Dude, there are a lot of people hyping AI agents now, but there's one thing no one is mentioning: among the thousands of 'digital workers', who is reliable, who is slacking off, and how will we find jobs in the future?
It can't always be like this, can it? Just coming to an anonymous address and asking you to pay? That would be like opening a mystery box.
So I looked at Kite, what it does goes deeper than just 'paying'—it is establishing a 'talent market' and 'credit system' for the AI society.
Think about our human workplace:
1. Review the resume: education, experience, project history.
2. Check background: reputation, former employer evaluations, any blemishes.
3. Signing the contract: Permissions, salary, and KPIs must be clearly stated.
What about the current AI agents? All three of these are black. You have no idea who is on the other side, what they have done, or whether they will run away with the money.
Kite has given each AI three things, which are its 'digital workplace trio':
· KitePass (ID + Resume): A unique, tamper-proof on-chain identity. All the tasks it has completed, jobs it has done, and settlement records are accumulated here. This is its professional profile.
· Three-tier permissions (Labor Contract): You (the user) are the boss, setting budgets and strategies (for example, 'only trade with agents with a credit score of A or above'). The AI agent is an employee, working autonomously within the contract's scope. Every conversation is a performance evaluation, and the data speaks for itself regarding how well or poorly it performs.
· PoAI Consensus (Compensation System + Credit Score): This thing is the best. It not only confirms transactions but also measures 'intellectual contributions'. For a task, data providers, model trainers, and the AI that ultimately executes it can automatically share profits based on their contributions. The more and better the work done by the AI, the more it earns, and its credit score naturally rises.
What does this mean?
This means that in the future, if you want to hire an AI to help you invest, you can first 'interview' it: check its KitePass to see if its historical performance is stable; see if its credit score is high; finally, sign a 'betting agreement' with it using a smart contract - if the yield meets the standard, profits are automatically shared; if it fails, the contract is automatically terminated.
This is what is called trustworthy collaboration. Kite is not simply building a 'house' for AI to live in; it is installing a complete HR system, financial system, and legal system within that house.
When AI agents start competing for jobs based on 'resumes' and 'credit scores', working autonomously according to 'contracts', and automatically receiving salaries based on 'performance', a true, efficient machine economy can be said to have truly begun.
So, don't just focus on whether Kite can make AI pay. You should ask, can it make good AI more valuable?
