Here's what bothers me about how the AI industry talks about data.
They call it "training data."
As if it's a natural resource. Something that just... exists. Ready to be mined.
It isn't.
Every piece of "training data" is a human decision. A doctor who spent 20 years developing clinical intuition and wrote it down. A programmer who stayed up until 3am solving a problem and shared the solution. A writer who spent months crafting something honest and put it online.
These aren't data points. They're people's life work.
The industry built a $500 billion cathedral on top of it without leaving a single brick for the people who quarried the stone.
OpenLedger isn't solving a technical problem.
It's correcting a moral one that got dressed up as a technical problem so people would stop asking uncomfortable questions.
When you realized AI was trained on your work what was your first reaction?
@OpenLedger $OPEN #OpenLedger
They call it "training data."
As if it's a natural resource. Something that just... exists. Ready to be mined.
It isn't.
Every piece of "training data" is a human decision. A doctor who spent 20 years developing clinical intuition and wrote it down. A programmer who stayed up until 3am solving a problem and shared the solution. A writer who spent months crafting something honest and put it online.
These aren't data points. They're people's life work.
The industry built a $500 billion cathedral on top of it without leaving a single brick for the people who quarried the stone.
OpenLedger isn't solving a technical problem.
It's correcting a moral one that got dressed up as a technical problem so people would stop asking uncomfortable questions.
When you realized AI was trained on your work what was your first reaction?
@OpenLedger $OPEN #OpenLedger