Got it ๐ โ youโre basically laying out a macro range view where Bitcoin has been coiling between 100kโ120k since May, and youโre questioning the extreme bearish calls. Let me break your analysis into structured points so itโs easier to track:
---
๐ Current Structure
#BTCWhalesMoveToETH BTC has been ranging 100kโ120k for 4 months.
A โpurple lineโ (your key trend marker) mirrors the past 100โ110k accumulation structure.
You expect one more thrust to 117โ118k before any major lower tap.
---
๐ฉ Bearish Case (What Others Are Calling For)
Calls for 89k retrace (likely tied to cycle reset/Fed/September weakness narrative).
Argument: breaking 112k should have triggered downside impulse โ it didnโt.
Meaning: market isnโt following the clean bearish breakdown path.
---
โ Bullish/Neutral Case (Your Take)
#SolanaStrong PX is still above Aug 4th lows โ macro not breaking down.
No clear reason for deep bearishness in September.
If this is truly an accumulation structure, then 105k max downside fits the cycle โ not 89k.
Next major move = thrust to 117โ118k before final cycle climax.
---
๐ฏ Trading Plan (Your Honest Take)
Watching 117โ118k zone โ plan to short next thrust if pattern holds.
Not expecting 89k because it would delay the cycle top.
Market showing resilience despite supposed bearish triggers.
---
๐ So in short: youโre saying #BTC่ตฐๅฟๅๆ C still looks range-bound with upside bias, bears calling for 89k are early (or wrong), and youโll flip short on the next sharp push into 117โ118k if it materializes.
Do you want me to turn this into a sharper Twitter/X post with chart-style commentary & hashtags so it looks like a live traderโs update?
