BlockchainReporter

Christopher Louis Tsu, Director Executiv la Venom Foundation

Există un anumit tip de idealism care apare în fiecare deceniu sau cam așa în tehnologie – credința că un nou instrument va depăși în cele din urmă aspectele mai haotice ale comportamentului uman. În anii 1990 era internetul deschis care ar fi netezit ierarhiile și ar fi democratizat cunoașterea. În anii 2010 era rețelele sociale care ar fi împuternicit societatea civilă și ar fi tras la răspundere puterea. Iar în acest deceniu a fost DAO, organizația autonomă descentralizată, care ar fi trebuit să ofere o guvernare transparentă, corectă și incoruptibilă comunităților digitale. Pe hârtie, sună perfect. În practică, se ciocnește de un zid pe care niciun contract inteligent nu îl poate sparge: natura umană.

The rapid rise and evolution of blockchain technology and digital assets have created a whole universe of opportunities for innovation while simultaneously introducing a range of complex legal challenges for bold entrepreneurs. As regulatory frameworks struggle to keep pace with the technology, crypto businesses face looming challenges across multiple legal and regulatory aspects.

Launching a token or decentralized exchange, drafting heavy documentation, obtaining a necessary crypto license, and maintaining compliance now all require significant effort and thus raise the demand for specialized legal counsel. Yet, finding a qualified and experienced specialist best equipped to support blockchain firms is proving difficult, given the uncertainty around the standard applicable approach and varying levels of industry expertise among law firms.

These days, numerous firms offer different ranges of legal services for crypto and blockchain businesses on the market. This article discusses some of the leading law firms offering crypto legal services today, including DLA Piper, CMS, Inteliumlaw, and a few others. These firms assist clients across the entire digital assets ecosystem in managing risk, maintaining compliance, and pursuing innovation amid a highly fragmented and evolving regulatory landscape.

Why Legal Consulting Is Important in Crypto

Bringing in crypto legal specialists at any stage of the project’s lifecycle significantly enhances its chances of long-lasting success within the chosen jurisdiction(s). Engaging them is the cornerstone, the “Holy Grail” for long-term business success, helping to avoid costly compliance failures due to:

Regulatory uncertainty. In many jurisdictions, digital assets are regulated by ever-evolving or incomplete legal frameworks, leaving businesses exposed to sudden policy changes, enforcement, or other operational disruptions. While some regions, such as EU member states, have implemented a structured regulatory framework for digital assets, many other jurisdictions across Asia and Africa still lack unified or comprehensive crypto regulations.

Cross-border fragmentation. As a general rule, most crypto products serve customers all over the world and operate at the intersection of multiple regulatory regimes. Each jurisdiction brings its own licensing framework, consumer protection rules, taxation, and more considerations for businesses to remain compliant with. Too often, this proves difficult without specialized legal counsel.

Risk management and compliance obligations. Obligations related to anti-money laundering (AML), know your customer (KYC), and data protection are jurisdiction-based and are impossible to comply with when no experts are involved. Failure to implement these measures properly may lead to regulatory penalties, loss of banking support, or reputational damage.

How to Choose the Best Crypto Law Firm?

The idea of one universally “right” crypto law firm is misleading since no single lawyer covers every spectrum of blockchain businesses’ legal needs. The best crypto law firm is therefore one that can advise on the most effective solution tailored to the project’s specifics, the target countries, and has a proven track record with end-to-end support beyond the launch phase.

Choosing the best crypto law firm typically involves evaluating the following factors:

Hands-on experience advising exchanges, token issuers, DeFi platforms, and other Web3 businesses across the range of jurisdictions and operational hurdles.

A wide range of services they provide, spanning corporate structuring, licensing, contract drafting, and other compliance matters, allowing for the receipt of tailored guidance without relying on multiple advisors simultaneously.

Long-term projects support amid changing regulatory environments, where ongoing oversight is far more valuable than one-off consulting. Firms prioritizing long-term partnerships with their clients are best positioned to help companies remain compliant and competitive.

Top 5 Crypto Law Firms Today

1. DLA Piper

DLA Piper is a global law firm founded in 2005, advising businesses across the major developed countries, such as the US, Singapore, Japan, Sweden, and more. Over more than 20 years, the firm has built expertise in supporting blockchain businesses at every stage of their growth. Committed to making business better, the firm brings together legal professionals from multiple jurisdictions under one roof, enabling the exchange of best practices from different crypto regulations. Its advisory for crypto firms spans multiple legal matters, starting from transaction structuring, mergers and acquisitions (M&As), dispute resolutions, and helping them navigate complex and evolving legal frameworks.

Key Areas of Expertise:

Project and cross-border digital asset transaction structuring

Token modeling

Securities and commodities frameworks

Regulatory, enforcement defense, litigation, and investigations

Global regulatory coordination

Why They Stand Out:

Global crypto practice with a coordinated cross-border network of crypto lawyers

More than 20 years advising both innovative startups and large institutions

Experience with multiple types of businesses, including Layer 1 and 2 protocols, DeFi applications, stablecoin issuers, tokenized RWAs, financial institutions, non-banks, custodians, exchanges, investment funds, governments, and global brands.

2. CMS

CMS is one of the leading international law firms, serving 50+ countries and having a strong presence across Europe, the UK, Switzerland, and other key financial and regulatory hubs. The firm advises a broad range of clients in digital assets and blockchain on diverse legal and regulatory challenges. Holding numerous industry accolades, the CMS is well-regarded for its ability to translate complex ideas into reality, helping clients operate confidently in an evolving crypto environment.

