Wahab Majeed

$BTC #BTC
To analyze the current sentiment shifts in the crypto market, particularly focusing on Bitcoin (BTC), we can look at various indicators such as price movements, trading volumes, social media activity, news sentiment, and the Crypto Fear & Greed Index. Since you did not specify a time frame, I'll provide a general approach to identifying sentiment shifts and then focus on recent developments.
✨️ Steps to Identify Sentiment Shifts
1. Price Movements: Analyze the recent price trends of BTC on major exchanges.
2. Trading Volumes: High trading volumes often indicate strong investor interest, which can correlate with positive sentiment.
3. Social Media Sentiment: Monitor Twitter, Reddit, and other forums for positive or negative mentions of BTC.
4. News Sentiment: Track news articles and their tone regarding BTC and the broader crypto market.
5. Crypto Fear & Greed Index: Use this index to gauge overall market sentiment.
✨️ Recent Developments and Sentiment Analysis
✨️ Price Movements
✨️Check the recent price action of BTC on leading exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and others. For example, if BTC has shown a steady upward trend over the past week, it could indicate improving sentiment.
✨️ Trading Volumes
Review trading volumes on major exchanges. Increased volumes without a corresponding decrease in price can signal growing confidence among traders.
✨️ Social Media Sentiment
Monitor social media platforms for discussions around BTC. Positive tweets, posts, and comments can indicate a bullish sentiment, while negative ones suggest bearishness.
✨️ News Sentiment
Look at recent news articles related to BTC. Positive news such as regulatory clarity, institutional adoption, or technological advancements can boost sentiment, whereas negative news like regulatory crackdowns or security breaches can dampen it.
✨️ Crypto Fear & Greed Index
The Crypto Fear & Greed Index provides a snapshot of market sentiment. A score below 25 indicates extreme fear, while a score above 75 indicates extreme greed. Scores between 25 and 50 suggest moderate fear, and scores between 50 and 75 indicate moderate greed.
✨️ Example Analysis
Let's assume today is January 15, 2023. Here’s how the sentiment might look based on recent data:
1. Price Movements: BTC has seen a steady rise from $40,000 to $42,000 over the past week.
2. Trading Volumes: Trading volumes on Binance and Coinbase have increased by 15% compared to the previous week.
3. Social Media Sentiment: Positive mentions on Twitter have increased by 10%, while Reddit discussions have been mostly optimistic.
4. News Sentiment: There have been several positive news articles about institutional investments and regulatory clarity in major markets.
5. Crypto Fear & Greed Index: The index has moved from 20 (extreme fear) to 35 (moderate fear) over the past week.
💫 Conclusion
Based on the above indicators, there seems to be a slight improvement in sentiment towards BTC and the crypto market in general. While the overall sentiment is still on the cautious side (moderate fear), the combination of rising prices, increased trading volumes, positive social media activity, and favorable news suggests a gradual shift towards more optimism.
💫Strategic Insights
1. Investors with a Short-Term Focus: Consider taking advantage of the improved sentiment to enter positions cautiously.
2. Long-Term Investors: Continue to monitor the market but maintain a long-term perspective, as short-term fluctuations are normal.
3. Risk Management: Ensure proper risk management strategies are in place, given the market is still in a cautious phase.
Would you like to dive deeper into any specific aspect of the analysis or need further insights?

