To be honest, the situation in the Middle East has been changing recently, which has made everyone see one thing clearly: in this uncertain environment, 'trust' is the most expensive cost.
This is also why I have been paying attention to @Sign lately. The on-chain signature and verification infrastructure they are developing has a core logic that is quite solid — allowing different countries and institutions to confirm identities and sign agreements without fully relying on centralized platforms.
In this unstable geopolitical environment, this decentralized 'digital notarization' has become a necessity. Especially now that digitalization in the Middle East is progressing rapidly, whether it's cross-border collaboration or data rights confirmation, everyone is looking for tools that can reduce trust friction.
So, $SIGN really shouldn't just be seen as a token. It is more like a forward-looking digital trust lever. When this reliable verification capability becomes a standardized configuration of the new generation of the internet, the potential value of $SIGN will naturally be released gradually as application scenarios unfold.
This geopolitical infrastructure attribute indeed has imaginative space in the current narrative of the crypto circle.