This was my view on the inscription in May this year, and the logic still holds true today:
From March 8 to the present, a narrative economics based on the rise of Bitcoin on the edge has gradually emerged, causing many people to secretly think, "When I first heard about BRC-20, I seemed to have seen that familiar and regretful midsummer again." XRC-20 also quickly evolved from BRC-20.
Can you imagine how many XRC-20s this narrative needs to produce, and how many rivers are separated by them? After the stories of making riches spread, regrets continued to support Fomo, and Fomo gave birth to regrets. In this cycle, the stories will stay forever.
The effect will confuse people's minds, and the concept itself does not understand itself, but the novice starts to place orders, and uses the image of a professor to bluff people to make money.
In short, I read the script thoroughly before entering the play, and I really like this summary, which I would like to share with the wise:
Your bias is not everything. More, the perspective of stakeholders is the biggest driving force behind a certain concept innovation. Traders are not the only market participants, and the interests behind it are even more complicated. However, the distribution of interests behind it will always draw a main line: block producers, whales rushing into the LP pool, project parties, trading platforms, etc. may all be Traders who are at a certain stage of a concept will be wise if they find the logic of maximizing their profits, follow it, and make profits within a small space. #BTC #ORDI #sats