ObaAgon
圖片、言論不做投資及財務建議，僅為個人紀錄訓練使用。
2 Following
2.3K+ Followers
4.9K+ Liked
235 Shared
Posts
All
Quotes
PINNED
I only post on Binance Square, X, and the TG group. All other platforms charge under false pretenses, please be cautious!
Please recognize my account name ObaAgon, there are too many impersonators!
—————————————————————
Explanation:
Bullish: 'Define high point'. Bullish directional energy. Bullish main behavior dynamics;
Bearish: 'Define low point'. Bearish directional energy. Bearish main behavior dynamics;
Starting with the defined high point. Bullish directional dynamics, dynamics will have time dynamics, regardless of how bullish actions are made. Ultimately, it is for defining the high point.
So if the bulls do not enter at the highest point, how can it be called a high point?
—————————————————————
'Event-driven, event occurrence rate is only 30%'
For example, event bulls: Event bulls have event news, most people do not know that news events are going to happen, so before the event detonates, there will only be a short squeeze, and when the event occurs, there will be a direct spike. Event bulls only represent events, not bullish actions; simply stating event bulls means only events without bullish actions, which leads to only bearish actions.
During the short squeeze process before the event occurs, if the event does not happen, the price may have already been declining throughout this process.
—————————————————————
'A high point' does not represent a high price.
'A low point' does not represent a low price.
In terms of low points, the text is different from low prices.
For example: low price low point, high price low point. Price and point are different things.
—————————————————————
'Build high point' 'Build low point'
Bearish builders establishing low points is a dynamic process. Only the bearish can achieve the lowest point price; ordinary people do not have the capability to absorb large liquidity orders. Therefore, the establishment of a low point occurs after the bearish start placing orders; during this order placement period, a price low point will be produced. Before the bearish leaves, a low point will appear before moving to a high point. As time passes and comes to an end, the K-line price will show a V shape, moving from the top of V to the bottom of V and back to the tail of V, producing a process called building a low point.
#BTC
Please recognize my account name ObaAgon, there are too many impersonators!
—————————————————————
Explanation:
Bullish: 'Define high point'. Bullish directional energy. Bullish main behavior dynamics;
Bearish: 'Define low point'. Bearish directional energy. Bearish main behavior dynamics;
Starting with the defined high point. Bullish directional dynamics, dynamics will have time dynamics, regardless of how bullish actions are made. Ultimately, it is for defining the high point.
So if the bulls do not enter at the highest point, how can it be called a high point?
—————————————————————
'Event-driven, event occurrence rate is only 30%'
For example, event bulls: Event bulls have event news, most people do not know that news events are going to happen, so before the event detonates, there will only be a short squeeze, and when the event occurs, there will be a direct spike. Event bulls only represent events, not bullish actions; simply stating event bulls means only events without bullish actions, which leads to only bearish actions.
During the short squeeze process before the event occurs, if the event does not happen, the price may have already been declining throughout this process.
—————————————————————
'A high point' does not represent a high price.
'A low point' does not represent a low price.
In terms of low points, the text is different from low prices.
For example: low price low point, high price low point. Price and point are different things.
—————————————————————
'Build high point' 'Build low point'
Bearish builders establishing low points is a dynamic process. Only the bearish can achieve the lowest point price; ordinary people do not have the capability to absorb large liquidity orders. Therefore, the establishment of a low point occurs after the bearish start placing orders; during this order placement period, a price low point will be produced. Before the bearish leaves, a low point will appear before moving to a high point. As time passes and comes to an end, the K-line price will show a V shape, moving from the top of V to the bottom of V and back to the tail of V, producing a process called building a low point.
#BTC
I just discovered that Twitter's new feature allows you to view the total number of tweets tagged across the entire network.
From the total amount of pi articles just seven hours ago, which was still very low, to now, in just a short seven hours, the total number of articles has skyrocketed to a new high in nearly two days.
Let's compare the price of pi:
From the highest price of 0.298 over the past two days to yesterday, it has been falling throughout today.
By calculating from the very low total number of articles at around 19:00 to now, which is seven hours later, the total number of articles has exploded, while the price has not continued to fall since 19:00.
Currently, it seems that the increase in the total number of articles is having a marketing effect, successfully creating a large turnover under selling pressure and becoming a support.
Let's continue to observe the impact of this big data on prices.
This feature is still in beta testing.
#pi
#pinetwork
From the total amount of pi articles just seven hours ago, which was still very low, to now, in just a short seven hours, the total number of articles has skyrocketed to a new high in nearly two days.
Let's compare the price of pi:
From the highest price of 0.298 over the past two days to yesterday, it has been falling throughout today.
By calculating from the very low total number of articles at around 19:00 to now, which is seven hours later, the total number of articles has exploded, while the price has not continued to fall since 19:00.
