puppies翱翔88888888
--
I can't believe it, the follow-up to this Bitcoin money laundering case is more dramatic than a suspense drama—60,000 Bitcoin case principal Qian Zhimin, who hid a 'digital asset blind box' for half a year, has finally been exposed.
When she was arrested, the devices she was holding were only handed over with the password right before the trial. The police were stunned to find out: in addition to the apparent 61,000 Bitcoins, she also secretly hoarded Bitcoin and Ripple worth £67 million. So this isn't money laundering, it's packaging illegal earnings into a 'crypto asset portfolio'?
Interestingly, today the UK's High Court just held a hearing to deal with that batch of Bitcoin—this pile of coins is now of such magnitude that any movement is 'earthquake-level news' in the crypto circle.
What's amusing is that Qian Zhimin's operation resembles that of an old hand hiding private money: thinking that digital devices + password locks are a 'safe', not realizing that judicial procedures are the 'universal key'. Assets accumulated illegally, no matter how concealed, only add 'material' to the case.
Will this £67 million 'extra asset' be disposed of along with the previous Bitcoins? Does this wave of 'excessive illicit funds' count as an 'unexpected surprise' in the money laundering case? Let's discuss in the comments whether this operation is foolish or a gamble on luck? $BTC $XRP
{spot}(BTCUSDT)
{spot}(XRPUSDT)
When she was arrested, the devices she was holding were only handed over with the password right before the trial. The police were stunned to find out: in addition to the apparent 61,000 Bitcoins, she also secretly hoarded Bitcoin and Ripple worth £67 million. So this isn't money laundering, it's packaging illegal earnings into a 'crypto asset portfolio'?
Interestingly, today the UK's High Court just held a hearing to deal with that batch of Bitcoin—this pile of coins is now of such magnitude that any movement is 'earthquake-level news' in the crypto circle.
What's amusing is that Qian Zhimin's operation resembles that of an old hand hiding private money: thinking that digital devices + password locks are a 'safe', not realizing that judicial procedures are the 'universal key'. Assets accumulated illegally, no matter how concealed, only add 'material' to the case.
Will this £67 million 'extra asset' be disposed of along with the previous Bitcoins? Does this wave of 'excessive illicit funds' count as an 'unexpected surprise' in the money laundering case? Let's discuss in the comments whether this operation is foolish or a gamble on luck? $BTC $XRP
{spot}(BTCUSDT)
{spot}(XRPUSDT)
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
1
0