$BEAT The trading attention has significantly increased over the past two weeks.
I revisited Audiera's data, and the more I look at it, the more I feel that this is not a traditional 'established IP on the blockchain', but rather it has truly connected the three key indicators of users, revenue, and destruction into a flywheel that can drive prices.
Let’s first discuss the parts that traders care about the most.
$BEAT The market is clean, with low circulation, and the single currency model makes the value recovery path very direct; the increase in trading volume is not due to large airdrops or the unlocking of locked assets, but rather the real on-chain revenue brought by AI Payment is starting to be recognized. This change is crucial—there is an extreme lack of 'profitable blockchain games' in the market, and Audiera has provided hard data this time.
After the launch of AI Payment, the on-chain accumulated income is already 148,900+ BEAT.
Not PPT, nor fake flow, but the actual payments users make for AI music and AI-generated content. The revenue is not idle; it directly enters the 'income → consumption → destruction' deflationary flywheel. The first batch of 125,000 BEAT has already been executed, and subsequent destruction will be announced weekly.
The impact on price does not need further explanation.
Sustained real income + fixed rhythm of destruction essentially creates continuous buying pressure on the market.
Why is Audiera seen as an evolution of old IP on-chain?
The core contradiction of sentimental projects is generally that the IP is large, the token design is old, the FDV is high, and there is huge unlocking pressure. Users come in, but value capture cannot be realized.
For example, MapleStory belongs to this structure—there’s no issue with the IP, but the model is somewhat outdated.
Audiera belongs to the newer category:
Single token
Low initial circulation
Product income flows directly back
The user base is far larger than most Web3 games
600 million historical users + 5 million on-chain users, this scale does not need to rely on tokens to 'force adoption', the product itself is a traffic entry point.
So from a trading logic perspective, $BEAT there are three points worth pondering.
The user scale is not a gimmick; it’s a natural demand side;
The income curve of AI Payment has just started, belonging to the most market-responsive fundamental signal;
Weekly destruction provides continuous expectations, making the reasons for bullishness more intuitive.
What types of Web3 games will the market truly pay for?
I think it’s not about which story sounds the loudest or which endorsement is the strongest; the essence of the game is 'users are willing to pay'.
Audiera exactly matches these three points; the price increase validates this logic.
So now looking at BEAT, I wouldn’t use 'theme' to explain the strength of the price; I prefer to think of it as a 'cash flow-driven token', only its flywheel is still in the acceleration phase.
Such projects often resist downturns better than purely narrative projects when the market improves, and are also easier to trade continuously.
Emotions may change, but data does not change—while Audiera's data is gradually driving the revaluation of BEAT.