Currently, it seems that the increase in the total number of articles is having a marketing effect, successfully creating a large turnover under selling pressure and becoming a support.
Let's continue to observe the impact of this big data on prices.
This feature is still in beta testing.
#pi
#pinetwork
I discovered a new feature on the Twitter X account:
It can display the total number of posts across the internet for articles under specific tags.
Taking pi as an example:
Twitter data shows that on March 12 and 13, the total number of articles discussing pi surged.
Since today, the total number of articles about pi has significantly decreased.
The total number of articles can be used to gauge the extent to which a project is being disseminated and promoted. I believe that the more people post, the more attention it will attract, and it will also bring in more traders.
Looking at the actual pi price and trading volume, it is indeed evident that the increase in the total number of articles has led to a sharp rise in trading volume.
This may serve as a reference.
I wonder what you think of the reference value?
#pi
#pinetwork
It can display the total number of posts across the internet for articles under specific tags.
Taking pi as an example:
Twitter data shows that on March 12 and 13, the total number of articles discussing pi surged.
Since today, the total number of articles about pi has significantly decreased.
The total number of articles can be used to gauge the extent to which a project is being disseminated and promoted. I believe that the more people post, the more attention it will attract, and it will also bring in more traders.
Looking at the actual pi price and trading volume, it is indeed evident that the increase in the total number of articles has led to a sharp rise in trading volume.
This may serve as a reference.
I wonder what you think of the reference value?
#pi
#pinetwork
What the hell is this?
"Did Musk originally shout pi?"
What does this actually refer to?
Is it referring to tau being greater than pi? Doesn't seem like it.
Could it refer to tau transferring to be continued by pi?
What exactly did 2022 predict?
And the pi mainnet opens on February 20, 2025.
Musk is on February 22, two days apart?
Is there some coincidence insider information?
It's too coincidental, how can everything be so coincidental?
#pi
#pinetwork
"Did Musk originally shout pi?"
What does this actually refer to?
Is it referring to tau being greater than pi? Doesn't seem like it.
Could it refer to tau transferring to be continued by pi?
What exactly did 2022 predict?
And the pi mainnet opens on February 20, 2025.
Musk is on February 22, two days apart?
Is there some coincidence insider information?
It's too coincidental, how can everything be so coincidental?
#pi
#pinetwork
※Important Update on Ai Judgment of Pi※
Attention, historically, since the competition between humanity and Ai, strictly speaking, Ai has also been accurate, and Ai should belong to the accurate five times.
"The problem with Ai has been updated again"
Since yesterday, Ai has maintained the problem using discussion prices, which historically usually indicates that someone wants to sell off.
The problem has now been updated and has become a pun.
According to the issues discussed by Ai, it is a half-constructive half-price pun:
The following three questions are:
1. Is it still worth paying attention to PI coins?
2. Can Pi currently maintain upward momentum, is it suitable to add positions?
3. Does the Pi token have the potential for continuous breakthroughs?
I feel that the above three questions intuitively seem to be about discussing prices, but in fact, I believe they cannot be counted as discussing prices.
1. Is it worth continuing to pay attention?
Of course, whether to focus on mining, ecology, or price is a personal choice, so this question fits both types.
2. Is it suitable to add positions?
I believe that adding positions does not necessarily relate to price; this can be using pi as the denominator for settlement or ecological usage demand, not necessarily related to price.
3. Potential for breakthroughs?
I believe it is not just a price breakthrough issue; this could also be about breakthroughs in system technology and ecological development or regulatory progress.
Therefore, I feel that the three points above simultaneously use all three as puns, which is different from usual.
Usually, discussing price means price, discussing system version means version, and there is completely no situation of this kind of pun.
Therefore, from this perspective, I believe Ai's meaning here should be to judge a large volume of turnover. In other words, yesterday it judged that the large selling pressure has converged, and buyers have increased purchases.
Thus, the demand and supply from both sides have simultaneously entered the market, generating a large turnover, which perhaps indicates a judgment of price support.
What do you think Ai's judgment of the problem means?
He has been accurate five times in a row.
#pi
#pinetwork
Attention, historically, since the competition between humanity and Ai, strictly speaking, Ai has also been accurate, and Ai should belong to the accurate five times.
"The problem with Ai has been updated again"
Since yesterday, Ai has maintained the problem using discussion prices, which historically usually indicates that someone wants to sell off.
The problem has now been updated and has become a pun.
According to the issues discussed by Ai, it is a half-constructive half-price pun:
The following three questions are:
1. Is it still worth paying attention to PI coins?
2. Can Pi currently maintain upward momentum, is it suitable to add positions?
3. Does the Pi token have the potential for continuous breakthroughs?
I feel that the above three questions intuitively seem to be about discussing prices, but in fact, I believe they cannot be counted as discussing prices.
