$NEIRO Here’s the latest on Standard Chartered’s endorsement of Ethereum’s growth potential and what the bank’s recent research is signaling about the future of ETH:
📈 Bullish Long-Term View
Standard Chartered (via its digital assets research team) has publicly expressed a strong belief that Ethereum is poised to outperform much of the crypto market over coming years:
Analysts at the bank describe 2026 as “the year of Ethereum”, expecting it to outperform Bitcoin and other assets based on strengthening network fundamentals and adoption trends.
Longer-term forecasts from the bank have even included targets such as ETH reaching ~$40,000 by 2030, reflecting confidence in Ethereum’s dominance in key sectors like decentralized finance and tokenization.
Standard Chartered’s view is grounded in Ethereum’s role in stablecoins, DeFi, and real-world asset tokenization, segments they expect to grow substantially and largely settle on the Ethereum network.
💡 Why Standard Chartered Is Positive
The bank’s bullish tone stems from several key structural advantages it sees in Ethereum:
1. Network Effects & Usage
Ethereum hosts the largest share of stablecoins and decentralized finance activity, keeping demand for ETH high as a settlement and gas token.
2. Tokenized Real-World Assets
Standard Chartered projects tokenized real-world assets could reach about $2 trillion by 2028, with the vast majority expected to operate on Ethereum — reinforcing its long-term utility and adoption.
3. Technological Improvements
Ongoing upgrades aimed at improving throughput and scalability are seen as supportive for growth by enabling more activity directly on Ethereum’s layer-1.
📉 Near-Term Adjustments
That said, the bank has trimmed some near-term price forecasts: Ethereum’s expected year-end value for 2026 was revised from earlier, more aggressive levels (like ~$12,000) to around $7,500, largely due to broader market weakness and Bitcoin’s influence on crypto price direction.
Dusk Network and the Shift Toward Compliant Privacy in Blockchain
Dusk Network is increasingly standing out as blockchain infrastructure moves into a more regulated and institution-focused phase. While early crypto narratives were built around full transparency and open access, real-world finance operates very differently. Institutions, enterprises, and regulated markets require privacy by design, not as an afterthought. This is exactly where Dusk Network is positioning itself.
Dusk focuses on enabling privacy-preserving smart contracts that still remain compliant with regulatory standards. By leveraging zero-knowledge technology, the network allows sensitive data to stay confidential while transactions and rules can still be verified on-chain. This balance is critical for use cases such as tokenized securities, regulated DeFi products, and enterprise-level financial applications that cannot function on fully transparent blockchains.
What makes Dusk particularly compelling is its long-term strategy. Instead of chasing short-term hype or trends, the project is building infrastructure designed for durability and real adoption. As global regulation around digital assets becomes clearer, networks that already align with compliance requirements will have a natural advantage. Privacy that works within legal frameworks is not optional for institutions, it is essential.
As blockchain continues to integrate with traditional finance, Dusk’s focus on confidentiality, compliance, and usability places it in a strong strategic position. Following updates from @Dusk_Foundation and tracking ongoing development around $DUSK can provide valuable insight into how privacy-focused infrastructure evolves alongside the broader market. #Dusk
$ETH Usdt 💸 Best Buying 🚀 Opportunity ⚡
📌 Entry Zone:
3,080 – 3,150
🎯 Targets:
TP1: 3,350
TP2: 3,650
TP3: 4,000 – 4,100 🚀💥
🛑 Stop Loss:
2,950 (Daily close below = setup invalid ❌)
#ETHUSDT #Ethereum #CryptoSignals #BinanceSquare #Bullish 🟢📊
$NEIRO Here’s the latest on the Ukraine–Polymarket situation and why Ukrainian authorities have blocked access to the platform:
What happened?
🔹 Ukraine has officially blocked access to the crypto prediction market Polymarket inside the country.
Authorities directed internet service providers to restrict the domain polymarket.com under a regulatory resolution issued on December 10, 2025.
🔹 The platform was added to Ukraine’s public registry of blocked online resources because officials consider its operations to be unlicensed gambling under Ukrainian law.
🔹 Many users in Ukraine now can’t access the site, though enforcement may still be inconsistent depending on the internet provider.
Why Ukraine took action
📍 Classification as gambling:
Polymarket lets users buy and sell positions tied to the outcomes of events — including geopolitical and war-related events — with prices reflecting implied probabilities. Ukrainian regulators say this is, in effect, online gambling, and that the platform lacks the required domestic license.
📍 War-related bets draw special scrutiny:
A large volume of bets on the Russia–Ukraine conflict — reportedly hundreds of markets with hundreds of millions of dollars wagered — intensified concerns in Kyiv about the ethics and legality of betting on real-world warfare outcomes.
