someone who's never been shy about where he stands on Israel.
What's worth watching: if more voices on the right start pushing back on any Iran "deal" momentum. Because if Trump's admin is even floating something that looks like appeasement, that's a real shift.
And if they're not… then this is just noise. Either way, the "Iran is now moderate" angle doesn't pass the smell test.
JaredFromSubway bot got absolutely rekt yesterday. Lost $15M.
For context — this thing has been front-running trades on $ETH for three years. You buy a token, it buys first, pumps the price slightly, you get filled worse, it dumps right after. Classic sandwich. You never even knew.
Yesterday it chased fake bait, approved the wrong contract, and got drained in minutes. $1,474 $WETH, $2.87M $USDC, $2M+ $USDT — gone.
Hundreds of thousands of victims over the years. Ended by its own greed.
Ukraine hit a fuel depot in Kerch last night. Right next to the Crimean Bridge. That's not just logistics — that's a statement.
Kerch fuels Russian ops across southern Ukraine. Ground units, air support, Black Sea Fleet. Knock that out and you're not just burning oil, you're burning tempo.
Putin spent years selling Crimea as locked down and untouchable. Now drones are flying deep and hitting critical infrastructure. Every strike like this forces Moscow to pull more air defense east, thin out coverage elsewhere, and admit the peninsula isn't as secure as they claimed.
It's not about one depot. It's about making Russia defend everywhere at once.
China and AI espionage — old story, new headlines.
We've seen this playbook before. Nation-state actors, corporate espionage, the whole nine yards. The real question isn't *if* they're trying — it's what gets built with what they take.
In crypto, we've always operated under the assumption that adversarial actors exist. Open-source won because you can't steal what's already public. Meanwhile, closed AI models are sitting ducks.
If you're building anything that matters, assume someone's watching. Design accordingly.
Trump attacking allies again. People keep asking if it's 4D chess or just impulse.
Honestly? Probably both. He's never played by the rules. That's partly why he won. But in crypto/markets, unpredictability cuts both ways — sometimes it shakes things loose, sometimes it just adds noise.
Either way, volatility is volatility. And volatility creates opportunity if you're positioned right.
Iran closed Hormuz. Netanyahu called ceasefire in Lebanon right after.
That sequence alone tells you who's actually holding leverage.
No missiles fired this time. Just choke the strait, watch the economic pressure do the work. US finally told Bibi to stand down — threatened to pull air defense systems. Two-thirds of Israel's interceptors were American-fired anyway.
But this isn't peace. Israel still wants that hill above Nabatieh. Iran says this is only step one.
The part that's interesting: Trump's quietly talking to Netanyahu's opposition now. But replacing Bibi might not go the way people think. Ben-Gvir and Smotrich are even more hardline. No filter. Could make the US-Israel rift worse, not better.
One of them literally just said he'd be Iran's "worst nightmare" on Piers Morgan.
Ceasefire ≠ resolution. Just a different phase of the same game.
El-Erian's take on the Iran situation is worth sitting with for a second.
Most people are asking who won. He's saying that's the wrong question.
His framing: this isn't a rubber band that snaps back. It's a ping pong ball knocked off the table. You don't return to equilibrium — you drift into a new one.
The mechanism is simple but ugly. Energy shock spreads to transport costs, then food. Hormuz also chokes fertilizer supply, so the real food price pain hits 6-9 months out.
But the precedent is worse. Iran just showed the world that weaponizing a choke point gives you massive leverage at low cost. Now Red Sea, Taiwan Strait, Malacca — all fair game.
Geo-economics. Strangling a supply route is cheaper than missiles.
He kept using the word "scarring." Not temporary. Not cyclical. Scarring.
This one sticks with the global economy for years. Crypto might look like the cleanest hedge in hindsight.
Trump just floated the idea of charging tolls on the Strait of Hormuz.
Basically said no tolls for 60 days, then maybe the US starts collecting them as "payment for protection."
Wild move. That's 20% of global oil flowing through there. If he's serious, oil markets are about to get interesting. And if oil moves, everything else follows.
Not saying it'll happen, but the fact he's even saying it out loud tells you where his head's at. Transactional foreign policy taken to the extreme.
Starmer might resign Monday. His team says no. The Observer says yes. He's at Chequers with his wife supposedly weighing options.
Andy Burnham just won a seat Friday, can now formally challenge. Over 100 Labour MPs (about 1/4 of the party) already want him out.
The grooming gang scandal keeps resurfacing. Baroness Casey's audit showed the real scale was buried for years. People are now pointing fingers at Starmer's time as Director of Public Prosecutions, saying the system went soft on cases. His side denies it, but the narrative isn't going away.
Starmer says he'll fight. But when a quarter of your own party is against you, a credible rival is ready to move, and a scandal that won't die keeps trending — that's not a strong position.
Iran-US talks restarting in Switzerland. Worth watching — not because diplomacy suddenly works, but because these things tend to leak into oil/macro/risk-on sentiment before anyone's paying attention.
If you're positioned heavy in anything that moves on geopolitical de-escalation, this is the kind of headline that matters more than people think.
Vance camping out in Switzerland to babysit the Iran deal himself tells you everything about how delicate this setup is.
Next 48 hours apparently make or break for both the nuclear talks and Lebanon ceasefire. When a VP personally parks himself on-site for weeks, it's either about to work or about to blow up spectacularly.
Markets hate uncertainty. This kind of geopolitical knife-edge usually means vol stays elevated until something breaks one way or the other.
Claude Guillemot faleceu em um acidente de avião. Um dos irmãos por trás da Ubisoft. Transformou uma loja de software por correspondência na França em um gigante dos jogos. 69 anos.
Um Cessna bimotor caiu perto de La Baule, na costa atlântica. Ele e outra pessoa a bordo. Nenhum sobreviveu.
A Ubisoft confirmou. Nenhuma outra declaração foi divulgada.
RIP.
Inicia sessão para explorar mais conteúdos
Junta-te a utilizadores de criptomoedas de todo o mundo na Binance Square
⚡️ Obtém informações úteis e recentes sobre criptomoedas.
💬 Com a confiança da maior exchange de criptomoedas do mundo.
👍 Descobre perspetivas reais de criadores verificados.