1. Is it worth continuing to pay attention?
Of course, whether to focus on mining, ecology, or price is a personal choice, so this question fits both types.
2. Is it suitable to add positions?
I believe that adding positions does not necessarily relate to price; this can be using pi as the denominator for settlement or ecological usage demand, not necessarily related to price.
3. Potential for breakthroughs?
I believe it is not just a price breakthrough issue; this could also be about breakthroughs in system technology and ecological development or regulatory progress.
Therefore, I feel that the three points above simultaneously use all three as puns, which is different from usual.
Usually, discussing price means price, discussing system version means version, and there is completely no situation of this kind of pun.
Therefore, from this perspective, I believe Ai's meaning here should be to judge a large volume of turnover. In other words, yesterday it judged that the large selling pressure has converged, and buyers have increased purchases.
Thus, the demand and supply from both sides have simultaneously entered the market, generating a large turnover, which perhaps indicates a judgment of price support.
What do you think Ai's judgment of the problem means?
He has been accurate five times in a row.
#pi
#pinetwork
PI should not feel panic because it dropped from 0.298 to 0.2; just think of it as reasonable for it to rise to 0.2.
0.2 to 0.298 belongs to the speculation zone. So just define the trend as the idea that PI has risen sharply to 0.2.
However, starting from now, PI is about to welcome the announcement of 314piday's market.
But this is not about a price surge, don't misunderstand; consider it an announcement for defining value benchmarks for a rebound. Looking forward to tonight.
#pi
#pinetwork
0.2 to 0.298 belongs to the speculation zone. So just define the trend as the idea that PI has risen sharply to 0.2.
However, starting from now, PI is about to welcome the announcement of 314piday's market.
But this is not about a price surge, don't misunderstand; consider it an announcement for defining value benchmarks for a rebound. Looking forward to tonight.
#pi
#pinetwork
I discovered a new feature on the Twitter X account:
It can display the total number of posts across the internet for articles under specific tags.
Taking pi as an example:
Twitter data shows that on March 12 and 13, the total number of articles discussing pi surged.
Since today, the total number of articles about pi has significantly decreased.
The total number of articles can be used to gauge the extent to which a project is being disseminated and promoted. I believe that the more people post, the more attention it will attract, and it will also bring in more traders.
Looking at the actual pi price and trading volume, it is indeed evident that the increase in the total number of articles has led to a sharp rise in trading volume.
This may serve as a reference.
I wonder what you think of the reference value?
#pi
#pinetwork
It can display the total number of posts across the internet for articles under specific tags.
Taking pi as an example:
Twitter data shows that on March 12 and 13, the total number of articles discussing pi surged.
Since today, the total number of articles about pi has significantly decreased.
The total number of articles can be used to gauge the extent to which a project is being disseminated and promoted. I believe that the more people post, the more attention it will attract, and it will also bring in more traders.
Looking at the actual pi price and trading volume, it is indeed evident that the increase in the total number of articles has led to a sharp rise in trading volume.
This may serve as a reference.
I wonder what you think of the reference value?
#pi
#pinetwork
PI should not feel panic because it dropped from 0.298 to 0.2; just think of it as reasonable for it to rise to 0.2.
0.2 to 0.298 belongs to the speculation zone. So just define the trend as the idea that PI has risen sharply to 0.2.
However, starting from now, PI is about to welcome the announcement of 314piday's market.
But this is not about a price surge, don't misunderstand; consider it an announcement for defining value benchmarks for a rebound. Looking forward to tonight.
#pi
#pinetwork
0.2 to 0.298 belongs to the speculation zone. So just define the trend as the idea that PI has risen sharply to 0.2.
However, starting from now, PI is about to welcome the announcement of 314piday's market.
But this is not about a price surge, don't misunderstand; consider it an announcement for defining value benchmarks for a rebound. Looking forward to tonight.
#pi
#pinetwork
On this Ai on pi, I think its judgment is not constructive issues.
It looks more like an enhanced discussion on price. The meaning is probably the massive pressure waiting to be sold off.
Because of the first question:
How long can the bullish trend continue?
The second question:
Will it continue to break through the new resistance level?
These two have nothing to do with the constructive system of pi; the so-called bullish trend is only discussed in the context of price.
The second is the resistance level, which is entirely about discussing price using technical analysis.
Therefore, it seems that Ai also categorizes according to the size of volume into first-level pressure and second-level pressure.
So now this is considered second-level pressure, right?
I understand it this way, so if it really drops a lot, then it means Ai is correct.
Because if the positions are increased twice according to the plan, it would still be profitable after the price drops.
