I only post on Binance Square, X, and the TG group. All other platforms charge under false pretenses, please be cautious! Please recognize my account name ObaAgon, there are too many impersonators! ————————————————————— Explanation: Bullish: 'Define high point'. Bullish directional energy. Bullish main behavior dynamics; Bearish: 'Define low point'. Bearish directional energy. Bearish main behavior dynamics; Starting with the defined high point. Bullish directional dynamics, dynamics will have time dynamics, regardless of how bullish actions are made. Ultimately, it is for defining the high point. So if the bulls do not enter at the highest point, how can it be called a high point? ————————————————————— 'Event-driven, event occurrence rate is only 30%' For example, event bulls: Event bulls have event news, most people do not know that news events are going to happen, so before the event detonates, there will only be a short squeeze, and when the event occurs, there will be a direct spike. Event bulls only represent events, not bullish actions; simply stating event bulls means only events without bullish actions, which leads to only bearish actions. During the short squeeze process before the event occurs, if the event does not happen, the price may have already been declining throughout this process. ————————————————————— 'A high point' does not represent a high price. 'A low point' does not represent a low price. In terms of low points, the text is different from low prices. For example: low price low point, high price low point. Price and point are different things. ————————————————————— 'Build high point' 'Build low point' Bearish builders establishing low points is a dynamic process. Only the bearish can achieve the lowest point price; ordinary people do not have the capability to absorb large liquidity orders. Therefore, the establishment of a low point occurs after the bearish start placing orders; during this order placement period, a price low point will be produced. Before the bearish leaves, a low point will appear before moving to a high point. As time passes and comes to an end, the K-line price will show a V shape, moving from the top of V to the bottom of V and back to the tail of V, producing a process called building a low point.
MicroStrategy's Saylor mentioned mag8, what is mag8?
Mag8 is a term coined by MicroStrategy, similar to G7, referring to the top eight global corporations holding BTC, which collectively account for 25% of the total BTC supply.
This means that if global corporations want BTC, they can only fight over the remaining 75%.
But where is that 75%?
Let me tell you, MicroStrategy couldn't scoop it up at a low price, and you won't be able to either. $BTC
Looking back at the BTC history from the 10th to the 12th, you can see: on the 10th at 10 PM, it was mentioned that a continuous rebound would start on the 11th, and as of today, the 12th at 4 PM, it continues to be highlighted that the rebound will keep going, and a new high will be reached soon without breaking the peak.
And now we're seeing the price consistently hitting new highs in this rebound.
As for the future, the main players will announce their strategies in advance, so be sure to check out the self-introduction explanation above.
This article's designated role is 'Rebound Trader in the Barrier.'
Currently, the major players in the market include: 1. Rebound Traders in the Barrier/Fake Double Bottom Creators. 2. The previously mentioned June Mid Bullish Strategist. 3. Banks and crypto circles agreeing on a 60k range, indicating institutional accumulation. *It's recommended to categorize this article's role and bookmark it for tracking purposes.* $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
Looking back at history, BTC was mentioned at 1 AM on the 10th, indicating that we were set for a double bottom, which turned out to be a fake (we'll know what was real in the future). Now, we can see that at 4 PM on the 10th, the price dropped to its lowest point.
Then, at 10 PM on the 10th, it was noted that the 11th would see another bounce, and currently, the price has returned close to that recent high during the rebound.
In the future, the main players will announce their plans in advance, so make sure to check out the self-introduction explanation above.
This article classifies its role as 'the rebound trader in the barrier'.
The main players currently in the market include: 1. The previously mentioned long traders from mid-June. 2. The agreement between banks and the crypto circle around the 60K barrier, indicating institutional accumulation. 3. The rebound traders in the barrier/fake double bottom creators. *This article will label its role classification, so please bookmark and track additions or removals based on categories.* $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT)
Looking back at history, BTC was mentioned at 1 AM on the 10th, indicating that we were set for a double bottom, which turned out to be a fake (we'll know what was real in the future). Now, we can see that at 4 PM on the 10th, the price dropped to its lowest point.
Then, at 10 PM on the 10th, it was noted that the 11th would see another bounce, and currently, the price has returned close to that recent high during the rebound.
In the future, the main players will announce their plans in advance, so make sure to check out the self-introduction explanation above.
This article classifies its role as 'the rebound trader in the barrier'.
The main players currently in the market include: 1. The previously mentioned long traders from mid-June. 2. The agreement between banks and the crypto circle around the 60K barrier, indicating institutional accumulation. 3. The rebound traders in the barrier/fake double bottom creators. *This article will label its role classification, so please bookmark and track additions or removals based on categories.* $BTC
SpaceX's largest IPO will also be the biggest short ever.
Historically, the internet has been flooded with so-called market cap theories, where they always use total market cap predictions that can't be surpassed.
With $1.77 trillion entering the game, liquidity at open will correspond to the stock price starting from that $1.77 trillion, raising a question:
After the initial $1.77 trillion, how can we attract another $1.77 trillion in new investments to boost the market cap to $3.54 trillion?