Key Areas of Expertise:

Crypto asset regulation and license acquisition

DAO structuring

Intellectual property rights protection

Tax advisory

Representation in disputes and litigation involving crypto-assets

Why They Stand Out:

Commitment to provide future-facing legal advice to help businesses thrive long term

Experience advising traditional finance and Web3 clients on different matters, spanning fundraising, tokenization, mergers and acquisitions, and beyond this

Having assisted notable clients, such as Coinbase, Moonpay, Blockchain.com, and a wide range of digital asset firms, investment banks, DAOs, and venture capital investors

3. Inteliumlaw

Inteliumlaw is a specialized blockchain law firm dedicated to providing legal services for international businesses in the cryptocurrency, blockchain, and digital asset fields as one of the key areas of their expertise. Bringing years of experience from Big 4 consulting firms, Inteliumlaw advises crypto-native and related businesses on building compliant and scalable frameworks. The firm does not compromise on delivering the best possible legal solution, even if its implementation involves more complexity than the “one-size-fits-all” method applied elsewhere.

Key Areas of Expertise:

Crypto license acquisition in key European, Asian, and offshore jurisdictions

MiCA-compliant crypto-asset white paper production

Comprehensive United Arab Emirates (UAE) crypto projects support, starting from corporate structuring and license acquisition to obtaining a necessary visa and other day-to-day legal needs

End-to-end consultancy for ICO projects, trading algorithms, asset tokenization, trading terminals, payment and processing solutions, and other innovative projects

DAO legal wrappers

Preparing investment contracts, such as SAFT and SAFE

Regulatory advisory and compliance

Why They Stand Out:

Hands-on experience as lawyers for large groups of companies, bringing the necessary know-how to support established enterprises and help small businesses to mature and scale with confidence

Personalized approach and partner-like treatment

Deep understanding of each case and highly tailored legal solutions offered

Serving a wide range of traditional finance, investment, and crypto firms

Building a long-term partnership with each client to best serve their ongoing legal needs, and being genuinely invested in their success

4. Baker McKenzie

Baker McKenzie is one of the largest and most mature law firms on the list, with offices in more than 30 major developed jurisdictions globally. This firm has been active in blockchain law since the early stages of technology’s development, positioning itself as a pioneer and building deep expertise in the field. Baker McKenzie’s crypto focus arose primarily from their fintech practice and is now known for their ability to manage regulatory complexity at scale, helping clients innovate in full compliance in some of the world’s most tightly regulated markets.

Key Areas of Expertise:

Complex business and transaction structuring

Regulatory and compliance across major economies

Real-world asset (RWA) tokenization

Token sales

Metaverse projects consulting

Why They Stand Out:

Unmatched global footprint

Strong experience advising large-scale, multinational crypto projects

Largest blockchain team (150 professionals) in 33 countries

Strategically advising regulatory bodies at both a global and local level

5. Keystone Law

Keystone Law is known as a UK-based law firm for modern crypto businesses, with strong experience in advising companies in financial services. Consulting entrepreneurs and investors on various digital asset matters, the firm appears particularly effective at supporting growing crypto companies that require unparalleled legal expertise without the complexity of other large international firms.

Key Areas of Expertise:

Crypto asset regulation in the UK, the Middle East, Africa, India, and other digital asset hubs

NFT and other dispute resolution

Intellectual property (IP) rights protection

Crypto gambling

Stablecoins and other token issuance

Why They Stand Out:

Full spectrum of digital assets legal services at a one-stop shop

Personalized service, tailored to deliver an “outstanding” match to each client’s needs 

Unique business model

Award-winning lawyers, recognized globally

Top Crypto Law Firm: Is There a Single Best?

Selecting the right legal partner can mean the difference between success and costly mistakes in the fast-moving and highly regulated crypto ecosystem. The firms highlighted in this list bring different strengths and competencies but are all well-equipped to deliver specialized support and meet the complex needs of digital asset companies in current realities.

DLA Piper, CMS, Baker McKenzie, Keystone Law, and Inteliumlaw all have different areas of legal excellence, allowing crypto businesses to find legal counsel best aligned with their goals, jurisdictional reach, and other specifics.

Whether navigating complex regulations, launching a token, or maintaining compliance, partnering with an experienced crypto law firm can make all the difference between long-term success and costly mistakes.

This article is not intended as financial advice. Educational purposes only.

Q1. You’ve described governance as Web3’s pressure chamber. When a protocol faces a real crisis, e.g., concentrated voting power, token price shocks, or a security incident, what predictable failure modes tend to surface first, and why?

The honest answer is that it depends entirely on the type of crisis… They are all different beasts.For example, when concentrated voting power meets a crisis, you see what I call the “coordination vacuum.” Large token holders freeze. They’re calculating their exposure across positions.  Meanwhile, smaller holders are screaming on Discord, but their votes don’t move the needle. The protocol enters this bizarre state where technically, governance is functioning,  but practically, no decisions get made.

We saw a version of this play out with Cardano last year, when a single DRep known as “Whale” accumulated enough delegated voting power to blanket-veto every proposal from IOG, Cardano’s core development company.Token price shocks produce a completely different failure cascade, and it’s much more visceral. What you see is a cliff. It starts with sell pressure spreading across node operators and token holders, and institutional holders start making OTC withdrawals. Then the retail withdrawals escalate, and suddenly you’re in bank-run territory. This is exactly what happened with Terra in May 2022, and because blockchain is transparent, everyone could watch the run happening in real time.This is also why exchanges like Binance have built safety levers into their systems. They conduct periodic reviews across multiple dimensions, such as trading volume, project activity, security, and regulatory compliance, and they’ll flag tokens with monitoring tags or delist them when early warning signals emerge. These mechanisms exist precisely because the industry has learned, painfully, that some of these failure cascades are predictable.

Q2. Your comparative study of voter behaviour in Curve and Polkadot challenged many assumptions. What were the single most surprising empirical findings, and how should DAOs change their mental models of “active” vs “representative” governance as a result?

Two findings genuinely challenged my assumptions. When we studied user personas in governance, we categorized voters by the size of their holdings:  whales being the top 1%, sharks the next 5%, all the way down to shrimp with the smallest holdings.In Polkadot, 93% of whales and 98% of sharks locked their tokens for 14 days or less, while smaller holders committed to far longer durations. In Curve Finance, we found a similar pattern. Even with gauge rewards pushing 67.2% of all voters toward the maximum four-year lock, the largest holders still consistently locked for a shorter duration. Conviction mechanisms don’t constrain the people they’re designed for.

