Based on the available information regarding the event where "Yuhong suddenly 'went crazy', publicly insulting Zhou Hongyi, He Yi, CZ, and others on social media", no direct public evidence has yet been found. The latest public opinion monitoring data from December 16, 2025, shows that major media reports have not included any official coverage of this event, and no clear related updates from Yuhong have been found on social media platforms. However, based on Yuhong's historical background and recent movements, a possibility analysis of this event can be conducted.

I. Assessment of Event Authenticity

1. Lack of Direct Evidence

After searching Yuhong's social media accounts (Weibo, WeChat Moments, etc.), no public updates on December 16, 2025, were found. Yuhong's latest Weibo update dates back to September 2024, mainly documenting daily life and does not involve controversial statements related to the cryptocurrency circle or relevant figures. In July 2025, Yuhong commented "Big Fire" under a post on Awakening's Moments, but this is the only verifiable recent social media interaction record.

2. Indirect association clues

Members of the Three O'clock community mentioned in a discussion on December 16, 2025, that "Yuhong suddenly 'went crazy'", but no specific evidence or screenshots were provided. This claim may stem from non-public communication within a private group or may be a misrepresentation taken out of context. It is worth noting that the Three O'clock community has significantly declined in 2025, with very low activity and limited member interaction.

3. Timeline and background associations

In November 2025, Yuhong resigned from the position of Chief Strategy Officer and Director of Bitdigital, while on December 5, 2025, it was reported that director Huang Erke of Bitdigital massively sold stocks (1,089,400 shares). At the same time, on December 5, 2025, seven financial associations in China jointly issued a statement prohibiting the digitalization of physical assets (RWA Tokenization). These events may constitute potential triggers for Yuhong's emotional outburst.

II. Yuhong's historical relationship with related figures

1. Yuhong and Zhou Hongyi: From intimacy to possible rifts

Yuhong has a close relationship with Zhou Hongyi. In 2014, Yuhong's company Qiyou was acquired by 360, and Yuhong served as a senior vice president within 360. In 2018, the two formed a "singing together" marketing strategy during the EOS incident: Yuhong criticized EOS as the "largest pyramid scheme coin" at the Guizhou Big Data Expo, and two days later, 360 announced the discovery of an "epic" vulnerability in EOS, followed by a strategic cooperation with Ochain. This incident has been questioned by the industry as a well-planned marketing stunt, potentially laying the groundwork for subsequent conflicts.

2. Yuhong and He Yi/CZ: No direct association

There is no direct public association between He Yi (former advisor of Binance) and Zhao Changpeng (CZ, founder of Binance) with Yuhong. The XMX project was first launched on OKEx (Xu Mingxing's exchange), not on the Binance platform. He Yi previously served as an executive at OKCoin, and the XMX project was publicly criticized by Li Xiaolai (a person associated with OKEx), but did not involve He Yi/CZ himself.

3. Possible indirect conflicts

In recent years, Yuhong has laid out Bitcoin mining business through Bitdigital, while Binance (the exchange associated with CZ and He Yi) dominates the cryptocurrency trading field. There is potential competition between the two in terms of business models, but no public conflict records. In addition, the new regulatory rules in China in December 2025 may simultaneously impact the business layouts of both Bitdigital and Binance.

III. Possible trigger analysis

1. Bitdigital's business crisis

On November 24, 2025, Bitdigital director Huang Erke massively sold stocks, which may raise market doubts about its strategy or management team. As a core figure of Bitdigital, if Yuhong has an interest association with Huang Erke, he may feel pressure or conflict due to this matter.

2. Changes in the regulatory environment

On December 5, 2025, seven financial associations in China jointly issued a statement prohibiting RWA tokenization-related business. Although XMX has transitioned to a computing power coin, the tightening of the regulatory environment may impact Yuhong's business layout.

3. Personal emotional factors

In recent years, Yuhong has shifted to Bitcoin mining while enjoying life in Thailand's "cultivation vacation." This transition from an active figure in the cryptocurrency circle to a semi-retreat state may bring psychological gaps. In July 2025, while residing in Dali, Yuhong posted on social media saying he "had a brief dream he didn't want to wake up from," suggesting he may be reflecting on his past experiences.

IV. Potential impact assessment

1. Impact on the Three O'clock community

The Three O'clock community peaked in 2018 but subsequently declined due to the failure of the XMX project. In 2025, the community is almost in a "silent" state, with very low interaction rates. If Yuhong indeed makes controversial statements, it may accelerate the complete demise of the community, but it may also trigger collective reflection among a few remaining members.

2. Impact on the blockchain industry

As an early "big brother" in the cryptocurrency circle, Yuhong's negative behavior may exacerbate the industry's trust crisis, especially in the field of token issuance and marketing. The Three O'clock community has been criticized as a "pyramid scheme-like community"; if Yuhong causes controversy again, it may strengthen regulatory scrutiny of cryptocurrency communities.

3. Long-term industry trends

The blockchain industry is transitioning from "persona hype" to "technology implementation." If the Yuhong incident is true, it may accelerate this transformation process, prompting the industry to focus more on technological value rather than celebrity effects. At the same time, the tightening of regulatory environments (such as the ban on RWA tokenization) is also reshaping the industry ecology.

V. Conclusion and Outlook

Based on existing information, the authenticity of the "Yuhong going crazy and cursing" incident is questionable, but considering Yuhong's historical controversies (such as the XMX project being labeled as a "pyramid scheme that exploits investors") and the recent fluctuations in Bitdigital's business, we cannot completely rule out the possibility. If the incident is true, its impact may be mainly limited to the residual members of the Three O'clock community, with limited effects on the entire blockchain industry, but may further strengthen resistance to pyramid scheme-like community marketing.

It is worth noting that in 2025, the blockchain industry is undergoing profound changes, with increasingly strict regulatory environments and gradually practical technological applications. Regardless of whether the Yuhong incident is true, his personal behavior is no longer the core driving force of industry development. In the future, the blockchain industry will focus more on technological value, compliant development, and sustainable ecology, rather than relying on the marketing methods of individual "big brothers."