uspolitics

Despite speculation that the U.S. administration might step back from supporting crypto legislation, the White House is once again trying to revive negotiations on a key bill that would define the regulatory framework for digital assets in the United States. Behind the scenes, a tense struggle is unfolding between policymakers, regulators, and the crypto industry itself.
Sources close to the administration suggest that frustration over repeated delays had grown so strong that a complete withdrawal of support was even considered. Nevertheless, the White House ultimately decided to maintain pressure and push for a deal.

White House Adviser: Now Is the Time to Act, Not to Wait
The Executive Director of the Presidential Council of Advisers for Digital Assets, Patrick Witt, openly called on both the crypto industry and lawmakers to accept compromises. According to him, the United States is currently in a uniquely favorable position: the president is supportive of crypto, the administration holds influence in Congress, and key regulatory agencies are open to dialogue.
Witt warned that missing this window of opportunity could have serious consequences. If regulation were only introduced after another major market shock or collapse, it would likely be rushed through under fear and political pressure—similar to what happened after the 2008 financial crisis—and could end up being far more restrictive for the industry.

Coinbase Comes Under Fire
Tensions escalated further after Coinbase, the largest U.S.-based crypto exchange, withdrew its support for the proposed legislation. Its CEO, Brian Armstrong, stated that “no bill is better than a bad bill,” a comment that triggered sharp criticism from within the White House.
Witt challenged this stance, arguing that such statements are only possible thanks to the current administration’s pro-crypto attitude. He also emphasized that a crypto market structure bill will eventually be passed regardless—arguing that the real question is not “if,” but “when.”

Why the Legislation Matters So Much
Congress is currently debating how regulatory authority over crypto assets should be divided between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). However, unresolved issues surrounding stablecoins, yield-bearing products, and decentralized protocols have sparked strong resistance from parts of the industry as well as from the traditional banking sector.
Due to this pushback, several key legislative steps have been delayed. At the same time, banks have intensified lobbying efforts, arguing that crypto firms should not be allowed to offer stablecoin-based yield products that could compete with traditional financial institutions.

Davos, Banks, and Delayed Decisions
The situation is further complicated by the fact that part of the discussion has shifted to the international stage. Representatives from the crypto sector and major banks are expected to meet on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, where additional lobbying efforts are likely to shape the final form of the legislation.
In response to mounting criticism, the U.S. Senate has postponed key hearings until late January, underscoring how difficult it has become to reach consensus.

Compromise Now—or Harsher Regulation Later
According to the White House, the current moment is pivotal. Either a compromise-based crypto law is passed now, while political conditions remain relatively favorable, or regulation will be delayed and eventually imposed under far less forgiving circumstances.
As Patrick Witt made clear, an industry worth several trillion dollars cannot continue operating indefinitely without a comprehensive regulatory framework. The question is no longer whether regulation will arrive—but under what terms, and who will have a seat at the table when it does.

#whitehouse , #USPolitics , #bitcoin , #DigitalAssets , #USPolitics

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

There’s NO DEAL yet — and the clock is ticking.
Senator John Boozman, Chair of the U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee, just confirmed that Republicans and Democrats remain divided on key fundamental policy issues in the crypto market structure bill.