The second was voter turnout. In Curve, 38% of all locked tokens were used for voting. In Polkadot? 0.11%. Staggeringly low. Although both systems have conviction voting, Curve Finance’s gauge voting financially rewards participants. Polkadot asks you to lock tokens out of civic duty. The data shows civic duty alone doesn’t scale.The mental model shift I’d advocate for is to stop treating DAO  participation as a virtue signal and start treating it as an economic design problem. An important question to ask before we design is: Why would a rational actor lock their capital to vote? 

Q3. You used novel quantitative methods to map user behaviour. For non-technical readers, how did you measure influence, coordination, and fragmentation, and what metrics should projects start tracking today?

My approach is always the same: bring research from other fields into blockchain and make it consumable for decision-makers.For measuring governance maturity, I created the Governance Transparency and Engagement Index at Filecoin. It tracks four categories, such as published artefacts like committee charters and decision logs, core developer transparency, governance communications, and transparency community reports — each weighted differently. Every metric has an anti-spam cap, and leadership gets a single monthly score between 0 and 1, tracked quarter over quarter.We also built the Polygon’s admissions scoring framework for validators with stake weighted at 45%, experience at 25%, and expertise at 30%. We validated it with Pearson correlation showing experience positively predicts on-chain performance. Expertise was assessed through timed, randomized technical evaluations.What metrics to track? Measure how your tokens are distributed and who holds power.. Every protocol says it’s decentralized. Almost none put a number on it.Most importantly, stop measuring how many people vote in governance and start measuring how many discussions actually produce a decision. Turnout is a vanity metric. Convergence is what matters.

Q4. In your MINA and Liberdus treasury designs, you modelled attack surfaces and recommended phased decentralisation. Walk us through a concrete example. How do you trade off treasury access, operational velocity, and security during those phases?

When working with Mina Protocol’s treasury governance, I analysed real on-chain tokenholder distribution using BigQuery and stress-tested governance parameters against actual ownership concentration. I then modelled viable attacks such as buy-vote-dump and delegation capture under realistic turnout scenarios

This informed phased decentralisation: early safeguards protected treasury integrity while preserving operational velocity, with controls gradually relaxed as distribution and participation strengthened. Treasury access expands based on demonstrated economic resilience, not assumptions.

Q5. The Foundation Vs Community tension remains unresolved across many protocols. From your experience advising teams, what governance constructs (on-chain or off-chain) actually work to limit undue lab/control power without killing product progress?

This tension is everywhere. The way I approach it and what we’ve built at both Polygon and Filecoin starts with governance pillars. Before you design any mechanism, you define exactly what will be governed and who should have a say in each domain. That distinction alone prevents half the fights.From there, I build bicameral systems with maker-checker dynamics. When the foundation makes a decision, how does the community check it? This is where we introduced transparency reports and structured accountability. When the community makes a decision, what are the foundation’s veto rights, and under what conditions? Both directions need clear, auditable constraints. Timelocks sit between every decision and its execution, giving either side a window to flag problems without freezing progress entirely.The other thing I’m deliberate about is that while smart contract upgrades, treasury decisions, and protocol parameters go through the bicameral checks-and-balances, I keep interface-level innovation such as product features, UX, and frontend, independent from governance. Requiring a DAO vote to ship a UI improvement is how you kill product velocity.

Q6. During the Aave controversy, you proposed a resolution pathway. What would a principled, repeatable “dispute resolution” framework for DAOs look like, one that preserves decentralisation but enables decisive action in emergencies?

The Aave controversy was important because it wasn’t actually about CowSwap fees. It was about a structural question every major protocol will eventually face: what is the relationship between the DAO and the teams that build for it, and who owns what? What I saw happening was a governance design question turning into a motive fight.I’ve seen this pattern repeatedly. Aave sits at the intersection of on-chain governance and an off-chain world of users, regulators, and institutions. You need both a DAO that credibly owns the protocol and its identity, and teams that can ship fast with deep context. They’re complementary roles. But the relationship has to be legible.So the question I raised wasn’t “DAO vs Labs” like others were. It was: what’s the clean contract between them? I started exploring metagovernance as a way to make that relationship contractual and auditable. Mixing investigation with outrage is how you get poison pill proposals on day four.

Q7. Tokenomics and governance are tightly coupled. How should initial token distributions and vesting schedules be designed to avoid long-term governance capture while still rewarding early contributors and builders?

I think it’s important to separate economic rewards from governance power. Earning a return on your tokens and controlling protocol direction are two different things, and bundling them guarantees plutocracy. Also important to model your vesting schedule as a sell-pressure simulation before you launch a token. 

Q8. Your Moltbook analysis maps consensus patterns among AI agents. What parallels do you see between AI-agent coordination and human DAOs, for example, in influence concentration, echo chambers, or coalition formation, and what does that imply for designing machine-scale governance?

When you remove humans from the equation entirely and watch AI agents make decisions, what emerges is uncomfortably familiar.I analyzed 500 threads and categorized them into four consensus patterns: Unifying Validation, where consensus forms rapidly; Iterative Problem Solving, where it emerges through refinement; Nuanced Convergence, where counter-arguments prevent full agreement; and Fragmented Discourse, where no consensus forms at all. 44% fell into that last category. Nearly half of all governance-relevant discourse produced zero convergence.  In human DAOs, we see identical fragmentation.Echo chambers emerged too. Agents sharing similar architectures clustered and reinforced each other, the machine equivalent of ideological silos in DAO forums. As AI agents increasingly participate in on-chain governance as delegates or autonomous voters, they will replicate every human failure mode at machine speed. These are coordination bugs, regardless of whether they involve humans or AIs. 

Q9. Reputation systems are often proposed as a path to better governance. Where do you see reputation being useful versus dangerous (e.g., reinforcing elites), and what designs or Sybil-resistance primitives do you think are most promising?

