Is WCT really worth holding long-term? You'll understand after reading these three points.

#WalletConnect @WalletConnect $WCT

Many people ask me: Is WCT really worth holding long-term? As a user who has held the token for a year, my answer is 'yes', and the reasons are hidden in the ecological development of WalletConnect and the value logic of WCT.

The first point is the ecological 'irreplaceability'. WalletConnect has become the 'infrastructure' for Web3 connections, covering over 600 wallets and 65,000 applications, serving 47.5 million users. Such a scale of ecology cannot be replaced in a short time, and as the core token of the ecology, WCT's long-term value is guaranteed; the second point is the 'sustainability' of returns. WCT's returns do not rely on 'pump and dump', but come from enterprise-level service dividends, staking rewards, and mining rewards. These returns will become increasingly stable as ecological revenue grows; the third point is the 'growth potential' in the future. The demand for multi-chain connections in Web3 is still exploding, and WalletConnect plans to connect more public chains and industries, the usage scenarios of $WCT will continue to expand, and its value will increase accordingly.

The key to holding tokens long-term is to see if the ecology behind the token has the 'ability to create long-term value'. For $WCT, as long as WalletConnect is still handling on-chain connections and enterprises are still using its services, its value will continue to accumulate. Such a 'token that grows with the ecology' is clearly worth holding long-term.