$BTC #BTC
Long ago, in the shadowed year of 2009, a mysterious figure known only as Satoshi Nakamoto forged a relic of unimaginable power: Bitcoin, the first decentralized cryptocurrency. It was born in the ashes of a world weary of centralized overlords—banks and governments hoarding trust like dragons guard their gold. Bitcoin was a rebellion, a peer-to-peer enchantment that allowed souls to trade value directly, without intermediaries lurking in the shadows. Its magic lay in the blockchain, a public ledger carved in digital stone, immutable and transparent, where every transaction was etched for eternity.
Bitcoin was no mere coin; it was designed as a deflationary force, a finite treasure with only 21 million pieces ever to exist. Like gold mined from the deepest earth, its scarcity imbued it with value, earning it the title of "digital gold." In our tale, imagine Bitcoin as an ancient mountain kingdom, its walls built of cryptographic stone, unyielding and eternal. Miners, the tireless dwarves of this realm, wield their computational picks to validate transactions and secure the network, earning Bitcoin as their reward. But beware, traveler, for the kingdom grows slower with time—every four years, the reward for mining halves in an event called the "Halving," ensuring the treasure remains rare and coveted. Today, Bitcoin stands as a store of value, a sanctuary for those fleeing the inflation of fiat realms, its price often swaying with the winds of market sentiment and global unrest.
Yet, far across the digital seas, a newer realm has risen—Hyperliquid, a land of speed and financial wizardry. Unlike Bitcoin’s stoic endurance, Hyperliquid is a tempest, a Layer 1 blockchain crafted for performance, optimized for the arcane arts of financial applications. Picture it as a floating citadel, its towers buzzing with energy, where transactions strike like lightning with a block latency of less than 1 second. Here, the marketplace is no ordinary bazaar; it hosts a fully onchain order book for perpetuals exchanges, a complex dance of futures trading where merchants and speculators wager on the tides of value without ever touching the shore of centralized control. Hyperliquid’s magic is in its efficiency—every deal, every contract, is woven directly into the blockchain, transparent and unstoppable, a marvel for decentralized finance (DeFi) sorcerers seeking speed and precision.
In our story, imagine a weary merchant, burdened by the slow caravans of Bitcoin’s kingdom, where transactions can take minutes to confirm under heavy traffic. He hears whispers of Hyperliquid and ventures there, finding a market where his trades are executed before he can blink, where financial services—from lending to derivatives—flow like a river of light. Yet, this citadel is not without its perils; its complexity and focus on performance mean it lacks the battle-tested resilience of Bitcoin’s ancient walls. Hyperliquid is a young realm, its lore still being written, its stability yet to face the sieges of time.

Thankingyou!

COAI
👋 Hi 👦 guys....
It would be Hit a new high $COAI at $61.00
Just Patience 👦 guys don't worry about it.
Don't missout this $COAI we have a Golden opportunity.Further as you like .
Golden news for all my dear followers $COAI is preparing for a major breakout! After deep analysis, I’ve confirmed that within the next few days, $100M+ in market cap could be added to $COAI. This type of expansion usually triggers a massive upward rally and strong buying momentum across the board.
Don’t wait for the explosion this is the perfect time to accumulate at these discounted levels before the surge begins. Once the momentum kicks in, $COAI could easily aim for new highs. Stay alert and act smart opportunities like this don’t repeat often!

👦 As soon As $COAI Again fully Bulish Momentum and we saw $COAI Reach on the 🌙 Moon.
Thankingyou!
Inshallah Tallah

$BTC #BTC $BNB
The United Nations is preparing to launch a blockchain academy for governments and a UN-led blockchain advisory group to assist countries in adopting the technology.
COINTELEGRAPH IN YOUR SOCIAL FEED
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) plans to launch two initiatives aimed at helping countries adopt blockchain technology.
Robert Pasicko, the leader of UNDP’s financial technology team, AltFinLab, told Cointelegraph at the UN City offices in Copenhagen, Denmark, that the organization plans to launch a blockchain education program for government officials alongside a blockchain advisory body.
The initiative builds on the UNDP’s existing blockchain academy for UN staff, now aimed at helping governments implement blockchain in real-world applications.
Pasicko said that “in a few weeks,” the new academy will begin operations and select four governments to work with. He expects formal approval for the initiative within one to two weeks.
“Training is just part of it,” Pasicko said, noting that the organization will also help initiatives move further through project development. He said that research conducted by the UNDP found 300 potential use cases for governments willing to adopt blockchain technology.
Flag of the United Nations at UN City in Copenhagen. Source: Wikimedia
Related: UN agency to upskill governments on crypto tech next year
UN blockchain advisory group in development
Pasicko said the idea for a UNDP-led blockchain advisory organization was discussed during a UN general assembly in New York attended by 25 of the top blockchain companies, including the Ethereum Foundation, Stellar Foundation and Polygon Labs. “If everything goes well,” the project could go live in two to three months, he said.
Pasicko noted that the UNDP already has pilots in 20 countries aimed at improving financial inclusion through blockchain technology. One partner is Decaf, a crypto-powered payment system that helps individuals access financial services without the need for banks. “How much longer do you need ordinary banks if you can bypass them with such apps?” Pasicko asked.
Related: United Nations, ICP launch digital credentials pilot in Cambodia
ATMs are going the way of phone booths
Pasicko compared the evolution of banking infrastructure to the decline of public phone booths, pointing out how those pieces of infrastructure are no longer needed for their original purpose. He noted that in some countries, they have evolved, and in Japan, they serve as WiFi hotspots.
“The same question is, do you need ATMs in a few years? I don’t think so,” he said.
When asked whether this change will be a consequence of cryptocurrencies, private stablecoins or central bank digital currencies, Pasicko said he would instead expect a combination of all three. He explained that different jurisdictions will likely favor different solutions, but technology makes intermediaries obsolete.
“You need an internet connection, you need your smartphone. There is nothing else you need for these transactions,“ he said.
Still, Pasicko pointed out that “those who are in charge today are trying their best to stay in charge.” He highlighted that technologies can be used for good or bad, noting that fire can warm people when they need it or burn villages.
According to him, blockchain is the same. He said that, depending on how this technology is deployed, it can either widen the divide between the rich and powerful and the rest, or it can serve the masses.

