Life is just a series of events. The event occurrence rate is 30%.
What does an event probability of 30% mean?
Why do we call it an event occurrence probability of 30%?
It's just about writing for every trader, using your own subjective perspective to interpret it as 30%.
What you think you are is exactly what you are. Your tomorrow is dictated by others.
No matter how hard you hustle, you can only call it influencing 30%.
Whether you have a tomorrow or not is decided by others.
For others (the whales), it's either 0 or 100%. For you, it's called 30%.
Mathematics is just a causation fallacy.
The so-called theory is a causation fallacy.
The so-called causal fallacy is also a distortion of the incorrect.
The theory you believe is itself wrong. Why is that?
Because under the correct perspective theory, 1+2=3; this is called theoretical correctness.
When someone infers 1+2=4, 5, or 6, they are all deemed incorrect.
However, when we search for our mistakes, we should be looking for 1+2=3.
This belongs to a wrong perspective, and 4, 5, 6 are all correct in relation to the mistakes.
In other words, all science is a causal fallacy. Why?
Because the theory that 1+2=4 can lead to infinite tech products, but producing those products doesn't mean 4 is correct.
Therefore, if we create a flying device, if the theory is correct, it's called directly creating a UFO, not an airplane.
In other words, why is technology always updating and innovating?
It's precisely because this theory is wrong that it needs an upgrade.
If it were correct, there would be no need for future upgrades.
Otherwise, 1+2=3; how can anything be more correct or precise than 3? Are there other values?
Of course, in some modern regions, elementary math has changed regarding this. It now marks 1+2=3 as wrong, calling it 1+2= =3.
To my understanding, I have proven that mathematics itself is a causal fallacy.
The correct term should be 'numbers,' not mathematics.
Human research has to cross from mathematics to numbers, which is an extremely challenging chasm to bridge.
Moreover, more people are shackled by so-called 'values,' misinterpreting them at a lower level than mathematics, which equals a misunderstanding of the so-called price.
Values, mathematics, numbers. Hawking only understood the meaning of numbers in his old age. Therefore, the journals he published later are explanations of numbers. He famously said, 'I have calculated black holes, but I cannot calculate the most complex thing in the world, which is a woman's heart.'
What he expresses is a chasm that mathematics cannot bridge. He entered the realm of 'numbers' that only those who understand numbers can grasp.
Who is the ancestor of Hawking? It's Einstein.
And who is Einstein's ancestor?
It's 'Laplace's demon.'
Laplace's demon is a way of expressing numbers.
Einstein understood E=mc² from Laplace's demon.
And what theory do I use to trade crypto?
It's 'similar to Laplace's demon'; I use 'similar' because I understand that he has issues.
"Bias towards chaotic attractors"; the use of 'bias' is because the logic is similar to mathematical chaotic attractors, but it's not actually that.
There is absolutely no mathematics involved here.
How can humanity transcend the three-dimensional universe?
The answer is: escape linear thinking. Linear is a 2D product but survives in a 3D world. Humans cannot enter 2D, but 3D exists in 2D, and 4D exists in 3D and 2D. Thus, being shackled by 2D in 3D prevents any transcendence.
