The day was shaped by risk control, not by clean normal-grid profit. Normal grid sells were present, but the main realized PnL driver was a Hard-SL risk exit.
What happened • Normal grid sell fills: 4 • Hard-SL exits: 1 order / 3 fills • Workdown / controlled exit fills: 0 Managed grid lifecycle • Active grids at start / recap: 0 / 2 • Managed grids opened / released: 4 / 2 • Lifecycle balance: OK • Risk pauses: 1
Realized performance • Return on sold grid basis: -3.1807% • Net realized PnL after fees: -5.71234965 USDC • Main PnL driver: Hard-SL risk exit (-6.52618795 USDC) • PnL review items: 0 • Data basis: Binance myTrades + BNBUSDC 1m fee quotes
Portfolio state • Active grids: 2 • Active symbols: AAVEUSDC, SEIUSDC • Open orders: 5 buys / 4 sells • Managed inventory: 166.5086245 USDC • Available quote: 25.01554224 USDC • Usable quote: 6.66440738 USDC
Why this matters A negative day should not be read as normal grid performance when a Hard-SL exit drove the result. The recap separates normal grid sells from risk-control exits. Performance is shown on sold grid cost basis, not total account balance.
Data basis: PnL is calculated from Binance myTrades facts attributed to Grid order IDs. BNB fees are converted to USDC using Binance BNBUSDC 1m kline close price for the trade minute. Net PnL is reliable only when trade attribution is complete, inventory cost basis is reconstructable, and fee quote conversion is complete.