In today's market, everyone knows to buy on dips, but very few can actually put down real money. $BTC 85000, 75000 are indeed good entry points, the key is whether your capital allocation can hold out until that time.
Don't talk about buying in batches; I've seen too many people run out of bullets at 90000. When the market gives you opportunities, it's often when you have the least money.
Strictly adhere to the gold standard, first ensure you have enough cash flow, then talk about bottom-fishing strategies.
From my experience with K-lines, if a deep adjustment is really coming, it may be harsher than everyone expects.
The key is to control the position ratio well; don't relax your risk control awareness just because you're buying in batches. I generally reserve at least 30% of funds, in case the market moves more extreme than expected.
Looking at INJ's trend, it actually aligns quite well with my expectations for the RWA track.
Technically, it appears bearish and oversold, but the fundamentals are doing a $10 billion mortgage migration, which is like a good student performing poorly on an exam, but the academic foundation is still there.
Integrating RWA is like moving offline gold to online trading; it sounds great, but the market often first questions, "Does anyone really want this thing?" and then slowly accepts the value.
I think the key still lies in two points: First, can this $10 billion migration truly bring about an increase in user activity and trading volume, rather than just looking good on paper? Second, if the macro environment continues to tighten, can RWA's "traditional + innovation" story withstand capital withdrawal?
From the perspective of currency-based assets, if INJ/BTC continues to weaken, then even if there's a rebound in USD terms, it may just be a passive rise following the broader market. The real turning point may have to wait for data validation after RWA applications are implemented.