Additionally, let's take a look at humans (Pig Bro):
This is impressive 👍,
On the 13th at 14:00, it predicted a temporary high point, and then at 17:00, a drop occurred.
And just before Kraken opened at 22:00, it once again predicted that as long as the opening did not utilize the news release, then 14:00 would become a true high point, and to return to 0.298 would take some time.
Now I see the price has returned to 0.242.
Could the eight consecutive predictions just appear like this?
Eight consecutive predictions require the direction to be correct and must also require timing accuracy.
Most analysts just guess a direction and do not know the timing, making it impossible to achieve the incredible feat of timing eight consecutive predictions.
What do you think of the competition between these two experts?
#pi
#pinetwork
It looks more like an enhanced discussion on price. The meaning is probably the massive pressure waiting to be sold off.
Because of the first question:
How long can the bullish trend continue?
The second question:
Will it continue to break through the new resistance level?
These two have nothing to do with the constructive system of pi; the so-called bullish trend is only discussed in the context of price.
The second is the resistance level, which is entirely about discussing price using technical analysis.
Therefore, it seems that Ai also categorizes according to the size of volume into first-level pressure and second-level pressure.
So now this is considered second-level pressure, right?
I understand it this way, so if it really drops a lot, then it means Ai is correct.
Because if the positions are increased twice according to the plan, it would still be profitable after the price drops.
Additionally, let's take a look at humans (Pig Bro):
This is impressive 👍,
On the 13th at 14:00, it predicted a temporary high point, and then at 17:00, a drop occurred.
And just before Kraken opened at 22:00, it once again predicted that as long as the opening did not utilize the news release, then 14:00 would become a true high point, and to return to 0.298 would take some time.
Now I see the price has returned to 0.242.
Could the eight consecutive predictions just appear like this?
Eight consecutive predictions require the direction to be correct and must also require timing accuracy.
Most analysts just guess a direction and do not know the timing, making it impossible to achieve the incredible feat of timing eight consecutive predictions.
What do you think of the competition between these two experts?
#pi
#pinetwork
On this Ai on pi, I think its judgment is not constructive issues.
It looks more like an enhanced discussion on price. The meaning is probably the massive pressure waiting to be sold off.
Because of the first question:
How long can the bullish trend continue?
The second question:
Will it continue to break through the new resistance level?
These two have nothing to do with the constructive system of pi; the so-called bullish trend is only discussed in the context of price.
The second is the resistance level, which is entirely about discussing price using technical analysis.
Therefore, it seems that Ai also categorizes according to the size of volume into first-level pressure and second-level pressure.
So now this is considered second-level pressure, right?
I understand it this way, so if it really drops a lot, then it means Ai is correct.
Because if the positions are increased twice according to the plan, it would still be profitable after the price drops.
Additionally, let's take a look at humans (Pig Bro):
This is impressive 👍,
On the 13th at 14:00, it predicted a temporary high point, and then at 17:00, a drop occurred.
And just before Kraken opened at 22:00, it once again predicted that as long as the opening did not utilize the news release, then 14:00 would become a true high point, and to return to 0.298 would take some time.
Now I see the price has returned to 0.242.
Could the eight consecutive predictions just appear like this?
Eight consecutive predictions require the direction to be correct and must also require timing accuracy.
Most analysts just guess a direction and do not know the timing, making it impossible to achieve the incredible feat of timing eight consecutive predictions.
What do you think of the competition between these two experts?
#pi
#pinetwork
It looks more like an enhanced discussion on price. The meaning is probably the massive pressure waiting to be sold off.
Because of the first question:
How long can the bullish trend continue?
The second question:
Will it continue to break through the new resistance level?
These two have nothing to do with the constructive system of pi; the so-called bullish trend is only discussed in the context of price.
The second is the resistance level, which is entirely about discussing price using technical analysis.
Therefore, it seems that Ai also categorizes according to the size of volume into first-level pressure and second-level pressure.
So now this is considered second-level pressure, right?
I understand it this way, so if it really drops a lot, then it means Ai is correct.
Because if the positions are increased twice according to the plan, it would still be profitable after the price drops.
Additionally, let's take a look at humans (Pig Bro):
This is impressive 👍,
On the 13th at 14:00, it predicted a temporary high point, and then at 17:00, a drop occurred.
And just before Kraken opened at 22:00, it once again predicted that as long as the opening did not utilize the news release, then 14:00 would become a true high point, and to return to 0.298 would take some time.
Now I see the price has returned to 0.242.
Could the eight consecutive predictions just appear like this?
Eight consecutive predictions require the direction to be correct and must also require timing accuracy.
Most analysts just guess a direction and do not know the timing, making it impossible to achieve the incredible feat of timing eight consecutive predictions.
What do you think of the competition between these two experts?
#pi
#pinetwork
Breaking news, important breaking news!