🎯 Both the gambling classification and war-betting controversies helped spur the ban.
Context: broader regulatory pressure
⚖️ Ukraine isn’t alone. Other countries — including France, Germany, the UK, Poland, Singapore, Thailand and more — have also restricted Polymarket access on similar grounds of unlicensed gambling or financial regulation issues.
🇺🇸 Separately, in the U.S., Polymarket has been navigating regulatory frameworks and received oversight from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for certain event contracts, even as debates continue over prediction markets and potential insider trading safeguards.
I’m spending time understanding how Dusk Network is designed and why it feels different from most blockchains. At its core, it is a layer 1 built for regulated finance, not just open experimentation.
The design starts with a strong settlement layer that focuses on finality. When a transaction is confirmed, it is done. This removes uncertainty and gives institutions confidence to use the system.
They’re using a modular approach so different parts of the network have clear roles. Settlement is strict and predictable. Execution is flexible so developers can build applications without fighting the core rules. Dusk supports both privacy focused transactions and transparent ones. This gives users and applications choice instead of forcing one model on everyone.
I’m also seeing how identity and compliance are treated with care. The system allows participants to prove they meet requirements without exposing unnecessary personal data. This is important because regulation requires identity, but markets do not need full exposure.
In practice, Dusk can be used for confidential payments, regulated DeFi, and tokenized assets that carry their rules with them. The long term goal is not hype or speed records. They’re aiming to become reliable market infrastructure that institutions and users can depend on quietly. If it works, people will not talk about it every day. They will just use it.
@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk
Giving dApps Real Control Over Data Ownership
Walrus ties every stored file to a simple object on Sui, so you and your users always know exactly who owns it and who can access it.
Smart contracts handle the details: set permissions, decide how long it lives, auto-renew when needed—all on-chain, no middleman.
Data stays decentralized, provable, and truly in the hands of the rightful owner. No more trusting some centralized server with your stuff.
Simple, secure, and actually Web3.
@WalrusProtocol $WAL #walrus
$WAL is the kind of project I focus on when thinking long-term, beyond just this week’s trends. For Web3 to go mainstream, app data can't be fragile or centralized. Walrus is aiming for storage solutions that remain accessible even when nodes fail or networks are under stress — exactly what real-world products require.
And $WAL
{future}(WALUSDT)
is the key that connects it all: it’s used for network services and rewards the operators who ensure data remains available over time. If more developers adopt @WalrusProtocol for NFTs, media, and apps, $WAL will be linked to actual demand, not just hype.
#walrus
If you are Bullish and REady to Pay "Funding Fees" then this market is all Yours.... YES...we Know, Red candles & Green traps are part.👍 News screaming in every direction.
This wallet? It doesn’t move.
While the market swings like a drunk pendulum, this whale is still sitting on gigantic long positions across ETH, BTC, and SOL no hedging or we say fear.
Address: 0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae
Right now, this account controls over $815 million in perpetual positions. Long-only. 100% exposure. Not a single short. And despite the chaos, it’s already sitting on $113.6 million in total profit, with unrealized gains hovering around $17.7 million and an ROE of +11.4%.
That’s not luck, we think. On ETH alone, this trader holds more than 203,000 ETH, worth about $648.8M. The entry sits around $3,147, with price now near $3,191. Liquidation way down at $2,076. Floating profit? Roughly $8.8M. And yet… over $5.2M already burned in funding fees. Still holding.
BTC? A clean 1,000 BTC long. Entry near $91,506, now marked around $93,640. That’s another $2.1M in floating profit. Funding bleed of about $685K. No exit.
And finally on SOL, the wild one. Over 511,000 SOL, entered near $130, now trading around $143. That leg alone is up $6.7M, a +92% on that position. Even after paying nearly $380K in funding, the trade just keeps breathing.
More than $6.3M lost to funding across all positions.
This is someone who picked a direction, and decided the market can scream all it wants.
@WalrusProtocol Walrus governance is about keeping the network reliable, not changing the rules every day. WAL is used to vote on how strict the penalties should be. Storage nodes can suggest new penalty settings before the epoch deadline, then nodes vote with their WAL stake (including delegated stake). If a proposal gets more than half the votes and enough people vote, it becomes active next epoch. If not, nothing changes. These votes mainly set costs for shard recovery and for nodes that fail data checks or don’t run enough checks. Big protocol upgrades are different: they happen only when most storage nodes accept them, after serious debate.
@WalrusProtocol #Walrus $WAL