Who understands, family! Woke up in the early morning to check the market, and I directly ended up with a 'work injury-level' slap on the thigh. A few days ago, when I cleared out $rave, I was still happily reviewing at the price of 106: 'Not bad, not bad, made a small profit and should take it,' but then it shot up to 250! I estimate that half of my friends in front of the screen are silently crying at the K-line storm: another day dominated by being 'sold off'!
To be honest, we can't really blame our lack of greed; the market has been too exhausting for the past six months. Everyday fighting over small gains of thirty to fifty dollars has become a conditioned reflex: whenever there's a chance to double, the hand clicks sell faster than the brain thinks. After all, having been in the crypto circle for a long time, the phrase 'take the profit' is already ingrained in my DNA, yet I've forgotten that the market is quietly changing.
Here I must provide some solid information, which is also the core conclusion of my calm review after selling: the selection logic for new projects on the top platforms in the circle has quietly completed a 'qualitative upgrade.' In the past, many projects dared to raise funds just with a white paper, but now it’s different. The platform will first put the projects into the alpha stage for 'testing,' and only if hard indicators like community activity, price stability, and capital flow pass, will there be subsequent liquidity support.
I specifically analyzed the performance of the four recent key new projects and found that this filtering mechanism is simply the 'golden rule for filtering out garbage projects.' Behind this is actually a two-way game between the platform and the project parties: the platform relies on high-quality projects to retain users, and the project parties must present real value to prove they are not 'air coins.' For us ordinary participants, this is absolutely great news, meaning the probability of stepping into pitfalls is greatly reduced, and the profit effect of high-quality projects will become more concentrated.
At this point, someone must be asking: 'Is the blogger going to quit their job to do this full-time?' Haha, not at all! On the contrary, I think the current 16+4 rhythm is just right. The 'minimum wage' for workers is like the 'stop-loss line' in crypto investment; with this sense of security, I can more rationally select projects and execute operations. Just talking about this morning's ARTX task, it was tailor-made for us 'competition kings,' simple and efficient, and can be completed in no time. After finishing my main job yesterday, I stayed up until three in the morning to complete it before sleeping. It's not that I'm overly competitive; it's that the money in the crypto circle is only reserved for those who are diligent!
Actually, after selling $rave, although I feel sorry, I am more grateful. It has allowed me to see the new trend in the market: it is no longer the era of making money just by buying randomly based on luck. Following the selection rhythm of high-quality platforms and seizing opportunities in the project's alpha stage is the main line for making money going forward.
I will continue to track the alpha signals of these high-quality new projects and will organize my practical skills under the 16+4 rhythm (such as how to efficiently complete tasks and how to judge whether a project is worth waiting for) into a checklist. Follow me to avoid getting lost @男神说币 #加密市场反弹 $BTC