The AI issue has changed.
In a competition between humans and AI, it currently seems that humans have won about seven times, but it appears that the competition is not over yet.
"Because the AI issue has changed"
From the previous text, we can see that although this wave of AI surge is due to price judgment (meaning someone wants to sell), historically, as far as AI's consecutive successes are concerned, as long as the AI issue becomes constructive, then the following is a significant rally.
If this previous rally is not a rise for AI, then the issue has now become constructive, could it be...?
A super rally?
Brothers, gather quickly to discuss, look at the attached image, the issue just now hasn't been changed, now it has been changed.
#pi
#pinetwork
#三美刀 Noodle shop
The AI issue has changed.
In a competition between humans and AI, it currently seems that humans have won about seven times, but it appears that the competition is not over yet.
"Because the AI issue has changed"
From the previous text, we can see that although this wave of AI surge is due to price judgment (meaning someone wants to sell), historically, as far as AI's consecutive successes are concerned, as long as the AI issue becomes constructive, then the following is a significant rally.
If this previous rally is not a rise for AI, then the issue has now become constructive, could it be...?
A super rally?
Brothers, gather quickly to discuss, look at the attached image, the issue just now hasn't been changed, now it has been changed.
#pi
#pinetwork
#三美刀 Noodle shop
Breaking news, important breaking news!
The AI issue has changed.
In a competition between humans and AI, it currently seems that humans have won about seven times, but it appears that the competition is not over yet.
"Because the AI issue has changed"
From the previous text, we can see that although this wave of AI surge is due to price judgment (meaning someone wants to sell), historically, as far as AI's consecutive successes are concerned, as long as the AI issue becomes constructive, then the following is a significant rally.
If this previous rally is not a rise for AI, then the issue has now become constructive, could it be...?
A super rally?
Brothers, gather quickly to discuss, look at the attached image, the issue just now hasn't been changed, now it has been changed.
#pi
#pinetwork
#三美刀 Noodle shop
The AI issue has changed.
In a competition between humans and AI, it currently seems that humans have won about seven times, but it appears that the competition is not over yet.
"Because the AI issue has changed"
From the previous text, we can see that although this wave of AI surge is due to price judgment (meaning someone wants to sell), historically, as far as AI's consecutive successes are concerned, as long as the AI issue becomes constructive, then the following is a significant rally.
If this previous rally is not a rise for AI, then the issue has now become constructive, could it be...?
A super rally?
Brothers, gather quickly to discuss, look at the attached image, the issue just now hasn't been changed, now it has been changed.
#pi
#pinetwork
#三美刀 Noodle shop
In this competition between humans and AI, humans are truly amazing.
Today, on the 13th at 2 PM, it was mentioned to be careful of building high points, and now at 5 PM, it has started to drop.
This can be called a seven-game winning streak for humans.
#pi
#pinetwork
Today, on the 13th at 2 PM, it was mentioned to be careful of building high points, and now at 5 PM, it has started to drop.
This can be called a seven-game winning streak for humans.
#pi
#pinetwork
In this competition between humans and AI, humans are truly amazing.
Today, on the 13th at 2 PM, it was mentioned to be careful of building high points, and now at 5 PM, it has started to drop.
This can be called a seven-game winning streak for humans.
#pi
#pinetwork
Today, on the 13th at 2 PM, it was mentioned to be careful of building high points, and now at 5 PM, it has started to drop.
This can be called a seven-game winning streak for humans.
#pi
#pinetwork
Pi will be listed on the Kraken exchange today.
Attached is the total amount of the Kraken exchange wallet address.
Currently, there are 1.12 million Pi, and there is no mention of the liquidity reserved for the exchange in the PCT white paper.
Therefore, the exchange's liquidity can only be promoted from other sources to encourage deposits.
#pi
#pinetwork
Attached is the total amount of the Kraken exchange wallet address.
Currently, there are 1.12 million Pi, and there is no mention of the liquidity reserved for the exchange in the PCT white paper.
Therefore, the exchange's liquidity can only be promoted from other sources to encourage deposits.
#pi
#pinetwork
In the history of PI, investors often send a beautiful picture.
The text on the picture reads "Evening Crane" (in Hokkien means "die well")!
"The weather can change now" brothers!
The picture has turned into "Crane Sun" (in Hokkien means "having money")!
PI has transcended! Transcended!
#pi
The text on the picture reads "Evening Crane" (in Hokkien means "die well")!
"The weather can change now" brothers!
The picture has turned into "Crane Sun" (in Hokkien means "having money")!
PI has transcended! Transcended!
#pi
Listening to the analyst, it's easy for pi to return to three beautiful knives.
I want to confirm with the boss whether this news is true!
If you also want pi to go to three beautiful knives, give a ❤️ to support the action.
