Japan is planning the "Space Pearl Harbor Incident"!\n \nYesterday, CCTV reported a piece of news: Japan is planning the "Space Pearl Harbor Incident", which has already revealed its ambition to develop a "space aircraft carrier". The first reaction of the Sentinel upon seeing this news is: Does Japan have this capability? In the field of aerospace, Japan is clearly in the second tier, lagging behind China and the United States; neither China nor the U.S. has said they want to develop a "space aircraft carrier". In the context of the current tense Sino-Japanese relations, what is the intention behind CCTV's use of the term "Space Pearl Harbor Incident" which easily touches on historical scars? In the Sentinel's view, this is China learning from the U.S. about the "China Threat Theory" that was once popular! This rhetoric emerged many years ago, was there really a threat from China to the United States back then?\nThere was basically no threat! The forces within the United States manufactured the "China Threat Theory" merely to curb China's development while achieving their own goals (such as securing more policies and funding for development in certain areas). Now, China's promotion of Japan's "Space Threat Theory" is also quite obvious, mainly for two reasons: first, against the backdrop of the current tense Sino-Japanese relations, to continue to strengthen the restraint on Japan;\nSecond, to accelerate the development of China's own aerospace industry, which is the main purpose. The "Aerospace Power" strategy proposed in the 15th Five-Year Plan requires the continuous release of various catalysts to accelerate the development of China's aerospace industry. In the domestic public opinion environment, Japan's "Space Threat Theory" is very beneficial for promoting China's aerospace industry. Recently, regarding the content related to the "Aerospace Power" strategy, the Sentinel has discussed it multiple times, including commercial aerospace and the recoverable rocket "Zhuque 3". Not long ago, although the recovery mission of Zhuque 3's rocket failed, it doesn't matter; China still has many enterprises working on recoverable rocket technology, such as the Long March 12A, which has a "national team" background and is about to launch. Currently, the news suggests it will be on December 17. At present, in the field of recoverable rockets, Chinese enterprises still have a significant gap compared to SpaceX under Elon Musk, and they need to keep catching up.\nTherefore, in the direction of becoming an aerospace power, the national support policies continue, including the "targeted blood transfusion" from the capital market. Currently, a large number of unicorn companies in the commercial aerospace sector, including Blue Arrow Aerospace, Yixin Aerospace, CAS Space, and Tianbing Technology, are preparing for IPO financing. In the field of technology, it has always been a "winner takes all" scenario; as long as one domestic enterprise breaks through in recoverable rocket technology, it will be enough, and all the resources previously invested can be recovered. There are always people who say that the country's massive investment in technology is excessive and will cause waste. But this is unavoidable. We cannot know in advance who will succeed; we can only throw resources around and cast a wide net, and in the end, it will be enough if a few seeds grow into towering trees.\nAs for the issue of potential overcapacity in the future, the Sentinel has repeatedly mentioned this; overcapacity is inevitable because technology will always mature. Once it matures, it will be widely replicated and spread, leading to overcapacity, which is a normal pattern. Before overcapacity occurs, we should layout new technologies and new tracks, continuously pushing for innovation... Human progress has always been like this! What we can do is to continuously follow new trends and timely abandon outdated things... but this is too difficult for ordinary people!\nNew trends can only be grasped by a few people because when most people believe in them, it is already too late; and to give up outdated things requires the courage to make a painful decision, just like real estate. The trend has become so obvious, yet many people are still unwilling to accept reality. A few days ago, the Sentinel's comments on the real estate market were criticized by quite a few people.