Replenishing coins is difficult to calculate, only can be exchanged at 1.1, but the price should rise.

$GAIN analysis of the project team's response after being attacked, I believe it fully complies with technical specifications. After the hacker maliciously exploited code vulnerabilities to issue additional tokens, the first step was to stop the pool to prevent further selling on decentralized exchanges. Next, the deposit and withdrawal functions on centralized exchanges were halted to prevent the hacker from selling on-chain and instead selling on centralized exchanges. After closing the vulnerabilities, new contracts were minted, and new tokens were exchanged for native tokens for legitimate users. Personal technical viewpoint!