$COAI #COAI @COAI
Introduction
In the rapidly evolving Web3 landscape, one of the hottest narratives is the convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and decentralized blockchain infrastructure. Amid this backdrop, ChainOpera AI (token ticker COAI) positions itself as more than “just another altcoin” — it brands itself as a foundational platform that re-thinks trust and power in Web3, by combining decentralized AI model governance + community-owned infrastructure + token incentives.
While crypto markets are littered with ambitious whitepapers, COAI stands out because its vision touches on deeper institutional questions: who controls AI models, how data and compute are shared, how trust is distributed in decentralized systems, and how token economics align community incentives. In doing so, it claims to challenge legacy power architectures in Web3 (exchanges, big tech AI providers, centralized data silos).
Let’s unpack what the project says it will do, the architecture and token model, the broader meaning for Web3, and then the risks.
💫What COAI proposes
1. Community-driven AI development & governance
COAI emphasizes that users, developers and infrastructure providers collectively participate in the AI lifecycle: model training, data provisioning, inference usage, and reward distribution. For example, an article on Binance posts that “users can contribute directly to model training and governance” with COAI.
💫💫💫Binance
This bottom-up governance model aims to decentralise not only compute but decision-making: token holders influence which AI agents are developed, how they are monetised, how contributions are rewarded. In other words: power over AI is not just with big tech; community participants hold stake and vote.
2. Infrastructure alignment: GPU + compute + blockchain
According to its listing on CoinMarketCap, COAI’s stated mission: build a full-stack AI platform — “AI Terminal Super App”, developer platform for agent creation, and decentralized infrastructure of models + GPU resources.
💫CoinMarketCap
Thus, the architecture is not simply token + smart contract, but also distributed compute resources and model sharing. The protocol claims to validate contribution (models, data, compute) via blockchain mechanisms, thereby making the infrastructure more open and transparent.
3. Token model: COAI as utility & governance
COAI is the native token of the ecosystem. It aims to:
Act as the currency for AI services (paying for inference, models)
Provide staking and reward mechanisms for contributions (i.e., those providing compute, data)
Enable voting/governance rights over protocol evolution and model selection.
For instance, a promotion piece says: “Token holders are expected to gain voting rights and contribute to strategic development … staking and reward systems could incentivize long-term holding.”
💫💫💫Binance.
Therefore, the token model tries to align incentives: if you contribute meaningfully, you get rewarded; you also have a say in direction. That is the proposed re-thinking of power: token-holders, not just founders or big players, shape the system.
💫Why this matters:
Reshaping trust & power in Web3
💫Trust architecture.
Traditional AI systems are opaque: large corporations own models, data, compute; the “black box” problem looms. Web3 promises decentralised trust: blockchain-based verification, transparent provenance, community participation. COAI’s value proposition is that by combining AI + blockchain you can create a system where contributions are visible, reward mechanisms are transparent, governance is distributed — thus re-engineering how trust is built in digital systems.
This matters because as AI models become central in applications (finance, identity, analysis), who controls them becomes a strategic question. COAI’s push is to put community in that loop.
💫Power dynamics
In much of Web3 today, power still concentrates in a few hands: large protocol founders, major token holders, centralised exchanges, big infrastructure providers. COAI’s narrative is that by building a distributed infrastructure for AI + compute + models + data, and by giving token-holders governance power, it decentralises power. It re-thinks the “architecture of power” — governance, model ownership, data flows — rather than simply payments or DeFi.
If realised, that would mark a shift in how digital infrastructure is built and governed.
💫Web3 + AI convergence
As many commentators note, Web3 and AI are increasingly intertwined: generative AI needs provenance, data traceability, decentralised compute and reward mechanics; Web3 can provide those. For instance, a Google Cloud blog describes how Web3 “can bring transparency to AI’s black box problem.”

