Z O E ETH

Dusk is basically a Layer 1 blockchain that’s trying to solve a problem most crypto people skip over: real finance can’t run on chains where everything is exposed. On most blockchains, your balance, your transfers, your activity patterns—everything is public by default, and that’s fine for open DeFi culture, but it’s a deal-breaker for institutions, regulated markets, and even serious investors who don’t want their strategies broadcast like a live scoreboard. Dusk’s whole lane is “regulated privacy,” meaning it wants to give users and institutions confidentiality while still keeping a path for auditability and compliance when it’s legitimately required. Instead of pretending privacy and regulation can’t coexist, Dusk is built around the idea that you can prove things are valid without revealing sensitive details, and that’s where its approach starts to feel different from typical general-purpose chains.
At a high level, Dusk is designed like financial infrastructure: a strong settlement layer at the base, with modular environments on top so different kinds of applications can be built without forcing everything into one box. One of the clearest examples of this is how Dusk supports two transaction “modes.” In simple terms, it has a public-style mode (often described as more transparent and account-based, useful for exchange integrations or flows where visibility is required) and a private-style mode (built for confidential transfers, where you can keep details hidden while still proving correctness). The important thing isn’t just that private transactions exist—lots of projects say that—it’s that Dusk is trying to make privacy practical for regulated markets by designing for selective disclosure, meaning you can keep things confidential day-to-day but still satisfy compliance checks and audits when needed. That’s a very “grown-up finance” design choice, because real markets are not purely transparent or purely private—they’re a mix.
On the technology side, Dusk leans heavily into zero-knowledge-friendly cryptography so the network can support privacy and verification together, and it also pushes an identity direction that’s meant to avoid the usual extremes. Traditional finance needs identity checks, but nobody wants on-chain identity to turn into doxxing. Dusk’s idea is closer to “prove you’re eligible without revealing your whole identity,” which is exactly what regulated tokenized assets and compliant DeFi need if they’re going to scale beyond crypto-native circles. For developers, Dusk also tries to lower the barrier to building by supporting different execution environments: a more native environment aimed at privacy-first applications, and an EVM path for builders who want familiar Ethereum tools and workflows. That’s a smart strategy because even if institutional adoption moves slowly, developer ecosystems can grow faster when the tooling feels familiar.
The DUSK token ties into the chain’s core functions rather than existing as a decoration. It’s used for staking and securing the network, paying transaction fees, and supporting the incentives that keep validators or network participants honest and active. In infrastructure-style projects, this matters because the chain needs reliable security and predictable economics over years, not just hype cycles. And when you look at Dusk’s ecosystem and partnerships, the theme stays consistent: it’s less about having 500 random dApps and more about building the rails—staking tools, dashboards, market infrastructure, and integrations that make sense for tokenized real-world assets and regulated settlement. The real-world use cases Dusk aims at—tokenized securities, compliant markets, regulated stable value for payments, and confidential institutional-grade transfers—are exactly the areas where privacy plus auditability isn’t a “nice to have,” it’s mandatory.
The growth potential for Dusk comes down to one big bet: if regulated on-chain finance and RWAs truly expand, the winners won’t be the loudest chains, they’ll be the chains that can actually handle compliance, identity, confidentiality, and settlement without turning everything into a public surveillance machine. Dusk has a strong narrative fit for that future, but it also faces real challenges: regulated adoption moves slowly, the tech stack is complex, security expectations are higher, and token value ultimately depends on real usage showing up—not just announcements. Still, if you think the next wave of crypto is less about vibes and more about infrastructure that financial institutions can actually use, Dusk is one of the projects built specifically for that world.

