红蜻蜓KIKI's Profile | Binance Square

·

--

South Korea’s birth rate crawled up from the bottom to the second-lowest, and at the same time, SK hynix pulled up a big bullish candle. Then a bunch of people instantly got ecstatic, and research reports were churned out: “SK hynix’s bullish candle blew up the birth rate.” After reading it, all I want to say is—ten months of pregnancy, brothers. The children being born now were conceived last year. What was SK hynix’s price last year? Go check the K-line chart before you start bragging, okay? Or are South Koreans collectively time-traveling to precisely bottom-pick while preparing for pregnancy? One bullish candle solves a decade-long population crisis—so why is the Korean government still handing out fertility subsidies? Just push the KOSPI to 50,000 points and get the whole country having triplets. If a research report like this can even be written, it only shows one thing—gamblers’ math really isn’t good.😂 Why does this kind of nonsense spread? Because it feels good. One K-line candle explains a national-level problem in a neat, powerful way. It’s concise, it sounds convincing, and shares bring views. But in investing, the most expensive tuition is treating correlation as causation. Have I seen this kind of thing in crypto? Not a few times. Bitcoin rises with a big bullish candle—then someone immediately attributes it: “So-and-so posted on Twitter,” “a certain country rolled out a policy,” “some ETF saw inflows.” When it falls, they look for reasons just as fast—there’s always something. Up is faith; down is conspiracy. What’s actually wrong with South Korea’s birth rate? High home prices, education-induced anxiety, gender conflict, difficulty finding jobs—these structural problems have been piling up for years. Can a single K-line explain them? If K-lines could solve population problems, the Federal Reserve would have printed a fertility miracle ages ago. What do you think? Those people from the last bull market who used on-chain data to predict crypto prices and ended up losing everything—probably the same crowd as the ones writing that SK hynix bullish-candle-can-blow-up-the-birth-rate report today. The tool changed, but the way of thinking hasn’t. On-chain numbers don’t lie, and neither do K-lines—but people do. People see two lines appearing at the same time, then they brain-cast an entire causal chain and confidently place their bets. Honestly, instead of hunting for a population turning point on SK hynix’s K-line, why not go ask young people in the streets of Seoul why they don’t want to have kids? Investing is about understanding underlying logic. It’s never about finding correlations. These are the folks who write research reports with a single bullish candle. Once the next bearish candle shows up, they’ll write a brand-new report again, overturning themselves with a fresh batch of哈哈哈.

South Korea’s birth rate crawled up from the bottom to the second-lowest, and at the same time, SK hynix pulled up a big bullish candle. Then a bunch of people instantly got ecstatic, and research reports were churned out: “SK hynix’s bullish candle blew up the birth rate.”

After reading it, all I want to say is—ten months of pregnancy, brothers.

The children being born now were conceived last year. What was SK hynix’s price last year? Go check the K-line chart before you start bragging, okay? Or are South Koreans collectively time-traveling to precisely bottom-pick while preparing for pregnancy?

One bullish candle solves a decade-long population crisis—so why is the Korean government still handing out fertility subsidies? Just push the KOSPI to 50,000 points and get the whole country having triplets.

If a research report like this can even be written, it only shows one thing—gamblers’ math really isn’t good.😂
Why does this kind of nonsense spread? Because it feels good. One K-line candle explains a national-level problem in a neat, powerful way. It’s concise, it sounds convincing, and shares bring views. But in investing, the most expensive tuition is treating correlation as causation.

Have I seen this kind of thing in crypto? Not a few times. Bitcoin rises with a big bullish candle—then someone immediately attributes it: “So-and-so posted on Twitter,” “a certain country rolled out a policy,” “some ETF saw inflows.” When it falls, they look for reasons just as fast—there’s always something. Up is faith; down is conspiracy.

What’s actually wrong with South Korea’s birth rate? High home prices, education-induced anxiety, gender conflict, difficulty finding jobs—these structural problems have been piling up for years. Can a single K-line explain them?

If K-lines could solve population problems, the Federal Reserve would have printed a fertility miracle ages ago. What do you think?

Those people from the last bull market who used on-chain data to predict crypto prices and ended up losing everything—probably the same crowd as the ones writing that SK hynix bullish-candle-can-blow-up-the-birth-rate report today. The tool changed, but the way of thinking hasn’t.

On-chain numbers don’t lie, and neither do K-lines—but people do. People see two lines appearing at the same time, then they brain-cast an entire causal chain and confidently place their bets.

Honestly, instead of hunting for a population turning point on SK hynix’s K-line, why not go ask young people in the streets of Seoul why they don’t want to have kids?

Investing is about understanding underlying logic. It’s never about finding correlations.

These are the folks who write research reports with a single bullish candle. Once the next bearish candle shows up, they’ll write a brand-new report again, overturning themselves with a fresh batch of哈哈哈.

红蜻蜓KIKI

CME finally gets it: Risk never takes a day off

Trending Topics