The more I learn about Fabric I really like how it checks if everything is working correctly. It does not assume that robots will always work perfectly. Instead it assumes that sometimes they might fail.
* It makes sure that the people in charge of the robots are responsible for what happens.
* They have to put some money on the line of like a guarantee.
* Other people watch to make sure everything is okay.
* If someone tries to cheat they get in trouble. Lose money.
This way of doing things seems mature to me. When machines start doing jobs you cannot just trust that they will work.
You have to make sure that they are designed to be trustworthy.
Fabric has a way of checking if the robots are working correctly. It gives them a challenge to complete.
If they try to cheat it costs them much money.
I think this is the kind of thinking we need if robots are going to work in the world.
Fabric assumes failure is possible. Builds rules around it.
Fabric’s challenge-based system is interesting because it makes cheating not worth it.
I think Fabric is on the track, with its verification model.
Fabric really makes me think about how robots can work.