Here’s my honest view on $LUNC, without exaggeration or recycled narratives.
The strength behind $LUNC
has never been random hype or short-term pumps. The real factor that keeps this ecosystem relevant is Binance. In a market where exchanges drop projects quickly, continued support is never accidental. Binance has walked away from many chains in the past — when it stays, it’s because optionality still exists.
CZ’s role in this space is often misunderstood. He has navigated regulatory pressure, market collapses, and industry shakeups that erased entire companies. Yet Binance remains structurally important to crypto liquidity. That level of endurance matters when evaluating long-term probabilities, not promises.
So when people ask whether LUNC can ever reclaim meaningful levels, the answer isn’t emotional — it’s conditional. Supply reduction, liquidity restructuring, and ecosystem discipline are hard, but not impossible. Extreme targets aren’t realistic overnight, but intermediate recoveries remain open as long as key infrastructure support exists.
Binance does not allocate time or resources to dead ecosystems.
If LUNC were finished, support would already be gone.
That alone keeps the discussion alive.