#Dusk @Dusk $DUSK

Walrus is basically trying to solve one of the least-hyped but most important problems in crypto: where the big data lives. Blockchains are great at storing small, high-value information like balances, ownership, and smart contract state, but the moment you bring real app content into the picture—videos, high-res NFT media, full website files, game assets, AI models, large datasets—most chains become painfully expensive and inefficient because they rely on broad replication. Walrus steps in as a decentralized blob storage network (a “blob” is just a large chunk of unstructured data) built to store big files in a way that stays censorship-resistant and reliably retrievable without forcing the entire blockchain to carry the full weight of that data. It’s closely connected to the Sui ecosystem, and instead of being “storage on the side,” Walrus uses Sui for coordination, ownership-style management, and programmability, so stored data can behave more like a real onchain resource that apps can reason about and build logic around.
What makes Walrus interesting is the way it avoids the usual “copy the entire file everywhere” approach. Rather than storing full duplicates across many nodes, Walrus breaks a file into many encoded pieces and distributes those pieces across independent storage operators. This technique—erasure coding—lets the network recover the original file even if a meaningful number of nodes go offline, fail, or act maliciously, which is crucial because real decentralized networks deal with constant churn. Walrus has its own flavor of this called Red Stuff, a two-dimensional erasure coding approach designed to keep storage overhead lower than pure replication while also making recovery and self-repair more efficient when nodes disappear or data needs to be repaired. That self-healing angle matters more than people realize, because the hidden cost in storage networks isn’t just “how much it costs to store,” it’s “how expensive it becomes to keep the network healthy when things inevitably break.”
Then there’s the token side. WAL isn’t supposed to be a random DeFi token that exists just to be traded; it exists to power the storage economy. WAL is used to pay for storage, and it also supports delegated staking and governance—meaning storage operators run nodes, users can delegate WAL stake to those operators, and incentives are designed so reliable operators attract stake and earn rewards while low-performing behavior can be penalized. Over time, that incentive system is what’s meant to keep the network honest and performant, because decentralized infrastructure survives on economics, not vibes. Walrus has published the basic tokenomics like supply and allocation buckets, but the more important long-term story is whether real usage grows: are more apps storing real data on Walrus, does retrieval remain smooth, do costs stay competitive, and does the operator set remain meaningfully decentralized rather than quietly concentrating around a few giant players.
Where Walrus can shine is exactly where modern apps are heading: decentralized websites, NFT media that doesn’t vanish when a centralized host goes down, onchain games with heavy asset bundles, and especially AI workflows where models and datasets are far too large for “onchain-first” thinking. If crypto is going to mature into real consumer products and AI-driven ecosystems, storage stops being a background detail and becomes a core layer—and Walrus is clearly aiming to be that layer inside the Sui world (and potentially beyond). The strengths here are obvious: it’s purpose-built for big data, it’s designed for efficiency and recoverability, and it plugs into a live smart contract ecosystem. But the risks are just as real: storage is brutally competitive, centralized clouds are still easier for most users, token-based incentives can lead to stake concentration if the system isn’t carefully balanced, and “privacy” depends heavily on encryption, key management, and access control at the application level, not just on how the network splits data across nodes. In the end, the most honest way to judge Walrus is simple: if it becomes boring infrastructure that developers use by default because it’s cheap, reliable, and easy, it can grow into something massive; if it stays mostly narrative without sustained real storage demand and healthy decentralization, it’ll struggle like many infrastructure projects do.

#Walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL

Walrus (WAL) is basically trying to solve one of the most annoying problems in crypto that nobody talks about enough: blockchains are great at moving value and proving ownership, but they’re terrible at storing big files. The moment your app needs real-world content images, videos, audio, PDFs, game assets, AI datasets, archives things either get insanely expensive if you try to push data onchain, or you fall back to centralized hosting that can break, disappear, or get censored. Walrus steps in as a decentralized “blob storage” layer built specifically for large data, and it uses the Sui blockchain as the coordination and verification engine. In simple terms, Sui acts like the control center where metadata, ownership, payments, and proofs live, while a network of Walrus storage nodes does the heavy lifting of actually holding and serving the files.
What makes Walrus feel different from a generic “storage coin” is that it’s designed to be verifiable and app-friendly. When you upload a file to Walrus, the network doesn’t just store it as one big chunk on one machine. Instead, it breaks the blob into encoded pieces with built-in redundancy and spreads those pieces across many nodes, so the data can still be recovered even if some nodes go offline. The research behind Walrus describes a two-dimensional erasure coding scheme called RedStuff, which is meant to keep data available in real-world conditions like node churn, network latency, and adversarial behavior, while avoiding the huge costs of brute-force replication. Walrus documentation also frames the storage overhead as roughly around five times the blob size due to this redundancy, which is still far more efficient than having many validators fully replicate the same data. The key point here is that Walrus is trying to make storage something you don’t have to “trust”—apps can get onchain proofs or certificates published through Sui that indicate the blob was stored and remains available, and because Sui uses an object model, storage resources and blobs can be represented and managed in a programmable way inside applications.
The WAL token exists to keep that whole economy running, and its utility is pretty straightforward: you pay in WAL to store data, you stake or delegate WAL to help secure the network and incentivize honest storage providers, and you use WAL for governance decisions that tune key parameters like penalties and economic settings. Officially, Walrus lists a maximum supply of 5 billion WAL, with an initial circulating supply of 1.25 billion (25%). The allocation breakdown published by the project is 43% to a community reserve, 10% to a user drop, 10% to subsidies, 30% to core contributors, and 7% to investors, and it notes that the community reserve includes amounts available at launch with a linear unlock schedule extending to March 2033. Walrus also describes WAL as deflationary in design, tying burning to penalties around short-term stake shifting and, when enabled, slashing/penalty events for low-performing nodes. The project also talks about aiming for storage pricing that feels stable in fiat terms, which is important because developers won’t build serious products on top of storage costs that swing wildly.
In terms of what people will actually do with Walrus, the strongest use cases are the ones where Web3 has always been weak: durable NFT media that doesn’t depend on a random server staying alive, big asset pipelines for Web3 gaming, decentralized publishing and archival storage for documents and records, dataset hosting and distribution for AI and data markets, and even decentralized static site hosting through “Walrus Sites.” Walrus also has a growing tooling ecosystem with SDKs and integrations curated publicly, which matters because storage only wins when it’s easy enough that developers use it without fighting the stack. On the momentum side, Walrus Foundation publicly announced a $140 million private token sale led by Standard Crypto with participation from major names like a16z crypto and others, and Walrus has highlighted collaborations in the ecosystem with projects focused on agent workflows and data narratives, which fits the broader direction they’re pushing: becoming a default “data layer” for onchain apps rather than a niche storage tool. Looking forward, public summaries and research-style coverage point to continued work into Q1 2026 on performance improvements, support for much larger blobs, better lifecycle management for stored data, and pricing stability mechanisms, which are exactly the kinds of unglamorous upgrades you want to see from infrastructure that plans to be used at scale.
If you’re judging Walrus fairly, the strengths are clear: it’s purpose-built for large data, it’s backed by serious research, it plugs into Sui in a way that makes storage programmable for applications, and WAL has a clean role in payments, security, and governance. But the risks are just as real, because decentralized storage is hard in production. The true test won’t be how good the whitepaper sounds it’ll be whether retrieval stays fast and reliable, whether node operators can sustainably deliver service, whether incentives stay balanced between cheap storage and strong security, and whether real applications choose Walrus over alternatives in a crowded market. Also, it’s worth being honest about the “privacy” angle: Walrus can provide resilient and verifiable storage, but privacy usually depends on encryption and access control at the application layer, so the end-user experience of “private storage” comes down to how developers implement those layers on top. If Walrus executes well on performance and developer experience, though, it has a real chance to become one of those quiet pieces of infrastructure that ends up everywhere powering NFT media, games, data markets, and AI workflows without most users even realizing Walrus is the reason their content stays alive.

#Walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL

Dusk is a Layer 1 blockchain founded in 2018 that’s built for a very specific mission: making real, regulated finance work on-chain without pretending privacy and compliance don’t matter. Most blockchains are transparent by default, which is great for public verification but awkward for institutions, because real finance runs on confidentiality—trades, positions, counterparties, customer data, and strategy can’t just be exposed to everyone. Dusk’s core idea is to create financial infrastructure that’s private when it should be private, but still auditable when it needs to be verified, meaning you can keep sensitive activity confidential while still being able to produce proofs for auditors, regulators, or authorized parties. In simple terms, Dusk is trying to be a settlement backbone for things like tokenized securities, regulated payment rails, and compliant DeFi—basically the “grown-up” version of on-chain finance where rules are part of the design instead of an afterthought.
Under the hood, Dusk leans into a modular architecture so different layers can specialize instead of forcing the chain to do everything in one big monolithic system. The base settlement layer focuses on security, consensus, and finality, while application execution can happen in environments that developers already understand. One major piece is the EVM-compatible side (often referred to as DuskEVM), which aims to let developers build with familiar Ethereum-style tooling while still settling on Dusk’s underlying layer. This matters because “finance-grade” platforms don’t just need clever cryptography—they need stability, predictable settlement, and a developer experience that doesn’t scare people away. On the privacy side, Dusk has built protocol-level privacy concepts rather than leaving privacy entirely to app developers, and it frames privacy as “confidential but provable,” which is exactly the kind of framing institutions tend to accept: private for everyday use, accountable when required by law or auditing.
The DUSK token exists mainly to power and secure this infrastructure, not just to be traded. It’s used for staking (so the network can defend itself and reach consensus), paying transaction and smart contract fees, and rewarding participants who help run the network. In practice, that means DUSK acts like the fuel and security bond for the chain: if the network sees real usage—settling assets, running financial applications, and processing activity—then demand for fees and staking becomes more meaningful. The ecosystem around Dusk is naturally more finance-focused than “everything chains,” leaning toward staking tools, dashboards, and applications that make sense for regulated assets and institutional workflows rather than endless copies of the same consumer crypto apps.
Where Dusk gets especially interesting is in its real-world use case alignment. Tokenized securities are a natural fit because securities require compliance controls, investor restrictions, reporting, and often privacy around ownership and trading activity. Regulated payment rails are another obvious lane because settlement is where finance lives and dies—if you can enable compliant value transfer (especially in regions with clear frameworks like Europe), you can become part of real market plumbing. And then there’s the idea of compliant DeFi, which some crypto people dislike in theory but is likely where larger pools of capital eventually flow: DeFi-style automation and composability, but with guardrails, permissions for certain products, privacy for positions and strategies, and auditability baked in. In this world, partnerships and integrations matter more than hype, because institutions adopt through licensed venues, payment providers, custodians, and regulated intermediaries—so traction isn’t just “more users,” it’s “more real flows.”
The upside for Dusk is pretty straightforward: if regulated finance truly moves on-chain in a big way, networks that can support privacy and compliance without breaking programmability could become foundational infrastructure. But the challenges are also real. Institutions move slowly, regulation evolves, and privacy tech is notoriously difficult to productize without making applications clunky or limiting composability. On top of that, competition is fierce—some players are building on Ethereum, others are building permissioned systems, and many are targeting the same RWA narrative. So Dusk’s long-term success won’t be decided by whether the idea sounds good; it’ll be decided by whether regulated products actually launch, actual assets get issued and traded, and real settlement volume shows up consistently. If that happens, Dusk could be one of the rare chains that isn’t just “crypto infrastructure,” but actual financial infrastructure; if it doesn’t, it risks being remembered as a project with the right concept that arrived into a market that wasn’t ready to move fast enough.

#Dusk @Dusk $DUSK

Dusk (DUSK) là một blockchain lớp 1 được xây dựng cho một phiên bản tiền mã hóa giống với tài chính thực tế hơn: được quản lý, chú trọng đến quyền riêng tư và thiết kế dành cho các tổ chức không thể hoạt động với mọi thứ công khai hoàn toàn. Cách dễ nhất để hiểu Dusk là bắt đầu từ vấn đề mà nó đang giải quyết. Hầu hết các blockchain giống như một ngôi nhà kính, mọi giao dịch đều có thể nhìn thấy, số dư có thể được theo dõi và các mẫu hoạt động có thể tiết lộ nhiều điều hơn người ta tưởng trong thời gian dài. Tính minh bạch này có thể rất tốt cho các thị trường mở, nhưng lại trở thành vấn đề lớn khi bạn đang xử lý các sản phẩm tài chính phải bảo vệ thông tin nhạy cảm, như vị thế khách hàng, chiến lược giao dịch, điều kiện đủ điều kiện đầu tư hoặc bất kỳ thứ gì liên quan đến nghĩa vụ bảo mật pháp lý. Trong tài chính truyền thống, quyền riêng tư không phải là đáng ngờ mà là điều bình thường. Các quỹ không công bố giao dịch, các ngân hàng không công khai số dư của bạn, và các cơ quan quản lý vẫn cần một cách để kiểm toán mà không làm lộ dữ liệu của mọi người ra công chúng. Dusk đang cố gắng mang cấu trúc “bí mật nhưng có thể kiểm toán” này lên chuỗi khối, không phải bằng cách thêm tuân thủ như một lớp vá sau này, mà bằng cách tích hợp quyền riêng tư và khả năng kiểm toán vào thiết kế từ đầu.

