Ridiculous! The village party secretary selling eggs was complained by Xiaomi's legal team? This magical reality is simply the "mirror" of the crypto world...

These past few days, the incident with that Weihai village secretary has really amused me. Isn't this just the current crypto market?

Everyone is fixated on those flashy concepts arguing incessantly, yet very few are willing to look down and take a peek.

On the contrary, this project Audiera makes me feel grounded.

Just like that village secretary who is genuinely giving cash to the villagers, $BEAT you can call it the chain reform of the old IP Dance Troupe, or a Web3 game, what really touches people is actually its solid AI Payment business data

— in just 12 days since its launch, it generated nearly 150,000 pieces of real income #BEAT on-chain.

Everything is traceable on-chain, what does that mean?

It means there are indeed users who spent real money to use its AI functions, such as generating music and interactions.

Moreover, I think the smartest point is that Audiera didn't create those complicated dual-token models to confuse us retail investors, just a single $BEAT, with the circulating supply controlled around 16%, very restrained.

Where did the money earned go?

Directly burned.

This logic is simple and brutal: project earns money -> buy back and burn -> the coins in our hands become scarce.

Isn't this a thousand times better than those projects that tweet every day saying "what we want to do in the future"?

The current funding is so precise, the big pie is fluctuating there, whoever has the ability to generate blood, whoever can traverse the bull and bear markets, the money will flow to them.

This kind of "real asset" supported by cash flow and with deflation expectations can truly hold on.