Influence ≠ Control, the stories of the past no longer determine the future

Do Kwon's story will be written into LUNC history rather than the present

When discussing LUNC, many people cannot distinguish between two concepts:

"Still in contact": participating in governance, holding key permissions, influencing decisions;

"Still have influence": his name and case will sway emotions and public opinion.

The current situation is:

On-chain governance of LUNC, parameter adjustments, community fund usage, etc., are all led by the community;

Terraform Labs has long since destroyed its LUNC and USTC holdings, and the founders have exited the stage in terms of control.

Do Kwon's name will still appear in media headlines in the short term, but that is merely a historical imprint, not real control.

As time goes by, LUNC will be evaluated more as a public chain led by the community and rebranded, and its performance will ultimately rely on its own ecosystem and development to speak for itself.