This comes as Republicans released their own draft of the legislation on Wednesday — without Democratic support — ahead of a high-stakes markup scheduled for January 27. ⏰
🧨 WHY THIS IS A BIG PROBLEM
No bipartisan backing ❌
Democrats are not on board
Risk of delay, dilution, or outright derailment
Boozman admitted the reality bluntly:
“Although it’s unfortunate that we couldn’t reach an agreement… it’s time we move this bill.”
Translation? 👉 Republicans are pushing forward anyway.
⚖️ WHAT THE BILL DOES The proposal lays out how crypto markets would be split between regulators:
📌 SEC → securities
📌 CFTC → digital commodities
But that division is exactly where the fight is exploding.
🛡️ KEY BOMBSHELL: DeFi & DEV PROTECTIONS According to top crypto lawyers:
✅ DeFi protocols get a path to avoid CFTC regulation
✅ Self-custody wallets NOT regulated
✅ Non-custodial DeFi interfaces NOT regulated
❌ Platforms that control custody or execution ARE regulated
In short: 👉 Intermediaries are targeted — not protocols, not users.
The bill also avoids regulating stablecoin yield, kicking that fight to the Senate Banking Committee — which is now rumored to be delayed until February or March 😬
🌪️ WHY MARKETS SHOULD CARE This is shaping up to be a regulatory cliffhanger:
If bipartisan support fails → legal uncertainty drags on
If Republicans force it through → political backlash intensifies
If delayed → institutions stay sidelined
Crypto clarity was promised.
Instead, Washington delivered gridlock.
👀 All eyes now on January 27.
One markup. No agreement. Massive consequences.
#CryptoRegulation #DeFi #SEC #USPolitics #BreakingNews
$BTC
$FRAX
$GUN
Follow RJCryptoX for real-time alerts.

Speculation over whether Donald Trump will complete his final term in office is gaining momentum once again. On prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi, the probability that the U.S. president leaves the White House before 2027 has climbed above 16%—and continues to rise.

Greenland Controversy Sparks a New Political Storm
The latest wave of criticism was triggered by Trump’s repeated remarks about Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark and a strategically important region rich in natural resources. Trump has suggested that the United States “will get Greenland one way or another,” refusing to rule out the use of military force. These statements have provoked sharp reactions both in Europe and among Democrats in the United States.
Liberal Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts has therefore called on Vice President J. D. Vance and members of the cabinet to consider invoking the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution—a provision that allows a president to be declared unfit to carry out the duties of office.

Letters, the Nobel Prize, and Escalating Rhetoric
According to reporting by The New York Times, Trump allegedly told European officials in private correspondence that he had been unfairly denied the Nobel Peace Prize, despite what he described as his “noble efforts” regarding Greenland. In a message to Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, Trump reportedly suggested that since the prize was not awarded to him, he no longer feels obligated to “think about peace.”
On his Truth Social platform, Trump also accused Denmark of failing for decades to counter Russian influence in Greenland, claiming that NATO has been warning Copenhagen about this threat for more than 20 years.

Health Concerns and Calls for Congressional Review
The debate intensified further due to questions surrounding the president’s health. Cardiologist Jonathan Reiner—who previously treated former Vice President Dick Cheney and now serves as a medical analyst for CNN—called for a formal congressional investigation into Trump’s fitness for office. Reiner challenged Trump’s statements to The Wall Street Journal about taking aspirin “to thin the blood,” describing the claim as medically inaccurate.
Criticism escalated when Arizona Representative Yassamin Ansari declared that the U.S. president is severely mentally unfit and poses a danger to Americans, urging immediate use of the 25th Amendment.

Impeachment Pressure vs. Congressional Reality
Despite growing pressure from progressive Democrats, the prospects for impeachment remain limited. Republicans currently hold a majority in Congress, making both impeachment and activation of the 25th Amendment highly unlikely without bipartisan support.
Former Democratic House campaign chair Cheri Bustos told ABC News that repeated impeachment efforts risk distracting lawmakers from voters’ everyday concerns. Even if impeachment articles passed the House, she argued, the Senate would almost certainly block removal.
The House of Representatives has already rejected two impeachment attempts led by Texas Congressman Al Green. In June, 128 Democrats joined Republicans to block another effort based on U.S. strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities conducted without congressional approval.

An Uncertain Road Ahead
Debate over Trump’s fitness for office, foreign policy decisions, and health concerns remains unresolved. While prediction markets suggest growing doubts, the political reality in Washington still favors Trump completing his term. Whether future actions—domestic or international—will shift that balance remains an open question.

#DonaldTrump , #USPolitics , #USGovernment , #whitehouse , #worldnews

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“