COAI is one of the projects attempting to operationalise that convergence. This bridging gives it relevance in the next wave of digital infrastructure.
The Latest Update / Market Context
According to CoinMarketCap, COAI currently has a circulating supply of approx 188 million tokens, out of a max supply of 1 billion. Market cap is around US $200 million.
CoinMarketCap
The token is trading around US $1.09 (at time of reporting) but is down significantly from its all-time high (~US $44.90) as per the data.
CoinMarketCap
On social and promotional channels (Binance Square), the project is being presented as “future of community-driven AI”.
Binance
Thus, the project is active in marketing and positioning, while still in a period of volatility and market consolidation.
Risks & Considerations
No project is without risks. For COAI and its ambitious vision especially, key caution areas include:
Execution risk
Vision is grand: build AI app, developer platform, decentralized compute, token governance, model marketplace. The more moving parts, the more potential failure points. Delivering infrastructure, developer adoption, robust models, governance mechanisms takes time — and markets may expect quicker payoff.
Tokenomics & supply risk
The large max supply (1 billion), with a current circulating ~188 million, suggests dilution risk or unlock schedules that could affect price. Additionally, as with many early tokens, volatility is high: dramatic drop from ATH indicates market caution.
Governance vs. centralisation tension
While governance is touted as community-driven, early stages may still see founding team and early investors controlling large parts of token/tokens locked. If governance ends up being concentrated, the vision of decentralised power may not materialise. Observers should check token distribution, lock-up schedules, and governance participation.
Market timing & competition
AI + Web3 is crowded and competitive. Major firms and protocols are entering. Projects that succeed will need strong differentiation, community adoption, developer ecosystem. If COAI fails to gain traction or leaves gaping competitors ahead, the vision may be undermined.
Regulatory & model risk
Decentralised AI governance raises questions of liability, model bias, data provenance, privacy. If legal or regulatory push-back arrives (for data misuse, unfair models, compute resource usage), the project may encounter hurdles.
What to Watch Next
For someone monitoring COAI and its mission of rethinking Web3 trust/power, key indicators include:
Developer uptake: Number of AI agents built, number of contributors training models, compute resources committed.
Governance participation: Token-holder voting metrics, proposals passed, transparency in governance.
Infrastructure deployment: Are model marketplace, compute resource marketplace, AI Terminal super-app actually live and growing?
Token unlock schedule: How many tokens will be unlocked? What portion is held by insiders?
Community strength: How strong is the user/holder community? Are there credible partners?
Marketplace traction: Are AI-powered applications using COAI token? Are services being adopted?
Competitive advances: How does COAI’s offering compare with other AI-Web3 protocols? Are there clear differentiators?
Conclusion
COAI represents a bold articulation of what the next phase of Web3 might look like: not just payments, not just DeFi, but a layered architecture where AI models + compute + governance + token incentives converge into a new trust and power regime. Its pitch — community-driven AI infrastructure, decentralised model ownership, transparent governance — speaks directly to some of the deeper structural questions facing Web3 today.
However, ambition needs execution. The road from whitepaper to live network, from aspirational governance to active community, is long and filled with technical, tokenomic, governance and regulatory hurdles. For investors, developers or users in places like Pakistan, COAI opens up exciting possibilities — but also demands scrutiny, patience and risk-awareness.
In other words: COAI isn’t just a token. It’s a proposition about how power is re-distributed in the digital ecosystem. If it delivers, it may help reshape the architecture of trust in Web3. If not, it may serve as another cautionary tale on the gap between vision and implementation.

In a sweeping shift in U.S. federal policy, the Department of Justice announced on April 8, 2025 that it would immediately disband its specialized team dedicated to investigating cryptocurrency-related infractions. The move, communicated in a memo by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, signals a major redirection of the DOJ’s priorities in the digital-asset arena.
What Happened
The team in question is the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET), established under the previous administration to target the misuse of cryptocurrencies — from money-laundering and mixers to exchange irregularities. The memo states plainly that “the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team shall be disbanded effective immediately.”
According to the memo, ongoing investigations that are inconsistent with the new policy directive “should be closed.” The DOJ will no longer pursue enforcement actions “that have the effect of superimposing regulatory frameworks on digital assets” — in other words, it will not engage in regulatory enforcement of crypto platforms merely on account of the asset type.
The Guardian,
Instead, the DOJ will shift its focus to prosecuting individuals or entities using digital assets in connection with serious criminal conduct: terrorism, narcotics trafficking, human-trafficking, organized crime, hacking, gang financing and other clearly illicit uses.