Walrus (and its token, WAL) is one of those crypto projects that makes more sense when you stop thinking like a trader and start thinking like a builder or a real user. Most blockchains are great at recording small, important facts who owns what, who sent what, what a smart contract says but they’re awful at storing large files. The moment you try to put real-world content into Web3 (images, videos, game assets, AI datasets, documents, full websites), you run into a painful reality: storing that “heavy stuff” directly onchain is too expensive and inefficient, so many “decentralized” apps end up quietly relying on centralized cloud storage. That’s why NFTs break when a server link dies, why onchain games still depend on traditional hosting for their content, and why a lot of Web3 experiences still feel like decentralization is only half-finished. Walrus exists to fix that gap by acting like a decentralized “big file layer” that lives alongside the Sui blockchain Sui handles the coordination and logic (ownership rules, payments, programmability), while Walrus handles the actual storage and retrieval of big blobs of data in a way that’s meant to be resilient and cost-efficient. The core trick is that Walrus doesn’t store your file as one giant object on one machine; it splits your data into many encoded pieces using erasure coding, spreads those pieces across different storage operators, and then allows the original file to be reconstructed later from only a portion of the pieces. That matters because real decentralized networks have churn nodes go offline, operators come and go, outages happen so a storage system has to be built around failure, not shocked by it. Walrus also aims to make repair and self-healing practical so missing pieces can be regenerated without wasting massive bandwidth, and it uses Sui to make storage “programmable,” meaning apps can treat stored data like a first-class building block rather than a fragile offchain add-on. In this setup, WAL isn’t just a random token stapled onto a product; it’s meant to be the economic engine: users (or the apps they use) pay in WAL to store data for a set period, storage operators stake WAL (and attract delegated stake) to earn assignments and rewards, and WAL staking power ties into governance so the community can adjust network parameters over time. The most important long-term question for WAL is simple: does Walrus become a storage layer people genuinely use every day? Because if real apps store real data continuously NFT media libraries, onchain game assets, creator content, AI agent memory, datasets, decentralized websites, or even certain data-availability-style needs for scaling stacks then WAL demand can become utility-driven instead of just speculative. That’s the bullish path: Walrus becomes boring infrastructure that developers pick because it’s reliable, predictable, and integrated into the Sui ecosystem, and the token gains value because it’s tied to actual storage consumption and network security. The risks are also straightforward: decentralized storage is competitive, and most users never touch protocols directly they touch apps and gateways so the ecosystem needs strong front ends, smooth developer tooling, and consistent performance in the messy real world where nodes fail and networks are stressed. If Walrus can keep the experience simple while proving durability at scale, it has a real chance to become one of those foundational pieces of Web3 that people stop talking about because it “just works,” but if adoption doesn’t reach that everyday level, the economics become more dependent on incentives and hype, which is always a weaker foundation.

#Walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL

Walrus (WAL) đang cố gắng giải quyết một vấn đề mà hầu hết các ứng dụng tiền mã hóa đều thầm lặng đối mặt: dữ liệu thực sự nằm ở đâu. Các blockchain rất tốt trong việc xác định quyền sở hữu và giao dịch, nhưng chúng không được thiết kế để lưu trữ các tệp lớn như hình ảnh, video, tập dữ liệu AI, tài sản trò chơi, nhật ký kiểm toán hay các tài liệu chứng minh. Vì vậy, nhiều ứng dụng 'phi tập trung' vẫn phải dựa vào lưu trữ đám mây thông thường, tạo ra những điểm yếu — các liên kết có thể bị hỏng, máy chủ có thể ngừng hoạt động, nội dung có thể bị xóa, và việc chứng minh rằng một tệp không bị thay thế hay thay đổi trở nên khó khăn hơn. Walrus xuất hiện như một mạng lưu trữ phi tập trung được xây dựng để hoạt động sát sao với blockchain Sui, với mục tiêu biến việc lưu trữ trở nên thực tế cho các sản phẩm thực tế: khả năng truy cập đáng tin cậy, tham chiếu có thể xác minh và xử lý hiệu quả các khối dữ liệu lớn về mặt chi phí. Cách đơn giản để hình dung là Sui đóng vai trò như lớp điều phối (quy tắc, thanh toán, bằng chứng), trong khi Walrus đóng vai trò như lớp dữ liệu nặng (thực sự lưu trữ và phục vụ các tệp).

