Brothers, let's continue.
This article's perspective is harsher and closer to what is truly happening with Injective now.
The vast majority of chains grow by relying on ecology, hotspots, narratives, subsidies, user migration, or being supported by a large project.
But Injective is not like that.
its growth method is to abstract, deconstruct, and rewrite 'how on-chain markets operate' step by step, forcing the entire industry to run according to its way.
In other words:
Injective is not doing the market,
Injective is 'turning the market into its own structure.'
This is its truly terrifying underlying logic.
Continue to break down.
First point: Injective does not rely on applications; it makes applications rely on 'its financial physical laws'
Brothers, look at other chains:
Strong applications → Hot chain
Hot projects → Ecological growth
More activities → more users
All are application-driven chains.
But Injective is completely the opposite:
The structure of the chain itself is too strong,
Causing applications to have to adapt to it,
only then can full trading capabilities be demonstrated.
For example, if you create perpetuals,
If it doesn't fit the chain-level order book, you can't function.
You create indices,
Without connecting its combination structure, you have no liquidity.
You create narrative assets,
If you don’t follow its price framework, you are fundamentally unstable.
You create strategy tools,
If you don’t embed the chain-level execution path, you won't get results.
Brothers, this is called chain-level coercion.
is not the application bringing the chain,
is chain automatic absorption application.
Second point: Injective is making 'trading not belong to any DEX, but to the chain itself'
Brothers, the most chaotic thing in the entire crypto industry is:
Every DEX is creating its own trading closed loop,
Every perpetual must rebuild depth, re-attract users, and restructure.
The result is:
Users are segmented
Depth is decentralized
Prices are disturbed
Strategy is fragmented
Risks are dispersed
Asset experience break
Injective's logic is completely the opposite:
Trading structure belongs to the chain
Depth belongs to the chain
Price belongs to the chain
Risk control belongs to the chain
Liquidity belongs to the chain
Combination of assets belongs to the chain
Matching belongs to the chain
Applications are not independent markets,
Applications are just the 'entrance' to the chain-level market.
Brothers, this means:
On Injective,
DEX is not a product,
DEX is an interface.
Perpetual is not the market,
Perpetual is the 'calling method' of the market.
This is why it can create the strongest 'depth convergence effect' in the entire industry.
Third point: Injective not only absorbs liquidity, it allows liquidity to 'self-organize'
Brothers, do you know why the liquidity of most chains is not stable?
Because it is incentive-based.
Walk away if there are no subsidies.
Walk away if there are no airdrops.
Walk away if there is no activity.
But Injective's liquidity is structural:
Strategy drives transactions
Transaction drives depth
Depth drives more strategies
Strategy drives more assets
Assets drive more combinations
Combination drives more indices
Indices drive more narratives
Narratives drive more funds
This is the 'self-organizing market structure'.
It is not obtained through subsidies,
But it is the market growing on its own.
Brothers, this is the key to whether the chain can become capital market infrastructure.
It is not about popularity,
It depends on whether it can make the market operate by itself.
Fourth point: Injective is turning 'on-chain prices' into a default benchmark for some industry
Brothers, you must see this point:
In the past, on-chain prices were noise prices.
AMM leverage is too shallow
Oracle delays are too large
Cross-chain depth inconsistency
The price difference between different chains is huge
On-chain prices lack 'credibility'.
What Injective is doing is enabling on-chain prices to have:
Continuity
Deep support
Cross-asset synergy
Structured generation
Professional strategy participation
24/7 stability
Thematic index synchronization
Combination of perpetual weighting
Narrative asset expectation anchoring
Brothers, this means:
Injective's price is not 'the price of any project',
But it is the 'reference price of on-chain professional markets'.
If we move in this direction, Injective could become:
The 'benchmark source' of the constant market price on-chain.
Fifth point: Injective is doing the 'operating system for future institutions entering the chain'
Brothers, the logic of institutions is very simple:
It's not about who has the stronger narrative,
But it depends on who can carry trillion-level transactions.
What institutions want is:
Certainty
Structured trading
Large-scale risk control
Stable execution path
Cross-asset combinations
Exponential pricing
Chain-level clearing rules
Depth continuity
Strategy friendliness
Now look at the entire industry:
Which chain can provide all of this to institutions?
Only Injective.
It is not waiting for institutions to come,
It is a tool that institutions must use in the future.
This creates a very strong industry inertia:
In the future, institutions will not choose Injective,
But it must use Injective.
Because other chains cannot provide this 'financial infrastructure-level' capability.
Sixth point: Injective's long-term goal is to let the on-chain capital market 'grow into its shape'
Brothers, you must understand this:
What is the most certain trend in the next five years?
It's not L2 narrative, not AI hype, not new chains, not memes.
is:
Asset on-chain
Market on-chain
Strategy on-chain
Combination on-chain
Clearing on-chain
Price on-chain
But the question is—
On-chain finance needs a complete market model to operate normally.
And Injective has already built this model in advance:
Operating system-level trading structure
Cross-asset structure
Index structure
Combination structure
Price structure
Risk control structure
Strategy structure
Depth structure
Chain-level execution structure
Brothers, do you understand the weight of my words?
Future on-chain capital markets will not run on a specific public chain,
But it runs within Injective's 'market model'.
This is its ultimate ambition.
A harsh and accurate summary:
Brothers, Injective is not creating a stronger public chain,
It is transforming the 'operating logic' of future on-chain markets into its own shape.
It does not need to defeat any competitors,
It only needs to force the entire industry to participate in the future in its own way.
And now, all of this has already begun to happen.