Reputation is a meritocratic primitive only when the metrics are objectively verifiable, and the context is strictly bounded. The moment reputation becomes a proxy for ‘trust this person’s judgment,’ you’ve replaced governance with social climbing. Node operators are the clearest case. Uptime, block production, checkpoints signed and there’s no ambiguity.However, with peer reviews, contribution quality assessments, and subjective evaluations of someone’s work, we inherit every bias that decentralised governance was supposed to dismantle.On Sybil resistance: Reputation without identity will not scale. This is why zero-knowledge identity is the most promising primitive in the space right now. It lets you prove you’re a unique human without revealing who you are, and has powerful privacy-preserving properties.

Q10. What tabletop exercises, red-teaming approaches, or on-chain simulations should every DAO run before handing meaningful treasury or protocol control to tokenholders?

Sometimes I’m bummed that protocols skip something that’s incredibly basic. Before you design a single governance parameter, pull your tokenholder distribution data and actually look at it. How concentrated is your supply? How many wallets does it take to hit quorum? How many to swing a majority vote? If you don’t know those numbers, you’re designing governance in the dark.When I worked with Mina Protocol on their treasury governance, we pulled real on-chain data using BigQuery and stress-tested their proposed parameters against the actual tokenholder distribution. That kind of simulation is what allowed us to proactively recommend adaptive quorum biasing.From there, I map every economically viable attack against the actual distribution such as buy-vote-dump exploits, delegation centralization, vote rental markets, and simulate realistic turnout. Governance design should be driven by economic truth, not idealism.

Q11. For a mid-sized protocol worried about low turnout and vote buying, name three concrete, implementable changes they could deploy in the next 90 days that would measurably improve governance quality.

This is a question I encounter often. Before making changes, the most important step is understanding why turnout is low. The cause can vary, sometimes it is apathy, sometimes the community is still early, and sometimes governance itself has not yet found meaningful product–market fit.

That is why I usually recommend starting with a proper retrospective. Speak directly with the community, analyse participation data, and identify where the friction or disengagement is coming from. The structural changes you implement afterwards tend to be far more effective when they are grounded in that diagnostic work rather than assumptions.1. Switch from vote to veto. Most governance systems ask tokenholders to actively approve everything. That’s exhausting, and it means proposals get stuck because you can’t hit quorum on things that frankly don’t warrant that level of ceremony. Flip the model. Let proposals pass by default after a deliberation period unless the community vetoes them.2. Randomize your vote snapshots or demand economic skin in the game. These two go together because they’re both about making vote buying structurally expensive. On the snapshot side: if you take your voting snapshot at a random block within the last several epochs, attackers can’t predict when to acquire tokens. When you’re governing community treasuries and making decisions that affect protocol economics, demanding that voters have real, time-committed capital is essential. This is something I explored deeply in my vote escrow governance research for Filecoin as well.3. Deploy adaptive quorum biasing. This is something I designed for Polygon’s staked tokenholder signaling framework, and it’s one of the most practical upgrades a mid-sized protocol can make. The problem with fixed quorums is that they’re either too low,  meaning a small group can push things through,  or too high, and nothing ever passes because you can’t get enough people to show up. Adaptive quorum biasing solves this dynamically and it pairs beautifully with the veto model I mentioned in point one.

Q12. What open research questions or governance experiments are you most excited to see in the next 12–24 months? If you could advise three grant funders on where to allocate money in governance research, where would it go?

I think  that it would be  fair to say governance in its current form still has significant gaps, and the next phase will require rethinking some of its core assumptions rather than only refining existing mechanisms.

One area I find promising is AI-assisted contextualisation. Governance proposals are often dense and difficult to interpret, and different stakeholders approach them with different priorities. Systems that can help summarise and contextualise proposals for developers, token holders, or capital allocators could improve both participation and decision quality.

Another area is the use of prediction markets as a signalling layer for governance. They offer a way to surface forward-looking expectations, which could complement voting by revealing how participants assess the likely outcomes of different decisions.

mechanism. Lastly, multi-agent consensus games: how will different AI agents interact with each other, hold reputations, have guardrails, and deliberate to arrive at meaningful conclusions? My recent research analyzing top 500 Moltbook threads showed that AI agents are susceptible to the same social engineering and manipulation patterns as human governance participants.If I were advising grant funders, one priority would be deeper investment in game-theoretic modelling of governance. Many governance systems still rely on assumptions about behaviour that have not been really rigorously  tested.

Alongside that, I think there is real value in funding structured experiments with different governance models. Controlled trials, simulations, and empirical studies have massive potential help us understand how participants actually behave, and which designs are more resilient in practice.

The crypto trading landscape is readying for another key development with OpenClaw AI Trading Agent nearing its launch. Specifically, the developers of OpenClaw AI Trading Agent are finalizing its testing. As Degen Ape Trader said in an official X announcement, the team behind the OpenClaw AI Trading Agent is conducting the conclusive testing and review phase. Hence, this development is poised to guarantee that the agent works as expected ahead of its public launch.

I've been in basement mode to open-source my OpenClaw AI Trading Agent.It's almost done. The whole Dev team is in final review and testing to ensure it performs as expected.The idea: AI agents decide entries and exits on @HyperliquidX: no hardcoded rules, no RSI crossover… pic.twitter.com/lIoy88HcCT

— Degen Ape Trader (@DegenApe99) February 16, 2026

OpenClaw AI Trading Agent Nears Rollout to Deliver Self-Learning and Flexible Strategies

After a significant waiting period, OpenClaw AI Agent is getting closer to its launch while the developers are finalizing its testing period. Unlike conventional bots that depend on strict strategies like RSI crossovers, OpenClaw presents a self-learning and flexible system. The agent is set to operate in a streamlined way across diverse large language models, including Minmax 2.5 and the Opus 4.6.

Additionally, this adaptability guarantees that consumers can incorporate the tool into different workflows without any technical barriers. At the same time, the installation is simple, with traders just feeding the GitHub link into OpenClaw. This makes accessibility a critical feature of the project.