#pi
#pinetwork
#三美刀
I want to confirm with the boss whether this news is true!
If you also want pi to go to three beautiful knives, give a ❤️ to support the action.
#pi
#pinetwork
#三美刀
※Breaking News※
Pi has accurately revealed price turning points four times in a row; as long as the AI-related questions concern prices, the prices cannot rise.
However, when the AI questions turn into constructive questions, prices will rise.
In the previous article on the 9th, it was mentioned that when AI questions turned constructive, prices rose to the current level.
Now the key issue has arisen again, the AI question has turned back to price inquiries, does this mean the trend will...?
What are your thoughts on this AI? If you're unclear about what has happened, you can click the quoted text below to review it further.
#pi
#pinetwork
Pi has accurately revealed price turning points four times in a row; as long as the AI-related questions concern prices, the prices cannot rise.
However, when the AI questions turn into constructive questions, prices will rise.
In the previous article on the 9th, it was mentioned that when AI questions turned constructive, prices rose to the current level.
Now the key issue has arisen again, the AI question has turned back to price inquiries, does this mean the trend will...?
What are your thoughts on this AI? If you're unclear about what has happened, you can click the quoted text below to review it further.
#pi
#pinetwork
Brothers of Pi, did you see it? It’s really accurate.
This is the fourth consecutive occurrence.
In the previous text, I mentioned that the AI issue turned back to discussing prices, and indeed the price has peaked and then retreated.
Now, very soon we see that the AI has started discussing constructive issues again, rather than discussing prices. Could the opportunity have arrived…..?
This is already the fourth consecutive occurrence since I posted about this situation, and those who have seen it must feel it's magical.
For those who have seen it, what do you think? Let’s discuss.
#pi
#pinetwork
This is the fourth consecutive occurrence.
In the previous text, I mentioned that the AI issue turned back to discussing prices, and indeed the price has peaked and then retreated.
Now, very soon we see that the AI has started discussing constructive issues again, rather than discussing prices. Could the opportunity have arrived…..?
This is already the fourth consecutive occurrence since I posted about this situation, and those who have seen it must feel it's magical.
For those who have seen it, what do you think? Let’s discuss.
#pi
#pinetwork
A review of BTC from the previous article on March 4th, which mentioned the subsequent upward trend until today, March 10th, in historical comparison:
The articles have been a continuous extension of the previous text, and all articles were published in advance, so there is no suspicion of false representation.
After the last upward movement on March 4th, continuing to the early morning of March 5th, when the situation was confirmed at 3 AM, the article was published immediately, mentioning that nothing happened between 3 PM and 6 PM, which would become the high point.
Subsequently, we can see that 3 PM was indeed the high point, followed by a continuous downward trend without looking back.
Throughout this period, it was still continuously mentioned that the short selling had not ended, and no low points were established, leading to a continuous downward trend.
Until 9 AM on the 9th, it was mentioned that a low point was being established, followed by a rise from a price of 65,000 at 9 AM to 69,000 by 3 AM on the 10th.
In the future, the main force will announce the main plans in advance, please refer to the self-introduction explanation above.
The articles have always been quoting previous texts in continuation, and you can click on the references below to check.
$BTC
$ETH
The articles have been a continuous extension of the previous text, and all articles were published in advance, so there is no suspicion of false representation.
After the last upward movement on March 4th, continuing to the early morning of March 5th, when the situation was confirmed at 3 AM, the article was published immediately, mentioning that nothing happened between 3 PM and 6 PM, which would become the high point.
Subsequently, we can see that 3 PM was indeed the high point, followed by a continuous downward trend without looking back.
Throughout this period, it was still continuously mentioned that the short selling had not ended, and no low points were established, leading to a continuous downward trend.
Until 9 AM on the 9th, it was mentioned that a low point was being established, followed by a rise from a price of 65,000 at 9 AM to 69,000 by 3 AM on the 10th.
In the future, the main force will announce the main plans in advance, please refer to the self-introduction explanation above.
The articles have always been quoting previous texts in continuation, and you can click on the references below to check.
$BTC
$ETH
Reviewing the historical accuracy of the BTC articles from three days ago to today:
From the mention at 4 AM three days ago not to trade long but to wait for a pullback, the article suggested to check again at 4 PM on the 3rd.
Subsequently, it was observed that the price fell all the way down to the lowest point at 4 PM.
After 4 PM, it was mentioned to start building the low points, and later, a rebound was seen to 8 PM.
Then again at 4 PM, it was noted to pay attention to the high points before continuing downward, and later at 9 PM, it was mentioned that it would continue to go down after 10 PM.
Shortly afterwards at 10 PM, a new low was immediately observed.
After creating a new low, it was mentioned again to continue building low points and that it would not reach 63.
