A new wave of criticism online is growing now after Pakistan's request to extend Trump's Iran deadline. Users are questioning whether the decision was truly independent.

The discussion is about the revision history of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's post on X. The history shows an early version of the message and a later, more detailed version. In it, it clearly states that he wants a two-week extension and that the Suez Canal should be reopened.

Some users believe this shows coordination behind the scenes. The theory is simple: if the USA agrees to an extension, Washington can present it as a response to Pakistan's request. Thus, the USA does not have to appear to yield to pressure.

There is no evidence for this claim. Neither the White House nor Pakistani authorities have said anything about a coordinated messaging strategy.

Still, the timing creates suspicion. The post came just a few hours before Trump's deadline, while the negotiations intensified and the markets reacted strongly.

In uncertain geopolitical moments, stories spread quickly. Right now, assumptions drive this narrative, not confirmed facts.