@Falcon Finance #FalconFinance $FF
For a long time, liquidity in DeFi was expected to move freely.
Fast in, fast out. Capital followed incentives, not structure.
That assumption is starting to break.
As DeFi absorbs synthetic liquidity, RWAs, and more complex collateral systems, capital becomes heavier. Less mobile. More selective. Liquidity still exists — but it doesn’t rush.
This changes how systems behave.
When liquidity slows down, pressure doesn’t disappear. It concentrates. Design flaws surface earlier. Risk stops hiding behind velocity.
Protocols built around constant movement struggle here. Those designed for containment adapt.
Falcon Finance fits into this shift not because it restricts liquidity, but because it assumes it won’t always move. Collateral becomes a way to hold capital in place without freezing it entirely.
Liquidity, in this context, isn’t about speed.
It’s about availability under constraint.
That distinction will matter more as markets mature.
The next phase of DeFi may not reward the fastest systems —
but the ones that remain functional when capital stops running.
If liquidity is no longer endlessly mobile,
what does that demand from protocol design?