Transforming multi-signature from a 'specialized tool' for experts into a universally usable feature — the next opportunity for WalletConnect

Stop thinking of multi-signature as something exclusive to DAOs and steel companies — for me, the most valuable thing WalletConnect can do is to standardize the multi-signature experience, making it cross-wallet compatible, allowing scenarios like 'household accounts, company cashiers, and rental deposit escrow' to be seamlessly brought on-chain. Currently, the barriers to multi-signature are high, the interfaces are varied, and wallet compatibility is even problematic; if we could make the multi-signature session protocol a native capability of WalletConnect, users could easily add signers, set thresholds and time windows step by step in a familiar interface, with service nodes coordinating signatures, ensuring order and rollback, making the user experience as simple as starting a group chat.

I see two key points: first, safety on the ground — turning multi-signature into a standard process can reduce losses caused by misoperations and blind signatures; second, broad situational applicability — from family-managed NFTs to small team finances, everyone can benefit. Economically, $WCT can serve as the staking and settlement unit for 'witnesses and arbitrators,' incentivizing nodes that provide ticket-style multi-signature escrow, auditing, and recovery services. It is important to ensure that governance and revocation mechanisms are transparent enough to prevent a few nodes from abusing power.

In summary, making multi-signature a universal, cross-wallet foundational capability is an important step towards democratizing on-chain asset management. @WalletConnect If this is done correctly, it can enhance security and expand the practical scenarios of $WCT to countless households. #WalletConnect $WCT