Dusk Network is basically built for the part of crypto that most chains struggle with: regulated finance. Most blockchains are transparent by default, which is great for open ecosystems, but it gets awkward fast when you try to run real financial activity on-chain because institutions don’t want their balances, trades, counterparties, and strategies visible to everyone forever, and regulators still need proof that rules were followed. Dusk sits right in that gap and tries to solve it with a simple idea: make a Layer 1 where privacy is the default, but compliance and auditability are still possible in a controlled way. In other words, it’s aiming for “privacy with receipts”—transactions and activity can be confidential, but the system can still prove correctness, and when needed, the right parties can selectively disclose information for audits or oversight without doxxing everything to the public.
Under the hood, Dusk leans into a modular design that separates the serious “truth layer” of the network from where apps actually run. The settlement layer often described as Dusk’s core handles consensus, finality, and the privacy foundations, while execution environments on top can give developers different ways to build. That’s why you’ll see Dusk talk about components like a base settlement layer (DuskDS) plus execution options like an EVM-compatible environment (DuskEVM) and a WASM-based route (DuskVM). The point of this setup is practical: developers can use familiar EVM tools and still settle into a network designed for finance-grade finality, while more native pathways can support deeper privacy models. On the privacy side, Dusk’s architecture is built around the idea that financial activity shouldn’t be a public billboard; instead of everything being openly readable, Dusk supports privacy-preserving transaction models where the network can validate that funds are real and rules are followed without revealing sensitive details like amounts or linkable identity trails, while still allowing selective disclosure when regulation demands it.
A big piece of Dusk’s “regulated by design” story is that it doesn’t just talk about privacy it tries to package compliance in a way that doesn’t turn into a data-honeypot nightmare. That’s where concepts like ZK-KYC (often referenced as Citadel) come in, with the general idea that a user should be able to prove they’re verified or eligible without repeatedly handing over personal data to every app or broadcasting identity on-chain. In the same spirit, Dusk also explores bringing confidentiality into EVM-style application environments through privacy tooling (often referenced as Hedger), because EVM by default is extremely transparent, and if Dusk wants serious financial apps to build there, it needs a way to protect sensitive flows while keeping contracts verifiable and usable for developers. None of this is trivial private execution is one of the hardest categories in blockchain—but it’s also exactly the kind of work that matters if your target users are institutions and regulated markets rather than purely retail speculation.
On the token side, DUSK is designed like infrastructure fuel more than a “governance-only” asset: it’s used for staking to secure the network, paying fees, and rewarding the participants who run the consensus and keep the chain healthy. The overall tokenomics framing is long-term, which matches Dusk’s narrative that regulated finance infrastructure is a multi-year game, not a quick seasonal trend. If the network grows real usage, fees and activity become a stronger driver of the system; if usage is slow early on, staking incentives and ecosystem building do more of the heavy lifting. Where Dusk really tries to stand out is in real-world use cases: tokenized regulated assets and securities, compliant DeFi where access rules and eligibility can be enforced, stable settlement rails for payments and market activity, and private institutional markets like OTC-style deals or treasury operations use cases where blockchain benefits are attractive, but public transparency would be a deal-breaker.
The upside story for Dusk is pretty straightforward: if RWAs and regulated financial products genuinely expand on-chain, the winners probably won’t be the loudest general-purpose chains, but the networks that can actually satisfy privacy, compliance, auditability, and settlement expectations at the base layer. Dusk’s strengths are that it has a clear niche, a modular architecture that makes developer adoption more realistic, and a product direction that treats compliance as a feature instead of an enemy. The risks are equally real: regulated adoption moves slowly, privacy tech is hard to ship without painful tradeoffs, network effects still matter (liquidity, integrations, developer mindshare), and regulatory environments can change. But if you believe the next phase of crypto is less about pure transparency and more about bringing serious finance on-chain in a way that respects confidentiality while still being provable and auditable, Dusk is positioned as one of the projects built specifically for that future.

