Dear Web3 players, we all love to see old IPs on-chain; it's a sentiment. But as investors, we must ask ourselves a harsh question: is this IP here to capitalize on sentiment, or is it genuinely trying to create an economic model?

Here we must make a clear comparison, comparing Audiera ($BEAT) with some high FDV (fully diluted valuation) sentimental projects, and you'll know where retail investors should put their money.

1. The 'cleanliness' of the chips and the risk of selling pressure

Many old IP projects (such as MapleStory Universe) follow the path of traditional Web2 giants in their economic design: high initial token unlock ratios, high FDV, and usually a dual-token model. What does this mean? Huge early selling pressure and complex cash-out paths.

BEAT is following the 'IP on-chain 2.0' route:

Single-token model: The entire ecosystem uses only $BEAT this one token, and the value capture path is very direct.

Low initial circulation: Effectively avoids the risk of a market crash caused by a large influx of tokens, resulting in a healthier chip structure.

It directly connects the huge traffic advantage of 600 million historical users and 5 million+ on-chain users to a more restrained and resilient economic model.

2. Distinction: Who is selling sentiment? Who is selling revenue?

Sentiment is虚的,收入 is real. Retail investors looking at Web3 games should focus on three indicators: users, revenue, and burn.

Users (User): Audiera has 600 million historical IP users, a foundation that no one can surpass.

Revenue: BEAT has achieved the most difficult step—real cash flow. Through AI Payment services, it has generated over 148,900+ $BEAT in on-chain revenue. This is not reliant on new user deposits, but on earning from product services.

Burn: This revenue has not been pocketed by the project party, but is used for periodic burns. The first batch of 125,000 BEAT has already been sent to the black hole.

3. $BEAT 's future: A deflationary story supported by real cash flow.

When Web2 music, AI creation, and payments meet token economics, the result is that BEAT tells a story of 'tokens supported by real cash flow'. The hotter the business, the higher the AI Payment revenue, and the more BEAT is burned. This is the real deflationary flywheel that can withstand bear markets and traverse cycles.

Therefore, as retail investors, we must be clear: do not pay for high FDV sentiment, but vote for healthy models with revenue and burn. BEAT's model is clearly more suitable for retail investors and long-term investors.