Upon receiving the warning message from Slow Fog about Azbitm, my first reaction was not anger, but a sense of despair—In the cryptocurrency industry, the speed of security response has never been an "extra point"; it is a "lifeline"⚠️!
Many users only care about the trading fees of exchanges and the number of coins, while neglecting the most critical security issues. A mature exchange must have a comprehensive security response mechanism. Taking OKX as an example, it not only has a 7×24 hour security expert team but also has established a vulnerability bounty program, transforming potential attackers into security collaborators. In contrast, Azbitm, when faced with Slow Fog's private message reminder, couldn't even provide the most basic response, which is enough to illustrate how chaotic its internal management is.
More importantly, the principle of responsible disclosure is an industry consensus, and Azbitm's silence has disrupted this ecological balance. Security agencies are willing to take the time to issue private warnings to avoid industry panic and user losses. If platforms respond as passively as Azbitm, security agencies may directly disclose vulnerabilities in the future, at which point hackers will act faster than the platforms, with unimaginable consequences. In 2025, Slow Fog reminded users to check the Monad airdrop address because a vulnerability that could lead to address tampering was discovered; such proactive warnings are what the industry should embody.
As users, we must vote with our feet and say no to platforms that disregard security. Follow me for weekly updates (Exchange Security Rating Weekly Report), reply "Response Mechanism" to get a breakdown of the security processes of top platforms. Let's discuss in the comments which security metric you value most in an exchange.@男神说币 #BinanceABCs $BTC