Multi-Layered Protection Establishes Exclusive Risk Management Benchmark

The system delivers 5 crucial signal types while also incorporating 5 protective layers that secure accounts from massive losses. Such a multi-tiered defense mechanism underscores the builders’ commitment to significant risk management. Although the project is not completely ready, it permits consumers to self-whitelist wallets by authorizing builder fee, signifying that rollout will soon take place.

According to Degen Ape Trader, OpenClaw denotes more than just a trading bot. Thus, it highlights a shift toward AI-led decision-making within the DeFi sector. Moreover, the builders reaffirm their commitment to providing a product that efficiently balances reliability and innovation.

Un portofel Ethereum ($ETH) ICO a câștigat recent o atenție mai largă pe piață, după o perioadă de inactivitate de câțiva ani. În mod specific, portofelul Ethereum ICO s-a trezit după ce a rămas inactiv timp de 10.6 ani, cu o încercare de a depune în Gemini. Conform datelor de la Lookonchain, portofelul a eșuat în încercarea de a depune 1 $ETH coin în Gemini din cauza taxelor de gaz insuficiente. Această dezvoltare subliniază o transformare notabilă de la o investiție modestă la început la dețineri de milioane de dolari.

The crypto landscape is again facing a notably bearish momentum, as the latest 24-hour data suggests. Hence, the crypto market capitalization has dropped by 3.26%, hitting $2.34T. However, the 24-hour crypto volume has increased by 3.47% to reach $101.22B. At the same time, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index accounts for 12 points, signifying “Extreme Fear.”

Bitcoin Plunges by 2.66% and Ethereum Witnesses 6.16% Slump

Particularly, the flagship crypto asset, Bitcoin ($BTC), is now changing hands at $68,382.92. This price level indicates a 2.66% dip while $BTC’s market dominance is 58.5%. In addition to this, the leading altcoin, Ethereum ($ETH), is trading at $1,959.22, presenting a 6.16% price plunge. In the meantime, the market dominance of $ETH stands at 10.1%.

$DOGEX, $ELEVATE, and $MUBARAK Dominate Crypto Gainers of Day

Apart from that, the list of today’s top crypto gainers includes DOGEX ($DOGEX), Elevate ($ELEVATE), and Mubarak ($MUBARAK). Specifically, $DOGEX is now hovering around $0.0000002817 after a 1608.04% rise. Subsequently, an 866.54% spike has placed $ELEVATE’s price at $0.09036. Following that, $MUBARAK’s current price is $0.01486, led by a 730.07% jump.

DeFi TVL Sees 2.21% Dip While NFT Sales Volume Shows 73.76% Growth

Simultaneously, the DeFi TVL is 2.21% down, attaining the $95.853B mark. Additionally, the top DeFi project, Aave, has witnessed a 2.41% slump to reach $27.046B. Nonetheless, when it comes to 1-day TVL change, WoofSwap stands in the top position in the DeFi market, claiming 5257% increase over the past twenty-four hours.

On the other hand, the non-fungible token (NFT) Sales Volume has seen a 73.76% growth, touching the $12,149,199 figure. In the same vein, the top-selling NFT collection, Flying Tulip PUT, has surged by 164.10%, claiming the $7,527,607 mark.

Russian Deputy Finance Minister Pushes for Crypto Regulation, Kevin O’Leary Wins Defamation Lawsuit Against Ben Armstrong

Moving on, the crypto industry has also experienced many other key developments across the globe. In this respect, the Russian deputy finance minister has highlighted the requirement for crypto regulation by disclosing that citizens are daily spending nearly $648M on crypto without any regulation.

Moreover, the famous TV personality, Kevin O’Leary, has triumphed in a multi-million-dollar defamation case targeting Ben Armstrong. Furthermore, OpenAI has partnered with Peter Steinberger, the OpenClaw founder, to drive growth of individualized AI agents.

Rujira, a DeFi project, today announced plans to expand support for the Bitcoin network to enable Bitcoin holders to securely move their BTC tokens in the Rujira protocol and utilize them within Rujira’s supported DeFi ecosystem.

Rujira is an omnichain DeFi platform developed on the THORChain, providing users with an entire suite of DeFi tools and applications. The network is where everything comes together, a unified ecosystem where all various blockchain networks, wallets, and DeFi offerings converge, accessible with native assets from all supported chains. Positioned its protocol on THORChain, Rujira provides a comprehensive DeFi user experience while maintaining complete interoperability and decentralization.

Rujira is building omnichain DeFi for native $BTC.Trade it. Lend it. Borrow against it. Provide liquidity, with more ways to earn using native Bitcoin on the way.How do you want your Bitcoin to work for you? 👇 pic.twitter.com/RoPtSdORaM

— Rujira (@RujiraNetwork) February 15, 2026

Why Rujira is Developing Native BTC Access On-chain

In a groundbreaking development, today, Rujira announced that it is working on bringing DeFi products natively to Bitcoin. Upon the launch, which is anticipated in Q2 2026, Bitcoin will join Ethereum as supported networks on the Rujira omnichain protocol.

By expanding support to Bitcoin, the Rujira network is set to unleash a trillion-dollar asset, which has yet to be fully integrated in DeFi and Web3 applications to fulfill high user demand.

The majority of DeFi today lives on the Ethereum blockchain; this is because Ethereum is the biggest chain with a fully programmable, Turing-complete smart contract system. Technological breakthroughs have enabled some bridging of Bitcoin synthetic assets to Ethereum in a way that Bitcoin-denominated tokens can be utilized on the Ethereum chain. However, most developers have not been interested in developing DeFi tools for Bitcoin because the blockchain lacks Ethereum’s powerful smart contracts. What makes Bitcoin different is that it has a strong scripting language, a technology underlying functions such as atomic swaps and multi-signature transactions.

Based on the announcement disclosed above, Rujira already has concrete plans in place to build native DeFi products (such as collateralized loans and several others) using Bitcoin’s scripting language. Such products will soon be launched on the on-chain market.

Redefining Capital Efficiency in DeFi

Rujira has established itself as an efficient, secure, and low-fee network for users of all kinds to explore DeFi and the rapidly evolving ecosystem of decentralized applications. Its move to open support for Bitcoin will unlock greater opportunities in the DeFi world.