Now, the price has risen from 10 PM to the present.
As mentioned above, it can be seen that the articles were released in advance of the time, and they were all follow-ups to previous texts, without prior releases followed by hindsight commentary. Some specialized terms should not be viewed through traditional technical jargon. If there is any misunderstanding, please refer to the introduction explanation above.
$BTC
#NFA (NFA, not investment advice)
Welcome to join my plaza group
點我入群！
{future}(BTCUSDT)
$ETH
{future}(ETHUSDT)
From the mention at 4 AM three days ago not to trade long but to wait for a pullback, the article suggested to check again at 4 PM on the 3rd.
Subsequently, it was observed that the price fell all the way down to the lowest point at 4 PM.
After 4 PM, it was mentioned to start building the low points, and later, a rebound was seen to 8 PM.
Then again at 4 PM, it was noted to pay attention to the high points before continuing downward, and later at 9 PM, it was mentioned that it would continue to go down after 10 PM.
Shortly afterwards at 10 PM, a new low was immediately observed.
After creating a new low, it was mentioned again to continue building low points and that it would not reach 63.
Now, the price has risen from 10 PM to the present.
As mentioned above, it can be seen that the articles were released in advance of the time, and they were all follow-ups to previous texts, without prior releases followed by hindsight commentary. Some specialized terms should not be viewed through traditional technical jargon. If there is any misunderstanding, please refer to the introduction explanation above.
$BTC
#NFA (NFA, not investment advice)
Welcome to join my plaza group
點我入群！
{future}(BTCUSDT)
$ETH
{future}(ETHUSDT)
On March 10th today, this should be something everyone has seen.
Since the release of new opportunities for pi on February 23rd, pi has skyrocketed to 0.24.
And on March 7th, it was mentioned that it was time to reach a high point around 12 o'clock. Then the price was seen dropping from the highest point at 12 o'clock.
Until March 9th, it was mentioned that pi would continue to rise. Now on the 10th, the price has risen from 0.2 to 0.22.
I am just the main translator; I am not the main player. If we are to speak of coincidence, this has coincided thousands of times.
Welcome to join my plaza group
點我加入
#pi
Since the release of new opportunities for pi on February 23rd, pi has skyrocketed to 0.24.
And on March 7th, it was mentioned that it was time to reach a high point around 12 o'clock. Then the price was seen dropping from the highest point at 12 o'clock.
Until March 9th, it was mentioned that pi would continue to rise. Now on the 10th, the price has risen from 0.2 to 0.22.
I am just the main translator; I am not the main player. If we are to speak of coincidence, this has coincided thousands of times.
Welcome to join my plaza group
點我加入
#pi
Brothers who care about pi:
A new opportunity for pi will start now, today, February 23. Look forward to it!
#pi
A new opportunity for pi will start now, today, February 23. Look forward to it!
#pi
This is definitely major explosive news!
The key point is that NVIDIA is the largest player globally, participating in BTC mining, which completely counters all those who are bearish on BTC.
The key point is that the vast majority of high-precision manufacturers produce and sell to others, while he is "producing for his own mining use."
"This is the key!"
In the future, whose equipment can outperform theirs?
He will definitely become the largest player in terms of global hash rate share, and he can choose not to sell high-priced chips, mine everything himself, which essentially monopolizes the mining industry, and no one will know how powerful the equipment he is using for hashing is.
No one wants to buy the most expensive equipment; he doesn't have to worry at all because he can use it himself.....
$BTC
The key point is that NVIDIA is the largest player globally, participating in BTC mining, which completely counters all those who are bearish on BTC.
The key point is that the vast majority of high-precision manufacturers produce and sell to others, while he is "producing for his own mining use."
"This is the key!"
In the future, whose equipment can outperform theirs?
He will definitely become the largest player in terms of global hash rate share, and he can choose not to sell high-priced chips, mine everything himself, which essentially monopolizes the mining industry, and no one will know how powerful the equipment he is using for hashing is.
No one wants to buy the most expensive equipment; he doesn't have to worry at all because he can use it himself.....
$BTC
※Wow, this major breaking news※
NVIDIA announces that it will mine BTC in space for real.
This officially means that NVDA is publicly participating in BTC.
Official responses have been published in the Twitter article.
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
NVIDIA announces that it will mine BTC in space for real.
This officially means that NVDA is publicly participating in BTC.
Official responses have been published in the Twitter article.
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
※Wow, this major breaking news※
NVIDIA announces that it will mine BTC in space for real.
This officially means that NVDA is publicly participating in BTC.
Official responses have been published in the Twitter article.
$BTC
NVIDIA announces that it will mine BTC in space for real.
This officially means that NVDA is publicly participating in BTC.
Official responses have been published in the Twitter article.
