CRYPTOLOGY NAFAY

self-custody wallet, announced Tuesday (June 30, 2026) that it's hiring the three-person team behind Ventuals: co-founders Alvin Hsia (CEO) and Emily Hsia (CTO), along with engineer Aris Samad (The Defiant) . The trio will join Phantom's trading and data teams this week (Crypto Briefing) , according to Phantom co-founder and CEO Brandon Millman. Notably, this is a talent hire, not an acquisition — Phantom is not buying Ventuals or its product. (The Defiant)
What Ventuals was: Ventuals billed itself as the first onchain derivatives protocol for private, pre-IPO company valuations, with markets tracking a synthetic price rather than actual shares. It was built on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 framework, which lets outside developers deploy and run their own perpetual-futures markets backed by a HYPE stake. (The Defiant) Its flagship contracts let traders take leveraged positions on the valuations of OpenAI and Anthropic — neither of which is publicly traded. (The Defiant) The platform reportedly grew to more than $1 billion in annualized trading volume (Crypto Briefing) .
Why it's ending: Ventuals announced earlier in June it was winding down. Its OpenAI and Anthropic markets were frozen at their trailing 24-hour average prices and settled, and there will be no Ventuals token. (The Defiant) The team is instead joining Phantom.
Why Phantom is doing this: Phantom said the hires are meant to help it "go deeper" on perpetuals and open markets as wallets increasingly evolve into trading platforms. (CoinDesk) The company noted it has become the largest distribution partner in the Hyperliquid ecosystem (CoinDesk) , and Millman said "Open markets have become a major focus for us... We've gone deep on perps, and we intend to go deeper." (CoinDesk) Phantom's own perps product runs on Hyperliquid and has done around $37 billion in cumulative volume, and it's already added equity perpetuals via HIP-3 (Crypto Briefing) — the exact infrastructure the Ventuals team specializes in.
What's next: Phantom hasn't said what the founders will specifically build, or whether this signals a deeper move into pre-IPO/equity perpetuals (The Defiant) , but their background maps directly onto that roadmap.
One caveat: since the Anthropic angle involves my own company, I'd treat any characterization of Anthropic's stance on these markets with a bit of extra caution — I don't have insight into that beyond what's in these reports.

The digital asset landscape shifted on its axis following an appearance by Coinbase’s Head of Institutional Strategy, John D’Agostino, on CNBC. Amidst localized market volatility and retail panic, D’Agostino revealed that behind closed doors, a massive sovereign accumulation strategy is brewing.
"We've seen over 40 countries commit to buying bitcoin in some fashion for their national balance sheets or other... All we're seeing is steady growth, even if the headlines don't match that."
— John D’Agostino, Coinbase Institution.
​While the headline has sent shockwaves through the financial world, parsing the reality from the rhetoric requires looking closely at the data.
​The Data Gap: Commitment vs. Confirmation.
​Public blockchain trackers tell a much more conservative story than D'Agostino's "40 countries" figure. This is because institutional "commitments"—such as passing legislative frameworks, setting up exploratory sovereign funds, or signing non-disclosure agreements with custodians like Coinbase—take months or years to materialize into public on-chain addresses.
​Currently, publicly confirmed data only identifies around 13 government entities holding Bitcoin, totaling roughly 650,000 BTC (valued at around $38 billion). The United States leads this public list, holding over 328,000 BTC, mostly seized through law enforcement. The massive gap between these 13 publicly visible governments and D'Agostino's claim of 40+ countries highlights just how much sovereign interest is currently moving through hidden, institutional pipelines rather than open market transactions.
​The Mechanics of Sovereign Adoption
​According to institutional insiders, sovereign funds and nation-states do not buy Bitcoin the way retail traders do. They don't look for "grand gestures" or make bombastic social media announcements. Instead, the process moves through quiet, highly regulated financial frameworks.
​The Discount Accumulation: D’Agostino noted that sovereign funds and family offices view market drawdowns below $65,000 not as a failure, but as a strategic discount to build out long-term allocations.
​The Legislative Catalysts: The United States leading by example—via the push for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve—has forced other nations to evaluate Bitcoin as a game-theoretic necessity. If one major superpower holds a scarce digital commodity, competing nations face a structural risk by holding zero.
​Regulatory Infrastructure: Nation-states require heavy infrastructure—market structure clarity, tax reforms, and secure institutional custodianship—before a single dollar of public funds is deployed.
​What to Watch Next
​For investors and analysts, the takeaway is clear: watch for the lag. The "deluge" of institutional and sovereign interest D'Agostino is witnessing inside Coinbase represents a forward-looking indicator. Over the coming months, the test will be whether these 40+ quiet commitments officially convert into confirmed, transparent sovereign purchases on the global balance sheet.