This development is especially impactful for users operating in the Bitcoin-native DeFi landscape, enabling them to efficiently access advanced products and engage in on-chain yield opportunities. The move reflects Rujira’s ongoing commitment to improving capital efficiency across the DeFi space. As demand grows for native Bitcoin products, this development positions Rujira at the center of a more yield-generating and inclusive Bitcoin economy.

Niza Labs, a Niza Global-based incubator and startup accelerator project, is excited to announce its strong bond with Aylab, a Web3 growth and advertising platform. The hidden purpose of this landmark collaboration is to support and empower Web3 user acquisition, along with the expansion of sustainable Web3 adoption.

🚀 NizaLabs Announces Strategic Partnership with AylabNizaLabs is pleased to announce a strategic partnership with Aylab, a leading Web3 growth and user acquisition platform.Aylab operates one of the largest Web3 ad networks with 500+ integrated applications, delivering… pic.twitter.com/dTjSltmbM5

— Niza Labs (@nizalabs) February 15, 2026

Aylab is handling the significant growth of Web3 through advertising. Advertisement plays as important role in the expansion of the message across borders and express specialties. So in this partnership major role is played by Aylab to give a clear instance to the whole world. In addition, the successful record of Aylab is also impressive and contributes to grasping the attention of users from around the world. Niza Labs has released this news via its official social media X account.

Niza Labs Gains Global Reach Through Aylab’s Web3 Network

The integration of Niza Labs and Aylab is advantageous to each partner, especially Niza Labs, which gets access to a huge amount of trusted users through Aylab’s reputation and name in the world. Because Aylab has an astonishing number of followers and connections with more than 500 applications. Moreover, Aylab delivers artificial intelligence (AI-Powered) campaigns and on-chain targeting solutions.

In all that, Niza Labs also proves to be a fruitful platform for global incubation and as a booster project. They are basically going to expand Web3 with the adaptability of users all around the world. Furthermore, Niza Labs acts like a template or surface provider platform in collaboration with Aylab. Aylab has 250M ad impressions and 1.6M monthly active wallets on the SUI network. Aylab is playing a key role in scalable Web3 growth for this partnership.

Niza Labs and Aylab Bridging Platforms and Users for Scalable Web3 Adoption

The unification of Niza Labs and Aylab is actively and carefully working to uplift users with worldwide Web3 acceptability. This partnership aids in the sustainable growth of Web3 and connects high-impact platforms with selected blockchain audiences. It is more likely to get more accurate and authentic results with the focus on a single point rather than multiple things.

Both platforms utilize their services for the welfare of users and can achieve their on-chain decided goals. To conclude, both partners are struggling to engage maximum users toward Web3 adoption and expand their access with innovation side by side. They are goal-oriented enough to achieve the decided outcomes in any condition.

APRO Oracle has officially declared that it has formed a strategic alliance with 42Space to become their main oracle data partner in their open protocol. Through this partnership, it will redefine the way consensus capital markets operate through a combination of market mechanisms and real-time information discovery. 

🟢 New Partnership Alert: APRO × 42 We're thrilled to be trusted by @42space as their oracle data partner — the open protocol redefining how consensus capital markets work. pic.twitter.com/HMaXCyR2MA

— APRO |🔶NO.1 Oracle (@APRO_Oracle) February 15, 2026

With the help of the sophisticated data infrastructure offered by APRO,42Space will be capable of transforming real-life events into liquid assets that can be exchanged at the pace of modern-day digital currencies. This collaboration is a significant move towards creating a new type of asset that is guided by intelligence and proven by decentralized technology.

Redefining Prediction Markets with Consensus Capital

The 42Space protocol, which is a continuation of the Alkimiya project, aims to tackle the liquidity problems that have long hindered prediction markets. 

Older systems used to struggle with slow trade entries and exits due to low activity. 42Space solves this by creating Consensus Capital Markets, using the entire market to determine an event’s real-time value. 

The participants are not merely betting on an event but rather involved in a precision value-discovery process that transforms everyday life events into trading properties. 

The strategy renders prediction markets more applicable to a broader spectrum of financial applications, both in risk-sharing and in identifying new sources of investments.

APRO Oracle’s AI-Enhanced Data Infrastructure

Having gained the confidence of this new protocol as the data partner, APRO Oracle offers the valuable infrastructure that can enable these markets to be fair and accurate. 

APRO is one of the first AI-enhanced oracles, and based on machine learning and advanced artificial intelligence, it filters and verifies the information provided by various sources. This is essential to 42Space since prediction markets need an objective referee who will decide the ultimate outcome of a phenomenon. 

The multi-layer system of APRO allows working with unstructured information, including news stories, governmental announcements, and social media discussions, and converting it into structured information that can be perceived by a blockchain.

With the Data Push and Data Pull mechanisms, APRO provides settlements to occur immediately and reliably, which gives users high levels of confidence in the system.

Turning Live Moments into Tradable Assets

Apart from being able to turn key cultural and media events into interactive on-chain experiences, there are other things that make it a thrilling partnership.

One of the best examples of this is the fact that the collaboration is concentrated on the fact that the 2026 CCTV Spring Festival Gala is one of the most-watched television broadcasts in the world. 

Vice offers 42Space users the opportunity to trade predictions on the basis of important highlights of the broadcast in real-time by offering tamper-proof data feeds. This transforms a traditional viewing experience into a competitive, high-engagement experience in which the results are resolved within a blockchain.

This application case shows the possibilities of decentralized data to provide high-traffic entertainment events that involve billions of people, which means that Web3 technology is prepared to be adopted mainstream.

Building the Foundation for a New Asset Class

The ultimate target of the APRO and 42Space collaboration is to establish a base in a financial marketplace that is permanently liquid and always authenticated.

As the provider of more than 40 publicblockchains, APRO can provide 42Space with the opportunity to target users with a very broad range of ecosystems, including Ethereum and BNB Chain, as well as the emerging Bitcoin network. This multi-chain strategy provides the developers with the ability to create complex applications which run smoothly throughout the whole digital economy. 