In the memo, Blanche wrote: “The Department of Justice is not a digital assets regulator.” He criticised the prior (Biden) administration for what he described as a “reckless strategy of regulation by prosecution.”
Why This Shift?
The decision follows an executive order signed earlier by President Trump that emphasised support for digital-asset innovation and “lawful access” to blockchain networks.
Trump has publicly embraced crypto in recent months, reversing earlier scepticism — establishing aims for the U.S. to become a “crypto-capital,” launching crypto initiatives and engaging with industry players. The DOJ’s move aligns with that broader framework.
Implications for Crypto Platforms, Investors & Enforcement
1. Reduced regulatory enforcement risk for some firms
With the DOJ stepping back from regulatory-style prosecutions of crypto platforms (exchanges, mixers, etc) and offline wallets, companies operating in the space may feel a reduced threat environment — at least from a criminal-enforcement perspective. For example, investigations into platforms for unlicensed money transmission or inadvertent technical violations may no longer be the DOJ’s priority unless tied to clear criminal intent.
2. Potential oversight gap and investor vigilance
On the flip side, critics argue this creates a potential oversight gap: reducing enforcement may reduce deterrence, and sophisticated mis-use of digital assets may grow unchecked. Investors, especially retail or less sophisticated ones, may face increased risk if regulatory/criminal backstop is weaker. Legal experts warn of blurred lines between innovation-friendly policy and under-regulation.
3. A clearer criminal-focus but narrower scope
The shift does not mean “no enforcement” — but rather a narrower focus: if a bad actor uses crypto for criminal activity, the DOJ will act. But generalized enforcement of unlicensed platforms or algorithmic/staking violations may be deprioritised. This may favour innovation but increase complexity for compliance professionals determining where enforcement risk lies.
4. Market perception and global ripple effects
From a market perspective, the shift may be seen as bullish for the crypto industry: a major enforcement agency signalling fewer barriers to innovation. However, markets also value clarity. If rules are vague and enforcement inconsistent, risk premium may increase. Globally, other jurisdictions may respond — either by tightening regulation to fill the perceived U.S. void, or by following suit and deregulating.
Key Concerns & Critique
Conflict of interest and politicisation
Given President Trump’s publicly stated crypto ambitions — and direct involvement in crypto ventures — the timing and nature of the policy shift raise questions of conflict and selectivity. Critics ask whether enforcement is being scaled back to favour certain interests rather than in the public interest.
Investor protection and consumer risk
By removing an enforcement layer, the risk for fraudulent schemes, “rug pulls,” mixers, unregulated wallets and opaque tokens could increase. If enforcement becomes crisis-driven (only when big frauds hit) rather than systematic, smaller investors may be disproportionately impacted.
Regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty
The memo’s language that the DOJ is “not a regulator” implies that enforcement of digital assets may shift toward regulatory bodies (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network). But until those bodies fill the gap with clear rules, firms may face uncertain exposures: legal, regulatory and reputational.
Ongoing investigations and precedent
Legal practitioners note that ongoing investigations must now be reviewed under the new directive — some may be closed or altered. This raises questions about precedent, legal consistency, fairness and how past enforcement will be treated.
What to Watch Going Forward
Will the SEC, CFTC or other regulators fill the enforcement gap with clearer, structured regulation or will they also move toward lighter enforcement?
How many ongoing crypto investigations are closed or altered under the memo’s guidance?
Whether fraud, hacks or major crypto-crime events occur under this weakened enforcement regime, and how the government responds.
Impact on global regulatory competition: will other countries increase oversight in response to U.S. pull-back?
Market reaction: does this enforcement shift lead to increased innovation / investment in crypto, or does the increase in risk offset benefits? Lastly, whether new legislation emerges to provide investor protection, transparency and oversight in the digital asset sector.
In Summary
The DOJ’s decision to disband the NCET and redirect its enforcement strategy marks a watershed in U.S. digital-asset policy. Under President Trump, the message is clear: the U.S. is embracing crypto innovation, shifting from broad enforcement of platforms toward targeted action against criminal misuse. For industry participants, this may present opportunity — but it also comes with heightened responsibility and risk. For investors and consumers, the change demands greater diligence. And for regulators and policymakers, it underscores the delicate balance between fostering innovation and ensuring accountability in the evolving world of crypto.