Today, the data from the two Alpha airdrops provided a vivid math lesson to all the 'brush points gang'.
The threshold for the first airdrop was lowered to 70 points, with a total of 200,000 pieces. The second airdrop had only 7,500 pieces, which were instantaneously snapped up. A simple calculation suggests that the truly active users in the Alpha ecosystem who are effective in seizing airdrops are probably between 100,000 and 150,000, far below the 'brushing numbers' indicated by major prediction platforms.
What does this indicate? It indicates that a large amount of data is ineffective, 'asleep', or 'strategically placed'. Many people are still accumulating points and interaction counts, but is this really the most efficient way to make money on-chain?
This leads me to ponder a more fundamental question: in today's world where attention has become a scarce resource, should we shift from 'physically grinding' to 'strategic participation'?
And this is precisely the greatest inspiration that the @Injective ecosystem has brought me.
What Injective builds is not a farm that makes you repeatedly 'click, sign, and earn points', but a LEGO kingdom of institutional-grade financial applications. Its core advantage lies in providing composable, zero gas fee, high-performance financial infrastructure.
@Pyth Network #PythRoadmap $PYTH