This also includes the original $1.77 trillion which will be sold off when the hype runs out.
These folks don’t care about the company's growth; they're just focused on how much they can make in the short term.
Therefore, the largest capital rotation in global history is about to explode. #spaceX
When trading BTC, a lot of negative thinkers love to analyze from a panic perspective.
Seeing MicroStrategy dump 32 BTC, they politically correctly assume that what was said before can't change, so they predict it's going to crash.
Or they use various calculations of interest payment times to determine how much cash MicroStrategy has to judge when it might go under.
This mindset belongs to one that uses negative emotions as its logic. It's like someone with severe depression sees everything in an extremely negative light, completely missing the positives.
Therefore, my view is that negative thinking isn't wrong; it's just a phase called the current state.
However, as a strategy executor, one shouldn't judge the ability to pay interest based on the current cash at hand.
Instead, they should think of ways to bring in more USD from external sources to cover interest payments, even methods that don't require using cash on hand.
Just like when Trump ran for president a second time, a negative current situation wouldn't prevent winning votes. Whether he wins or loses depends on the actions taken next.
So, for the negative commentators online, I believe it's not just about talking about how things will fail, but also discussing how many ways there are to create more USD for MicroStrategy.
Thus, given the current situation, the future is definitely not as described by the negative online commentary. Just from my own actions, I already know MicroStrategy has numerous ways to continue increasing USD.
There is absolutely no issue with interest pressure.
And now MicroStrategy has bought another 1550 BTC and added 100 million USD, which completely proves that the methods of negative commentary are all wrong. $BTC
On the 5th, I mentioned that BTC around 60 is a signal for a bottom and a potential bounce, and on the 7th, I pointed out that after 4 AM, we should expect a breakout on the bounce. This morning, we indeed saw that breakout.
Additionally, as mentioned earlier, the bounce should reach the evening of the 8th.
However, we are already seeing the bounce hit the evening of the 8th.
Feel free to join my group chat for future articles $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
BTC, as mentioned earlier, it was time to trade the rebound between 4 AM and 8 AM on the 7th, and now we can see it has happened.
The drop at 6 AM was a tactical move by those looking to short the market, deliberately eating up some of the lower bid orders to increase liquidity and create additional sell pressure on BTC, before going in with market buys to trigger a rebound all the way up.
Feel free to join my group chat for future updates $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT)
Why is the US backing BTC without fearing a dollar collapse?
I have serious doubts about Trump and the whole US government being so confident that BTC can serve as a reserve for the US and possibly partially replace the dollar. The main reason could be:
Trump might have struck a deal with MicroStrategy, which is a US company. If MicroStrategy becomes the largest BTC holder and can control BTC, it essentially means the US government can participate and intervene.
Therefore, if MicroStrategy holds a significant amount of BTC in the future and repackages it to launch various derivatives under US regulation, it would mean that the US controls all cash flows and can manage the entire financial stream.
As a result, MicroStrategy could eventually receive government support, aiming to accumulate all BTC or hold an absolute majority, making it equivalent to the current share of the dollar among all fiat currencies globally as a settlement denominator.
In this way, BTC would officially become a global legal tender on par with the dollar and controlled by the US. $BTC
Hey BTC investors, here's the scoop: CNBC reports that SpaceX's IPO will allocate up to 30% of shares to retail investors, expected to launch in June with the ticker $SPCX.
SpaceX has disclosed in its IPO filings that it holds approximately 18,712 BTC, valued at over $1 billion, "Thus, retail investors holding SpaceX stock can indirectly gain exposure to Bitcoin."
Key takeaway: Once SpaceX goes public, it will immediately become the world's first treasury company with a market cap exceeding $1 trillion in BTC.
Future investors buying SPCX will be just like buying MSTR stock, relative to holding assets valued in BTC.
"In the future, all investors buying SPCX will essentially be buying 30% of the value of BTC holdings." $BTC
"Two stop-loss signals at 60k mentioned on June 5." This isn’t just about leaving cash on the order book at 60k to hold that price, it’s more like a 'zone' around 60k.
It’s like two magnets getting close, and suddenly hitting a distance that amplifies their repelling force.
On the buying side: This is where if the price drops further from 60k, it triggers a 'buy the dip' mentality, using limit orders instead of market orders. I call this 'energy concentration mode'; it’s like Sun Wukong gathering energy blasts. The further the price drops from 60k, the stronger the energy blast (buying sentiment) becomes.
In other words, when it dips down even a little, it creates a vibe where, when buying at 59,500, if it drops to 59,490, they close their long position, then a buy order gets filled at 59,500, causing them anxiety and a loss of 50 points. The key here is only operating long positions, which reflects human behavior, similar to a huge energy blast effect.
On the selling side: Around the 60k mark, we see the opposite pattern of the energy blast. On the buy side, investors are hands-on, while on the sell side, they tend to be passive, letting the system handle it (like liquidation). This indicates that shorting at these levels is a concentrated state of being out of the money; the lower the price goes below 60k, the stronger the passivity becomes, just like the attraction on the buy side intensifies and the repulsion on the sell side increases. This force reflects human consciousness.