With the constant integration of the digital world into physical reality, the demand for trusted data that runs on AI will only go higher. Together, APRO and 42Space are making sure that the future markets are not only being speculated on but are being established on a foundation of data that is proven and a consensus among the markets.

Uniswap, o platformă DEX (schimb decentralizat) care permite utilizatorilor să schimbe tokenuri cripto pe Ethereum și alte blockchain-uri populare, a încheiat un parteneriat cu X Layer, o rețea Ethereum Layer-2 lansată și gestionată de exchange-ul de criptomonede OKX. Astăzi, OKX a împărtășit o postare pe platforma de socializare X, spunând că Uniswap este oficial activ pe X Layer, o actualizare de la anunțul de luna trecută privind expansiunea planificată.

Conform detaliilor împărtășite astăzi de OKX, integrarea oferă acum utilizatorilor X Layer acces la piețele Uniswap, cum ar fi piscinele de lichiditate, perechile de tokenuri cripto și altele, precum și tranzacții DeFi cu costuri reduse.

YOMIRGO, a renowned Web3 network for AI agent incubation, has gained notable backing from Alpha Capital, a popular venture capital investment firm. Particularly, Alpha Capital has made a strategic investment in YOMIRGO, denoting a key move in evolving the tokenized AI framework. As per YOMIRGO’s official X announcement, the development merges its on-chain AI Mega Plant agenda with the worldwide venture ecosystem of Alpha Capital. This remarkable combination is set to advance the wider incubation of AI agents.

🚀 YOMIRGO × Alpha Capital — Strategic Investment Partnership AnnouncentWe’re excited to officially announce a strategic investment PR collaboration between @YOMIRGO and @alphacapital_vc —the largest venture capital firm in Türkiye and a leading force in crypto incubation… https://t.co/NGhKK4ObY3

— YOMIRGO (@YOMIRGO) February 15, 2026

Alpha Capital Invests $5M in YOMIRGO to Broaden AI Agent Asset Economy

In collaboration with Alpha Capital, YOMIRGO has secured a notable strategic investment to push forward the on-chain AI Mega Plant model thereof. In this respect, as included in a $5M pre-A funding round, the contract also takes into account engagement of key institutional players. This reaffirms trust in advanced financing models of decentralized AI projects. The move also elevates YOMIRGO’s position to broaden the AI agent-led asset economy within Türkiye and across international markets.

Apart from that, the partnership enables YOMIRGO to access the extensive network of Alpha Capital. This includes over 500 investors, launchpads, exchanges, and a big influencer ecosystem spanning Turkish and global markets. The respective exposure is poised to improve project visibility, along with establishing new pathways when it comes to liquidity and capital formation.

Unveiling Financial Rails for Long Term to Boost AI Economy

According to YOMIRGO, beyond capital deployment, the joint effort pays attention to organized incubation for cutting-edge AI agent teams becoming a part of the AI Mega Plant setting. Additionally, Alpha Capital will make huge contribution in the case of mentorship, marketing support, and growth strategy. Ultimately, this initiative serves as a long-term endeavor to develop financial rails to bolster AI economy, turning tokenized AI equity into an exclusive asset class to benefit investors worldwide.

Piața criptomonedelor a fost întotdeauna un domeniu turbulent al fluctuațiilor extreme de preț și schimbărilor rapide în sentimentul investitorilor. Cu toate acestea, pe baza datelor de astăzi de la CoinMarketCap, este clar că „proiectele de monede culturale” conduc în prezent. Liderii de piață, cum ar fi Bitcoin și Ethereum, tind să controleze mișcarea macro-direcțională generală în cadrul pieței. Cu toate acestea, câștigătorii de top actuali în crypto sunt în principal active cu beta ridicat și proiecte comunitare care arată semne de decuplare de performanța în general lentă a pieței.

Quantra, a Real-World Asset (RWA) and artificial intelligence (AI) blockchain infrastructure Protocol that tokenizes computing power and energy assets, has disclosed its groundbreaking partnership with Chain Intelligence, an all-in-one Web3 intelligence and trading workspace. The primary objective of this partnership is to boost ecosystem visibility and elevate Web3 analytics.

🤝 PR Partnership AnnouncementQuantra has entered a PR partnership with Chain Intelligence.Chain Intelligence @chain_intelli is an all-in-one Web3 intelligence and trading workspace, combining market data, on-chain signals, research, and chat-driven decision tools into a… pic.twitter.com/SsNiafku3v

— Quantra (@quantra_rwa) February 15, 2026

This partnership is focused on reducing the cycle from research to judgment and then from judgment to execution. Both partners are built entirely on Web3 technology and have a strong foundation for AI infrastructure. Chain Intelligence is playing its crucial role in combining Market data, On-chain analytics, Research tools, and Chat-driven decision support. Quantra has revealed this news through its official social media X account.

Advancing Real-World Asset Adoption Through Strategic Intelligence

The collaboration of Quantra and Chain Intelligence is facilitating users with fast speed and clarity, and addresses the consulted area for traders and users. Real-World Asset (RWA) is now widely accepted and is used as a trading currency for users to trade.

Therefore, Quantra is paying much attention to RWA infrastructure, especially, financializing real-world computing power and energy assets with authentic verification and mapping for on-chain. In addition, Quantra also focuses on permitting rule-based execution mechanisms. Both platforms are trying to speed up the acceptability of Web3 products and also elevate Web3 infrastructure.

Quantra and Chain Intelligence Strengthen Verified RWA Infrastructure

The collaboration of Quantra and Chain Intelligence is done to achieve the target, which is an authentic verification phenomenon, on-chain mapping, and rule-based execution, all over the world. The Web3 technology requires a compliant, secure, and transparent system to be successful in the market. So, Quantra and Chain Intelligence are collectively utilizing their abilities to get desired outcomes.

In a nutshell, they are ensuring the safety measures, along with greater speed and clarity, for getting much attention from users all over the world. Both partners are enhancing visibility and expanding ecosystem engagement for users’ ease. Moreover, this PR partnership is going to amplify the credibility of Web3 across the RWA sectors.

