Jager — this is a clear example of the issue I’ve been noticing.
Jager
Alpha
0.0₉29906
-0.83%
The AI keeps flagging “high concentration risk” based purely on top holder percentages, without properly separating infrastructure wallets (burn addresses, liquidity pools, exchange wallets, routers) from genuinely privately controlled wallets.
BNB
615.17
+0.79%
That distinction matters a lot, and ignoring it can seriously distort the real picture of holder distribution and market risk.
Before generating concentration risk insights, wallet classification should be a required step.
Otherwise, the analysis can end up misleading instead of informative.