#Dusk @Dusk $DUSK

Walrus (WAL) is basically trying to solve one of the most ignored problems in crypto: blockchains are great at proving ownership and enforcing rules, but they’re awful at storing real-world data like images, videos, game assets, app front-ends, AI datasets, and big archives. Most “decentralized” apps still quietly rely on normal cloud servers for that stuff, which creates weak points—content can disappear, front-ends can be taken down, and users end up trusting whoever controls the storage. Walrus steps in as a decentralized “blob storage” network (blobs = big unstructured files) built to work closely with the Sui blockchain, where Sui acts like the coordination and logic layer while Walrus handles the heavy data. Instead of saving a file as one big chunk on one machine, Walrus breaks it into many encoded fragments using erasure coding (and its own approach often referred to as “Red Stuff”), then spreads those fragments across independent storage nodes so the original file can still be reconstructed even if a bunch of nodes go offline. That’s the core value: high availability and resilience without wastefully storing full copies everywhere, which can make storage more cost-efficient than brute-force replication. What makes Walrus feel especially “Web3-native” is that it’s designed for programmable storage apps can treat storage like a first-class resource by referencing blobs through on-chain logic on Sui, so smart contracts can do things like check that a blob exists and is available before minting an NFT, gate access to content, extend storage automatically when users pay, or manage the lifecycle of data over time. WAL, the token, exists because decentralized storage needs a real economy to function: users pay in WAL to store data, node operators are incentivized and secured through delegated staking, and governance uses WAL stake to vote on network parameters and upgrades; over time, penalty and burn/slashing-style mechanisms can help push honest behavior and keep incentives aligned, although in many networks these enforcement features evolve as the system matures. In terms of ecosystem and use cases, Walrus fits naturally into data-heavy categories that crypto is moving toward NFT brands that don’t want media turning into broken links, decentralized websites and dApp front-ends that shouldn’t be easy to censor, games that need large assets, AI workflows that need big datasets, and applications that want tamper-resistant audit trails or historical records stored in a verifiable way. The long-term growth story is simple: if Web3 keeps expanding into media, gaming, AI agents, and consumer apps, storage stops being a side feature and becomes core infrastructure—and Walrus is positioning itself to be that “plumbing layer” for the Sui ecosystem and beyond. At the same time, the risks are real and worth respecting: decentralized storage is a fiercely competitive space, incentives need to transition from subsidy-driven growth to sustainable real demand, “decentralized storage” doesn’t automatically mean “private storage” unless apps use encryption and solid key management, and the user experience must stay fast and reliable or developers will choose alternatives. If Walrus can deliver consistent performance, meaningful adoption, and a healthy token-driven security model, it has a clear path to becoming one of those quiet but essential networks that you don’t hype every day because it’s too busy powering everything behind the scenes.

#Walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL

Dusk Network về cơ bản là một blockchain lớp 1 đang cố gắng giải quyết một vấn đề mà crypto liên tục gặp phải: tài chính thực sự cần bảo mật và thiết kế thân thiện với quy định, nhưng phần lớn các chuỗi đều hoặc hoàn toàn minh bạch (điều này làm lộ thông tin người dùng và tổ chức) hoặc quá riêng tư đến mức tuân thủ trở nên phức tạp. Dusk cố ý nằm ở khoảng giữa. Nó được xây dựng cho cơ sở hạ tầng tài chính được quản lý, nghĩa là mục tiêu dài hạn không chỉ là "một chuỗi DeFi khác", mà là lớp cơ sở cho các thứ như DeFi tuân thủ, tài sản thực thế được mã hóa và các ứng dụng tài chính cấp độ tổ chức, nơi mà tính bảo mật là điều bình thường và khả năng kiểm toán vẫn có thể thực hiện khi cần thiết. Nói cách khác, nó hướng đến "bảo mật theo thiết kế" mà không giả vờ rằng các cơ quan quản lý không tồn tại. Mạng chính thức đã hoạt động từ ngày 7 tháng 1 năm 2025, điều này quan trọng vì nó chuyển Dusk từ nhiều năm phát triển sang một mạng lưới hoạt động thực tế.