$BTC
Brothers of Pi, did you see it? It’s really accurate.
This is the fourth consecutive occurrence.
In the previous text, I mentioned that the AI issue turned back to discussing prices, and indeed the price has peaked and then retreated.
Now, very soon we see that the AI has started discussing constructive issues again, rather than discussing prices. Could the opportunity have arrived…..?
This is already the fourth consecutive occurrence since I posted about this situation, and those who have seen it must feel it's magical.
For those who have seen it, what do you think? Let’s discuss.
#pi
#pinetwork
This is the fourth consecutive occurrence.
In the previous text, I mentioned that the AI issue turned back to discussing prices, and indeed the price has peaked and then retreated.
Now, very soon we see that the AI has started discussing constructive issues again, rather than discussing prices. Could the opportunity have arrived…..?
This is already the fourth consecutive occurrence since I posted about this situation, and those who have seen it must feel it's magical.
For those who have seen it, what do you think? Let’s discuss.
#pi
#pinetwork
Attention everyone, it's true that after the AI leak, it skyrocketed from the 23rd and today, on the 7th, it's reached 0.23.
Now something important has come up again, the AI leak issue has turned into a question about the price.
Could it be that the price has already peaked?
I tell you all, it's really not such a coincidence; it's accurate every time.
You all keep seeing me reference previous texts, how many times now
#pi
#pinetwork
Now something important has come up again, the AI leak issue has turned into a question about the price.
Could it be that the price has already peaked?
I tell you all, it's really not such a coincidence; it's accurate every time.
You all keep seeing me reference previous texts, how many times now
#pi
#pinetwork
The well-known Zhaotian Temple in Taiwan drew the national fortune lottery yesterday.
The complete lottery poem is hair-raising and can be fully felt in today’s context.
The complete content of the lottery poem:
Dragons and tigers intersect at the door,
This matter must be connected in both ways,
Gold suddenly turns into iron,
What use is it to ask the deities for fortune?
There are a total of 60 lottery sticks, and the probability of drawing this one is 1.67%.
However, under the current international situation, the chance of drawing this stick is extremely slim.
Dragons and tigers seem to imply the United States and its enemy countries.
The phrase about being connected in both ways suggests that all matters, good and bad, moving and still, will be involved.
And the phrase that everyone is most familiar with, 'Gold suddenly turns into iron.'
From a literal perspective, one might think it refers to the commodity 'gold' turning into the cheap metal 'iron'.
However, in my view, the so-called gold refers to wealth, and in the future of the AI era, it is very likely that wealth will become useless, at least that’s what Musk has predicted.
Therefore, looking at it this way, the fiat currency in hand or financial products related to becoming fiat currency as a settlement benchmark are likely to face a crisis.
What do you think about this lottery poem?
$BTC
The complete lottery poem is hair-raising and can be fully felt in today’s context.
The complete content of the lottery poem:
Dragons and tigers intersect at the door,
This matter must be connected in both ways,
Gold suddenly turns into iron,
What use is it to ask the deities for fortune?
There are a total of 60 lottery sticks, and the probability of drawing this one is 1.67%.
However, under the current international situation, the chance of drawing this stick is extremely slim.
Dragons and tigers seem to imply the United States and its enemy countries.
The phrase about being connected in both ways suggests that all matters, good and bad, moving and still, will be involved.
And the phrase that everyone is most familiar with, 'Gold suddenly turns into iron.'
From a literal perspective, one might think it refers to the commodity 'gold' turning into the cheap metal 'iron'.
However, in my view, the so-called gold refers to wealth, and in the future of the AI era, it is very likely that wealth will become useless, at least that’s what Musk has predicted.
Therefore, looking at it this way, the fiat currency in hand or financial products related to becoming fiat currency as a settlement benchmark are likely to face a crisis.
What do you think about this lottery poem?
$BTC
Attention everyone, it's true that after the AI leak, it skyrocketed from the 23rd and today, on the 7th, it's reached 0.23.
Now something important has come up again, the AI leak issue has turned into a question about the price.
Could it be that the price has already peaked?
I tell you all, it's really not such a coincidence; it's accurate every time.
You all keep seeing me reference previous texts, how many times now
#pi
#pinetwork
Now something important has come up again, the AI leak issue has turned into a question about the price.
Could it be that the price has already peaked?
I tell you all, it's really not such a coincidence; it's accurate every time.
You all keep seeing me reference previous texts, how many times now
#pi
#pinetwork
The issue of this suspected AI leak has not changed until now, and the price remains at its highest.
Does this mean it is not over yet?
If you are unclear about what this is saying, you can check the quoted text below.
#pi
#pinetwork
Does this mean it is not over yet?
If you are unclear about what this is saying, you can check the quoted text below.
#pi
#pinetwork
Login to explore more contents