So, when it dips down, it creates a feeling of pain and panic, but instead of placing orders, many let their losing long positions get liquidated by the system, preferring to incur liquidation fees rather than acting at the last moment. The further it goes down, the more people exhibit this behavior.
Thus, between buyers and sellers, a zone is created around 60k, indicating a stop-loss signal formed by human consciousness.
All of this is just a ramble, a description of the two points of stop-loss signals; it means these two points of stop-loss signals aren’t determined by price but rather by the impact of consciousness on human reflexes. $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
1. Spot lending liquidation 2. 60000 was the price agreed upon during the initial negotiations between traditional banking and crypto, and now the price is 61, potentially fluctuating around 60.
Both of these points are considered support signals. $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT)
BTC, as mentioned earlier, it was time to trade the rebound between 4 AM and 8 AM on the 7th, and now we can see it has happened.
The drop at 6 AM was a tactical move by those looking to short the market, deliberately eating up some of the lower bid orders to increase liquidity and create additional sell pressure on BTC, before going in with market buys to trigger a rebound all the way up.
Feel free to join my group chat for future updates $BTC
I think MicroStrategy is really smart. Why did they propose a $400 billion IPO?
Let me break it down in simpler terms: This is essentially about how the entire Wall Street IPO scene is trying to integrate the sales of giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic as part of their debt strategy. They're essentially converting everything into MicroStrategy's IPO to raise cash.
It's like they're pulling in all of Wall Street's capital to make it work for their strategy, making Wall Street companies use MicroStrategy as a middleman.
In other words, investors want to buy IPOs → they first buy MicroStrategy (or take out loans to buy) → MicroStrategy then goes on a buying spree for BTC → institutions then either sell off their MicroStrategy positions or find other ways to chase SpaceX, effectively forcing the funds to take a detour and become a BTC-based war chest.
So he's got some serious ambitions. It's like he's planning to wrap up all of Wall Street into MicroStrategy and then convert everything into a BTC-based investment strategy for the SpaceX IPO.
What a clever guy. $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
In the crypto space, traders are here to tell you what this guy with unlimited bullets has to say.
This unlimited bullets guy, MicroStrategy, claims he’s going to use a tenfold power punch to take his current 50 billion BTC and raise 400 billion with 8x leverage to buy BTC.
In other words, MicroStrategy currently holds 840,000 BTC, and once the IPO is completed, he can instantly scoop up 5.88 million BTC, bringing the total to 6.72 million BTC.
This world's most powerful unlimited bullets guy is definitely Sun Wukong, a Super Saiyan.
This dude doesn’t care if BTC drops to $1 for liquidation. Dropping to $50,000 means you get liquidated, not him; stop whining about $50,000, $30,000, or $10,000 liquidating MicroStrategy.
Even if it crashes to $1, there won’t be any liquidation. The moment it hits $1, he’ll immediately buy all BTC for 21 million and then burn 20 million, leaving 1 million with a sell order at $50 million. That way, he’ll have 50 trillion dollars.
For this guy, quantity is just a number he wrote down himself. $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT)
In the crypto space, traders are here to tell you what this guy with unlimited bullets has to say.
This unlimited bullets guy, MicroStrategy, claims he’s going to use a tenfold power punch to take his current 50 billion BTC and raise 400 billion with 8x leverage to buy BTC.
In other words, MicroStrategy currently holds 840,000 BTC, and once the IPO is completed, he can instantly scoop up 5.88 million BTC, bringing the total to 6.72 million BTC.
This world's most powerful unlimited bullets guy is definitely Sun Wukong, a Super Saiyan.
This dude doesn’t care if BTC drops to $1 for liquidation. Dropping to $50,000 means you get liquidated, not him; stop whining about $50,000, $30,000, or $10,000 liquidating MicroStrategy.
Even if it crashes to $1, there won’t be any liquidation. The moment it hits $1, he’ll immediately buy all BTC for 21 million and then burn 20 million, leaving 1 million with a sell order at $50 million. That way, he’ll have 50 trillion dollars.
For this guy, quantity is just a number he wrote down himself. $BTC
※BREAKING News Alert※ It's official, the Digital Asset Bill hearing is scheduled for June 9th, 9 AM EST 🚀 on the agenda website.
The U.S. House Ways and Means Committee is circulating 7 separate crypto tax bills, and there will be a "Full Committee Legislative Hearing on Digital Asset Taxation" on June 9th to discuss this. $BTC
Let me ask all the BTC pros out there a question: Since the peak on May 6, BTC has dropped and in these 30 days, a total of 39,000 BTC has flowed into Binance.
During the recent sharp drop in the last 7 days, the BTC that changed hands hasn’t left Binance either.
What do you think about the folks holding onto this 39,000 BTC on Binance? What’s their game plan? A. Are they liquidity providers? B. Are they investors?
What do the holders of this 39,000 BTC want to achieve? 1. If they’re investors, what comes next? 2. If they’re liquidity takers, what’s in store for them?
What’s the take from the experts? Any wild theories out there? $BTC