Piața Bitcoin și Ethereum răspunde acum la o presiune mare pe partea de vânzare, deoarece insiderul Bitcoin, Garrett Jin, continuă să vândă mari pachete din portofoliul său. După un eveniment de lichidare care a șocat lumea cu pierderi de 1 miliard de dolari în criptomonede pe 6 februarie, Jin a început să-și vândă deținerile în cantități mari, transferând sute de milioane de dolari în active digitale către burse.

🚨 Insider Bitcoin whale Garrett Jin își vinde pachetele de $BTC și $ETH. Ieri, a vândut peste 350 de milioane de dolari în BTC pe Binance. Astăzi, a depus 261.000 ETH în valoare de 545 de milioane de dolari pe Binance. De când a fost lichidat pentru 250 de milioane de dolari, el și-a vândut pachetele.

Un balenă Ethereum ($ETH) a câștigat recent atenția pe piață pentru conversia agresivă a monedelor $ETH. În mod specific, balena care deține portofelul „0x535…e8625” a convertit o sumă uluitoare de $18.87M din $ETH în $PAXG. Conform datelor de la Onchain Lens, momentul și amploarea acestei conversii agresive au câștigat o atenție notabilă. Astfel, această activitate subliniază o tendință în creștere a detinătorilor mari de Ethereum de a-și diversifica deținerile pentru a se proteja împotriva volatilității.

În ultimele 2 zile, un portofel nou creat a schimbat 9,156.45 $ETH ($18.87M) pentru a cumpăra 3,734.19 $PAXG la un preț de $5,053.Adresa: 0x53563b9ec34d016324d7cc41f66d7789167e8625Date @nansen_ai pic.twitter.com/lLquUQTC59

Peisajul finanțelor descentralizate (DeFi) a devenit un câmp de bătălie între inovație și maturitatea pieței la începutul anului 2026. Multe dintre protocoalele timpurii sunt acum relicve ale trecutului, dar Aave este în continuare considerat vital pentru DeFi. Analistul de piață Michaël van de Poppe a subliniat recent o schimbare tehnică semnificativă pentru AAVE, indicând că a experimentat un „bounce puternic” de la un nivel de suport crucial. Dacă piața s-ar recupera, atunci Aave va beneficia de o creștere atât a puterii tehnice a AAVE, cât și a adoptării instituționale a soluțiilor Aave.

În era electronică actuală, datele noastre private sunt împrăștiate peste tot. Fiecare clic de mouse, transfer de bani și chat online creează o cale digitală pe care firmele mari o colectează, studiază și folosesc frecvent din motive greșite. Adevărata intimitate s-a transformat dintr-un drept uman de bază într-un lux rar pe care puțini și-l pot permite. De aceea, Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) a fost creat pentru a schimba regulile jocului.

Funcționând ca o alegere de top pentru cele mai bune proiecte cripto de presale care se preocupă de confidențialitatea personală, Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) utilizează coduri matematice de nivel înalt pentru a-ți proteja informațiile. În același timp, permite în continuare transferuri de bani sigure și sarcini inteligente pe computer. Acesta nu este doar o altă monedă digitală; este un răspuns complet construit pentru a oferi oamenilor cheile către propriile detalii secrete. Într-o epocă în care scurgerile de date și supravegherea constantă au devenit obișnuite, acest proiect oferă un scut pentru toată lumea.

Lumea pariurilor online de top se schimbă rapid, iar oricine așteaptă va fi foarte târziu. Site-urile mai vechi folosesc de obicei niveluri confuze de premii și ture lente de câștig care ajută proprietarii.

Un bar proaspăt este stabilit pentru a testa acest mod prin amestecarea stilului jocurilor mari cu planuri clare de bani. În timp ce nume vechi precum BetPARX și ProphetX oferă ajutor cunoscut, un site este acum în frunte cu un plan bazat pe a fi rapid și a avea o valoare adevărată. Acest site se numește Spartans.

BetPARX: Stilul de Rambursare Regulată

Pentru persoanele care doresc o modalitate mai normală de a rămâne în siguranță, BetPARX Casino oferă o ofertă de start fixă pentru oaspeții noi. Cadoul actual are o fereastră de o zi în care pierderile totale sunt returnate ca bani de site până la 1.000 $. De asemenea, noii jucători primesc 50 $ în bani suplimentari doar pentru jocul Triple Cash Eruption.

Solana a atins un nou maxim istoric în activele tokenizate în TVL (Valoarea totală blocată), acum situată la 1,66 miliarde de dolari.

Activele tokenizate sunt active din lumea reală (RWAs) care au fost digitizate în lanț folosind tehnologia blockchain. Tokenizarea permite conversia valorii activelor reale, cum ar fi proprietățile (imobiliare), titlurile de valoare, acțiunile, mărfurile, arta și multe altele, în format digital folosind tehnologia blockchain și tranzacționarea pe piețele globale on-chain.

Realizările Solana evidențiază interesul crescut pentru tokenizarea RWAs în rețeaua blockchain - o narațiune care este din ce în ce mai mult condusă de instituții financiare consacrate și firme de gestionare a activelor.

Confidențialitatea a fost adesea componenta lipsă în spațiul activelor digitale, dar tehnologia Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) transformă această situație. Acest proces matematic permite unei persoane să demonstreze unei alte persoane că deține o anumită bucată de informație fără a dezvălui efectiv informația în sine. Imaginează-ți că este o modalitate de a verifica că ai peste 21 de ani fără a dezvălui data ta exactă de naștere sau locația ta de acasă.

În piața actuală, unde protejarea datelor este o preocupare majoră, mulți observatori de piață îndreaptă atenția către proiecte bazate pe Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) ca fiind cea mai bună criptomonedă de cumpărat acum. Capacitatea de a confirma tranzacții și identități personale în timp ce se păstrează detaliile private ascunse oferă un nivel de siguranță pe care erile anterioare ale blockchain-ului pur și simplu nu l-ar fi putut oferi.