Turing Test

　　I often have a feeling: The bull market of Web3 is often a grand "village building movement." The project team takes a huge token budget and builds seemingly bustling cities on barren blockchain land, trying to prove to the world that this is the promised land of the future. When we opened KITE AI's white paper, the 48% allocation for the ecosystem and community distribution was like an astronomical amount of demolition compensation, enough to build high-rise buildings in a short period. KITE AI's vision is grand; it attempts to establish a dedicated Layer 1 for an "Agentic Economy," challenging Injective's dominance in the financial field or Monad's hegemony in the high-performance track. However, as an observer accustomed to penetrating the narrative fog, I smell a hint of historical decay in this grand subsidy movement. KITE AI's meticulously designed "Piggy Bank" mechanism, although nominally aimed at encouraging long-termism, seems to inadvertently filter out a group of financial mercenaries most adept at arbitrage under the microscope of game theory, thus constructing a **“Digital Bojukan Village”** that exists solely to pass the capital Turing test.